Verona
2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th2019
XI
11
THCongresso
GAVeCeLT
Congress
2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rdII
2
NDConvegno
GAVePed
Conference
3 DicembreDecember 3rdXIII
13
THPICC
Day
4 Dicembre December 4thVerona
2-3-4 Dicembre
December 2
nd
-3
rd
-4
th
2019
XI
11
TH
Congresso
GAVeCeLT
Congress
2-3 Dicembre
December 2
nd
- 3
rd
II
2
ND
Convegno
GAVePed
Conference
3 Dicembre
December 3
rd
XIII
13
TH
PICC
Day
4 Dicembre
December 4
th
T
h
e
A
l
p
h
a
b
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
A
PPROCCIO
A
PPROPRIATO
APPROPRIATEZZA
SCELTA RAZIONALE
A
B
C
BRACCIO - BASILICA
CUORE - COMPLICANZE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
A
PPROCCIO
A
PPROPRIATO
APPROPRIATEZZA
SCELTA RAZIONALE
A
C
BEST PRACTICE
CUORE - COMPLICANZE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
APPROPRIATEZZA
APProccio alla Vena APPropriata
Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment
La scelta del LATO e VENA un passaggio essenziale per un impianto efficace
e a basso rischio di complicanze
E’fondamentale una accurata esplorazione ecografica di entrambe le braccia
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
RAPEVA
APPROPRIATEZZA
APProccio alla Vena APPropriata
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
APPROPRIATEZZA
APProccio alla Vena APPropriata
Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment
Un protocollo ben definito e sistematico per
l’esame delle vene del braccio e della
zona sopra/ sottoclaveare
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
RAPEVA
APPROPRIATEZZA
APProccio alla Vena APPropriata
Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment
Un protocollo ben definito e sistematico per
l’esame delle vene del braccio e della
zona sopra/ sottoclaveare
7 “Fermate”
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
V Cefalica al gomito
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
2
Aa eVv Brachiali al gomito
3
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
3
Vena Basilica
4
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
3
Vena Basilica
4
4
Fascio Nervo-Vascolare
5
5
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
3
Vena Basilica
4
4
Fascio Nervo-Vascolare
5
Vena Cefalica
5
6
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
3
Vena Basilica
4
4
Fascio Nervo-Vascolare
5
Vena Cefalica
5
6
Vena Ascellare
7
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
1
2
3
3
Vena Basilica
4
4
Fascio Nervo-Vascolare
5
Vena Cefalica
5
6
Vena Ascellare
7
Vv Giugulare
VSucclavia
6
7
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
A
PPROCCIO
A
PPROPRIATO
APPROPRIATEZZA
SCELTA RAZIONALE
A
B
C
BRACCIO - BASILICA
CUORE - COMPLICANZE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
A
B
C
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
A
B
C
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
A
B
C
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
A
PPROCCIO
A
PPROPRIATO
APPROPRIATEZZA
SCELTA RAZIONALE
A
B
C
BRACCIO - BASILICA
CUORE - COMPLICANZE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
C
CUORE - CENTRALE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
ECG INTRACAVITARIO NEI NEONATI E NEI BAMBINI
Accuratezza 95,8% - 98,8 %
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-long-atrial-septum-p4c
#1 S
ubcostal 4c
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
E
chocardiography
#2 S
ubcostal
Bicaval
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/sub-short-svc-and-ivc-p4d
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
#3 A
pical 4C
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
#3 A
pical 4C
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
#3 A
pical 4C
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/a4c-p3a
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
#3 A
pical 4C
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
#4 R
ight
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/hrp-svc-septum-p6
#4 R
ight
Parasternal
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/hrp-svc-septum-p6
#4 R
ight
Parasternal
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
https://pedecho.org/library/normal/echocardiogram/hrp-svc-septum-p6
#4 R
ight
Parasternal
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
E
chocardiography
C
linical
Cases
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
E
chocardiography
C
linical
Cases
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
E
chocardiography
C
linical
Cases
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Cardiac Imaging
RULE OUT COMPLICATION
TIP LOCATION
C
E
chocardiography
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
C
CUORE - CENTRALE
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Consistent adoption of
SIP protocol
as proposed by
GAVeCeLT since 2010:
1 – hand washing, maximal barrier protection, 2% chlorhexidine
2 – US scan of all veins before starting the procedure (RaPeVA)
3 – choice of vein matched with cath diameter (3:1)
4 – individuation of brachial artery and median nerve
5 – US-guided puncture and cannulation
6 – tip navigation by US
7 – tip verification by intracavitary EKG
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Feb 2008 - Apr 2014
1660 Devices
138 CVC
157 PICC
retrospective single center study
Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted
Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters
in Children with Leukemia
Pierre-Amaël Noailly Charny, MD1,2, Nathalie Bleyzac, MD1, Robin Ohannessian, MD, MPH2, Edouard Aubert, MD3,
Yves Bertand, MD, PhD1,2, and Cecile Renard, MD1
ObjectiveTo study the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis (CAT) between peripherally inserted central cath-eters (PICCs) and tunneled central venous cathcath-eters in children with leukemia.
Study designWe analyzed all PICCs and conventional tunneled catheters placed in patients aged<18 years and admitted to our institute for leukemia treatment between February 2008 and April 2014. Cases of symptom-atic CAT were confirmed by ultrasound and treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.
ResultsDuring the study period, 157 PICCs and 138 conventional tunneled catheters were placed in 192 pa-tients with leukemia. CAT incidence was 1.5% (n= 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16) in the PICC group. The OR for CAT occurrence after PICC vs conventional tunneled catheter placement was 5.6 (95% CI, 1.2-26.5).
ConclusionOur results suggest that the use of PICCs in children with leukemia increases the risk of CAT in comparison with the use of conventional tunneled catheters. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to characterize this risk and to better define indications. (J Pediatr 2018;■■:■■-■■).
See related article, p •••
C
entral venous lines (CVLs) are important in the treatment of children with cancer, but have been shown to be strongly associated with venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in both solid tumor1-4and hematologic3-8malignancies. Forexample, Piovesan et al reported that 30% of VTEs in children with cancer were associated with CVLs and that these events most frequently manifested as deep vein thrombosis in the extremities.3
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in patients with hematologic malignancies, both adults and children.9,10PICCs are inserted into a peripheral vein and advanced to place the catheter tip in the superior vena cava. This
insertion mode causes fewer immediate complications than conventional tunneled catheters.9,11,12PICCs are, however,
associ-ated with thrombosis at the insertion site,10,13,14particularly in patients with cancer.13,15,16The authors of a meta-analysis
pub-lished in 201313reported that the rate of VTEs in adult patients with cancer with PICCs ranged from 4.69% to 8.64% and that
the probability of developing a VTE was significantly higher when PICCs were used compared with conventional tunneled cath-eters (OR, 2.55). In the general pediatric population, there seems to be no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis between these 2 methods for establishing venous access.10However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared
PICCs with conventional tunneled catheters as concerns thrombosis development in children undergoing treatment for leukemia. Since 2008, the use of PICCs has increased in our pediatric hematology and oncology institute, with a concomitant decrease in that of conventional tunneled catheters. We took advantage of this evolution in practices to compare retrospectively the risks of thrombosis associated with PICC and conventional tunneled catheter placement in children diagnosed with leukemia.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, retrospective study at the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute in Lyon, France. Chil-dren diagnosed with hematologic cancer between February 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, were identified using the
ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukemia AML Acute myeloid leukemia CAT Catheter-associated thrombosis CVL Central venous line L-ASP L-asparaginase
LMWH Low-molecular-weight heparin PICC Peripherally inserted central catheter VTE Venous thromboembolic event
From the1Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology,
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;2University of
Lyon Claude Bernard; and3Department of Anesthesia,
Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
0022-3476/$ - see front matter. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T
HE
J
OURNAL OF
P
EDIATRICS
• www.jpeds.com
ORIGINAL
ARTICLES
1
FLA 5.5.0 DTD■ YMPD9875_proof ■ April 27, 2018
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Increased Risk of Thrombosis Associated with Peripherally Inserted
Central Catheters Compared with Conventional Central Venous Catheters
in Children with Leukemia
Pierre-Amaël Noailly Charny, MD1,2, Nathalie Bleyzac, MD1, Robin Ohannessian, MD, MPH2, Edouard Aubert, MD3,
Yves Bertand, MD, PhD1,2, and Cecile Renard, MD1
ObjectiveTo study the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis (CAT) between peripherally inserted central cath-eters (PICCs) and tunneled central venous cathcath-eters in children with leukemia.
Study designWe analyzed all PICCs and conventional tunneled catheters placed in patients aged<18 years and admitted to our institute for leukemia treatment between February 2008 and April 2014. Cases of symptom-atic CAT were confirmed by ultrasound and treated with low-molecular-weight heparin.
ResultsDuring the study period, 157 PICCs and 138 conventional tunneled catheters were placed in 192 pa-tients with leukemia. CAT incidence was 1.5% (n= 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16) in the PICC group. The OR for CAT occurrence after PICC vs conventional tunneled catheter placement was 5.6 (95% CI, 1.2-26.5).
ConclusionOur results suggest that the use of PICCs in children with leukemia increases the risk of CAT in comparison with the use of conventional tunneled catheters. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to characterize this risk and to better define indications. (J Pediatr 2018;■■:■■-■■).
See related article, p •••
C
entral venous lines (CVLs) are important in the treatment of children with cancer, but have been shown to be strongly associated with venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in both solid tumor1-4and hematologic3-8malignancies. Forexample, Piovesan et al reported that 30% of VTEs in children with cancer were associated with CVLs and that these events most frequently manifested as deep vein thrombosis in the extremities.3
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in patients with hematologic malignancies, both adults and children.9,10PICCs are inserted into a peripheral vein and advanced to place the catheter tip in the superior vena cava. This
insertion mode causes fewer immediate complications than conventional tunneled catheters.9,11,12PICCs are, however,
associ-ated with thrombosis at the insertion site,10,13,14particularly in patients with cancer.13,15,16The authors of a meta-analysis
pub-lished in 201313reported that the rate of VTEs in adult patients with cancer with PICCs ranged from 4.69% to 8.64% and that
the probability of developing a VTE was significantly higher when PICCs were used compared with conventional tunneled cath-eters (OR, 2.55). In the general pediatric population, there seems to be no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis between these 2 methods for establishing venous access.10However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have compared
PICCs with conventional tunneled catheters as concerns thrombosis development in children undergoing treatment for leukemia. Since 2008, the use of PICCs has increased in our pediatric hematology and oncology institute, with a concomitant decrease in that of conventional tunneled catheters. We took advantage of this evolution in practices to compare retrospectively the risks of thrombosis associated with PICC and conventional tunneled catheter placement in children diagnosed with leukemia.
Methods
We conducted a single-center, retrospective study at the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute in Lyon, France. Chil-dren diagnosed with hematologic cancer between February 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013, were identified using the
ALL Acute lymphoblastic leukemia AML Acute myeloid leukemia CAT Catheter-associated thrombosis CVL Central venous line L-ASP L-asparaginase
LMWH Low-molecular-weight heparin PICC Peripherally inserted central catheter VTE Venous thromboembolic event
From the1Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology,
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;2University of Lyon Claude Bernard; and3Department of Anesthesia,
Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
0022-3476/$ - see front matter. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T
HE
J
OURNAL OF
P
EDIATRICS
• www.jpeds.com
ORIGINAL
ARTICLES
1
FLA 5.5.0 DTD■ YMPD9875_proof ■ April 27, 2018
https://doi.org10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.03.026
tunneled catheters at our institute between 2008 and 2014, an increase in the risk of CAT in the deep veins of the arm with PICCs compared with conventional tunneled catheters, and the presence of 2 risk factors for CAT in this setting: age≥12 and<18 years and AML. Our results are consistent with those of other studies showing that PICCs were associated with thromboses, particularly in patients with cancer.3,9,13,15,19-21Kanin
and Young authored the only other study comparing these 2 types of CVLs in a pediatric population.10They
demon-strated that PICCs pose a substantial risk for thrombosis, but found no difference in incidence between PICCs and conven-tional tunneled catheters. Their study included only children aged<18 years of age, but it was not focused on cancer. Our study is thus the first to determine and compare the inci-dence of CAT specifically in children with leukemia.
PICCs are placed in small caliber vessels of the arm and thus they probably alter flow dynamics. The choice of catheter di-ameter seems to be a determinant prognostic factor for the oc-currence of CAT and the use of larger veins (eg, the internal jugular) may decrease CAT risk.22Microtrauma to the intima
owing to repeated arm movement may also explain the oc-currence of CAT. Catheter diameter varies according to several measures, including the child’s weight and the concerned vein’s diameter.23,24Unfortunately, information vein diameter was not
included in our data; thus, we were not able to look at poten-tial associations between vein and catheter diameters. Beyond the role of the CVL itself, leukemia with homeostasis disor-ders can trigger thromboembolism.25,26Leukemia cells are
known to induce a prothrombotic state27and the presence of
a central venous catheter can further contribute to that hypercoagulability.
Piovesan et al reported that older children (mean age of 13.5 years in their study) had a higher risk of experiencing throm-botic events.3
Pediatric studies report a bimodal distribution of throm-botic events, with the majority occurring in neonates and adolescents,28,29and indeed we too identified age≥12 and <18
years as a risk factor for CAT.
In our center, globally speaking, as PICC use progressed, so did the number of CAT events. We started using PICCs in 2009.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 PICC Conventional tunneled catheter PICC-related CAT Conventional tunneled catheter-related CAT
Figure. Rates of PICC and conventional tunneled catheter placement and PICC- and conventional tunneled catheter-related CAT occurrence at the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Institute during the study period. TC, conventional tunneled catheter.
Table III. Univariate and multivariate analyses of CAT risk factors in children with leukemia
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Risk factors % CAT OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Catheter type
PICC 10.2 (16/157) 7.7 (1.7-34.2) 5.6 (1.2-26.5) Conventional tunneled catheter 1.5 (2/138)
Leukemia type AML 13.7 (7/51) 3.4 (1.2-9.2) 2.2 (0.7-6.4) ALL 4.5 (11/224) Age (y) <12 3.5 (8/226) 4.6 (1.7-12.2) 2.3 (0.8-7.0) ≥12 14.5 (10/69)
T
HEJ
OURNAL OFP
EDIATRICS• www.jpeds.com
Volume■■4 Noailly Charny Jr et al
FLA 5.5.0 DTD■ YMPD9875_proof ■ April 27, 2018
Unfortunately, information vein diameter was
not included in our data; thus, we were
not able to look at potential associations
between vein and catheter diameters
CAT incidence was 1.5% (n = 2) in the conventional tunneled catheter group and 10.2% (n = 16)
in the PICC group.
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7
ORIGINAL
Peripherally inserted central catheters
are associated with lower risk of bloodstream
infection compared with central venous
catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:
a propensity-adjusted analysis
Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Natalia Viu Degaspare1,2,3,
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa4 and Otavio T. Ranzani1,5,6
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Abstract
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.
Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.
Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.
Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention. Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br
1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,
Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article
Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs
in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in
CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting. Intensive Care Med
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7
ORIGINAL
Peripherally inserted central catheters
are associated with lower risk of bloodstream
infection compared with central venous
catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:
a propensity-adjusted analysis
Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi
1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi
1, Natalia Viu Degaspare
1,2,3,
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz
1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto
1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa
4and Otavio T. Ranzani
1,5,6© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Abstract
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric
intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous
catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore,
we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in
critically ill children.
Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included
patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our
primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for
Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account
for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.
Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI
inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were
associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity
analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding
place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.
Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.
Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br
1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,
Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article
Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs
in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting.
Jan 2013 - Dec 2014
1660 Devices
738
CVC
922
PICC
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7
ORIGINAL
Peripherally inserted central catheters
are associated with lower risk of bloodstream
infection compared with central venous
catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:
a propensity-adjusted analysis
Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Natalia Viu Degaspare1,2,3,
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa4 and Otavio T. Ranzani1,5,6
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Abstract
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.
Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.
Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.
Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention. Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br
1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,
Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article
Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs
in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in
CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting. Intensive Care Med
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7
ORIGINAL
Peripherally inserted central catheters
are associated with lower risk of bloodstream
infection compared with central venous
catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:
a propensity-adjusted analysis
Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi
1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi
1, Natalia Viu Degaspare
1,2,3,
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz
1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto
1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa
4and Otavio T. Ranzani
1,5,6© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Abstract
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric
intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous
catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore,
we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in
critically ill children.
Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included
patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our
primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for
Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account
for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.
Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI
inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were
associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity
analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding
place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.
Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.
Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br
1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,
Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article
Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs
in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting.
retrospective multicentre study in
4
PICUs
(adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037).
(adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044)
(place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a
time-dependent variable)
1 ) CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI vs PICC
Verona 2-3-4 Dicembre December 2nd-3rd-4th 2019 XI 11TH Congresso GAVeCeLT Congress 2-3 DicembreDecember 2nd- 3rd II 2 NDConvegno GAVePed Conference 3 DicembreDecember 3rd XIII 13THPICC Day
4 Dicembre December 4th
IL PICC ACCESSO VENOSO CENTRALE
DI PRIMA SCELTA IN ETA’ PEDIATRICA
Baseline disease
CVC (N: 540)
PICC (N: 715)
Oncologic
47 (8.7%)
58 (8.1%)
0,71
Immunosuppression
14 (2.6%)
27 (3.8%)
0,243
Cardiomyopathy or
myocarditis
52 (9.6%)
32 (4.5%)
<0,001
Bronchiolitis and/or
asthma
75 (13.9%)
149 (20.8%)
<0,001
Chronic neurological
diseases
11 (2.00%)
3 (0.4%)
0,007
Intensive Care Med
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7
ORIGINAL
Peripherally inserted central catheters
are associated with lower risk of bloodstream
infection compared with central venous
catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:
a propensity-adjusted analysis
Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Natalia Viu Degaspare1,2,3,
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa4 and Otavio T. Ranzani1,5,6
© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Abstract
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric
intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children.
Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included
patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.
Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI
inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.
Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention. Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br
1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,
Rua Azevedo Macedo, 92, São Paulo, São Paulo 04013-060, Brazil Full author information is available at the end of the article
Take-home message: PICCs could be used as an alternative to CVCs
in Paediatric ICUs. We observed that in four PICUs from Brazil, PICCs were commonly used instead of CVCs.We showed for the first time in a multicentre study that PICCs were associated with a protective effect in CLABSI prevention in paediatric critical care setting.
Intensive Care Med
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7
ORIGINAL
Peripherally inserted central catheters
are associated with lower risk of bloodstream
infection compared with central venous
catheters in paediatric intensive care patients:
a propensity-adjusted analysis
Ricardo Silveira Yamaguchi
1,2,3*, Danilo Teixeira Noritomi
1, Natalia Viu Degaspare
1,2,3,
Gabriela Ortega Cisternas Muñoz
1,2,3, Ana Paula Matos Porto
1, Silvia Figueiredo Costa
4and Otavio T. Ranzani
1,5,6© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM
Abstract
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric
intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous
catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore,
we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in
critically ill children.
Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in São Paulo, Brazil. We included
patients aged 0–14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our
primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for
Dis-ease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account
for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting.
Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI
inci-dence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70–3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were
associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05–4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity
analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02–4.64; p = 0.044) after adding
place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable.
Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.
Keywords: Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
*Correspondence: ryamaguchi@prestadores.amil.com.br
1 Americas Medical Service, Americas Research and Education Institute,