• Non ci sono risultati.

Concept paper on the revision of the ‘Guideline on

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Concept paper on the revision of the ‘Guideline on "

Copied!
4
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

30 Churchill Place Canary Wharf London E14 5EU United Kingdom

An agency of the European Union

Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact

© European Medicines Agency, 2016. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.

21 July 2016

1 EMA/CHMP/446302/2016

2 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) 3

Concept paper on the revision of the ‘Guideline on

4

strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human

5

clinical trials with investigational medicinal products’

6

(EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07)

7 8

Adopted by CHMP for release for consultation 21 July 2016

Start of public consultation 21 July 2016

End of consultation (deadline for comments) 30 September 2016

10 9

Comments should be provided using this template. The completed comments form should be sent to FIH-rev@ema.europa.eu

11

Keywords First-in-human, early phase, clinical trials, risk mitigation, integrated protocols, multiple ascending dose.

12

13

(2)

Concept paper on the revision of the ‘Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products’ (EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07)

EMA/CHMP/446302/2016 Page 2/4

1. Introduction

14

The requirements for progression from the conduct of non-clinical studies to clinical trials for 15

investigational medicinal products in humans are extensively addressed as part of ICH M3 (R2) and the 16

related Q&A document. In addition, in 2007, EMA published the ‘Guideline on strategies to identify and 17

mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials (CTs) with investigational medicinal products’

18

(EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07), which is now proposed for revision.

19

2. Problem statement

20

The current guideline mainly focuses on non-clinical aspects of drug development and the use of 21

animal data and reflects the practice at the time it was developed which focused on a single ascending 22

dose (SAD) design for first-in-human (FIH) trials.

23

Since then, integration of the non-clinical data available before FIH administrations and the 24

pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and human safety data emerging during a trial has also 25

evolved. Consequently, the practice has evolved and many FIH trials are now performed with 26

integrated protocols potentially combining a number of different study parts, e.g. single and multiple 27

ascending doses (SAD and MAD), food interaction, different age groups and early proof of concept or 28

early proof of principle parts. FIH and early phase CTs with multiple study parts are, therefore, 29

increasingly being submitted for regulatory review to National Competent Authorities as part of a single 30

CT application.

31

3. Discussion (on the problem statement)

32

Some specific discussion points have been defined (non-exhaustive) when reviewing the current 33

guideline:

34

• Extension of the guidance to early phase CTs including single study or integrated protocol designs.

35

• Extension of the non-clinical aspects of the guideline to address:

36

− better integration of non-clinical pharmacology data (including PK and PD data evaluated using 37

current PK/PD or physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling) and data from the 38

toxicology testing into an overall risk assessment for FIH and early CTs administration;

39

− translation of non-clinical data to human use by extrapolation and verification of assumptions 40

made;

41

− expanding on the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) approach taking all 42

biological effects into account;

43

− the role of non-clinical data for the:

44

o estimated therapeutic dose, maximum human dose level (both for SAD and MAD parts), 45

dose escalation steps and dosing frequency and intervals;

46

o definition of stopping criteria for the trial;

47

o identification of safety aspects to monitor.

48

• Extension of the clinical part of the guideline with new guidance to address:

49

− integrated CT designs and study endpoints including decision-making aspects;

50

(3)

Concept paper on the revision of the ‘Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products’ (EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07)

EMA/CHMP/446302/2016 Page 3/4

− extension of the remit of the guidance beyond single ascending dose FIH trials to incorporate 51

other early phase trials and designs;

52

− clarification on the choice of trial subjects;

53

− overall dose/exposure range and scheme including stopping rules;

54

− rolling review of emerging human data during the study;

55

− general principles on key scientific information to be included in a CT application;

56

− safety observations for trial participants;

57

− handling of adverse events in relation to stopping rules and progress to next dosing steps;

58

− general principles on communication to competent authorities and CT subjects.

59

Given the diversity in type of investigational medicinal products being developed and clinical trial 60

designs, and considering the complexity in interpretation of relevance of animal toxicology findings for 61

human use, it is considered that the revised guideline should continue to be followed in conjunction 62

with all applicable national and international guidance in an integrated, risk-based approach. In 63

addition, although already outlined in the current document, there is a need to emphasise that the 64

guideline is applicable for all molecules and not only for biotechnology-derived proteins.

65

4. Recommendation

66

The CHMP recommends the revision of the ‘Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for 67

first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products’ (EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07).

68

Aspects to be considered in drafting the revision include the specific points raised above.

69

In line with the existing guideline, it is anticipated that the revised guidance should continue to be 70

applicable to all types of investigational medicinal products including, but not limited to, trials where 71

specific factors of risk have been identified or are anticipated.

72

5. Proposed timetable

73

The Concept Paper will be released for public comments for 2 months. A draft version of the revised 74

guideline is expected to be published for comments before the end of 2016.

75

6. Resource requirements for preparation

76

The preparation will mainly involve the multidisciplinary group nominated by CHMP, which includes 77

experts from CHMP and its working parties and Heads of Medicines Agencies’ (HMA) Clinical Trial 78

Facilitation Group with consultation of relevant EMA scientific committees and working parties, in 79

addition to the abovementioned HMA’s Clinical Trial Facilitation Group . 80

7. Impact assessment (anticipated)

81

The most important anticipated impact of the revised guideline will be the enhancement of the current 82

strategies to identify and mitigate risks for trial-participants. This is to facilitate the conduct of these 83

trials in a safe, efficient and transparent manner to the benefit of public health and further harmonise 84

practice in EU Member States.

85

(4)

Concept paper on the revision of the ‘Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products’ (EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07)

EMA/CHMP/446302/2016 Page 4/4

8. Interested parties

86

Patients, physicians, academia, ethics committees, pharmaceutical industry, sponsors, investigators, 87

contract research organisations and regulatory authorities.

88

9. References

89

Non-clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials and marketing authorisation for 90

pharmaceuticals (ICH M3 (R2), EMA/CPMP/ICH/286/1995).

91

ICH guideline M3 (R2) - questions and answers (EMA/CHMP/ICH/507008/2011).

92

Preclinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals (ICH S6 (R1), 93

EMA/CHMP/ICH/731268/1998).

94

Nonclinical evaluation for anticancer pharmaceuticals (ICH S9, CHMP/ICH/646107/08).

95

Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH E6 (R1), CPMP/ICH/135/95).

96

Questions and Answers by the CTFG on clinical trials - Answers to frequently asked questions, updated 97

January 2012 – Head of Medicines Agencies’ Clinical trial facilitation group (link).

98

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

"In these times of change, and aware of the concerns of our citizens, we commit to the Rome Agenda, and pledge to work towards (…) a social Europe: a Union which, based on

recommended that prior antibacterial therapy is not allowed in trials of treatment for infections that 344.. tend to respond clinically within a

Keywords Vaccine, humoral immune response, cellular immune response, vaccination schedule, immunogenicity studies, protective efficacy, effectiveness, safety, immune correlates

A wide range of events not related to AD or treatment, but thought to influence the measure of outcome (cognition) during the trial period should be regarded as relevant

Keywords Respiratory syncytial virus, bronchiolitis, severe RSV disease, case definition, clinical and laboratory confirmation, vaccine-associated disease enhancement, vaccination

A mediation technology or channel, including vis-à-vis communication 28 A nonneutral technology, likely to shape contents and to affect human perception 11 An agent for the

disciplina, quanto nella definizione di “Terzo settore”, richiama proprio questo principio.. E questo, lo si ripete, solo per citarne alcune che sembrano fra quelle

Current address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit` a degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica - 00133 Roma, Italy. E-mail