• Non ci sono risultati.

The computation of the Sommerfeld Integral tails by using the Generalized Pencil of Functions method is here presented. Suppose we want to solve the Sommerfeld-type integral:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "The computation of the Sommerfeld Integral tails by using the Generalized Pencil of Functions method is here presented. Suppose we want to solve the Sommerfeld-type integral: "

Copied!
5
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

143

APPENDIX B

The computation of the Sommerfeld Integral tails by using the Generalized Pencil of Functions method is here presented. Suppose we want to solve the Sommerfeld-type integral:

( ) ( )

0

, | ' n ,

SI = ∫ ψ k ρ z z J k ρ ρ k dk ρ ρ (B.1) where ψ(k ρ ,z|z’) is the generic spectral domain Dyadic Green’s Functions, J n is the first kind Bessel function of order n, ρ is the radial distance between source and observation point in a cylindrical reference system, k ρ

is the wavenumber in the ρ-direction while z and z’ is the vertical coordinates of the field and source point respectively.

Suppose we have M samples of the spectral domain DGF’s ψ k , through the GPOF method we are able to express each sample as:

1 0,1, , ,

i

M k

k i i

i s t i

b k N

e δ

ψ γ

γ

=

= =

=

(B.2)

where b i , s i and δt are the complex residues, the complex poles and the sampling rate respectively.

In order to evaluate the complex residues and poles, we define the following set of matrices:

0 1 1 1 2

3

2 2 1

1

2 1

1 1

.

L L

L L

N L N N L N

N L N L

ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ

ψ

ψ ψ ψ ψ

ψ

ψ ψ ψ ψ

ψ ψ

+

− − − −

− − − +

   

   

   

Λ = Γ =

   

   

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

( B.3)

Looking into the underling structure of the matrices Λ and Γ , it follows that:

, Λ = Ζ⋅Β⋅Π

Γ = Ζ⋅Β⋅Ω⋅Π (B.4)

(2)

GENERALIZED PENCIL OF FUNCTIONS

144 where:

1

1 1

1 2

1

1 1

1 1 1

1 2

1 1

2 2

1 1 1

1

1

0 0 0 0 .

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

L

M

L

N L N L N L

M

M M

b b

b

γ γ

γ γ γ

γ γ

γ γ γ

γ γ

γ

− − − − − −

   

   

 

Ζ =       Π =      

   

   

   

Ω = Β =

   

   

   

 

    

   

 

 

 

       

 

(B.5)

To illustrate the use of the GPOF algorithm we can write:

+ + ,

Λ ⋅Γ = Π ⋅Ω⋅Π (B.6)

where the superscript + denotes the matrix pseudo-inverse. It can be shown from (B.6) that exists a vector p i with i=1,2,…,M such that:

i i i . p γ p

Λ ⋅Γ ⋅ = + (B.7)

To compute the pseudo-inverse, we can use the Singular Value Decomposition:

1 ,

H

H

U D V

V D U

+ −

Λ = ⋅ ⋅

Λ = ⋅ ⋅ (B.8)

where D is the singular value diagonal matrix, while U and V are left and right singular matrices respectively.

It is important to underline that for noise data, we can choose the M largest singular values of D and the resulting matrix Λ is called truncated + pseudo inverse.

Since:

H ,

V V I

Λ ⋅ Λ = ⋅ + = (B.9)

(3)

GPOF METHOD

145 where I is the identity matrix, substituting the (B.8) into the (B.9) and left multiplying by V H , we obtain:

( )

1

0 1, 2, ,

i i .

H

i M

D U V

γ ϑ

Θ − ⋅ = =

Θ = ⋅ ⋅Γ ⋅

 (B.10)

Note that the Θ is a MxM matrix and that γ are its eigenvalues. Finally i

we can evaluate the complex residues and poles as follows:

( )

1

1 1

2 1 2 2

1 1 1

1 2

1 1 1

.

M

N N N

M M M

i i

R R

R s ln

t

ψ

γ γ γ ψ

γ γ γ ψ

γ δ

− − −

     

     

   =  ⋅  

     

     

     

=

     

 (B.11)

(4)
(5)

146

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Abbiamo anche dimostrato per la prima volta che la proteina BAG3 viene rilasciata da cardiomiociti sottoposti a stress e può essere rilevabile nel siero di pazienti affetti da

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty,

As consequences of the first application we observe that CG (considered as an iterative method) has a linear rate of convergence, is in general faster than G, and is competitive

In that case, we could say that the external control, and in particular the accounting control entrusted to the external auditor, should not be mandatory, but it should be quite

In the special case where the manifold has the form {(u, m(u)) : u ∈ R} for some function m, the problem can be viewed as nonparametric regression with measurement error; see

Solution proposed by Roberto Tauraso, Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`a di Roma “Tor Vergata”, via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Roma,

[r]

The issue addressed in this work is the determination of the quenched critical point for the localization/delocalization phase transition of a polymer interacting with an