• Non ci sono risultati.

Bibliografia C. Alexander “

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Bibliografia C. Alexander “"

Copied!
4
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

1

Bibliografia

C. Alexander “Volatility and correlation: measurement, models and applications”, working paper, 1998.

P. Artzner e al. “Coherent measurement of risk”, in Mathematical Finance 1999, Vol. 9, No. 3.

G. Barone-Adesi e K. Giannopoulos “Non parametric VaR techniques. Myths and

realities”, working paper, 2001.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “International Convergence of Capital

Measurements and Capital Standards”, Bank for International Settlement, July 1988.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “ Supervisory Treatment of Market Risk”, Bank for International Settlement, April 1993.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Amendment to the capital accord to

incorporate market risks”, Bank for International Settlement, January 1996.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision “Supervisory Frame-work for the usu of

backtesting in conjunction with the internal models approach to market risk capital requirements”, Bank for International Settlement, January 1996.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “The Application of Basel II to Trading

Activities and the Treatment of Double Default Effects”, Bank for International

Settlement, July 2005.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Basel II: International Convergence of

Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. A Revisited Framework-Comprehensive Version”, Bank for International Settlement, June 2006.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Guidelines for computing capital for

incremental risk in the trading book – consultative document”, Bank for International

Settlement, July 2008.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Enhancements to the Basel II framework”, Bank for International Settlement, July 2009.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Guidelines for computing capital for

incremental risk in the trading book – final version”, Bank for International Settlement,

July 2009.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision “Revision to the Basel II market risk

framework”, Bank for International Settlement, July 2009.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Strengthening the resilience of the banking

sector”, Bank for International Settlements, December 2009.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “The Basel Committee’s response to the

financial crisis: re-port to the G20”, Bank for International Settlement, October 2010.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Basel III: a global regulatory framework

for more resilient banks and banking systems”, December 2010.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Revision to the Basel II market risk

framework. Updated as of 31 December 2010”, Bank for International Settlement,

(2)

2 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Interpretive issues with respect to the

revisions to the market risk framework”, Bank for International Settlement, November

2011.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Basel III regulatory consistency assessment

programme”, Bank for International Settlement, April 2012.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Fundamental review of the trading book –

consultative document”, Bank for International Settlement, May 2012.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Regulatory consistency assessment

programme (RCAP) – Analysis of risk-weighted assets for market risk”, Bank for

International Settlement, January 2013.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, “Results of the Basel III monitoring exercise

as of 30 June”, Bank for International Settlement, March 2014.

J. Berkowitz, “Testing density forecasts, with applications to risk management”, working paper, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2001.

C. Books, G. Persand, “The pitfalls of VaR estimates”, working paper, Risk, 2003. J. Boudoukh, M. Richardson, R. F. Whitelaw, “The best of both worlds: a Hybrid

Approach to calculat-ing Value at Risk”, working paper, New York, 1998.

D. Brigo, M. Morini, A. Pallavicini, “Counterparty credit risk, collateral and funding”, Wiley Finance, United Kingdom, 2013.

C. Brooks and G. Persand “Volatility forecasting risk manage-ment”.

A. Burchi, “Modelli VaR e il requisito di capitale per il rischio di mercato”, Banca impresa società, 2011, Vol. 30, Fasc. 1, Pagg. 75-103.

A. Campell, “The risk of value-at-risk”, working paper, Risk, 2009.

J. Chen, “Measuring market risk under Basel II, 2.5, and III: VaR, Stressed VaR, and

Expected Shortfall”, working paper, Michigan State University – College of Law, 2013.

P. F. Christoffersen, “Evaluating interval forecasts”, working paper, International Economic Review, 1998.

J. Danielsson e al. “Incentives for effective risk management”, in Journal of Banking & Finance 2002, Vol. 26, No. 7.

B. De Prisco, D. Rosen, “Modelling stochastic counterparty credit exposure for

derivatives portfolios”, working paper, 2005.

F. X. Diebold, T. A. Gunther, A. S. Tay, “Evaluating density forecasts with applications

to financial risk management”, working paper, International Economic Review, 1998.

D. Duffie, A. Li e T. Lubke, “Policy perspectives on OTC derivatives market

infra-structure”, working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports n. 424,

2010.

D. Duffie, H. Zhu, “Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk?”, working paper Graduate school of business, Stanford University, 2011.

EuroCCP, “Recommendations for reducing risks among interoperating CCPs”, discussion document, 2010.

(3)

3 European Banking Authority, “Guidelines on the Incrememntal Default and Migration

Risk Charge (IRC)”, May 2012.

M. Filagrana, “Derivatives and counterparty risks: towards new rules”, working paper, Bancaria 2010, Vol.66, Fasc. 4.

M. S. Gibson, “Measuring counterparty credit exposue to a margined counterparty”, working paper, Federal Reserve Board, 2005.

J. Gregory, “Counterparty credit risk and credit value adjustment. A continuing

challenge for global financial markets”, Wiley Finance, United Kingdom, 2012.

J. Hull and A White, “Incorporating volatility updating into the historical simulation

method for Value at Risk”, working paper, Journal of Risk, 1998.

P. Jorion, “Value at Risk: the new benchmark for managing financial risk”, McGraw.Hill, 2007.

P. H. Kupiec, “Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models”, working paper, The Journal of Derivatives, 1995.

L. Liberace, “Dal CVA al CVA Desk: verso una gestione attiva del rischio di

controparte”, in Banche e banchieri – Vol.39 – Fasc. 2. – Anno 2012.

J. A. Lopez , “Methods for Evaluating Value at Risk Estimates”, working paper, FRBSF Economic Review, 1999.

J. Magerle e T. Nellen, “Interoperability between central counterparties”, working paper, Swiss Na-tional Bank, 2011.

P. Nasi, “I rischi di mercato e il rischio di controparte: novità regolamentari e

implicazioni gestionali”, in “Basilea 3. Gli impatti sulle banche”, a cura di F. Tutino, G.

Birindelli, P. Ferretti, Egea, Milano, 2011.

F. Orsi, “Misurazione del rischio di mercato”, Plus (collana Manuali), Pisa, 2009. M. Pritsker “The hidden dangers of historical simulation”, working paper, 2001. M. Pykhtin, “Modeling credit exposure for collateralized counterparties”, working paper, Federal Re-serve Board, 2009.

A. Resti, A. Sironi, “Rischio e valore nelle banche”, Egea, Milano, 2008.

A. Resti, A. Sironi, “La crisi finanziaria e Basiela 3: origini, finalità e struttura del

nuovo quadro regola-mentare”, working paper, Carefin 1/2011, Università Bocconi di

Milano.

R. T. Rockafeller, S. Uryasev, “Conditional val-ue-at-risk for general loss

distributions”, in Journal of Banking & Finance 2002, Vol. 26.

D. Rowe and M. Mulholland, “Aggregating market-driven credit exposure: a multiple

risk source ap-proach”, in Derivative Credit Risk, 1999.

D. Rowe, “Aggregating credit exposure: the primary risk source approach”, in Derivative Credit Risk, 1995.

M. C. A. Ruijter, “An interest rate model for counterparty credit risk”, Tesi presentata al Delf Institute of Applied Mathematics, Netherlands, 2010.

(4)

4 F. Saita, “Il risk management in banca. Performance corrette per il rischio e

allocazione del capitale”, Egea, Milano, 2000.

Senior Supervisors Group, “Observation on risk management practices during the

recent market turbu-lence”, March 2008.

E. Sheedy, “Why VaR models fail and what can be done”, working paper, 2008.

A. Sironi, M. Marsella, “La misurazione e la gestione dei rischi di mercato”, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1997.

A. Sironi, “The Basel Committee proposals for capital adequacy reform: a critical

analysis”, working paper, Carefin 16/2010, Università Bocconi di Milano.

Y. Van der Stel, “The incremental risk model: an assessment of alternative inputs and

assumptions in a multi-period setting”, 2009.

W. Vecchiato, E. Virguti, “Rischio di controparte, derivati e Credit Value Adjustment:

strategie e metodi di gestione”, Bancaria - Vol.69 – Fasc. 5 – Anno 2013.

Siti internet consultati

www.bis.org www.eba.europa.eu www.bancaditalia.it www.ssrn.com www.unicredit.it www.intesasanpaolo.com www.mps.it www.ubibanca.com www.bancopopolare.it

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

India has implemented the risk based supervision (RBS) framework which evaluates the risk profile of the banks through an analysis of 12 risk factors viz, eight business risks and

Interestingly, for all products (except RMBS), IRB banks using the supervisory formula on unrated securitization positions generally would face slightly lower charges if holding

The purpose of this Newsletter is to set forth the views of the Basel Committee Accord Implementation Group’s Validation Subgroup (AIGV) regarding the appropriate treatment in

But as I noted above, QIS4 does not represent the final version of Basel II in the United States and we realize that bank data and risk-management systems required by Basel II are

Considering the capital adequacy framework related to credit risk 12 (Chart 4), the foundation internal ratings-based (IRB) approach is expected to be the most widely used

The Committee thus had to solve the difficult question of how a single set of standards might still satisfy a wide set of practical considerations: (1) the new capital

The Subgroup has parsed its work on validation into discrete components of work, or modules, for discussion within the Subgroup. Throughout these modules, the Subgroup is

Coming back to the points I made earlier, even considering the ongoing work on trading activities under Basel II, I believe that the vast majority of efforts being undertaken by