• Non ci sono risultati.

Zito - PICC nel bambino

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Zito - PICC nel bambino"

Copied!
65
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Verona

2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th

2019

XI

11

TH

Congresso

GAVeCeLT

Congress

2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd

II

2

ND

Convegno

GAVePed

Conference

3 DicembreDecember 3rd

XIII

13

TH

PICC

Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

Verona

2-3-4 Dicembre

December 2

nd

-3

rd

-4

th

2019

XI

11

TH

Congresso

GAVeCeLT

Congress

2-3 Dicembre

December 2

nd

- 3

rd

II

2

ND

Convegno

GAVePed

Conference

3 Dicembre

December 3

rd

XIII

13

TH

PICC

Day

4 Dicembre

December 4

th

(2)

T

h

e

A

l

p

h

a

b

e

t

S

t

r

e

e

t

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(3)

A

PPROCCIO

A

PPROPRIATO

APPROPRIATEZZA

SCELTA RAZIONALE

A

B

C

BRACCIO - BASILICA

CUORE - COMPLICANZE

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(4)

A

PPROCCIO

A

PPROPRIATO

APPROPRIATEZZA

SCELTA RAZIONALE

A

C

BEST PRACTICE

CUORE - COMPLICANZE

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

(5)

APPROPRIATEZZA

APProccio alla Vena APPropriata

Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment

La scelta del LATO e VENA un passaggio essenziale per un impianto efficace

e a basso rischio di complicanze

E’fondamentale una accurata esplorazione ecografica di entrambe le braccia

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(6)

RAPEVA

APPROPRIATEZZA

APProccio alla Vena APPropriata

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(7)

APPROPRIATEZZA

APProccio alla Vena APPropriata

Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment

Un protocollo ben definito e sistematico per

l’esame delle vene del braccio e della

zona sopra/ sottoclaveare

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(8)

RAPEVA

APPROPRIATEZZA

APProccio alla Vena APPropriata

Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment

Un protocollo ben definito e sistematico per

l’esame delle vene del braccio e della

zona sopra/ sottoclaveare

7 “Fermate”

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(9)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(10)

1

V Cefalica al gomito

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(11)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(12)

1

2

2

Aa eVv Brachiali al gomito

3

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(13)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(14)

1

2

3

3

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(15)

1

2

3

3

Vena Basilica

4

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(16)

1

2

3

3

Vena Basilica

4

4

Fascio Nervo-Vascolare

5

5

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(17)

1

2

3

3

Vena Basilica

4

4

Fascio Nervo-Vascolare

5

Vena Cefalica

5

6

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(18)

1

2

3

3

Vena Basilica

4

4

Fascio Nervo-Vascolare

5

Vena Cefalica

5

6

Vena Ascellare

7

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(19)

1

2

3

3

Vena Basilica

4

4

Fascio Nervo-Vascolare

5

Vena Cefalica

5

6

Vena Ascellare

7

Vv Giugulare

VSucclavia

6

7

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(20)

A

PPROCCIO

A

PPROPRIATO

APPROPRIATEZZA

SCELTA RAZIONALE

A

B

C

BRACCIO - BASILICA

CUORE - COMPLICANZE

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(21)

A

B

C

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(22)

A

B

C

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(23)

A

B

C

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(24)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

(25)

A

PPROCCIO

A

PPROPRIATO

APPROPRIATEZZA

SCELTA RAZIONALE

A

B

C

BRACCIO - BASILICA

CUORE - COMPLICANZE

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(26)

C

CUORE - CENTRALE

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(27)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

ECG INTRACAVITARIO NEI NEONATI E NEI BAMBINI

Accuratezza 95,8% - 98,8 %

(28)

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-long-atrial-septum-p4c

#1 S

ubcostal 4c

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(29)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

(30)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

(31)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

(32)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

E

chocardiography

#2 S

ubcostal

Bicaval

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(33)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

(34)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

(35)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

(36)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

#3 A

pical 4C

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

(37)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

#3 A

pical 4C

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(38)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

#3 A

pical 4C

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(39)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

#3 A

pical 4C

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(40)

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

#4 R

ight

(41)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/hrp-svc-septum-p6

#4 R

ight

Parasternal

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(42)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/hrp-svc-septum-p6

#4 R

ight

Parasternal

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(43)

https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/hrp-svc-septum-p6

#4 R

ight

Parasternal

E

chocardiography

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(44)

E

chocardiography

C

linical

Cases

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(45)

E

chocardiography

C

linical

Cases

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(46)

E

chocardiography

C

linical

Cases

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

(47)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

(48)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

(49)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Cardiac Imaging

RULE OUT COMPLICATION

TIP LOCATION

C

E

chocardiography

(50)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

(51)

C

CUORE - CENTRALE

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Consistent adoption of

SIP protocol

as proposed by

GAVeCeLT since 2010:

1 – hand washing, maximal barrier protection, 2% chlorhexidine

2 – US scan of all veins before starting the procedure (RaPeVA)

3 – choice of vein matched with cath diameter (3:1)

4 – individuation of brachial artery and median nerve

5 – US-guided puncture and cannulation

6 – tip navigation by US

7 – tip verification by intracavitary EKG

(52)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Feb 2008 - Apr 2014

1660 Devices

138 CVC

157 PICC

retrospective single center study

Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted

Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters

in Children with Leukemia

Pierre-Amaël Noailly Charny, MD1,2, Nathalie Bleyzac, MD1, Robin Ohannessian, MD, MPH2, Edouard Aubert, MD3,

Yves Bertand, MD, PhD1,2, and Cecile Renard, MD1

ObjectiveTo study the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis (CAT) between peripherally inserted central cath-eters (PICCs) and tunneled central venous cathcath-eters in children with leukemia.

Study designWe analyzed all PICCs and conventional tunneled catheters placed in patients aged<18 years and admitted to our institute for leukemia treatment between February 2008 and April 2014. Cases of symptom-atic CAT were confirmed by ultrasound and treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.

ResultsDuring the study period, 157 PICCs and 138 conventional tunneled catheters were placed in 192 pa-tients with leukemia. CAT incidence was 1.5% (n= 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16) in the PICC group. The OR for CAT occurrence after PICC vs conventional tunneled catheter placement was 5.6 (95% CI, 1.2-26.5).

ConclusionOur results suggest that the use of PICCs in children with leukemia increases the risk of CAT in comparison with the use of conventional tunneled catheters. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to characterize this risk and to better define indications. (J Pediatr 2018;■■:■■-■■).

See related article, p •••

C

entral venous lines (CVLs) are important in the treatment of children with cancer, but have been shown to be strongly associated with venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in both solid tumor1-4and hematologic3-8malignancies. For

example, Piovesan et al reported that 30% of VTEs in children with cancer were associated with CVLs and that these events most frequently manifested as deep vein thrombosis in the extremities.3

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in patients with hematologic malignancies, both adults and children.9,10PICCs are inserted into a peripheral vein and advanced to place the catheter tip in the superior vena cava. This

insertion mode causes fewer immediate complications than conventional tunneled catheters.9,11,12PICCs are, however,

associ-ated with thrombosis at the insertion site,10,13,14particularly in patients with cancer.13,15,16The authors of a meta-analysis

pub-lished in 201313reported that the rate of VTEs in adult patients with cancer with PICCs ranged from 4.69% to 8.64% and that

the probability of developing a VTE was significantly higher when PICCs were used compared with conventional tunneled cath-eters (OR, 2.55). In the general pediatric population, there seems to be no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis between these 2 methods for establishing venous access.10However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared

PICCs with conventional tunneled catheters as concerns thrombosis development in children undergoing treatment for leukemia. Since 2008, the use of PICCs has increased in our pediatric hematology and oncology institute, with a concomitant decrease in that of conventional tunneled catheters. We took advantage of this evolution in practices to compare retrospectively the risks of thrombosis associated with PICC and conventional tunneled catheter placement in children diagnosed with leukemia.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study at the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute in Lyon, France. Chil-dren diagnosed with hematologic cancer between February 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, were identified using the

ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukemia AML Acute myeloid leukemia CAT Catheter-associated thrombosis CVL Central venous line L-ASP L-asparaginase

LMWH Low-molecular-weight heparin PICC Peripherally inserted central catheter VTE Venous thromboembolic event

From the1Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology,

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;2University of

Lyon Claude Bernard; and3Department of Anesthesia,

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

0022-3476/$ - see front matter. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

https://doi.org10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026

ARTICLE IN PRESS

T

HE

J

OURNAL OF

P

EDIATRICS

• www.jpeds.com

ORIGINAL

ARTICLES

1

FLA 5.5.0 DTD■ YMPD9875_proof ■ April 27, 2018

(53)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted

Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters

in Children with Leukemia

Pierre-Amaël Noailly Charny, MD1,2, Nathalie Bleyzac, MD1, Robin Ohannessian, MD, MPH2, Edouard Aubert, MD3,

Yves Bertand, MD, PhD1,2, and Cecile Renard, MD1

ObjectiveTo study the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis (CAT) between peripherally inserted central cath-eters (PICCs) and tunneled central venous cathcath-eters in children with leukemia.

Study designWe analyzed all PICCs and conventional tunneled catheters placed in patients aged<18 years and admitted to our institute for leukemia treatment between February 2008 and April 2014. Cases of symptom-atic CAT were confirmed by ultrasound and treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.

ResultsDuring the study period, 157 PICCs and 138 conventional tunneled catheters were placed in 192 pa-tients with leukemia. CAT incidence was 1.5% (n= 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16) in the PICC group. The OR for CAT occurrence after PICC vs conventional tunneled catheter placement was 5.6 (95% CI, 1.2-26.5).

ConclusionOur results suggest that the use of PICCs in children with leukemia increases the risk of CAT in comparison with the use of conventional tunneled catheters. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to characterize this risk and to better define indications. (J Pediatr 2018;■■:■■-■■).

See related article, p •••

C

entral venous lines (CVLs) are important in the treatment of children with cancer, but have been shown to be strongly associated with venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in both solid tumor1-4and hematologic3-8malignancies. For

example, Piovesan et al reported that 30% of VTEs in children with cancer were associated with CVLs and that these events most frequently manifested as deep vein thrombosis in the extremities.3

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in patients with hematologic malignancies, both adults and children.9,10PICCs are inserted into a peripheral vein and advanced to place the catheter tip in the superior vena cava. This

insertion mode causes fewer immediate complications than conventional tunneled catheters.9,11,12PICCs are, however,

associ-ated with thrombosis at the insertion site,10,13,14particularly in patients with cancer.13,15,16The authors of a meta-analysis

pub-lished in 201313reported that the rate of VTEs in adult patients with cancer with PICCs ranged from 4.69% to 8.64% and that

the probability of developing a VTE was significantly higher when PICCs were used compared with conventional tunneled cath-eters (OR, 2.55). In the general pediatric population, there seems to be no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis between these 2 methods for establishing venous access.10However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared

PICCs with conventional tunneled catheters as concerns thrombosis development in children undergoing treatment for leukemia. Since 2008, the use of PICCs has increased in our pediatric hematology and oncology institute, with a concomitant decrease in that of conventional tunneled catheters. We took advantage of this evolution in practices to compare retrospectively the risks of thrombosis associated with PICC and conventional tunneled catheter placement in children diagnosed with leukemia.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study at the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute in Lyon, France. Chil-dren diagnosed with hematologic cancer between February 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, were identified using the

ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukemia AML Acute myeloid leukemia CAT Catheter-associated thrombosis CVL Central venous line L-ASP L-asparaginase

LMWH Low-molecular-weight heparin PICC Peripherally inserted central catheter VTE Venous thromboembolic event

From the1Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology,

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;2University of Lyon Claude Bernard; and3Department of Anesthesia,

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

0022-3476/$ - see front matter. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

https://doi.org10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026

ARTICLE IN PRESS

T

HE

J

OURNAL OF

P

EDIATRICS

• www.jpeds.com

ORIGINAL

ARTICLES

1

FLA 5.5.0 DTD■ YMPD9875_proof ■ April 27, 2018

https://doi.org10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026

tunneled catheters at our institute between 2008 and 2014, an increase in the risk of CAT in the deep veins of the arm with PICCs compared with conventional tunneled catheters, and the presence of 2 risk factors for CAT in this setting: age≥12 and<18 years and AML. Our results are consistent with those of other studies showing that PICCs were associated with thromboses, particularly in patients with cancer.3,9,13,15,19-21Kanin

and Young authored the only other study comparing these 2 types of CVLs in a pediatric population.10They

demon-strated that PICCs pose a substantial risk for thrombosis, but found no difference in incidence between PICCs and conven-tional tunneled catheters. Their study included only children aged<18 years of age, but it was not focused on cancer. Our study is thus the first to determine and compare the inci-dence of CAT specifically in children with leukemia.

PICCs are placed in small caliber vessels of the arm and thus they probably alter flow dynamics. The choice of catheter di-ameter seems to be a determinant prognostic factor for the oc-currence of CAT and the use of larger veins (eg, the internal jugular) may decrease CAT risk.22Microtrauma to the intima

owing to repeated arm movement may also explain the oc-currence of CAT. Catheter diameter varies according to several measures, including the child’s weight and the concerned vein’s diameter.23,24Unfortunately, information vein diameter was not

included in our data; thus, we were not able to look at poten-tial associations between vein and catheter diameters. Beyond the role of the CVL itself, leukemia with homeostasis disor-ders can trigger thromboembolism.25,26Leukemia cells are

known to induce a prothrombotic state27and the presence of

a central venous catheter can further contribute to that hypercoagulability.

Piovesan et al reported that older children (mean age of 13.5 years in their study) had a higher risk of experiencing throm-botic events.3

Pediatric studies report a bimodal distribution of throm-botic events, with the majority occurring in neonates and adolescents,28,29and indeed we too identified age≥12 and <18

years as a risk factor for CAT.

In our center, globally speaking, as PICC use progressed, so did the number of CAT events. We started using PICCs in 2009.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 PICC Conventional tunneled catheter PICC-related CAT Conventional tunneled catheter-related CAT

Figure. Rates of PICC and conventional tunneled catheter placement and PICC- and conventional tunneled catheter-related CAT occurrence at the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute during the study period. TC, conventional tunneled catheter.

Table III. Univariate and multivariate analyses of CAT risk factors in children with leukemia

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis

Risk factors % CAT OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)

Catheter type

PICC 10.2 (16/157) 7.7 (1.7-34.2) 5.6 (1.2-26.5) Conventional tunneled catheter 1.5 (2/138)

Leukemia type AML 13.7 (7/51) 3.4 (1.2-9.2) 2.2 (0.7-6.4) ALL 4.5 (11/224) Age (y) <12 3.5 (8/226) 4.6 (1.7-12.2) 2.3 (0.8-7.0) ≥12 14.5 (10/69)

T

HE

J

OURNAL OF

P

EDIATRICS

• www.jpeds.com

Volume■■

4 Noailly Charny Jr et al

FLA 5.5.0 DTD■ YMPD9875_proof ■ April 27, 2018

Unfortunately, information vein diameter was

not included in our data; thus, we were

not able to look at potential associations

between vein and catheter diameters

CAT incidence was 1.5% (n = 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16)

in the PICC group.

(54)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7

ORIGINAL

Peripherally inserted central catheters

are associated with lower risk of bloodstream

infection compared with central venous

catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:

a propensity-adjusted analysis

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Natalia Viu Degaspare1,2,3,

Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa4 and Otavio T. Ranzani1,5,6

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM

Abstract

Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.

Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention. Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit

*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br

1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,

Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article

Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs

in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in

CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting. Intensive Care Med

DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7

ORIGINAL

Peripherally inserted central catheters

are associated with lower risk of bloodstream

infection compared with central venous

catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:

a propensity-adjusted analysis

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi

1,2,3*

, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi

1

, Natalia Viu Degaspare

1,2,3

,

Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz

1,2,3

, Ana Paula Matos Porto

1

, Silvia Figueiredo Costa

4

and Otavio T. Ranzani

1,5,6

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM

Abstract

Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric

intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous

catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore,

we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in

critically ill children.

Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included

patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our

primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for

Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account

for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI

inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were

associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity

analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding

place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.

Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit

*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br

1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,

Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article

Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs

in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting.

Jan 2013 - Dec 2014

1660 Devices

738

CVC

922

PICC

(55)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7

ORIGINAL

Peripherally inserted central catheters

are associated with lower risk of bloodstream

infection compared with central venous

catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:

a propensity-adjusted analysis

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Natalia Viu Degaspare1,2,3,

Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa4 and Otavio T. Ranzani1,5,6

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM

Abstract

Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.

Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention. Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit

*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br

1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,

Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article

Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs

in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in

CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting. Intensive Care Med

DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7

ORIGINAL

Peripherally inserted central catheters

are associated with lower risk of bloodstream

infection compared with central venous

catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:

a propensity-adjusted analysis

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi

1,2,3*

, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi

1

, Natalia Viu Degaspare

1,2,3

,

Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz

1,2,3

, Ana Paula Matos Porto

1

, Silvia Figueiredo Costa

4

and Otavio T. Ranzani

1,5,6

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM

Abstract

Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric

intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous

catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore,

we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in

critically ill children.

Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included

patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our

primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for

Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account

for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI

inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were

associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity

analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding

place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.

Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit

*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br

1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,

Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article

Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs

in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting.

retrospective multicentre study in

4

PICUs

(adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037).

(adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044)

(place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a

time-dependent variable)

1 ) CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI vs PICC

(56)

Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day

4 Dicembre December 4th

IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE

DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA

Baseline disease

CVC (N: 540)

PICC (N: 715)

Oncologic

47 (8.7%)

58 (8.1%)

0,71

Immunosuppression

14 (2.6%)

27 (3.8%)

0,243

Cardiomyopathy or

myocarditis

52 (9.6%)

32 (4.5%)

<0,001

Bronchiolitis and/or

asthma

75 (13.9%)

149 (20.8%)

<0,001

Chronic neurological

diseases

11 (2.00%)

3 (0.4%)

0,007

Intensive Care Med

DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7

ORIGINAL

Peripherally inserted central catheters

are associated with lower risk of bloodstream

infection compared with central venous

catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:

a propensity-adjusted analysis

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Natalia Viu Degaspare1,2,3,

Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa4 and Otavio T. Ranzani1,5,6

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM

Abstract

Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric

intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.

Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included

patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI

inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention. Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit

*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br

1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,

Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article

Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs

in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting.

Intensive Care Med

DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7

ORIGINAL

Peripherally inserted central catheters

are associated with lower risk of bloodstream

infection compared with central venous

catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:

a propensity-adjusted analysis

Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi

1,2,3*

, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi

1

, Natalia Viu Degaspare

1,2,3

,

Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz

1,2,3

, Ana Paula Matos Porto

1

, Silvia Figueiredo Costa

4

and Otavio T. Ranzani

1,5,6

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM

Abstract

Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric

intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous

catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore,

we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in

critically ill children.

Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included

patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our

primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for

Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account

for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.

Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI

inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were

associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity

analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding

place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.

Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.

Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit

*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br

1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

[r]

[r]

Si scriva una funzione che riceva come parametri una variabile p di tipo struct persona , un vettore vp di tipo struct persona e la dimensione n del vettore. La funzione

[r]

Scrivere la teoria delle piccole oscillazioni attorno a tale punto.. Verificare che esiste almeno

Lampadario, fungaia, cartoleria, stalliere, alimentari, macelleria, furbata, gelato, colpaccio, fratellastro, sorellina, vicinato, angolino, stanchezza, postaccio,

2 Completa le frasi in modo da ottenere periodi contenenti una subordinata soggettiva9. che non tutti

L’obiettivo è collegare ogni isola con ponti orizzontali o verticali in modo che abbia un numero di ponti corrispondente al numero dato e si formi un percorso che colleghi