ili ili

(1)

The deba.te in T:ta.ty a.boLLt the Jtale

0tl

bci.ence in Hib-tolty ib ~ed becaUbe U empha.bÙeb philobOphy hea.vily a.nd negIeetb ge

nuine hib-toJt.<.ea.l a.na.lybib. In th.<.b ltegMd FoJUna.n I b pa.peJtb Me held -to

be

va.fue. MOlteoveJt, they dea.l w.<.th bci.ence in WehnM GeJUna.ny, an ab peet o

tha.t hib-toJt.<.cal peJt.<.od wh.<.ch ib Ubua.tly oveJtlook.ed, even though

in the WehnM RepubUc ib

i l i hught in IMy jUbt

now. Fina.lly FOJUnan' b appJtaach -to the hibtàlty

bc.<.ence ib c.on6ltonted by the pJtagJtam tlOlt an

pkOpabed by Ita. l.<.a.n bchoR.aM who Me moved by a beJt.<.oUb inteJtebt in the Jta.d.<.ea.l