• Non ci sono risultati.

displacement curves obtained from transducers measures for each specimen

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "displacement curves obtained from transducers measures for each specimen"

Copied!
19
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

8.1 Results of the tensile tests on the T-stubs

In the following, the detailed results obtained from the tensile tests performed on the T-stubs are reported.

For each specimen the following data are collected:

the displacement rate ;

the maximum load measured during the tests;

the displacement measured by the three transducers A, B and C (according to Figure 33) associated with the maximum load;

the observed collapse mode;

some notes on the observed collapse and, if needed, on the instruments outputs or malfunctions;

the force vs. displacement curves obtained from transducers measures for each specimen;

the photographs of the specimen during the test and after the collapse has occurred;

the bolts pretorque;

the maximum axial deformation of the bolts measured using the strain gauges installed within each bolt (Figure 33);

the maximum axial load acting in the bolts shank, calculated using the calibration curves previously obtained for each bolt (as reported in the main document);

the force vs. bolt axial load and the force vs. bolt axial deformation curves obtained for each bolt;

the photographs of each bolt after the collapse has occurred.

Figure 33: The instruments set-up

(2)

C-01 326,90 487,95 8,12 8,15 9,60 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: collapse of bolt B followed by the collapse of bolt A

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(3)

C-01 bolt A 0,55 4257,3 346,51

C-01 bolt B 0,55 4387,7 257,50

Bolt C-01 A after the collapse Bolt C-01 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-01 Bolt A C-01 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-01 Bolt A

C-01 Bolt B

εy εy

(4)

C-02 326,90 502,99 9,66 0,02(*) 11,44 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: contemporaneous collapse of both bolts (*) measures of transducer B are not available

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer C

(5)

C-02 bolt A 0,55 4773,4 254,06

C-02 bolt B 0,55 4742,3 267,32

Bolt C-02 A after the collapse Bolt C-02 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-02 Bolt A C-02 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-02 Bolt A

C-02 Bolt B

εy εy εy εy

(6)

C-03 326,90 510,92 10,35 9,40 11,04 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: collapse of bolt A followed by the collapse of bolt B

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(7)

C-03 bolt A 0,55 5338,2 301,31

C-03 bolt B 0,55 5580,9 322,50

Bolt C-03 A after the collapse Bolt C-03 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load(kN) C-03 Bolt A C-03 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-03 Bolt A

C-03 Bolt B

εy

(8)

C-05 0,07 458,42 13,54 11,84 14,68 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: collapse of bolt A followed by the collapse of bolt B

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(9)

C-05 bolt A 0,55 6659,9 382,30

C-05 bolt B 0,55 7857,9 458,17

Bolt C-05 A after the collapse Bolt C-05 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-05 Bolt A C-05 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-05 Bolt A

C-05 Bolt B

εy

(10)

C-06 0,07 441,19 12,56 8,33 7,06 Collapse mode: mode 2 (more pronounced)

Note: collapse of bolt A

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force (kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(11)

C-06 bolt A 0,55 5563,9 301,57

C-06 bolt B 0,55 4730,0 257,04

Bolt C-06 A after the collapse Bolt C-06 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-06 Bolt A C-06 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-06 Bolt A

C-06 Bolt B

εy

(12)

C-07 0,07 465,53 7,47 7,27 10,33 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: collapse of bolt B

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(13)

C-07 bolt A 0,55 4268,9 238,85

C-07 bolt B 0,55 4106,8 236,5

Bolt C-07 A after the collapse Bolt C-07 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-07 Bolt A C-07 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-07 Bolt A

C-07 Bolt B

εy εy εy εy

(14)

C-08 160,00 445,35 8,05 6,84 6,74 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: contemporaneous collapse of both bolts

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(15)

C-08 bolt A 0,55 4838,1 258,89

C-08 bolt B 0,55 5163,1 273,34

Bolt C-08 A after the collapse Bolt C-08 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-08 Bolt A C-08 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-08 Bolt A

C-08 Bolt B

εy

(16)

C-09 160,00 487,30 6,88 6,82 8,52 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending markedly to mode 3)

Note: contemporaneous collapse of both bolts

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(17)

C-09 bolt A 0,55 4966,7 264,03

C-09 bolt B 0,55 5053,4 276,25

Bolt C-09 A after the collapse Bolt C-09 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-09 Bolt A C-09 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-09 Bolt A

C-09 Bolt B

εy εy εy εy

(18)

C-10 160,00 479,81 6,30 6,61 8,98 Collapse mode: mode 2 (tending to mode 3)

Note: collapse of bolt B followed by the collapse of bolt A

Specimen during the test Specimen after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Force(kN)

Displacement (mm)

Transducer A Transducer B Transducer C

(19)

C-10 bolt A 0,55 3721,2 291,46

C-10 bolt B 0,55 4696,4 261,19

Bolt C-10 A after the collapse Bolt C-10 B after the collapse 0

100 200 300 400 500 600

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial load (kN) C-10 Bolt A C-10 Bolt B

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

Force(kN)

Bolt's axial deformation (µm/m) C-10 Bolt A

C-10 Bolt B

εy εy εy εy εy εy εy εy

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

This study demonstrates a parameter, the C/M ratio, that can be easily calculated from 9@'Tc-sestaimbi SPECT images for use in identifying patients with abnormal LVEF directly from

Ainsi, le volume de la migration hautement qualifiée vers la Tunisie entre mai 2007 et mai 2008 est estimé à 2 340 migrants dont 1 230, soit 52,6% du total, ont seulement le diplôme

The Bellah scheme demonstrated that with a good community organization and management, mini grids powered by pico and micro hydropower plants could be very successful..

The purpose of this study is to compare the sensitivity of ActiveAx model with that one of DTI, in microstructural characterization, using a clinically feasible

5. la quantità minima di ore dedicate all’inglese pari al 25% dell’orario settimanale; 6. la presenza nell’istituzione scolastica di assistenti di lingua inglese. Il progetto è

[113] Tao, J., Zhu, Y., and Fan, Q., “Improved state space model predictive control design for linear systems with partial actuator failure,” Ind. D., “Fault-Tolerant Economic

We use this dataset to compute the tuning constant c (Huber loss function is going to adopted), the R 2 goodness-of-fit measure, the LR-type test for specifying the