• Non ci sono risultati.

Inability to keep home adequately warm - EU-SILC survey[ilc_mdes01]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Inability to keep home adequately warm - EU-SILC survey[ilc_mdes01]"

Copied!
3
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

4/1/2018 Eurostat - Data Explorer

http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/print.do 1/3

Inability to keep home adequately warm - EU-SILC survey [ilc_mdes01]

GEO

Last update: 19-12-2017

Print Table HHTYP: Total

UNIT: Percentage INCGRP: Total

TIME 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

European Union (28 c : : : : 9.4

Belgium 14.5 14.6 6.4 5.1 5.6

Bulgaria 69.5 67.4 66.3 64.2 66.5

Czech Republic 8.9 6.1 6.0 5.2 5.2

Denmark 9.4 10.3 1.7 1.5 1.9

Germany (until 1990 5.5 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.0

Estonia 2.3 3.6 1.1 1.7 3.1

Ireland 3.8 3.5 3.7 4.1 6.8

Greece 12.0 13.8 15.4 15.7 15.4

Spain 10.1 8.0 5.9 7.2(b) 7.5

France 5.9 4.6 5.3 5.5 5.7

Croatia : : : : 8.3

Italy 10.4 10.7 11.4 10.8 11.6

Cyprus 33.8 34.6 29.2(b) 21.7 27.3

Latvia 25.7 20.9 16.8 16.4 19.1

Lithuania 27.6 22.4 22.6 24.1 25.2

Luxembourg 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.5

Hungary 14.8 10.8 9.7 8.9 10.7

Malta 10.8 10.2 8.8 11.1 14.3

Netherlands 2.2 1.6 1.8 1.3 2.3

Austria 3.8 2.6 3.9(b) 2.9 3.8

Poland 28.4 22.7 20.1(b) 16.3 14.8

Portugal 39.9 41.9 34.9 28.5 30.1

Romania : 33.3 24.4 22.1 20.1

Slovenia 3.0 4.2 5.6 4.6 4.7

Slovakia 9.7 4.6 6.0 3.6 4.4

Finland 2.4 1.1 1.9 1.3 1.4

Sweden 2.5 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.7

United Kingdom 4.8 4.5 6.0 5.8 6.1

Norway 1.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7

Switzerland : 6.9 6.9 7.6 7.3

Serbia : : : : :

(2)

4/1/2018 Eurostat - Data Explorer

http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/print.do 2/3

GEO

GEO

TIME 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

European Union (28 c 9.8 10.8 10.7 10.2 9.4

Belgium 7.1 6.6 5.8 5.4 5.2

Bulgaria 46.3 46.5 44.9 40.5(b) 39.2

Czech Republic 6.4 6.7 6.2 6.1 5.0

Denmark 2.3 2.5 3.8 2.9 3.6

Germany (until 1990 5.2 4.7 5.3 4.9 4.1

Estonia 3.0 4.2 2.9 1.7(b) 2.0

Ireland 6.8 8.4 10.0 8.9 9.0

Greece 18.6 26.1 29.5 32.9 29.2

Spain 6.5 9.1 8.0 11.1 10.6

France 6.0 6.0 6.6 5.9 5.5

Croatia 9.8 10.2 9.9 9.7 9.9

Italy 17.8 21.3 18.8 18.0 17.0

Cyprus 26.6 30.7 30.5 27.5 28.3

Latvia 22.5 19.9 21.1 16.8 14.5

Lithuania 36.2 34.1 29.2 26.5 31.1

Luxembourg 0.9 0.6 1.6 0.6 0.9

Hungary 12.2 15.0 14.6 11.6 9.6

Malta 17.6 22.1 23.4 22.1 13.9

Netherlands 1.6 2.2 2.9 2.6 2.9

Austria 2.7 3.2 2.7 3.2 2.6

Poland 13.6 13.2 11.4 9.0 7.5

Portugal 26.8 27.0 27.9 28.3 23.8

Romania 15.6 15.0 14.7 12.9 13.1

Slovenia 5.4 6.1 4.9 5.6 5.6

Slovakia 4.3 5.5 5.4 6.1 5.8

Finland 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.7

Sweden 1.6 1.4 0.8 0.8 1.2(b)

United Kingdom 6.5 8.1(b) 10.6 9.4 7.8

Norway 1.2 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.5

Switzerland 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.7(b) 0.6

Serbia : : 18.3 17.1 15.2

TIME 2016 2017

European Union (28 c 8.7 :

Belgium 4.8 :

Bulgaria 39.2(b) :

Czech Republic 3.8 :

Denmark 2.7 2.7

Germany (until 1990 3.7 :

Estonia 2.7 :

Ireland 5.8 :

(3)

4/1/2018 Eurostat - Data Explorer

http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/print.do 3/3

GEO

No footnotes available Special value:

: not available Available flags:

b break in time series c confidential

d definition differs, see metadata e estimated

f forecast

i see metadata (phased out) n not significant

p provisional r revised

s Eurostat estimate (phased out) u low reliability

z not applicable

Source of data: Eurostat

TIME 2016 2017

Greece 29.1 :

Spain 10.1 :

France 5.0 :

Croatia 9.3 :

Italy 16.1 :

Cyprus 24.3 :

Latvia 10.6 :

Lithuania 29.3 :

Luxembourg 1.7(b) :

Hungary 9.2 :

Malta 6.8 :

Netherlands 2.6(b) :

Austria 2.7 :

Poland 7.1 :

Portugal 22.5 :

Romania 13.8 :

Slovenia 4.8 :

Slovakia 5.1 :

Finland 1.7 :

Sweden 2.6 :

United Kingdom 6.1 :

Norway 0.9 :

Switzerland 0.6 :

Serbia 13.3 :

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The second software procedure is based on BRR approach; in order to calculate the value of deft, firstly BRR technique is applied to the current sampling design (two-stages

Fin dall’inizio del progetto Eu-Silc è stato quindi previsto un periodo di transizione, fino all’anno di indagine 2007, che consentisse ai paesi aderenti di sperimentare

L’obiettivo della stratificazione è quello di formare gruppi (o strati) di unità caratterizzate, relativamente alle variabili oggetto d’indagine, da massima omogeneità interna

20 Si pensi ad esempio alla valorizzazione della variabile DA_9 riferita alle “categorie particolari” secondo le modalità “M” (soci di cooperative) o “P” (titolari di borse

After one year of inertia, the Constitutional Court of Italy went one step further by striking down the existing law and once again called on the Parliament: The ICC’s press release

Materiale didattico realizzato a cura della UOS “Prevenzione specifica” della ATS di Milano Città Metropolitana, su mandato della Direzione Generale Welfare -

Given an array D[1,n] of positive and negative integers , find the longest segment in D whose sum is larger than a fixed threshold s.. Array P is pre-computed in linear time

la tipologia dei parametri che l’indagine deve produrre, la cadenza e il periodo di riferimento dei quesiti, nonché la precisione di alcune stime obiettivo di