A new space from a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit
joint work (in progress) with G. Basso
or
5F
From Fans to Fences via Fra¨ıss´e Families
A new space from a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit
joint work (in progress) with G. Basso or
5F
From Fans to Fences via Fra¨ıss´e Families
A new space from a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit
joint work (in progress) with G. Basso or
5F
From Fans to Fences via Fra¨ıss´e Families
Introduction
Main basic notions:
I topological structures
I projective Fra¨ıss´e families
I projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
These have been introduced by T. Irwin and S. Solecki (2006).
Introduction
Main basic notions:
I topological structures
I projective Fra¨ıss´e families
I projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
These have been introduced by T. Irwin and S. Solecki (2006).
Topological structures
Let L be a first-order language.
I An L-structure A is a topological L-structure if:
I A carries a compact (Hausdorff), zero-dimensional, second countable topology
I the interpretations of the relation symbols are closed sets
I the interpretations of the function symbols are continuous functions
Topological structures
Let L be a first-order language.
I An L-structure A is a topological L-structure if:
I A carries a compact (Hausdorff), zero-dimensional, second countable topology
I the interpretations of the relation symbols are closed sets
I the interpretations of the function symbols are continuous functions
Topological structures
Let L be a first-order language.
I An L-structure A is a topological L-structure if:
I A carries a compact (Hausdorff), zero-dimensional, second countable topology
I the interpretations of the relation symbols are closed sets
I the interpretations of the function symbols are continuous functions
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB= (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB= ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB= ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L;
that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism.
So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if
the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Epimorphisms
I A continuous surjection ϕ : A → B between topological L-structures A, B is an epimorphism if
I fB = (ϕ(a1), . . . , ϕ(an)) = ϕfA(a1, . . . , an), for every n-ary function symbol f ∈ L
I cB= ϕ(cA) for every constant symbol c ∈ L
I rB = ϕ × . . . × ϕ
| {z }
n times
(rA) for every n-ary relation symbol r ∈ L; that is
rB(b1, . . . , bn) iff
∃a1, . . . , an∈ A (ϕ(a1) = b1∧ . . . ∧ ϕ(an) = bn∧ rA(a1, . . . , an))
I If there is an epimorphism A → B, write B E A
I An isomorphism between topological L-structures is a bijective epimorphism. So, it is
I an isomorphism between L-structures
I a homeomorphism between their supports
I An epimorphism ϕ : A → B refines a covering U of A if the preimage of any element of B is contained in some member of U .
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if the following properties hold: JPP (joint projection property) ∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C )
AP (amalgamation property) for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A
there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if
the following properties hold: JPP (joint projection property) ∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C )
AP (amalgamation property) for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A
there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if the following properties hold:
JPP (joint projection property)
∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C ) AP (amalgamation property) for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms
ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if the following properties hold:
JPP (joint projection property)∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C )
AP (amalgamation property) for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A
there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if the following properties hold:
JPP (joint projection property)∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C ) AP (amalgamation property)
for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A
there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if the following properties hold:
JPP (joint projection property)∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C ) AP (amalgamation property) for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms
ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A
there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e families
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family if the following properties hold:
JPP (joint projection property)∀A, B ∈ F ∃C ∈ F (A E C ∧ B E C ) AP (amalgamation property) for every A, B, C ∈ F and epimorphisms
ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: C → A there exist D ∈ F and epimorphisms
ψ1: D → B, ψ2: D → C such that
ϕ1ψ1= ϕ2ψ2
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold: L1 (projective universality) ∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold: L1 (projective universality) ∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality) ∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)
∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)∀A ∈ F A E P L2’ for every clopen partition U of P
there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity)
for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Projective Fra¨ıss´e limits
Let
I F a family of topological L-structures
I P a topological L-structure
P is a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F if the following properties hold:
L1 (projective universality)∀A ∈ F A E P
L2’ for every clopen partition U of P there exist A ∈ F and an epimorphism ϕ : P → A refining U
L3 (projective ultrahomogeneity) for every A ∈ F and epimorphisms ϕ1, ϕ2: P → A
there exists an isomorphism
ψ : P → P such that
ϕ2= ϕ1ψ
Fundamental sequences
Let F be a family of topological L-structures.
A fundamental sequence (Dn, πn) is a sequence of elements Dn∈ F together with epimorphisms πn: Dn+1→ Dn such that, denoting
πnm= πn· . . . · πm−1: Dm→ Dn, for m ≥ n the following properties hold:
I ∀A ∈ F ∃n ∈ N A E Dn
I for every n, every A, B ∈ F , every epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: Dn→ A there exist m ≥ n and an epimorphism
ψ : Dm→ B such that
ϕ1ψ = ϕ2πnm
Fundamental sequences
Let F be a family of topological L-structures. A fundamental sequence (Dn, πn) is a sequence of elements Dn∈ F together with epimorphisms πn: Dn+1→ Dnsuch that,
denoting
πnm= πn· . . . · πm−1: Dm→ Dn, for m ≥ n the following properties hold:
I ∀A ∈ F ∃n ∈ N A E Dn
I for every n, every A, B ∈ F , every epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: Dn→ A there exist m ≥ n and an epimorphism
ψ : Dm→ B such that
ϕ1ψ = ϕ2πnm
Fundamental sequences
Let F be a family of topological L-structures. A fundamental sequence (Dn, πn) is a sequence of elements Dn∈ F together with epimorphisms πn: Dn+1→ Dnsuch that, denoting
πnm= πn· . . . · πm−1: Dm→ Dn, for m ≥ n
the following properties hold:
I ∀A ∈ F ∃n ∈ N A E Dn
I for every n, every A, B ∈ F , every epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: Dn→ A there exist m ≥ n and an epimorphism
ψ : Dm→ B such that
ϕ1ψ = ϕ2πnm
Fundamental sequences
Let F be a family of topological L-structures. A fundamental sequence (Dn, πn) is a sequence of elements Dn∈ F together with epimorphisms πn: Dn+1→ Dnsuch that, denoting
πnm= πn· . . . · πm−1: Dm→ Dn, for m ≥ n the following properties hold:
I ∀A ∈ F ∃n ∈ N A E Dn
I for every n, every A, B ∈ F , every epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: Dn→ A there exist m ≥ n and an epimorphism
ψ : Dm→ B such that
ϕ1ψ = ϕ2πnm
Fundamental sequences
Let F be a family of topological L-structures. A fundamental sequence (Dn, πn) is a sequence of elements Dn∈ F together with epimorphisms πn: Dn+1→ Dnsuch that, denoting
πnm= πn· . . . · πm−1: Dm→ Dn, for m ≥ n the following properties hold:
I ∀A ∈ F ∃n ∈ N A E Dn
I for every n, every A, B ∈ F , every epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: Dn→ A
there exist m ≥ n and an epimorphism ψ : Dm→ B such that
ϕ1ψ = ϕ2πnm
Fundamental sequences
Let F be a family of topological L-structures. A fundamental sequence (Dn, πn) is a sequence of elements Dn∈ F together with epimorphisms πn: Dn+1→ Dnsuch that, denoting
πnm= πn· . . . · πm−1: Dm→ Dn, for m ≥ n the following properties hold:
I ∀A ∈ F ∃n ∈ N A E Dn
I for every n, every A, B ∈ F , every epimorphisms ϕ1: B → A, ϕ2: Dn→ A there exist m ≥ n and an epimorphism
ψ : Dm→ B such that
ϕ1ψ = ϕ2πnm
A basic result
Theorem (essentially: Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
Let F be a non-empty, at most countable family of finite topological L-structures. Then the following are equivalent:
1. F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family 2. F has a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit 3. F has a fundamental sequence
Moreover, in this case
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F is unique up to isomorphism
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limits of F and of its fundamental sequence coincide
I a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit for both is the inverse limit of the fundamental sequence
A basic result
Theorem (essentially: Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
Let F be a non-empty, at most countable family of finite topological L-structures. Then the following are equivalent:
1. F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family 2. F has a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit 3. F has a fundamental sequence Moreover, in this case
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F is unique up to isomorphism
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limits of F and of its fundamental sequence coincide
I a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit for both is the inverse limit of the fundamental sequence
A basic result
Theorem (essentially: Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
Let F be a non-empty, at most countable family of finite topological L-structures. Then the following are equivalent:
1. F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family 2. F has a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit 3. F has a fundamental sequence Moreover, in this case
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F is unique up to isomorphism
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limits of F and of its fundamental sequence coincide
I a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit for both is the inverse limit of the fundamental sequence
A basic result
Theorem (essentially: Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
Let F be a non-empty, at most countable family of finite topological L-structures. Then the following are equivalent:
1. F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family 2. F has a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit 3. F has a fundamental sequence Moreover, in this case
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F is unique up to isomorphism
I the projective Fra¨ıss´e limits of F and of its fundamental sequence coincide
I a projective Fra¨ıss´e limit for both is the inverse limit of the fundamental sequence
Prespaces
Denote by LR a first-order language with a distinguished binary relation symbol R, that is
LR = {R, . . .}
I A prespace is any topological L-structure A such that RA is an equivalence relation
I If (A, RA, . . .) is a prespace, then it is a prespace of every compact metrisable space homeomorphic to A/RA
Prespaces
Denote by LR a first-order language with a distinguished binary relation symbol R,
that is
LR = {R, . . .}
I A prespace is any topological L-structure A such that RA is an equivalence relation
I If (A, RA, . . .) is a prespace, then it is a prespace of every compact metrisable space homeomorphic to A/RA
Prespaces
Denote by LR a first-order language with a distinguished binary relation symbol R, that is
LR = {R, . . .}
I A prespace is any topological L-structure A such that RA is an equivalence relation
I If (A, RA, . . .) is a prespace, then it is a prespace of every compact metrisable space homeomorphic to A/RA
Prespaces
Denote by LR a first-order language with a distinguished binary relation symbol R, that is
LR = {R, . . .}
I A prespace is any topological L-structure A such that RA is an equivalence relation
I If (A, RA, . . .) is a prespace, then it is a prespace of every compact metrisable space homeomorphic to A/RA
Prespaces
Denote by LR a first-order language with a distinguished binary relation symbol R, that is
LR = {R, . . .}
I A prespace is any topological L-structure A such that RA is an equivalence relation
I If (A, RA, . . .) is a prespace, then it is a prespace of every compact metrisable space homeomorphic to A/RA
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP
or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
General goal
I Start with a non-empty, at most countable, projective Fra¨ıss´e family F of finite topological LR-structures
I Compute its limit P
I Determine if P is a prespace; that is, determine if the relation RP is an equivalence relation
I Using some structural properties of F , study the space X = P/RP or other objects associated to it (for example, its group of homeomorphisms)
I Conversely, given a compact metrisable space X , find if there exists F , with limit P, such that P is a prespace whose quotient is X
Example: the pseudo-arc (Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
I LR = {R}
I F = {finite linear graphs}
Theorem
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family
I If P is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F, then P/RP is a prespace and P/RP is a pseudo-arc
Example: the pseudo-arc (Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
I LR = {R}
I F = {finite linear graphs}
Theorem
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family
I If P is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F, then P/RP is a prespace and P/RP is a pseudo-arc
Example: the pseudo-arc (Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
I LR = {R}
I F = {finite linear graphs}
Theorem
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family
I If P is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F, then P/RP is a prespace and P/RP is a pseudo-arc
Example: the pseudo-arc (Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
I LR = {R}
I F = {finite linear graphs}
Theorem
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family
I If P is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F, then P/RP is a prespace
and P/RP is a pseudo-arc
Example: the pseudo-arc (Irwin, Solecki - 2006)
I LR = {R}
I F = {finite linear graphs}
Theorem
I F is a projective Fra¨ıss´e family
I If P is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of F, then P/RP is a prespace and P/RP is a pseudo-arc
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X
Quotients of projective Fra¨ıss´e limits for LR = {R}
Theorem
The following is the list of all spaces of the form P/RP, where P is a prespace that is the projective Fra¨ıss´e limit of a projective Fra¨ıss´e family of finite topological {R}-structures.
I Cantor space
I disjoint sums of m singletons and n pseudo-arcs, with m + n > 0
I disjoint sums of n spaces, each of the form X = P ∪S
j ∈NQj, where:
I P is a pseudo-arc
I every Qj is a Cantor space clopen in X
I S
j ∈NQj is dense in X