• Non ci sono risultati.

15 Microsurgical Anterior Approach to T5–10 (Mini-TTA)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "15 Microsurgical Anterior Approach to T5–10 (Mini-TTA)"

Copied!
9
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

15 Microsurgical Anterior Approach to T5–10

(Mini-TTA)

H.M. Mayer

15.1

Terminology

This chapter describes a microsurgical modification of the conventional thoracotomy to approach the anterior thoracic spine from T5 to T10. It is called “Mini-TTA”

(TTA, transthoracic approach).

15.2

Surgical Principle

The anterior thoracic spine is approached from the right side through a limited thoracotomy with a 4- to 6-cm skin incision depending on the number of levels to be treated. The thoracic cavity can be opened either by resection of a small part of the rib (“window” tech- nique), by a rib flap (“open-door” technique), by a sin- gle osteotomy of one rib (“sliding” technique), or by an intercostal approach (Fig. 15.6). A specially designed soft tissue spreader is used to retract the ribs, the ipsi- lateral lung, and, if necessary, the diaphragm (see also Chapter 16). With the use of a surgical microscope or an endoscope for thoracoscopy, a mono- or bisegmen- tal anterior exposure of the thoracic spine can easily be achieved.

15.3 History

The technique was developed from the microsurgical approaches described for the exposure of the lumbar spine and lumbosacral junction (Mini-ALIF; see Chap- ter 45). A soft tissue spreader, which can also be used for transperitoneal exposure of L5–S1, has been modi- fied by adding different blades for retraction of the tho- racic contents as well as of the ribs. The first patient was operated on by the author on 6 March 1996.

15.4 Advantages

Small skin incision

Small, less traumatic thoracotomy

Less trauma to the rib cage with window, sliding, or intercostal technique

No cosmetic alterations Short ICU stay

Better illumination and magnification of surgical field

Safe dissection of tissues anterior and in the spinal canal

No laboratory training necessary

15.5

Disadvantages

Exposure limited to one or two segments with surgical microscope

Individual learning curve Long instruments

Limited manipulation of the motion segment (e.g., reduction)

Limited options for anterior instrumentation

15.6 Indications

This approach has been used in patients with the fol- lowing indications:

Thoracic disc herniations Fractures

Spondylodiscitis/spondylitis

Palliative treatment of monolocular malignant tumors

Enucleation or marginal excision of benign tumors or tumor-like lesions

Anterior biopsies of lesions providing no indica-

tion of their malignant or benign nature

(2)

15.7

Contraindications

There are no absolute contraindications for this ap- proach. However, decisions should be made on an indi- vidual basis in the following patients:

Patients with previous thoracotomy or thoraco- scopic surgery

Patients with a condition following pleural empy- ema

Patients in whom single-lung ventilation is not possible

Patients with severe or acute respiratory insuffi- ciency

Patients with vascular diseases or malformations of or in the thoracic cavity

15.8

Patient’s Informed Consent

Information about approach-specific risks and hazards should contain the following points:

Postoperative pain due to resection of the rib and alteration of intercostal nerve (post-thoracotomy syndrome)

Injury of intrathoracic blood vessels with hemo- thorax and repeated surgery

Injury to the esophagus and the mediastinum with infection (mediastinitis)

Injury to the thoracic duct with chylothorax Injury to the lung, postoperative pneumothorax Postoperative atelectasis

Injury to the diaphragm and lesion of retroperito- neal structures (bowel, spleen, etc.) with dia- phragm hernia, peritonitis, and retroperitoneal bleeding

Injury to the pericardium and heart with postoper- ative scarring

Injury to splanchnic nerves Pleuritis

15.9

Surgical Technique

15.9.1

Preoperative Planning

All data necessary for a meticulous preoperative plan- ning can be obtained by AP and lateral X-ray of the tho- rax and thoracic spine as well as by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is mandatory to have a clear impres- sion of the pathology to be treated as well as of the to- pography of the anatomic region where the pathology is located. The radiologist should be asked to mark the

Fig. 15.1. MRI in sagittal plane with marked vertebral body

level of T12 or L1 on a MRI-scout view of the whole spine in the sagittal plane (Fig. 15.1). This facilitates in- traoperative localization especially of soft tissue pa- thology, such as thoracic disc herniations. In patients with variations of the lumbosacral junction (sacraliza- tion of L5 or lumbalization of S1) it is recommended to mark L5 on the MRI-scout view (i.e., the vertebra sup- rajacent to the last intervertebral space!).

Size and localization of the thoracic blood vessels, such as the aorta or the azygos/hemiazygos system, should be analyzed preoperatively. Involvement of these blood vessels in the pathology (e.g., tumors, spondylitis with prevertebral soft tissue involvement) must be assessed as well.

Selective intubation and unilateral ventilation is helpful during surgery through a mini-thoracotomy.

This should be clarified with the anesthesiologist pre-

operatively. If unilateral ventilation is not possible or

contraindicated (especially in older patients or in pa-

tients with pulmonary problems) this must not be a

contraindication to the microsurgical approach. The

retractor system described below is able to retract a

ventilated lung as well.

(3)

15.9.2 Positioning

The patient is placed on the operating table in a left later- al position (Figs. 15.2, 15.3). The approach is from the right side. The cranial and caudal parts of the operating table can be tilted (if necessary) in order to achieve a right convex bending of the thoracic spine. However, care must be taken that the level of pathology (e.g., interverte- bral space, vertebral body) shows an orthograde projec- tion onto the skin level in a lateral fluoroscopic view.

Both legs are bent about 80° at the knee joints, supported with soft cushions, and fixed with a tape. The lower (left) arm is stretched out and a small soft towel roll is placed under the axilla in order to prevent lesions to the brachial plexus. The upper (right) arm is placed in 90° elevation, the elbow is bent slightly, and the forearm is placed on an armrest. The ulnar sulcus must be free, and both arms should be placed without pressure or tension.

The position of the body of the patient is held by two soft pads from behind: one supports the buttocks and the other the neck. A third one is placed from anterior to fix the pelvis below the anterior superior iliac spine (Fig. 15.3). Because of this fixation, the patient can be tilted with the operating table in the horizontal plane if

Fig. 15.2. Positioning of the patient

Fig. 15.3. External support and fixation of the patient on the op- erating table

necessary during the operation. The head of the patient is supported by a gel cushion and placed in a neutral position.

The operating table must be radiolucent from the lumbosacral junction to the level of the pathology to be treated. This is mandatory because fluoroscopic con- trol of the level to be approached is paramount to avoid exploration of the wrong level and to place the skin in- cision in the right place. During the operation, the op- erating table usually does not need to be tilted in the frontal plane.

If higher thoracic levels must be approached, the up- per (right) arm must be placed in maximum elevation.

(Cave: do not overstretch the brachial plexus!)

15.9.3 Localization

The skin incision is determined by localizing the level to be approached in projection to the skin level. If the pathology cannot be visualized directly by fluoroscopy (e.g., disc herniations), the level must be determined by counting the vertebral bodies from L5 up to the target level. (Cave: make sure, that L5 in the lateral fluoro- scopic view is really L5.) Lumbosacral anomalies may be a pitfall (see above). The level to be approached is marked on the skin with lateral fluoroscopic projec- tion. If a disc space is approached (e.g., disc hernia- tions, spondylodiscitis), then the orientation of the disc space as well as the anterior and posterior borders are marked. If a vertebral body is the surgical target (e.g., tumors or fractures) then the silhouette of the vertebral body should be drawn onto the skin under fluoroscopic control. This facilitates the placing of the skin incision according to the size of the exposure which is needed (Figs. 15.4, 15.5). The skin incision is marked parallel to

Fig. 15.4. Localization of the pathologic vertebra in projection onto the skin surface

(4)

Fig. 15.5. Skin incision

the orientation of the rib or the intercostal space under- neath and should be centered over the pathologic level (Fig. 15.5).

15.9.4 Surgical Steps

15.9.4.1

Exposure of the Rib or Intercostal Space

Exposure of the “target rib” or intercostal space to enter the thoracic cavity is easy at the middle and lower tho- racic levels. Through a 4- to 6-cm skin incision, the lat- eral part of the serratus muscle is exposed and split par- allel to the orientation of its fibers. Thus the underlying rib or intercostal space are exposed. At levels above T7 the latissimus dorsi muscle has to be retracted or in- cised anteriorly to expose the rib. The “target rib” is al- ways determined by the localization of the skin incision and not by the conventional method (rib two levels above the pathology).

a b

Fig. 15.6. a Intercostal technique. b Window technique.

15.9.4.2

Mini-thoracotomy

15.9.4.2.1

Intercostal Approach

In young patients with an elastic rib cage and a mono- segmental pathology (e.g., thoracic disc herniation), thoracotomy can be performed by an intercostal ap- proach. The intercostal muscles are split close to the su- perior rim of the caudal rib and the thoracic cavity is entered after splitting of the visceral pleura. The inter- costal space can be opened with the rib spreader in or- der to give sufficient exposure (Fig. 15.6a).

15.9.4.2.2

“Window” Technique

Subperiosteal dissection is performed and the intercos- tal muscles are dissected first from the superior rim of the caudal rib and then from its caudal rim. Due to the oblique insertion of the external intercostal muscles, dis- section is facilitated if the muscles are detached from posterior to anterior at the inferior rim and from anteri- or to posterior at the superior rim. Thus, trauma to the intercostal blood vessels and nerve is minimized. The rib is exposed over a length between 4 and 6 cm. With a curved dissector, the rib is isolated from its periosteal bed. Osteotomies are performed at the anterior and pos- terior borders of the exposed part and the rib is taken out (and preserved for grafting if necessary). Thus a “win- dow” of 5 – 6 cm length and 3 – 4 cm width is created, the size depending on the width of the excised rib (Fig. 15.6b).

15.9.4.2.3

“Open-door” Technique

The thoracic cavity can also be entered through a rib

flap. In this alternative exposure, the intercostal mus-

(5)

c d Fig. 15.6. (contin.) c Open-door technique. d Sliding technique

cles are only detached from the superior rim of the rib.

The osteotomies are performed the same way as de- scribed above, however the osteotomized part of the rib is opened (like a door) in order to enter the thoracic cavity (Fig. 15.6c). At the osteotomy sites, small drill holes are set to facilitate transosseous sutures at the end of the operation. This technique can be used if no bone grafting is necessary and if an intercostal exposure is not recommended for anatomic reasons (e.g., stiff rib cage, osteoporotic bone).

15.9.4.2.4

“Sliding” Technique

This is another alternative which gives sufficient mono- segmental exposure without rib defect. Only one osteo- tomy is performed and when spreading the intercostal space, one rib “slides” over the other to give a wider ex- posure as compared to an intercostal approach (Fig. 15.6d). This technique can be used in the lower thoracic spine and at the thoracolumbar junction (see Chapter 16).

15.9.4.3

Exposure of the Target Area

After rib osteotomy the visceral pleura is incised and the thoracic cavity is opened. The rib retractor is in- serted. The retractor blades are available in different sizes (Fig. 15.7). The bladescan be rotated in the retrac- tor and thus be adjusted to the individual anatomic sit- uation (Fig. 15.8). In patients being ventilated unilater- ally, the collapsed lung can be retracted with an inflat- able balloon mounted on a blunt lung blade which is fixed on the rib retractor (Fig. 15.9).

Fig. 15.7. Rib retractor blades

Fig. 15.8. Rib retractor in situ

15.9.4.4

Exposure of the Thoracic Spine

The procedure is then continued with the help of a sur-

gical microscope (“microsurgery”; Fig. 15.10) or an en-

doscope (“open” thoracoscopic surgery). Thus, the an-

terolateral circumference of the thoracic spine can be

(6)

Fig. 15.9. Lung blade with inflatable balloon

Fig. 15.10. Surgical microscope centered above the target area

exposed. The rib head(s) of the level(s) to be ap- proached are identified. The correct level is identified by intraoperative fluoroscopic control.

The pleura parietalis is opened in a T-shaped man- ner longitudinally anterior to the rib head and at a 90°

angle to the rib head. Special pleura scissors have been developed for this purpose (Fig. 15.11). Blunt dissec- tion of the anterolateral circumference is performed with peanut swabs (Fig. 15.12). If necessary, the seg- mental vessels can be closed with ligaclips, cut and dis- sected from the surgical field.

Fig. 15.11. Pleura scissors

Fig. 15.12. Blunt dissection of the anterolateral thoracic spine with bipolar coagulation

15.10

Surgical Strategies

15.10.1

Thoracic Disc Herniations (Figs. 15.13a, b, 15.14) Identification of disc level

Opening of pleura (as described above) Removal of rib head and radiate ligaments with rongeurs and high-speed drill

Opening of the disc space posterior third under- neath the rib head

Removal of 3 – 5 mm of adjacent vertebral bodies Identification and drilling of superior border of pedicle until dura can be identified

Tracing the dura and removal of posterior third of

the intervertebral disc including the herniated part

and the posterior longitudinal ligament

(7)

a

b Fig. 15.13. a Drawing shows amount

of necessary removal of rib head (lined area). b Drilling of vertebral bodies

Fig. 15.14. Disc herniation at T5 – 6 before (left) and after (right) Mini-TTA

Cave:

Achieve hemostasis without compression of the spinal cord (e.g., careful bipolar coagulation of epidural veins, Surgicel, Gelfoam, cottonoid patties, etc.)

Resect the posterior longitudinal ligament until the decompressed dura is identified clearly

Avoid injury to foraminal structures (segmental nerve and blood vessels)

Restrict removal of parts of the vertebral bodies or pedicle to a minimum

15.10.2

Partial and Complete Corpectomy (e.g., Fractures, Tumors, Spondylitis)

Identification of the target vertebral body and the adjacent discs

Ligation and dissection of the segmental vessels on the target vertebral body

Removal of the adjacent intervertebral discs (see above) and “isolation” of the target vertebra Identification of the pedicle and removal to identi- fy the dura

In spondylitis cases identify the intercostal nerve

after removal of corresponding rib head

(8)

Fig. 15.15. Hockey-stick dissectors

Trace the nerve down into the spinal canal to identify the thecal sac

“Shell out” the target vertebra with a high-speed drill (fractures) or by piecemeal removal with rongeurs (tumors, spondylitis)

Decompression of the spinal cord by displacing the posterior part of the “vertebral body shell” into the

“shelled out” part with hockey-stick dissectors (Fig. 15.15)

In spondylitis cases identify the layer between infected tissue and the dura

Completion of decompression across to the base of the opposite pedicle

If necessary prepare graft bed for fusion or verte- bral body replacement

Cave:

Extremely careful dissection is necessary because of obscured normal anatomy by posttraumatic (or- ganized) hematoma (fractures), pleural adhesions, and prevertebral abscesses (spondylitis)

15.11

Postoperative Care

A chest tube is placed in all patients. If the amount of drainage fluid is less than 100 cc within the last 24 hours, the chest tube is closed for 6 hours. When a control X-ray of the lung shows a normal picture, it can be removed. This is usually between 24 and 72 hours postoperatively depending on the type of surgery. Fol- lowing the operation, the patient can be extubated in the operating room. It is rarely necessary to perform

postoperative artificial ventilation except for patients with significant obstructive lung disease or after a pro- longed operating time. The patients remain in the ICU until the chest tube is removed. Postoperative pain is controlled by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medi- cation as well as by a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), usually with morphine-type analgesics. The pa- tients are mobilized on the fist postoperative day irre- spective of the type of surgery. Respiratory therapy be- gins immediately after the patient is awake and ready to cooperate.

15.12

Complications and Hazards

Besides the well-known complications of conventional thoracotomy, the following potential intraoperative complications may be faced:

Inadequate exposure due to wrong positioning and/or localization

Direct or indirect injury to lung, thoracic duct, azygos/hemiazygos vein, segmental vessels, aorta or heart, intercostal vessels, intercostal nerves, and sympathetic chain/splanchnic nerves

Spinal cord injury or ischemia Dural tears

Control of vascular injuries is most demanding through a limited transthoracic approach. The surgeon should always be prepared to enlarge the surgical field to a conventional thoracotomy if such complications cannot be managed adequately.

15.13

Critical Evaluation

This approach represents a modification of the conven- tional thoracotomy described for the treatment of pa- thologies of the anterior thoracic spine. As far as our preliminary experience shows, mini-thoracotomy lead to a reduction of intra-and postoperative morbidity in the type of diseases treated so far. Trauma to the rib cage and muscles covering the anterolateral part of the thorax is diminished. The postoperative ICU stay is short as is the time in hospital. The same is true for in- traoperative blood loss, incision pain, and cosmesis.

These data are comparable to data obtained with a

closed thoracoscopic technique (see Chapters 18,

20 – 23). As compared to closed thoracoscopic tech-

niques, the learning curve is flat for surgeons trained in

open thoracotomies. The only difference is the size of

the approach and the use of optical aids for illumina-

tion and magnification (surgical microscope or endo-

scope).

(9)

The approach, however, seems to be ideal only for patients with mono- or bisegmental pathology. Exci- sion of herniated discs, palliative excision of malignant tumors, decompression of the spinal canal in tumors, spondylitis, and fracture cases can be achieved without major difficulties. The same is true for biopsies or drainage of prevertebral abscesses.

However, technical skills must be acquired by sur- geons not familiar with the use of a surgical microscope or endoscope. Exposure is possible, but more difficult, in patients in which single-lung ventilation is not possi- ble.

Suggested Reading

1. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S (eds) (1991) Orthopädi- sche Operationslehre, vol I: Wirbelsäule. Thieme, Stuttgart

2. Landreneau RJ, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, Dowling RD, Acuff DE, Magee MJ, Ferson PF (1992) Video assisted thoracic surgery: basic technical concepts and intercostal approach strategies. Ann Thorac Surg 54:800 – 807

3. Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for mini- mally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 22:

697 – 700

4. Mayer HM (1998) Microsurgical anterior approaches for anterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine. In: McCul- loch JA, Young PH (eds) Essentials of spinal microsurgery.

Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 633 – 649

5. McAffee PC, Regan JJ, Zdeblick T (1995) The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases. Spine 20:1624 – 1632

6. Mulder DS (1995) Pain management principles and anes- thesia techniques for thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 56:

630 – 632

7. Regan JJ, McAffee PC, Mack MJ (eds) (1995) Atlas of endo- scopic spine surgery. Quality Medical Publishing, St Louis, MO

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The thesis deals with the right to control of the partner non-administrator within the limited liability company in his dual physiognomy of right to information and right

Government Printing Office , Social Security Administration (US)..

Laminectomy was the sole procedure by which to access the spinal canal until Robinson and Smith [24], and Cloward [2] devised the anterior procedures, and was a choice of treatment

At this point, however, an acknowledgement of the limits of the proposal’s ability to eliminate wealth inequality in pretrial outcomes or eliminate net- widening concerns

Spinal cord injury with resultant quadriplegia, tetraplegia, or paraplegia due to unwarranted attempts at the removal of disc fragments or spurs located along the anterior aspect of

The Policy should take account of health and safety legislation, the employee’s terms and conditions of employment as they relate to working time and the statutory obligations

however, in the two deceased subjects (cases number 1 and 2) necropsy allowed a subjective evaluation of this percentage as being of approximately 40% (a value com- parable to

To this end, the Directive establishes that credit institutions must largely offer payment accounts “with basic features in order to allow them to open, operate and close the