• Non ci sono risultati.

Characterization of Segmented HPGe Detectors Using Pulse Shape Comparison Methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Characterization of Segmented HPGe Detectors Using Pulse Shape Comparison Methods "

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Characterization of Segmented HPGe Detectors Using Pulse Shape Comparison Methods

F.C.L. Crespi a,b, V. Vandone a,b, F. Camera a,b, S. Brambilla b, B. Million b, S. Riboldi a,b , O. Wieland b

a Physics Department, University of Milan, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy

b INFN Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy

A. Boston c, C. Unsworth c

c Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

Large volume (240 cm3), Highly segmented HPGe detectors

Digital electronics to record and process signals from segment

Determination of the detector position response

Pulse Shape Analysis (PSA) to decompose recorded signals

Reconstruction of tracks evaluating permutations of Interaction Points (IPs)

g-ray Tracking Detectors

g

Reconstructed Gamma Energy Spectrum

Energy (keV)

Abstract

Pulse Shape Comparison Scan (PSCS) – Basic Idea -

AGATA Demonstrator

In many in-beam gamma spectroscopy experiments the detection of high- energy gamma rays in the range up to 10-20 MeV is of primary importance.

New generation high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometers like AGATA and GRETA are composed of position sensitive segmented HPGe detectors and provide a reconstruction of the gamma-ray tracks. The performance of AGATA detectors in this energy range has, however, never been studied in detail. A measurement of the response to 15.1 MeV gamma rays has therefore been performed using two HPGe triple clusters of the AGATA Demonstrator array, operating at LNL-INFN. This study represents a crucial test of the AGATA detectors for the measurement of high-energy gamma rays, in terms of detection efficiency, energy resolution, tracking and performance of the pulse shape analysis (PSA) algorithms.

The technique is based on a specific pulse shape comparison procedure (therefore we named it Pulse Shape Comparison Scan, PSCS).

The main difference between the PSCS and standard techniques is that PSCS does not require any ‘coincidence’ between events: this approach allows to enormously decrease the time duration of the measurements. In highly segmented HPGe detectors (e.g. AGATA), two different single-interaction gamma events give rise to clearly distinguishable signal shapes. To identify the gamma ray interaction point position 2 data sets are used: each one corresponding to a specific measurement characterized by a defined collimation of the gamma ray source. In fact, the only case in which a signal of one set is identical to a signal of the other is when the two signals originate at the position corresponding to the crossing point of the two lines defined by the source collimation.

Conclusions

Different sets of collimated data have been acquired with the Liverpool University Scanning system [1].

Front face and lateral single scan data have been used to test the Pulse Shape Comparison based Scan (PSCS) [2] and extract the signal basis for 4 detector segments (A1,A2,F1,F2). The obtained Signal Shapes are compared with those extracted with the standard Coincidence Scan and the calculated basis. Although some discrepancies are present the general trend of the shape variation with position is consistent in all the cases. From the results of these first tests the PSCS showed to be a valuable tool to extract the position response of HPGe segmented detectors.

[1]A. Boston, et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 261 (2007) 1098-1102

[2] F.C.L. Crespi, et al, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 593 (2008), p. 440.

Data Acquired with the Liverpool University Scanning System to Test the PSCS Method

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns) -40

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns) -20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns)

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns)

1

3 0

2

0 2

3

Coincidence Scan Data Front Face Singles Scan Data

120 3

880 (0.1*mm), 500 (0.1*mm), 50.5 (0.1*mm)

Pos X’ Pos Y’ Pos Z

Coincidence scan PSCS scan Calculated Basis

Pos X [0.1*mm]

PosY [0.1*mm]

-30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 110

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

1 2 3 4 5 6

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

882 493 806 513

883 523 839 504

883 554 873 500

884 585 906 500

885 616 940 504

886 646 973 513

887 677

888 708

889 739

Pos Y [0.1*mm]

Pos X [0.1*mm]

Pos X [0.1*mm]

Pos Y [0.1*mm]

•Traces of 128 samples digitized at 100 MHz

• The trigger was generated through a CFD on

• the core with a threshold of

~300 keV

137Cs source collimated to 1mm swept across Front face of the detector

Step Lenght = 1 mm Step Duration = 60 s

X-start 48 mm, X-range 86 mm Y-start 39 mm, Y-range 86 mm

137Cs

Front Face Singles Scan

137Cs source collimated to 1mm swept across Side face of the detector

Step Length = 1 mm Step Duration = 30 s

X-start 3 mm, X-range 82 mm Y-start 38 mm, Y-range 95 mm

137Cs

137Cs source collimated to 1mm swept across Side face of the detector (Step Dur. = 150s)

(performed only for 2 detector rings)

Side Singles Scan Data

Higher Statistics Side Singles Scan Data

1 5 6 3 24

-30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 110

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

1 2 3 4 5 6

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

1 2 3 4 5 6

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

1 2 3 4 5 6

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

-30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 110

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

1 2 3 4 5 6

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

-30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 110

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

1 2 3 4 5 6

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

A simple test has been performed to check the consistency of the data:

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns) -20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns)

-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns) -20

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

20 40 60 80

Amplitude (A.U.)

Time (10*ns)

1

3 0

2

0 2

3

Coincidence Scan Data Front Face Singles Scan Data 890 (0.1*mm), 740 (0.1*mm), 50.5 (0.1*mm)

Pos X Pos Y Pos Z

TIME [10*ns] TIME [10*ns] TIME [10*ns]

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

TIME [10*ns]

AMPLITUDE [a.u.]

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

TIME [10*ns]

TIME [10*ns]

All Multiplicities Multiplicity > 0.3*Max_Mult Multiplicity > 0.5*Max_Mult

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

-40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

Selecting Shapes with an higher “Multiplicity”

value allows to obtain an improved result

PSCP has been used to extract the position response

of 4 detector segments:

A1,A2,F1,F2

*Pos Z = 4 mm (in all the cases)

Z(0.1*mm)

Y (0.1*mm)

X (0.1*mm) X’ (0.1*mm)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Si vede nel fotoassorbimento corrisponde a una frequenza la cui energia associata e ’ maggiore dell ’ energia di legame. Stato nel continuo

between events or γ rays: this approach allows to increase by orders of magnitude the acquisition rate of signals associated to single interaction points with a determined

PSA algorithms developed for highly segmented HPGe detectors make use of a signal data base which contains the detector pulse shapes for all the possible interaction positions

Gamma ray tracking arrays composed of large volume segmented HPGe detectors like AGATA and GRETA will be used in experiments with radioactive ion beams.. The gamma

The addition of measurements taken at PTB/BESSY with four NaI detec- tors (see Section 3.2 ) for computing the NaI response is particularly neces- sary in the region around the

The experimental data accumulated for more than 8 years of measurements, with the information of the calorimeter, the neutron detector and the scintillation counters made it

It is more interesting to evaluate the noise contribution to the intrinsic energy resolution of the pulser peak, in order to compare it with respect to the detector

The researches of the seismic wave propagation velocity in the tailings massif were carried out using three measurement methods: cross-hole seismic testing (CHT) and cone penetration