• Non ci sono risultati.

Progress in Drug Research Founded by Ernst Jucker

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Progress in Drug Research Founded by Ernst Jucker"

Copied!
10
0
0

Testo completo

(1)
(2)

Progress in Drug Research

Founded by Ernst Jucker

Series Editors

Prof. Dr. Paul L. Herrling Alex Matter, M.D., Director

Novartis International AG Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases CH-4002 Basel 10 Biopolis Road, #05-01 Chromos

Switzerland Singapore 138670

Singapore

(3)

Birkhäuser Verlag BaselBoston Berlin

Progress in Drug Research

Imaging in Drug Discovery and

Early Clinical Trials

Vol. 62

Edited by

Markus Rudin

(4)

Editor:

Prof. Dr. Markus Rudin

Institute for Biomedical Engineering University of Zürich/ETH Zürich Moussonstr. 18

CH – 8092 Zürich Switzerland

ISBN-10: 3-7643-7157-9 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel – Boston – Berlin ISBN-13: 978-3-7643-7157-9

The Publisher and Editor cannot assume any legal responsibility for information on drug dosage and administration contained in this publication. The respective user must check its accuracy by consulting other sources of reference in each individual case.

The use of registered names, trademarks etc. in this publication, even if not identified as such, does not imply that they are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations or free for general use.

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broad- casting, reproduction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data banks. For any kind of use permission of the copyright owner must be obtained.

© 2005 Birkhäuser Verlag, P.O. Box 133, CH-4010 Basel, Switzerland Part of Springer Science+Business Media

Printed on acid-free paper produced from chlorine-free pulp. TCF ∞ Cover design and layout: Micha Lotrovsky, CH-4106 Therwil, Switzerland Printed in Germany

ISBN-10:7643-7157-9 e-ISBN: 3-7643-7426-8

ISBN-13: 978-3-7643-7157-9

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 www.birkhauser.ch

(5)

Contents

Foreword . . . . vii

The drug discovery process . . . . 1 Paul L. Herrling

Imaging modalities: principles and information content . . . . 15 Tobias Schaeffter

Magnetic resonance and fluorescence based molecular

imaging technologies . . . . 83 David Sosnovik and Ralph Weissleder

Studying molecular and cellular processes in the intact organism . . . . . 117 Olivier Gheysens and Sanjiv S. Gambhir

Disease phenotyping: structural and functional readouts . . . . 151 R. Mark Henkelman, X. Josette Chen and John G. Sled

Evaluation of drug candidates: efficacy readouts during

lead optimization . . . . 185 Markus Rudin, Nicolau Beckmann and Martin Rausch

Risk identification and management: MRI as a research tool

in toxicology studies of new chemical entities . . . . 257 Mark W. Tengowski and John J. Kotyk

Pharmacokinetic studies with PET . . . . 279 Mats Bergström and Bengt Långström

Imaging biomarkers predictive of disease/therapy outcome:

ischemic stroke and drug development . . . . 319 Janet C. Miller and A. Gregory Sorensen

(6)

Clinical drug evaluation using imaging readouts:

regulatory perspectives . . . . 357 David S. Lester

Index . . . . 385 Contents

(7)

Foreword

Imaging techniques are undergoing a tremendous development. The clin- ically established methods such as X-ray computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound imaging, and nuclear imag- ing provide structural and functional data of ever increasing quality. Today, the speed of data acquisition allows making efficient use of the measure- ment time; the collection of multiple complementary datasets during a sin- gle imaging session enhances the reliability of the diagnostic/prognostic information. Improved image processing tools enable three-dimensional visualization of imaging data as well as the derivation of biomedical rele- vant information from the primary imaging data. In the recent years, tar- get-specific, so-called molecular imaging approaches have been developed at a rapid pace. Information such as target expression, target function, path- way activities (e.g., protein-protein interactions), or cell migration can meanwhile be studied in the intact organism with reasonable spatial and temporal resolution. While most of these methods are currently confined to animal studies, they will be translated in a not too distant future also to the clinical arena. The value of these techniques, which allow visualizing the underlying molecular mechanism associated with disease, as a basic research tool and, most importantly, for diagnostics will be enormous. In addition, the use of multiplexed imaging methods will enable the compre- hensive characterization of a therapeutic intervention, visualizing and mea- suring the biodistribution of both the drug and the drug target, the drug- target interaction, the activation of signal transduction pathways, and ulti- mately the morphological and physiological consequences of these molecular events.

It is obvious that aside from the already established relevance in medical diagnostics, imaging techniques will play a major role in the development of novel therapies. As non-invasive modalities they are readily translatable from a preclinical to a clinical setting. There is considerable hope that imaging methods, in conjunction with other bio-analytical techniques, will provide early information of drug efficacy, much earlier than conventional pharma- cological readouts. Drug development resources could then be focused on the most promising development candidates, for which pilot clinical trials using imaging readouts have demonstrated proof of the therapeutic concept. This

vii

(8)

viii

potentially would save considerable resources and might expedite transla- tional and clinical studies, from which ultimately the patient would profit.

Non-invasive imaging enhances the diagnostic accuracy, enabling medical personnel to select and tailor the therapy strategy in an optimal way; moni- toring the patient’s therapy response will allow optimizing the treatment reg- imen.

The objective of this volume is to illustrate the role of non-invasive imag- ing for modern drug discovery and development. There is considerable expec- tation by many different stakeholders that investments in imaging technol- ogy will add value to the process of developing a novel drug: for biomedical researches imaging should enhance the basic understanding of the disease process, for the drug development it should yield unambiguous information that facilitates proper decision making allowing to focus resources, for man- agement it should expedite the development process and thus reduce costs, for marketing it should provide compelling visual evidence of drug effi- ciency that would convince prescribers to choose this drug, for the regula- tors validated imaging data might replace softer endpoints that are currently used for many indications. Most importantly, patients would profit from bet- ter monitoring and better medicine.

The layout of the book follows the drug discovery process, from the tar- get selection/validation (molecular imaging) to the clinical drug evaluation and ultimately to the approval by regulatory authorities. Chapter 1 by Paul L Herrling gives an overview of the drug discovery process from the selection of a potential drug target to the handover to the clinical development. The layout of the volume essentially follows this process. In Chapter 2, Tobias Schäffter discusses the basic principles of the individual non-invasive imag- ing techniques that are used as clinical diagnostic tools.

The information provided by modern imaging techniques extends far beyond the structural-anatomical readouts obtained from the first X-ray studies. Today, information on molecular and cellular events, physiologi- cal and metabolic processes can be gathered in the intact organism, which complements structural information. Molecular and cellular imaging approaches translate many assays developed for molecular and cell biolog- ical studies into paradigms suited for in vivo visualization. These aspects are discussed in Chapters 3 by David Sosnovik and Ralph Weissleder focusing on MRI and optical (fluorescence) imaging techniques, and in Chapter 4 by Olivier Gheysens and Sam Gambhir with special emphasis on nuclear and

(9)

optical (bioluminescence) methods. Molecular imaging approaches will impact drug discovery at all phases: from the visualization of the target expression and target function, to the molecular proof-of-therapeutic mechanism at a molecular level in the intact organism – ultimately in the patient.

The use of genetically modified organisms, and in particular mice, for testing biological hypotheses or as models of human diseases has become indispensable in modern biomedical research. This demands tools for rapid and efficient characterization of such animals with the intention to link molecular, physiological, metabolic or structural peculiarities to genetic modifications (phenotyping). Transgene insertion is a random process, correspondingly large numbers of mice have to be analyzed to identify the desired phenotypes. Non-invasive methods play an important role in this task; these aspects are addressed by R. Mark Henkelman et al.

in Chapter 5.

Following target identification and validation and the screening of large compound libraries, potential drug candidates have to be optimized with regard to efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, and safety. This lead opti- mization phase involves the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of drug effects in models of human disease, as discussed by Markus Rudin et al. in Chapter 6. Mark Tengowski and John Kotyk illustrate the role of imaging, and in particular MRI for the evaluation of potential safety issues and toxicolog- ical effects.

A prerequisite for clinical drug evaluation is knowledge of the drug’s pharmacokinetic (PK) properties. In vivo PK studies are based on positron- emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled drug molecules. Aspects of tracer synthesis, PET experiments, and the extraction of quantitative infor- mation from PET data are topic of Chapter 8 by Mats Bergström and Bengt Langström. Clinical drug evaluations, in particular when targeting chronic diseases require large patient populations, are time consuming and there- fore expensive. To optimize the chances for success, pilot studies aiming to demonstrate proof of the pharmacological concept would be of outmost importance. Such studies depend on the availability of biomarkers that are indicative of treatment outcome. Biomarkers would also be of value for stratifying patient groups, a higher homogeneity of the population, increas- ing the relevance of the study. In Chapter 9 Janet Miller and Greg Sörensen discuss the potential of imaging biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of

ix

(10)

human stroke as well as for the evaluation of therapeutic interventions. In particular, the concept of using the patient as its own control is highly attractive. Finally, Chapter 10 is devoted to the use of imaging readouts for clinical drug trials. David Lester puts special emphasis on regulatory aspects, discussing efforts by the regulatory authorities regarding the use of innov- ative methodologies such as imaging in drug approval process.

Zürich, May 2005 Markus Rudin

x

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Another relevant clinical application of dendrimers is represented by molecular imaging devices. Many groups reported dendrimer-based agents for magnetic, optical and

In particular, advantages entailed by the confinement of cleaning fluids within gels or highly viscous matrices can be summarized as follows: (i) the increase in

Cell cycle-related analysis of the cDDP-sensitive human cancer 2008 cells after treatment with the Pd(bipy)-thiourea and Pd(phen)-thiourea complexes. Cells were seeded in 6-well

Together, these results qualify AmDM/DOX nanomicelles as promising drug delivery systems for cancer therapy, which significantly increase anticancer drug potency, even in

Moya A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Sagrista-Sauleda J et al (1995) Limitations of head- up tilt test for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions in patients with

substance abuse and heterogeneity, 15–17 treatment programs, long-term, 199 Drug Abuse and Control Act of 1970, 167 drug abuse prevention, 211. epidemiological information linking

Andrea Affaticati, MD Department of Mental Health Local Health Service Parma, Italy Maria Lidia Gerra, MD Department of Neuroscience Unit of Psychiatry University of Parma Parma,

Ultimately the most effective way to reduce the extensive harms of the global drug prohibition regime and advance the goals of public health and safety is to get drugs under