• Non ci sono risultati.

CHAPTER 2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "CHAPTER 2"

Copied!
11
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

23

CHAPTER 2

ANALYSIS OF LOADS

This chapter deals with the estimated critical racing configurations and the loads the catamaran is subjected to. Only the static configurations have been considered with their equivalent balance. In particular the windward sailing has been analyzed as the most critical due to the fact only one hull is immersed while the other stands out of water. The water drag is reduced in this configuration. The sail aerodynamic force and the components weight are balanced only by the fluid dynamic actions operating on the hull flowing on water (Fig. 2.1).

All forces working on the catamaran will be detailed in the following paragraphs.

(2)

24

2.1 Aerodynamic sail load

The aerodynamic force has been calculated on the basis of the sail profile and geometry whose features are shown in Chart 2.1.1.

A NACA 0012 profile (Fig. 2.1.2) has been chosen. Its characteristic coefficients, with a Reynolds number Re = 700000, are detailed in Fig. 2.1.3, Fig. 2.1.4, Fig. 2.1.5, Fig.

2.1.6.

As shown in Fig.2.1.1 the aerodynamic load changes together with the roll angle. The higher is the roll angle the lower is the aerodynamic force necessary for the catamaran roll equilibrium.

Fixed a range of reasonable roll angles 10° ≤ Ψ ≥ 35° it has been taken the highest value of the aerodynamic force ( Fa= 680 N), correspondent to Ψ= 10°, to develop the

analysis and sizing the structure then.

(3)

25

Fig. 2.1.2 Sail airfoil

Geometrical Property Units Value

Chord m 1,59

Surface m2 13,9

Aspect Ratio 5,44

Max thickness % 12 at 30% chord Max camber % 0 at 0% chord

(4)

26

Fig. 2.1.3 Drag coefficient

(5)

27

Fig. 2.1.5 Lift and drag coefficient relation

(6)

28

The aerodynamic force, lift and drag have been finally calculated and their values are scheduled below (Chart 2.1.2).

Symbol Units Value

Angle of attack Α o 8

Aerodynamic Force F N 685

Lift L N 684

Drag D N 45

Lift to Drag ratio E 15

Chart 2.1.2 Aerodynamic force and components

2.2 Hull pressure load

The immersed part of the hull is subjected to water pressure and drag force. The pressure Pi is the hydrostatic pressure which balances the catamaran weight and the

aerodynamic force z-component (Fig. 2.2.1). This force component is caused by the roll momentum.

The drag force instead is composed of two components, one determined by the transversal catamaran motion (leeway), the other by the transverse waves hitting the hull during the sail (Fig. 2.2.2).

(7)

29

(8)

30

Fi is defined as :

Fi = ∫ dS

with

S: hull wet surface

(9)

31

A layout of the main forces applied to the catamaran is shown below (Fig. 2.2.3).

Fig. 2.2.3 Leeway motion

with:

La : Aerodynamic Lift

Da : Aerodynamic Drag

Dh : Hydrodynamic Drag

2.3 Components weight

The components real weight has been given by the company except for the hull, since research of its optimum weight is the aim of this thesis work.

Before starting performing the first analysis step, a below-average value of the hull weight had to be fixed. Once the points of maximum stresses and strains are calculated and checked, the hull panels will be reinforced in order to obtain a stiff and tough structure.

(10)

32

Finally the skipper weight has been fixed taking into account the adult male average weight and the equipment the skipper must wear during the race.

The weights are detailed below component by component (Chart 2.3.1).

Components Weight (Kg) Hull (x2) 28 Cross-beams (x2) 3 Sail 20 Mast 12 Skipper 80 Centerboard (x2) 1 Others 3

Chart 2.3.1 Components weight

2.4 Centerboards load

The centerboard force (Fig. 2.4.1), having an effect as the leeway motion occurs, has been also considered although it affects the catamaran balance only marginally.

(11)

33

with :

Fdv: centerboard force

Fdvz :centerboard force z-component

Fdvy: centerboard force y-component

2.5 Tie-rod preload.

The tie rods, whose task is to support the mast, have been preloaded.

The preload has been calculated, on the basis of their ultimate tensile strength, through a thermal gradient whose magnitude has been found by the following expression

ΔT =

with:

P = Fixed preload E = Steel young modulus A = tie rod section area

λ = 1,2*10-5 steel coefficient of thermal expansion

Thus:

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Pinning Model, Wetting Model, Phase Transition, Entropic Repulsion, Markov Renewal Theory, Local Limit Theorem, Perron–Frobenius Theorem, FKG

The disclosed displacements are the result of deformation of the bolt material in the elastic and plastic range as well as the properties of the bonding materials used (cement,

Figure 3.22: Experimental time series showing the presence of a stable upright position together with a stable large amplitude sub-harmonically resonant roll motion for ITACA in

Throughout the development of the concept of the authenticity, the author tried to identify an alternative approach for the benefits of professionals in order both to promote

The first group of three papers addresses the fundamental issue of obtain- ing robust estimates of location and scale from multivariate data.. The contri- bution by Boente,

Hydrophobic compounds are favorably partitioned in the non-polar microenvironment, while metal ions can bind electrostatically to the polar head of the surfactant, or can be

Sakai and myself [33], [34] determined (1) all the biharmonic hypersurfaces in irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type which are regular orbits of commutative Hermann actions

Pereira L, Jenkins TM, Berghella V (2003) Conventional management of maternal red cell alloimmunization compared with management by Doppler assessment of middle cerebral artery