• Non ci sono risultati.

Lateral femoral condyle osteochondritis dissecans

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Lateral femoral condyle osteochondritis dissecans "

Copied!
4
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

PATHOLOGY

Lateral femoral condyle osteochondritis dissecans

TREATMENT

Fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation

SUBMITTED BY

Brian J. Cole, MD, MBA, Rush Cartilage Restoration Center, Rush Univer- sity Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

CHIEF COMPLAINT AND

HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS

This patient is a 19-year-old male college student whose chief complaint is that of activity-related lateral-sided left knee pain, with associated swelling, stiffness, locking, and a sense of giving-way. His symptom onset began suddenly 2 years previously while playing soccer. His symptoms are made worse with weight bearing, running, impact activities, and prolonged standing. He desires to participate in collegiate-level sports.

He was initially treated 1 year previously with arthroscopy and removal of a necrotic 2.5 cm by 2.5 cm osteochondral fragment consistent with chronic osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle (Figure C14.1). He failed to improve following loose body removal and was referred for definitive treatment.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Height, 6 ft, 2 in.; weight, 185 lb. He has a normal gait. Alignment reveals slight symmetric physi- ologic varus of approximately 2 degrees. He has a mild effusion with tenderness along the lateral femoral condyle. His range of motion is from 0 to 130 degrees. There is no evidence of any meniscal findings. He has shght patellofemoral and lateral compartment crepitus with range of motion. He has no evidence of quadriceps

atrophy. He has a normal patellofemoral joint and a normal ligament examination.

RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION

Forty-five-degree posteroanterior flexion weight-bearing and lateral radiographs demon- strate osteochondritis dissecans of the lateral femoral condyle of the left knee with a large cavitary defect involving more than 5 to 8 mm of subchondral bone at the base of the defect (Figure C14.2).

SURGICAL INTERVENTION

Because of the size, location, and depth of the lesion, the patient was indicated for fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation (Figure C14.3). Postoperatively, he was made non- weight bearing for approximately 8 weeks and used continuous passive motion for 6 weeks for 6 to 8h/day. At 6 months, he was permitted to engage in high-impact activities.

FOLLOW-UP

Two years following his allograft transplant, he complains of no pain, swelling, or catching. He has returned to all activities. He has radi- ographic evidence of graft incorporation and preservation of joint space (Figure C14.4).

42

(2)

Case 14

43

FIGURE

C14.1. Arthroscopic photograph of the defect obtained at the time of fragment removal demon- strates exposed subchondral bone with normal meniscus and normal lateral tibial plateau.

FIGURE

C14.2. Forty-five-degree flexion posteroan- terior weight-bearing (A) and lateral (B) radi- ographs demonstrate osteochondritis dissecans of

the lateral femoral condyle of the left knee with a

large cavitary defect.

(3)

44

Case 14

B

FIGURE C14.3. Twelve months following fragment

removal, intraoperative photographs demonstrate fibrocartilage covering the subchondral bone (A).

(B) Fresh osteochondral allograft, measuring 25 mm by 25 mm, is press-fit within the lateral femoral condyle.

B

FIGURE C14.4. Two-year postoperative 45-degree

flexion posteroanterior weight-bearing (A) and non- weight-bearing (B) flexion lateral radiographs

demonstrate excellent incorporation of the lateral

femoral condyle osteochondral allograft.

(4)

Case 14

DECISION-MAKING FACTORS

1. A young high-demand patient with osteo- chondritis dissecans of the weight-bearing zone of the lateral femoral condyle.

2. Failure of previous treatment involving frag- ment removal with persistent symptoms.

3. A large (6.25 cm^) and deep lesion (greater than 6 to 8 mm of subchondral bone involve-

45

ment) of the lateral femoral condyle consid- ered otherwise difficult if not contraindicated to manage with osteochondral autograft or autologous chondrocyte implantation.

4. Rehabihtation tolerance and willingness to

be compUant with initial nonweight-bearing

status.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

All ten (100%) subjects with a normal knee experienced posterior motion (i.e., posterior femoral roll-back) of the lateral femoral condyle from full extension to 90° of knee

Radiographs demonstrate a lesion of osteo- chondritis dissecans of the medial femoral condyle of his left knee (Figures C

Preoperative anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs demonstrate a fragmented lesion of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) along the medial femoral condyle of the right knee..

At arthroscopy, in addition to evidence of a prior subtotal medial meniscectomy, she was noted to have a concomitant grade IV focal chondral defect of the weight-bearing zone of

Posteroanterior 45-degree flexion weight- bearing radiograph demonstrates signs of femoral condyle flattening, joint space narrow- ing along the lateral compartment, and early

Photographs of grade III/IV chondral lesion of the medial femoral condyle measuring approxi- mately 15 mm by 15 mm before (A) and after (B) formal microfracture technique was

Six-month second-look arthroscopy of the patella (A) demonstrates soft fibrocartilage within the defect and the medial femoral condyle (B), with a well-healed and

RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION Plain radiographs of the right knee (Figure C15.1) reveal hardware fixation from the pre- vious anteromedialization procedure in place as well as