• Non ci sono risultati.

List of Figures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "List of Figures"

Copied!
3
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

viii

List of Figures

Fig. 2- 1 Simplified representation of the MYRRHA primary cooling system during

the 6th European Framework Program of the EUROTRANS XT-ADS design phase……….……. 2-3

Fig. 2- 2 General layout of the MYRRHA reactor vessel showing how the spallation target is split up in a center and an off-center part and how the two parts are connected. Hatched area

indicates LBE primary coolant……….……….... 2-4

Fig. 2- 3 Top view of the center of the reactor core, in which three elements are removed

to create space for the beam tube………... 2-5

Fig. 2- 4 Schematization of the two different target configurations developed for the MYRRHA reactor

(“Window design” on the left side and “Windowless design” on the right side)……….……. 2-6

Fig. 2- 5 A cut-out view of the spallation target area with a detached flow design.

The LBE flow is indicated in red, the proton beam in yellow and the fuel assemblies is orange………….…… 2-6

Fig. 2- 6 XT-ADS nozzle design called v0.10LBE. The red contour indicates the expected

LBE flow profile……….……… 2-7

Fig. 2- 7 Conventions used for pressure profile calculation……….……… 2-9

Fig. 2- 8 Characteristic pump curve……….………. 2-10

Fig. 2- 9 Spallation loop main dimensions……….……….. 2-12

Fig. 3- 1 Displaced grid of CVs and junctions……….……. 3-11

Fig. 3- 2 ATHLET nodalization of the spallation loop……….… 3-16

Fig. 3- 3 Axial distribution of the power deposition by the proton beam in the spallation area……….. 3-17

Fig. 3- 4 Four-quadrant pump curves obtained for different rotation velocities……….….. 3-19

Fig. 3- 5 Main pump rotation velocity……….………. 3-23

Fig. 3- 6 LBE mass flow rate in the secondary side of the HX……… 3-23

Fig. 3- 7 Thermal power imposed on target zone……….……… 3-23

Fig. 3- 8 LBE mass flow rate in the primary loop……….... 3-24

Fig. 3- 9 Temperature through the target area……….………. 3-24

Fig. 3- 10 Temperature upstream and downstream of the primary side of the HX……….……... 3-25

Fig. 3- 11 Inlet and outlet pressure in the main pump……….... 3-26

Fig. 3- 12 Inlet and outlet pressure in the target region……….………. 3-26

Fig. 3- 13 Liquid level variation in main vessel and beam tube components……….… 3-27

Fig. 3- 14 LBE mass flow rate in the primary loop……….…... 3-28

Fig. 3- 15 Temperature through the target area……….. 3-29

Fig. 3- 16 Temperature upstream and downstream of the primary side of the HX……….…... 3-29

Fig. 3- 17 Liquid level variation in main vessel and beam tube components……….…… 3-29

Fig. 3- 18 LBE mass flow rate in the primary loop……….…... 3-31

Fig. 3- 19 Temperature through the target area……….………. 3-32

Fig. 3- 20 Temperature upstream and downstream of the primary side of the HX……….……... 3-32

Fig. 3- 21 Liquid level variation in main vessel and beam tube components……….…… 3-33

Fig. 3- 22 Thermal power imposed on target zone……….…… 3-34

Fig. 3- 23 LBE mass flow rate in the primary loop……….…... 3-34

Fig. 3- 24 Liquid level variation in main vessel and beam tube components……… 3-34

Fig. 3- 25 Temperature through the target area……….. 3-34

Fig. 3- 26 LBE mass flow rate in the secondary side of the HX……… 3-35

(2)

ix

Fig. 3- 28 Temperature through the target area……….….…. 3-36

Fig. 3- 29 Temperature upstream and downstream of the primary side of the HX………..……... 3-36

Fig. 3- 30 Liquid level variation in main vessel and beam tube components……….……. 3-37

Fig. 4- 1 2D (left) and 3D (right) CV used for Cartesian grids……….….…… 4-6

Fig. 4- 2 Mesh element (ANSYS CFX)……….…….…... 4-9

Fig. 4- 3 Steep spatial gradients due to the UDS (ANSYS CFX)……….……….…… 4-10

Fig. 4- 4 Non-physical oscillation due to discretization with specified blend factor (ANSYS CFX)………..…. 4-11

Fig. 4- 5 XT-ADS Target design (v0.10LBE)……….….. 4-26

Fig. 4- 6 Computational domain realized with ANSYS Design Modeler……….… 4-26

Fig. 4- 7 Mesh generated using ICEM CFD tool……….…….…. 4-27

Fig. 4- 8 Final statistic of the angles in the structured mesh……….….… 4-28

Fig. 4- 9 Boundary conditions applied for the target domain……….... 4-30

Fig. 4- 10 3D representation of the boundary conditions (BCs) for the target domain………... 4-31

Fig. 4- 11 LBE volume fraction distribution obtained with ANSYS CFX code (blue is liquid LBE,

red is NC gas)………...………... 4-32

Fig. 4- 12 Absolute pressure distribution obtained using ANSYS CFX code………... 4-32

Fig. 4- 13 LBE velocity distribution obtained using ANSYS CFX code……….…... 4-32

Fig. 4- 14 Velocity vectors plotted in the return line of the computational domain……….….….. 4-34

Fig. 5- 1 Coupling approach……….…. 5-11

Fig. 5- 2 Surface coupling……….….… 5-11

Fig. 5- 3 Hydraulic coupling parameters………. 5-12

Fig. 5- 4 Thermal coupling parameters……….….… 5-12

Fig. 5- 5 Shared library structure……….….………. 5-14

Fig. 5- 6 Flow chart of the coupled ANSYS CFX code with the ATHLET code………….……….…... 5-14

Fig. 5- 7 Flow chart showing the finalization of the coupled code………...…….... 5-16

Fig. 5- 8 FEBE extrapolation algorithm……….…... 5-16

Fig. 5- 9 Exchange parameters for “Opening - Opening” boundary conditions………..……….. 5-19

Fig. 5- 10 Explicit coupling scheme………..…….. 5-19

Fig. 5- 11 Semi-implicit coupling scheme………..……. 5-21

Fig. 5- 12 ATHLET nodalization of the open TH configuration………..…... 5-23

Fig. 5- 13 ICEM CFD mesh of one fourth pipe………..…………. 5-24

Fig. 5- 14 Open TH configuration with two coupling interfaces……….. 5-24

Fig. 5- 15 LBE mass flow variation set up in FILL junction………..…. 5-25

Fig. 5- 16 LBE velocity in Node 2 of Pipe 2………. 5-25

Fig. 5- 17 LBE pressure in Node 2 of Pipe 2……… 5-25

Fig. 5- 18 FILL temperature………... 5-25

Fig. 5- 19 LBE temperature at the inlet of ANSYS CFX pipe……….. 5-26

Fig. 5- 20 LBE temperature in Node 2 of Pipe 2………... 5-26

Fig. 5- 21 Cold LBE enters the CFD pipe from the inlet………... 5-26

Fig. 5- 22 Hot LBE enters the CFD pipe from the outlet………... 5-26

Fig. 5- 23 Thermal-hydraulic exchange parameters in the open configuration………...………. 5-28

Fig. 5- 24 Difference between the total inlet and outlet mass flow rates obtained in the ANSYS CFX

stand-alone simulation………..…... 5-30

(3)

x

Fig. 5- 26 LBE mass imbalance in the new target domain for the three meshes………..……... 5-33

Fig. 5- 27 LBE volume fraction distribution obtained with ANSYS CFX code (blue is liquid LBE,

red is NC gas)………... 5-34

Fig. 5- 28 Pressure distribution obtained with ANSYS CFX code………..…… 5-34

Fig. 5- 29 Velocity distribution obtained with ANSYS CFX code………..………… 5-34

Fig. 5- 30 LBE velocity calculated at the inlet and outlet boundaries of the CFD domain………... 5-35

Fig. 5- 31 LBE mass flow rate calculated at the inlet and outlet boundaries of the CFD domain……… 5-36

Fig. 5- 32 LBE absolute pressure calculated at the inlet and outlet boundaries of the CFD domain……… 5-36

Fig. 5- 33 New open configuration for the coupled code simulation………..…. 5-37

Fig. 5- 34 LBE absolute pressure provided by ANSYS CFX to the upper edge of ATHLET network………... 5-38

Fig. 5- 35 LBE velocity provided by ATHLET to the inlet opening of the CFD domain………...…. 5-38

Fig. 5- 36 LBE absolute pressure provided by ATHLET to the outlet opening of the CFD domain………...…… 5-38

Fig. 5- 37 LBE mass flow rate provided by ANSYS CFX to the lower edge of ATHLET network……… 5-38

Fig. 5- 38 Fill mass flow rate in the first transient simulation……….…... 5-40

Fig. 5- 39 LBE absolute pressure provided by ANSYS CFX to the upper edge of ATHLET network……… 5-40

Fig. 5- 40 LBE velocity provided by ATHLET to the inlet opening of the CFD domain……… 5-40

Fig. 5- 41 LBE absolute pressure provided by ATHLET to the outlet opening of the CFD domain………... 5-41

Fig. 5- 42 LBE mass flow rate provided by ANSYS CFX to the lower edge of ATHLET network……… 5-41

Fig. 5- 43 LBE volume fraction distribution plotted 1 second (on the left side) and 14 seconds

(on the right side) after the beginning of the simulation………..……….... 5-42

Fig. 5- 44 Fill mass flow rate in the second transient simulation……….. 5-43

Fig. 5- 45 LBE absolute pressure provided by ANSYS CFX to the upper edge of ATHLET network………... 5-43

Fig. 5- 46 LBE velocity provided by ATHLET to the inlet opening of the CFD domain……… 5-43

Fig. 5- 47 LBE absolute pressure provided by ATHLET to the outlet opening of the CFD domain………... 5-44

Fig. 5- 48 LBE mass flow rate provided by ANSYS CFX to the lower edge of ATHLET network……… 5-44

Fig. 5- 49 LBE volume fraction distribution plotted 1 second (on the left side) and 14 seconds

(on the right side) after the beginning of the simulation……….……. 5-45

Fig. 5- 50 LBE velocity vector distribution plotted 1 second (on the left side) and 14 seconds

(on the right side) after the beginning of the simulation……….. 5-47

Fig. 5- 51 Closed loop configuration used in the coupled code simulations……….... 5-49

Fig. 5- 52 LBE absolute pressure provided by ANSYS CFX to the upper edge of ATHLET network……… 5-49

Fig. 5- 53 LBE velocity provided by ATHLET to the inlet opening of the CFD domain………... 5-49

Fig. 5- 54 LBE absolute pressure provided by ATHLET to the outlet opening of the CFD domain……….….. 5-50

Fig. 5- 55 LBE mass flow rate provided by ANSYS CFX to the lower edge of ATHLET network……… 5-50

Fig. 5- 56 Main pump rotation velocity during the first transient simulation………... 5-51

Fig. 5- 57 LBE mass flow rate obtained in the closed loop……….. 5-51

Fig. 5- 58 LBE absolute pressure obtained at the inlet and outlet boundaries of the CFD domain………. 5-51

Fig. 5- 59 LBE volume fraction distribution plotted 5 second (on the left side) and 19 seconds

(on the right side) after the beginning of the simulation……….. 5-52

Fig. 5- 60 Main pump rotation velocity during the second transient simulation……….. 5-53

Fig. 5- 61 LBE mass flow rate obtained in the closed loop……….. 5-53

Fig. 5- 62 LBE absolute pressure obtained at the inlet and outlet boundaries of the CFD domain………. 5-53

Fig. 5- 63 LBE volume fraction distribution plotted 5 second (on the left side) and 19 seconds

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Au niveau des différences spécifiques, les composantes discrétisantes sont indispensables pour les adjectifs qualificatifs primaires (dont les définitions constituent des

Lo sviluppo delle tecniche costruttive in terra cruda, dalle più semplici alle più complesse, contempla molteplici tipologie, distinguibili spesso in base

There are many methods to obtain particle beams; the application of pulsed laser ablation (PLA) technique (the one that we adopt in this work) allows to get ions from solid

However, the good correlation between transduction velocity and total fiber number implies that the total fiber number may be a better morphological predictor of an effective

The assessment of coherent processing requires a knowledge of the spectrum of the target and clutter in the CUT, as well as their amplitude statistics. There are many

I argue below that we should set aside the ticking bomb scenario because of its unrealistic character, that realistic approximations of the scenario pose an unac- ceptable risk to

One aspect of the increasing view of pressure ulcer development as a marker for quality care has been the increasing level of pressure ulcer litigation against clinicians and

In this research project, I have focused on the analysis of multiple ecosystem services provided in one of the most extended and densely populated area of Italy, the urban