Application Layer 2-1
Chapter 2 part B: outline
2.3 FTP
2.4 electronic mail
SMTP, POP3, IMAP
2.5 DNS
FTP: the file transfer protocol
file transfer
FTP server FTP
user interface
FTP client
local file system
remote file system user
at host
transfer file to/from remote host client/server model
client: side that initiates transfer (either to/from remote) server: remote host
ftp: RFC 959
ftp server: port 21
Application Layer 2-3
FTP: separate control, data connections
FTP client contacts FTP server at port 21, using TCP
client authorized over control connection
client browses remote directory, sends commands over control connection when server receives file transfer command, server opens 2
ndTCP data
connection (for file) to client after transferring one file, server closes data connection
FTP client
FTP server
TCP control connection,server port 21
TCP data connection, server port 20
server opens another TCP data connection to transfer another file
control connection: “ out of band ”
FTP server maintains
“ state ” : current directory, earlier authentication
FTP commands, responses
sample commands:
sent as ASCII text over control channel
USER username PASS password LIST return list of file in current directory
RETR filename retrieves (gets) file
STOR filename stores (puts) file onto remote host
sample return codes
status code and phrase (as in HTTP)
331 Username OK, password required 125 data
connection already open;
transfer starting
425 Can ’ ’ ’ ’ t open
data connection
452 Error writing
file
Application Layer 2-5
Chapter 2 part B: outline
2.3 FTP
2.4 electronic mail
SMTP, POP3, IMAP
2.5 DNS
Electronic mail
Three major components:
user agents mail servers
simple mail transfer protocol: SMTP
User Agent
a.k.a. “ mail reader ”
composing, editing, reading mail messages
e.g., Outlook, Thunderbird, iPhone mail client
outgoing, incoming
messages stored on server
user mailbox outgoing message queue
mail server
mail server
mail server
SMTP SMTP SMTP
user agent
user agent
user agent
user agent
user agent
user agent
Application Layer 2-7
Electronic mail: mail servers
mail servers:
mailbox contains incoming messages for user
message queue of outgoing (to be sent) mail messages SMTP protocol between mail servers to send email messages
client: sending mail server
“ server ” : receiving mail server
mail server
mail server
mail server
SMTP SMTP SMTP
user agent
user agent
user agent
user agent
user agent
user agent
Electronic Mail: SMTP [RFC 2821]
uses TCP to reliably transfer email message from client to server, port 25
direct transfer: sending server to receiving server
three phases of transfer
handshaking (greeting) transfer of messages closure
command/response interaction (like HTTP, FTP )
commands: ASCII text
response: status code and phrase
messages must be in 7-bit ASCI
Application Layer 2-9
user agent
Scenario: Alice sends message to Bob
1) Alice uses UA to compose message “ to ”
bob@someschool.edu 2) Alice ’ s UA sends message to her mail server; message placed in message queue 3) client side of SMTP opens
TCP connection with Bob ’ s mail server
4) SMTP client sends Alice ’ s message over the TCP connection
5) Bob ’ s mail server places the message in Bob ’ s mailbox 6) Bob invokes his user agent
to read message
mail server
mail server 1
2 3 4
5
6
Alice’s mail server Bob’s mail server
user agent
Sample SMTP interaction
S: 220 hamburger.edu C: HELO crepes.fr
S: 250 Hello crepes.fr, pleased to meet you C: MAIL FROM: <alice@crepes.fr>
S: 250 alice@crepes.fr... Sender ok C: RCPT TO: <bob@hamburger.edu>
S: 250 bob@hamburger.edu ... Recipient ok C: DATA
S: 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself C: Do you like ketchup?
C: How about pickles?
C: .
S: 250 Message accepted for delivery C: QUIT
S: 221 hamburger.edu closing connection
Application Layer 2-11
Try SMTP interaction for yourself:
telnet servername 25 see 220 reply from server
enter HELO, MAIL FROM, RCPT TO, DATA, QUIT commands
above lets you send email without using email client (reader)
SMTP: final words
SMTP uses persistent connections
SMTP requires message (header & body) to be in 7-bit ASCII
SMTP server uses CRLF.CRLF to
determine end of message
comparison with HTTP:
HTTP: pull SMTP: push both have ASCII command/response interaction, status codes HTTP: each object encapsulated in its own response msg
SMTP: multiple objects
sent in multipart msg
Application Layer 2-13
Mail message format
SMTP: protocol for exchanging email msgs RFC 822: standard for text
message format:
header lines, e.g.,
To:
From:
Subject:
different from SMTP MAIL FROM, RCPT TO:
commands!
Body: the “ message ”
ASCII characters only
header
body
blank line
Mail access protocols
SMTP: delivery/storage to receiver ’ s server mail access protocol: retrieval from server
POP: Post Office Protocol [RFC 1939]: authorization, download
IMAP: Internet Mail Access Protocol [RFC 1730]: more features, including manipulation of stored msgs on server
HTTP: gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo! Mail, etc.
sender’s mail server
SMTP SMTP mail access
protocol
receiver’s mail server
(e.g., POP, IMAP) user
agent
user agent
Application Layer 2-15
POP3 protocol
authorization phase
client commands:
user: declare username pass: password server responses
+OK -ERR
transaction phase, client:
list: list message numbers retr: retrieve message by number
dele: delete quit
C: list S: 1 498 S: 2 912 S: . C: retr 1
S: <message 1 contents>
S: . C: dele 1 C: retr 2
S: <message 1 contents>
S: . C: dele 2 C: quit
S: +OK
POP3 server signing offS: +OK POP3 server ready C: user bob
S: +OK
C: pass hungry
S: +OK
user successfully logged onPOP3 (more) and IMAP
more about POP3
previous example uses POP3 “ download and delete ” mode
Bob cannot re-read e- mail if he changes client
POP3 “ download-and- keep ” : copies of messages on different clients
POP3 is stateless across sessions
IMAP
keeps all messages in one place: at server
allows user to organize messages in folders keeps user state across sessions:
names of folders and
mappings between
message IDs and folder
name
Application Layer 2-17
Chapter 2 part B: outline
2.3 FTP
2.4 electronic mail
SMTP, POP3, IMAP
2.5 DNS
2.6 P2P applications 2.7 socket programming
with UDP and TCP
DNS: domain name system
people: many identifiers:
SSN, name, passport # Internet hosts, routers:
IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams
“ name ” , e.g., www.yahoo.com - used by humans Q: how to map between IP
address and name, and vice versa ?
Domain Name System:
distributed database
implemented in hierarchy of many name servers
application-layer protocol: hosts, name servers communicate to resolve names (address/name translation)
note: core Internet function, implemented as application- layer protocol
complexity at network ’ s
“ edge ”
Application Layer 2-19
DNS: services, structure
why not centralize DNS?
single point of failure traffic volume
distant centralized database maintenance
DNS services
hostname to IP address translation
host aliasing
canonical, alias names
mail server aliasing load distribution
replicated Web servers: many IP addresses correspond to one name
A: doesn ’ t scale!
Root DNS Servers
com DNS servers org DNS servers edu DNS servers
poly.edu DNS servers
umass.edu DNS servers yahoo.com
DNS servers
amazon.com DNS servers
pbs.org DNS servers
DNS: a distributed, hierarchical database
client wants IP for www.amazon.com; 1
stapprox:
client queries root server to find com DNS server
client queries .com DNS server to get amazon.com DNS server client queries amazon.com DNS server to get IP address for www.amazon.com
… …
Top-Level Domain servers
Authorative DNS servers
Application Layer 2-21
DNS: root name servers
contacted by local name server that can not resolve name root name server:
contacts authoritative name server if name mapping not known gets mapping
returns mapping to local name server
13 root name
“ servers ” worldwide (labeled from A to M)
a. Verisign, Los Angeles CA (5 other sites) b. USC-ISI Marina del Rey, CA l. ICANN Los Angeles, CA
(41 other sites) e. NASA Mt View, CA f. Internet Software C.
Palo Alto, CA (and 48 other sites)
i. Netnod, Stockholm (37 other sites) k. RIPE London (17 other sites)
m. WIDE Tokyo (5 other sites) c. Cogent, Herndon, VA (5 other sites)
d. U Maryland College Park, MD h. ARL Aberdeen, MD
j. Verisign, Dulles VA (69 other sites )
g. US DoD Columbus, OH (5 other sites)
TLD, authoritative servers
top-level domain (TLD) servers:
responsible for com, org, net, edu, aero, jobs, museums, and all top-level country domains, e.g.: uk, fr, ca, jp Network Solutions maintains servers for .com TLD Educause for .edu TLD
authoritative DNS servers:
organization ’ s own DNS server(s), providing
authoritative hostname to IP mappings for organization ’ s named hosts
can be maintained by organization or service provider
Application Layer 2-23
Local DNS name server
does not strictly belong to hierarchy
each ISP (residential ISP, company, university) has one
also called “ default name server ”
when host makes DNS query, query is sent to its local DNS server
has local cache of recent name-to-address translation pairs (but may be out of date!)
acts as proxy, forwards query into hierarchy
requesting host
cis.poly.edugaia.cs.umass.edu
root DNS server
local DNS server
dns.poly.edu1 2
3 4
5
6
authoritative DNS server dns.cs.umass.edu 8 7
TLD DNS server
DNS name
resolution example
host at cis.poly.edu wants IP address for gaia.cs.umass.edu
iterated query:
contacted server replies with name of server to contact
“ I don ’ t know this
name, but ask this
server ”
Application Layer 2-25
5 4 6
3
recursive query:
puts burden of name resolution on
contacted name server
heavy load at upper levels of hierarchy?
requesting host
cis.poly.edugaia.cs.umass.edu
root DNS server
local DNS server
dns.poly.edu1 2
7
authoritative DNS server dns.cs.umass.edu 8
DNS name
resolution example
TLD DNS server
DNS: caching, updating records
once (any) name server learns mapping, it caches mapping
cache entries timeout (disappear) after some time (TTL) TLD servers typically cached in local name servers
• thus root name servers not often visited
cached entries may be out-of-date (best effort name-to-address translation!)
if name host changes IP address, may not be known Internet-wide until all TTLs expire
update/notify mechanisms proposed IETF standard
RFC 2136
Application Layer 2-27
DNS protocol, messages
query and reply messages, both with same message format
msg header
identification: 16 bit # for query, reply to query uses same #
flags:
query or reply recursion desired recursion available reply is authoritative
identification flags
# questions
questions (variable # of questions)
# additional RRs
# authority RRs
# answer RRs
answers (variable # of RRs)
authority (variable # of RRs)
additional info (variable # of RRs)
2 bytes 2 bytes
name, type fields for a query RRs in response to query records for authoritative servers additional “ helpful ” info that may be used
identification flags
# questions
questions (variable # of questions)
# additional RRs
# authority RRs
# answer RRs
answers (variable # of RRs)
authority (variable # of RRs)
additional info (variable # of RRs)
DNS protocol, messages
2 bytes 2 bytes