• Non ci sono risultati.

The suitability of Giant reed and Miscanthus silages for biogas production: a preliminary comparison

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "The suitability of Giant reed and Miscanthus silages for biogas production: a preliminary comparison"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Material and methods

Experimental trial has been conducted using the winter cut of Giant Reed and Miscanthus crops, harvested on the 9th of

December, fine-cut and put in mini-silos of 1.5 l of volume for a silage phase of 44 days. In this preliminary experiment, It has been decided to evaluate a biomass with a reduced moisture content. Methane production has been analyzed by the AMPTS II gasometer. Three replicates in batches of 400 ml were performed for each treatment. The trial had a control treatment performed with 400 g of inoculum, degased pigs slurry from a biogas plant. Giant Reed and Miscanthus treatments were performed with an inoculum/crop volatile solid ratio equal to 2.

BMP has been expressed in ml per g of solid volatile by subtracting the intrinsic biogas potential of the inoculum. Experiments were conducted for a total of 39 days, till the methane production was considered not relevant.

Results

The methane production for this winter cut was, as expected, not particularly high, with cumulative values of 132.2 ml CH4 VSg-1 for Giant reed and of 128.6 ml CH

4

VSg-1 for Miscanthus, which are lower than the average maize yield (345 ml CH 4

VSg-1; Ragaglini et al., 2014). Thus, Giant reed and Miscanthus can be considered

having the same BMP. It could be observed a second peak of Giant reed, which could be related with fermentative processes during digestion.

The suitability of Giant reed and Miscanthus silages for biogas

production: a preliminary comparison

Francesco Candoni*, Francesco Danuso, Mario Baldini, Fabrizio Ginaldi

*Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Udine,

corresponding author: [email protected] research founded by University of Udine

XLIII° Convegno della Società Italiana di Agronomia – Pisa, 17-19 settembre 2014

XLIII° Convegno della Società Italiana di Agronomia – Pisa, 17-19 settembre 2014

Introduction

The recent policies enacted by EU foresee an increased interest for cultivation of energy crops, mainly in marginal areas. Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and Miscanthus (Miscanthus sinensis x giganteus) are two of the most promising energy crops (Ragaglini et al., 2014). Perennial grasses have already been recognized as high-yielding crops that can minimize environmental impacts, because of the reduced input requirements. Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) has been widely used to assess methane yields of organic matter when degraded in anaerobic conditions, including plant biomass (Raposo et al., 2012). The aim of this study was to start a comparison of silage biomass of Giant reed and Miscanthus, with the purpose to evaluate their suitability for biogas production, in a northeast area of Italy.

Tab 1. Experimental treatments

Fig. 1. BMP of Giant Reed and Miscanthus (3 replicates)

References: Ragaglini et al., (2014). Suitability of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) for anaerobic digestion: Effect of harvest time and frequency on the biomethane yield potential. Bioresour. Technol., 152, 107-115 Raposo et al., (2012). Anaerobic digestion of solid organic substrates in batch mode Renew Sust Energ Rev, 16(1), 861-877.

Conclusion

The low values of BMP could be explained by the delayed harvest in December, suitable for burning but usually not suggested

for biogas production. Considering that in field conditions, Giant reed mean yields are around 30 t ha

-1

, while for Miscanthus

only 20 t ha

-1

(Ragaglini et al., 2014), the spread of yields between two crops with a similar BMP reduces the suitability of

Miscanthus for biogas production. Only in the end of the research plan it will be possible provide a more detailed assessment,

involving summer cuts with higher moisture and digestibility of VS content.

Miscanthus

Giant reed

AMPTS II

Acknowledgments: Daniele Goi for the use of AMPTS II, Francesco da Borso for scientific advices , Fabio Zuliani and Valentina Cabbai for technical support

Treatments Material Crop

(g) Inoculum(g) Water(g) VS crop(%) VS inoculum(%) Ratio

Control Inoculum 0 400 0 0 4.5 0

A Giant reed 21 376 9 39.9 4.5 2

M Miscanthus 19 381 0 46.1 4.5 2

Crop pH start pH 44days TS start TS 44days

Giant Reed 5.49 4.53 44.6 % 43.1%

Miscanthus 6.51 5.91 53% 49.2%

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Monitoraggio dei fattori di rischio presenti nei luoghi di lavoro, con un approfondimento sugli aspetti organizzativi, attraverso l’analisi delle informazioni che emergono

Dati infortunistici e questionari su condizioni lavorative e percezione dei rischi in ambito portuale.. CONVEGNO

Avvio della metodologia AUDIT per la verifica dei programmi di prevenzione adottati dalle aziende.. Piano attuativo Locale (PAL)

 Condizioni operative dei RLSS (sede, mezzi, dotazioni, monte ore, accesso ai piani di sicurezza).. Accordi

In materia di prevenzione, tra gli altri strumenti messi a disposizione delle aziende da parte dell’Inail, vengono attivate forme di sostegno economico per la

studio professionale associato consulenti chimici del porto pettenati - turchetto.. LINEE

di autorizzare la concessione del patrocinio Inail al convegno: “Atex day Italia: la nuova direttiva Atex ed il rischio di esplosione” che, organizzato

partecipazione XLIII Convegno dell’Associazione Italiana di Epidemiologia, che si terrà a Catania dal 23 al 25 ottobre 2019, nonchè al pagamento delle relative quote di