• Non ci sono risultati.

17 Regulation of TRAIL-Induced

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "17 Regulation of TRAIL-Induced "

Copied!
7
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

From: Cancer Drug Discovery and Development: Death Receptors in Cancer Therapy Edited by: W. S. El-Deiry © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ

297

17 Regulation of TRAIL-Induced

Apoptosis by Transcriptional Factors

Rüdiger Göke and Youhai H. Chen, MD , P h D

TRAIL AND ITS RECEPTORS

In 1995, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) was identified based on its sequence homology to other TNF family members (1). Among members of the TNF family, TRAIL shares the highest sequence homology with Fas ligand (FasL, CD95L). However, unlike FasL, TRAIL appears to induce apoptosis of tumor cells but not most normal cells (2). To date, five receptors for TRAIL have been cloned: TRAIL-R1 (DR4, Apo2A) (3), TRAIL-R2 (DR5, TRICK, Killer) (3–8), TRAIL- R3 (DcR1, TRID, LIT) (6–9), TRAIL-R4 (DcR2, TRUNDD) (10), and osteoprotegerin (OPG) (11). Unlike other TRAIL receptors, which bind only to TRAIL, osteoprotegerin also binds to osteoprotegerin ligand (OPGL), TRANCE, and RANK ligand (RANKL).

TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 contain intracellular death domains and induce, via coupling

with intracellular adaptor proteins, the proteolytic cleavage of caspase-8 (12). Caspase-

8 activation initiates the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways, resulting in caspase-

3 cleavage, which is an irreversible step in a cell’s commitment to apoptosis. Other

TRAIL receptors do not generate death signals because TRAIL-R3 does not contain a

death domain and is attached to the membrane by a glycolipid anchor (6,9), whereas the

death domain of TRAIL-R4 is not functional (10) and OPG exists only in a soluble form

(11). Therefore, TRAIL-R3 and TRAIL-R4 might act as decoy receptors by competing

with other TRAIL receptors for TRAIL. The expression pattern of TRAIL receptors on

certain cell lines might determine their sensitivity to TRAIL. However, the expression of

TRAIL decoy receptors is not always related to a cell’s resistance to TRAIL-induced

apoptosis (13). Other factors may, therefore, play more decisive roles in determining a

cell’s sensitivity to TRAIL. In this review, we will focus on NF-gB and PPAR-a, two

transcription factors that were recently found to play important roles in TRAIL-induced

apoptosis.

(2)

ROLES OF NF-gB IN TRAIL-INDUCED APOPTOSIS

The Rel/NF-gB family of transcription factors regulates a number of biological pro- cesses, including cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, immune response, and inflammation (14–16). Rel/NF-gB are normally present in the cytoplasm in association with a family of inhibitors (IgBs) that mask their nuclear localization sequences (17,18).

Activation of IgB kinase (IKK) leads to phosphorylation and degradation of IgBs. As a result, Rel/NF-gB are released and translocated to the nucleus, where they bind to DNA and induce the transcription of target genes (15).

Rel/NF-gB induce the expression of a number of anti-apoptotic genes, including cellular inhibitors of apoptosis (cIAPs), mitochondrial proteins of the Bcl

2

family such as Bfl-1/A1 and Bcl-X

L

, A20, manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), IEX-1L, caspase 8/FADD-like IL-1`-converting enzyme (FLICE)-inhibitory protein (c-FLIP), TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) and 2 (TRAF2), and TRAIL receptor 3 (16,19–

30). Numerous studies exist which demonstrate that Rel/NF-gB inhibit programmed cell death induced by TNF-_, anticancer drugs, and ionizing radiation (16,31–33).

Recently, it has also become clear that Rel/NF-gB regulate TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

Thus, treatment of TRAIL-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line L3.6 with TRAIL and the NF-gB inhibitor NBD (NEMO-binding domain) peptide significantly decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis (34). This effect was most likely due to decreased FLIP levels in L3.6 cells as a result of NF-gB inhibition. Prostate cancer cell lines PC3AR and PC3Neo show different TRAIL sensitivities, which are associated with a difference in NF-gB levels in these cells (35). Blocking NF-gB function by adenoviral transfer of mutated I gB increased apoptotic responses, suggesting a direct role for NF-gB in this system.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease. TRAIL might represent a new treatment option, since it kills most MM cell lines and MM cells freshly isolated from patients. Treatment with the NF- gB inhibitor SN50 enhanced TRAIL-induced apoptosis in sensitive cells and reversed resistance of ARH-77 and IM-9 MM cells (36). Interest- ingly, treatment with SN50 did not sensitize normal B-lymphocytes towards TRAIL- induced apoptosis. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) promotes proliferation of MM cells and protects them against TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In a recent study, IGF-1 was shown to activate NF-gB and upregulate the expression of survival factors FLIP, survivin, cIAP-2, A1/Bfl-1, and XIAP (37). Overexpression of Akt decreased TRAIL sensitivity of MM cells. Interestingly, treatment of cells with an Akt inhibitor abrogated NF-gB activation and prevented the protective effect. These data show that besides NF- gB, the PI-3K/Akt pathway is also involved in the regulation of TRAIL sensitivity. An important role for NF-gB in TRAIL-induced apoptosis has also been demonstrated in lymphoid cell lines. Thus, acute T-cell leukemia cells (CEM, Jurkat) and BJAB cells (Burkitt lymphoma) treated with NF-gB inhibitors showed a significantly increased sensitivity towards TRAIL (38,39).

It has been previously reported that TRAIL, but not other TNF family members,

induces apoptosis in the majority of melanoma cell lines (40–44). The mechanisms of

TRAIL resistance of some melanoma cells are not well understood. Lack of response to

TRAIL was partially due to a loss of TRAIL receptor expression (41). However, a clear

correlation between expression of TRAIL decoy receptors and TRAIL resistance could

(3)

not be established (13). In a recent study, pretreatment of melanoma cell lines with the proteasome inhibitor -acetyl-

L

-leucinyl-

L

-leucinyl-

L

-norleucinal (LLnL), which also inhibits NF-gB, sensitized 10 of 12 cell lines to TRAIL-induced apoptosis (45). Further- more, TRAIL resistant melanoma cells generated by intermittent TRAIL exposure exhib- ited elevated levels of activated NF-gB. Resistance in these cell lines could be reversed by LLnL and by a degradation-resistant form of IgB_(45). These results suggest that NF- gB significantly influences TRAIL sensitivity in melanoma cells. Reports on renal cancer cells provide contradictory results. Whereas Pawlowski et al. reported that neither acti- vation nor inhibition of NF-gB signal transduction pathway protected renal carcinoma cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis (46), a recent report shows that constitutive activa- tion of NF-gB prevents TRAIL-induced apoptosis in these cells (47).

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a proinflammatory lipid mediator that acts via a G protein-coupled receptor. Activation of epidermal PAF receptor results in protection against TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Recently, this effect was shown to be NF-gB-dependent since it could be antagonized by a super-repressor form of IgB (48). Therefore, it seems that G protein-coupled receptors like the PAF receptor are able to block TRAIL-in- duced apoptosis in a NF-gB-dependent manner.

Various subunits of NF-gB can have different effects on the cellular response to TRAIL. Thus, the c-Rel subunit promotes TRAIL-induced cell death by increasing the expression of TRAIL receptors 1 and 2; the Rel-A subunit blocks TRAIL-induced apoptosis by increasing Bcl-X

L

expression (49). However, further investigation is needed to establish the specific roles of each NF-gB subunit in TRAIL-induced apoptosis.

ROLES OF PPAR-a IN TRAIL-INDUCED APOPTOSIS

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. PPARs form a subfamily consisting of PPAR- _, PPAR-6, and PPAR-a(50). PPAR-a is highly expressed in adipose tissues but also present in intestine, mammary gland, endothelial and smooth muscle cells, monocytes, macrophages, and a number of other cell types (51–58). PPAR- a exists in two isoforms, PPAR-a1 and PPAR-a2, which are produced from a single gene as a result of the utilization of different promoters and alternative splicing (51). PPAR- a forms a dimer with the retinoid X receptor. This complex binds to the promoter region of specific target genes. Binding of PPAR-a ligands leads to conformational changes resulting in activation of the target genes. PPAR-a plays an important role in cell growth and differentiation, lipid metabolism, and inflammation (59,60).

PPAR-a is highly expressed in several cancer cell lines, including breast cancer (53,61–

63), prostate cancer (64,65), pancreatic cancer (66), gastric cancer (67), colon cancer (68,69), liposarcoma (70), bladder cancer (71), lung cancer (72), and related cancer tissues from patients (64,68,70). Activation of PPAR-a resulted in suppression of cell growth, induction of apoptosis, promotion of terminal differentiation, and morphological changes to a well differentiated and less malignant state (50,60,73).

The mechanisms by which PPAR-a ligands promote apoptosis are not well under-

stood. PPAR-a ligands were shown to up-regulate Bax and Bad protein levels and

downregulate Bcl

2

(61,74). However, in other studies PPAR-a ligands had no effect on

Bax and Bcl

2

mRNA expressions (75–77). While troglitazone and pioglitazone were

(4)

shown to increase the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21

WAF/CIP1

and p16

INK4

(71,78), troglitazone did not change p21

WAF/CIP1

levels in smooth muscle cells (75). Furthermore, PPAR-a ligand-induced inhibition of NF-gB-dependent transcription might be mediated by PPAR-a-independent mechanisms (58,79). Thus, further investi- gations are needed to elucidate the proapoptotic activities of PPAR-a ligands.

TRAIL holds tremendous promise for cancer therapy because of its ability to selec- tively kill transformed cells but not normal cells. However, not all tumor cells are equally sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Using Jurkat cells, we showed that pioglitazone inhibits cell growth and sensitizes them for TRAIL-induced apoptosis (39). Similar results were obtained in carcinoid cells that are normally resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis (78). In carcinoid cells, pioglitazone treatment upregulated p21

WAF/CIP1

ex- pression. Because overexpression of p21

WAF/CIP1

by adenoviral gene transfer sensitized cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, the proapoptotic effect of pioglitazone might be mediated by p21

WAF/CIP1

in carcinoid cells. Recently, the sensitizing effect of PPAR-a ligands on TRAIL-induced apoptosis was also observed in prostate and ovarian cancer cell lines (80). In these cells, PPAR-a ligands induced ubiquitination and proteasome- dependent degradation of FLIP without affecting FLIP mRNA levels. Interestingly, this effect was not related to NF-gB, independent of PPAR-a expression, and could be ob- served even in the presence of a PPAR-a dominant-negative mutant, indicating a novel PPAR-a-independent mechanism. This assertion is supported by a recent study in which the PPAR-a agonist bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE) induces apoptosis in Jurkat cells independent of PPAR-a, in both caspase-dependent and -independent manners (81).

In summary, transcription factors NF-gB and PPAR-a play important roles in the regulation of programmed cell death. Recent studies strongly suggest that while PPAR- a promotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis, NF-gB inhibits it. Therefore, NF-gB inhibitors and PPAR-a agonists may be used as enhancers for TRAIL-based cancer therapy.

REFERENCES

1. Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, et al. Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity 1995;3:673–82.

2. Walczak H, Krammer PH. The CD95 (APO-1/Fas) and the TRAIL (APO-2L) apoptosis systems. Exp Cell Res 2000;256:58–66.

3. Pan G, O’Rourke K, Chinnaiyan AM, et al. The receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL. Science 1997;276:111–113.

4. Walczak H, Degli-Esposti MA, Johnson RS, et al. TRAIL-R2: a novel apoptosis-mediating receptor for TRAIL. EMBO J 1997;16:5386–5397.

5. Sheridan JP, Marsters SA, Pitti RM, et al. Control of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by a family of signaling and decoy receptors. Science 1997;277:818–821.

6. Schneider P, Bodmer JL, Thome M, Hofmann K, Holler N, Tschopp J. Characterization of two receptors for TRAIL. FEBS Letters 1997;416:329–334.

7. Screaton GR, Mongkolsapaya J, Xu XN, Cowper AE, McMichael AJ, Bell JI. TRICK2, a new alterna- tively spliced receptor that transduces the cytotoxic signal from TRAIL. Curr Biol 1997;7:693–696.

8. Wu GS, Burns TF, McDonald III ER, et al. Killer/DR5 is a DNA damage-inducible p53-regulated death receptor gene. Nat Genet 1997;17:141–143.

9. Degli-Espost MA, Smolak PJ, Walczak H, et al. Cloning and characterization of TRAIL-R3, a novel member of the emerging TRAIL receptor family. J Exp Med 1997;186:1165–1170.

10. Degli-Esposti MA, Dougall WC, Smolak PJ, Waugh JY, Smith CA, Goodwin RG. The novel receptor TRAIL-R4 induces NF-gB and protects against TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, yet retains an incomplete death domain. Immunity 1997;7:813–820.

(5)

11. Emery JG, McDonnell P, Burke MB, et al. Osteoprotegerin is a receptor for the cytotoxic ligand TRAIL.

J Biol Chem 1998;273:14,363–14,367.

12. Srivastava RK. Intracellular mechanisms of TRAIL and its role in cancer therapy. Mol Cell Biol Res Commun 2000;4:67–75.

13. Griffith TS, Lynch DH. TRAIL: a molecule with multiple receptors and control mechanisms. Curr Opin Immunol 1998;10:559–563.

14. Ghosh S, May MJ, Kopp EB. NF-kappa B and Rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune responses. Ann Rev Immun 1998;16:225–260.

15. Bours V, Bentires AM, Hellin AC, et al. Nuclear factor-kappa B, cancer, and apoptosis. Biochem Pharma 2000;60:1085–1089.

16. Karin M, Lin A. NF-kappaB at the crossroads of life and death. 2002;3:221–227.

17. Verma IM, Stevenson JK, Schwarz EM, Van_Antwerp D, Miyamoto S. Rel/NF-kappa B/I kappa B family: intimate tales of association and dissociation. Genes Dev 1995;9:2723–2735.

18. Karin M. The beginning of the end: IkappaB kinase (IKK) and NF-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem 1999;274:27,339–27,342.

19. Wang CY, Mayo MW, Korneluk RG, Goeddel DV, Baldwin AS. NF-kappaB antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science 1998;281:

1680–1683.

20. Stehlik C, de Martin R, Kumabashiri I, Schmid JA, Binder BR, Lipp J. Nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB- regulated X-chromosome-linked iap gene expression protects endothelial cells from tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis. J Exp Med 1998;188:211–216.

21. Zong WX, Edelstein LC, Chen C, Bash J, Gelinas C. The prosurvival Bcl-2 homolog Bfl-1/A1 is a direct transcriptional target of NF-kappaB that blocks TNFalpha-induced apoptosis. Genes Dev 1999;

13:382–387.

22. Grumont RJ, Rourke IJ, Gerondakis S. Rel-dependent induction of A1 transcription is required to protect B cells from antigen receptor ligation-induced apoptosis. Genes Dev 1999;13:400–411.

23. Chen F, Demers LM, Vallyathan V, Lu Y, Castranova V, Shi X. Involvement of 5'-flanking kappaB-like sites within bcl-x gene in silica-induced Bcl-x expression. J Biol Chem 1999;274:35,591–35,595.

24. Lee HH, Dadgostar H, Cheng Q, Shu J, Cheng G. NF-kappaB-mediated up-regulation of Bcl-x and Bfl-1/A1 is required for CD40 survival signaling in B lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:9136–9141.

25. Tamatani M, Che YH, Matsuzaki H, et al. Tumor necrosis factor induces Bcl-2 and Bcl-x expression through NFkappaB activation in primary hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem 1999;274:8531–8538.

26. Krikos A, Laherty CD, Dixit VM. Transcriptional activation of the tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducible zinc finger protein, A20, is mediated by kappa B elements. J Biol Chem 1992;267:17,971–17,976.

27. Jones PL, Ping D, Boss JM. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1beta regulate the murine manganese superoxide dismutase gene through a complex intronic enhancer involving C/EBP-beta and NF-kappaB. Mol Cell Biol 1997;17:6970–6981.

28. Wu MX, Ao Z, Prasad KV, Wu R, Schlossman SF. IEX-1L, an apoptosis inhibitor involved in NF- kappaB-mediated cell survival. Science 1998;281:998–1001.

29. Kreuz S, Siegmund D, Scheurich P, Wajant H. NF-kappaB inducers upregulate cFLIP, a cycloheximide- sensitive inhibitor of death receptor signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:3964–3973.

30. Bernard D, Quatannens B, Vandenbunder B, Abbadie C. Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors protect against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis by up-regulating the TRAIL decoy receptor DcR1. J Biol Chem 2001;276:27,322–27,328.

31. Wang CY, Mayo MW, Baldwin AS. TNF- and cancer therapy-induced apoptosis: potentiation by inhibition of NF-kappaB. Science 1996;274:784–787.

32. Wang CY, Cusack JC, Liu R, Baldwin AS. Control of inducible chemoresistance: enhanced anti-tumor therapy through increased apoptosis by inhibition of NF-kappaB. Nature Med 1999;5:412–417.

33. Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR, Li ZW. NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit.

Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:301–310.

34. Thomas RP, Farrow BJ, Kim S, May MJ, Hellmich MR, Evers BM. Selective targeting of the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway enhances tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-mediated pancreatic cancer cell death. Surgery 2002;132:127–134.

35. Eid MA, Lewis RW, Abdel_Mageed AB, Kumar MV. Reduced response of prostate cancer cells to TRAIL is modulated by NFkappaB-mediated inhibition of caspases and Bid activation. Internat J Oncol 2002;21:111–117.

(6)

36. Mitsiades CS, Treon SP, Mitsiades N, et al. TRAIL/Apo2L ligand selectively induces apoptosis and overcomes drug resistance in multiple myeloma: therapeutic applications. Blood 2001;98:795–804.

37. Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades N, Poulaki V, et al. Activation of NF-kappaB and upregulation of intracellular anti-apoptotic proteins via the IGF-1/Akt signaling in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic im- plications. Oncogene 2002;21:5673–5683.

38. Jeremias I, Herr I, Boehler T, Debatin KM. TRAIL/Apo-2-ligand-induced apoptosis in human T cells.

Eur J Immunol 1998;28:143–152.

39. Göke R, Göke A, Göke B, Chen Y. Regulation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis by transcription factors. Cell Immunol 2000;201:77–82.

40. Thomas WD, Hersey P. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis in Fas ligand-resistant melanoma cells and mediates CD4 T cell killing of target cells. J Immunol 1998;161:2195–2200.

41. Zhang XD, Franco A, Myers K, Gray C, Nguyen T, Hersey P. Relation of TNF-related apoptosis- inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor and FLICE-inhibitory protein expression to TRAIL-induced apoptosis of melanoma. Cancer Res 1999;59:2747–2753.

42. Zhang XD, Franco AV, Nguyen T, Gray CP, Hersey P. Differential localization and regulation of death and decoy receptors for TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in human melanoma cells. J Immun 2000;164:3961–3970.

43. Thomas WD, Smith MJ, Si Z, Hersey P. Expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD40 on melanoma cells. Internat J Cancer 1996;68:795–801.

44. Thomas WD, Hersey P. CD4 T cells kill melanoma cells by mechanisms that are independent of Fas (CD95). Internat J Cancer 1998;75:384–390.

45. Franco AV, Zhang XD, Van_Berkel E, et al. The role of NF-kappa B in TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis of melanoma cells. J Immunol 2001;166:5337–5345.

46. Pawlowski JE, Nesterov A, Scheinman RI, Johnson TR, Kraft AS. NF-kappa B does not modulate sensitivity of renal carcinoma cells to TNF alpha-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Antican- cer Res 2000;20:4243–4255.

47. Oya M, Ohtsubo M, Takayanagi A, Tachibana M, Shimizu N, Murai M. Constitutive activation of nuclear factor-kappaB prevents TRAIL-induced apoptosis in renal cancer cells. Oncogene 2001;

20:3888–3896.

48. Southall MD, Isenberg JS, Nakshatri H, et al. The platelet-activating factor receptor protects epidermal cells from tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis through an NF-kappa B-dependent process. J Biol Chem 2001;276:45,548–45,554.

49. Ravi R, Bedi GC, Engstrom LW, et al. Regulation of death receptor expression and TRAIL/Apo2L- induced apoptosis by NF-kappaB. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:409–416.

50. Desvergne B, Wahli W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism.

Endocrine Rev 1999;20:649–688.

51. Tontonoz P, Hu E, Graves RA, Budavari AI, Spiegelman BM. mPPAR gamma 2: tissue-specific regu- lator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes Dev 1994;8:1224–1234.

52. Mansen A, Guardiola_Diaz H, Rafter J, Branting C, Gustafsson JA. Expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) in the mouse colonic mucosa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;222:844–851.

53. Mueller E, Sarraf P, Tontonoz P, et al. Terminal differentiation of human breast cancer through PPAR gamma. Mol Cell 1998;1:465–470.

54. Delerive P, Martin-Nizard F, Chinetti G, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators inhibit thrombin-induced endothelin-1 production in human vascular endothelial cells by inhibiting the activator protein-1 signaling pathway. Circ Res (Online) 1999;85:394–402.

55. Marx N, Schonbeck U, Lazar MA, Libby P, Plutzky J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators inhibit gene expression and migration in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res (Online) 1998;83:1097–1103.

56. Ricote M, Li AC, Wilson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-g is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature 1998;391:79–82.

57. Marx N, Sukhova G, Murphy C, Libby P, Plutzky J. Macrophages in human atheroma contain PPARgamma: differentiation-dependent peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) expression and reduction of MMP-9 activity through PPARgamma activation in mono- nuclear phagocytes in vitro. Am J Pathol 1998;153:17–23.

(7)

58. Chinetti G, Griglio S, Antonucci M, et al. Activation of proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma induces apoptosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages. J Biol Chem 1998;273:25,573–25,580.

59. Chinetti G, Fruchart JC, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): nuclear recep- tors at the crossroads between lipid metabolism and inflammation. Inflam Res 2000;49:497–505.

60. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. PPARgamma: a nuclear regulator of metabolism, differentiation, and cell growth. J Biol Chem 2001;276:37,731–37,734.

61. Elstner E, Muller C, Koshizuka K, et al. Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorgamma and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:8806–8811.

62. Badawi AF, Badr MZ. Chemoprevention of breast cancer by targeting cyclooxygenase-2 and peroxi- some proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (Review). Int J Oncol 2002;20:1109–1122.

63. Elstner E, Williamson EA, Zang C, et al. Novel therapeutic approach: ligands for PPARgamma and retinoid receptors induce apoptosis in bcl-2-positive human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;74:155–165.

64. Mueller E, Smith M, Sarraf P, et al. Effects of ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in human prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10,990–10,995.

65. Hisatake JI, Ikezoe T, Carey M, Holden S, Tomoyasu S, Koeffler HP. Down-regulation of prostate- specific antigen expression by ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2000;60:5494–5498.

66. Eibl G, Wente MN, Reber HA, Hines OJ. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma induces pancreatic cancer cell apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;287:522–529.

67. Takahashi N, Okumura T, Motomura W, Fujimoto Y, Kawabata I, Kohgo Y. Activation of PPARgamma inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells. FEBS Lett 1999;455:135–139.

68. Sarraf P, Mueller E, Jones D, et al. Differentiation and reversal of malignant changes in colon cancer through PPARgamma. Nature Med 1998;4:1046–1052.

69. Yang WL, Frucht H. Activation of the PPAR pathway induces apoptosis and COX-2 inhibition in HT- 29 human colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2001;22:1379–1383.

70. Tontonoz P, Singer S, Forman BM, et al. Terminal differentiation of human liposarcoma cells induced by ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and the retinoid X receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:237–241.

71. Guan YF, Zhang YH, Breyer RM, Davis L, Breyer MD. Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) in human transitional bladder cancer and its role in inducing cell death.

Neoplasia 1999;1:330–339.

72. Tsubouchi Y, Sano H, Kawahito Y, et al. Inhibition of human lung cancer cell growth by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists through induction of apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;270:400–405.

73. Fujiwara T, Horikoshi H. Troglitazone and related compounds: therapeutic potential beyond diabetes.

Life Sci 2000;67:2405–2416.

74. Zander T, Kraus JA, Grommes C, et al. Induction of apoptosis in human and rat glioma by agonists of the nuclear receptor PPARgamma. J Neurochem 2002;81:1052–1060.

75. Okura T, Nakamura M, Takata Y, Watanabe S, Kitami Y, Hiwada K. Troglitazone induces apoptosis via the p53 and Gadd45 pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharm 2000;407:227–235.

76. Ohta K, Endo T, Haraguchi K, Hershman JM, Onaya T. Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human papillary thyroid carcinoma cells. J Clin Endocrin Metab 2001;86:2170–2177.

77. Toyoda M, Takagi H, Horiguchi N, et al. A ligand for peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in human liver cancer cells. Gut 2002;50:563–567.

78. Göke R, Göke A, Göke B, El-Deiry WS, Chen Y. Pioglitazone inhibits growth of carcinoid cells and promotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis by induction of p21waf1/cip1. Digestion 2001;64:75–80.

79. Straus DS, Pascual G, Li M, et al. 15-deoxy-delta 12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits multiple steps in the NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:4844–4849.

80. Kim Y, Suh N, Sporn M, Reed JC. An inducible pathway for degradation of FLIP protein sensitizes tumor cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem 2002;277:22,320–22,329.

81. Fehlberg S, Trautwein S, Göke A, Göke R. Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether induces apoptosis in tumour cells independently of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, in caspase-dependent and - independent manners. Biochem J 2002;362:573–578.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

showed chronic in filtration with a large amount of eosinophils around numerous helminth forms identi fied as larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis ( Figure 1 b, c).. The diagnosis

In this thesis we presented the numerical implementation of a framework that unifies Dark Energy and Modified Gravity models, the Effective Field The- ory of Cosmic Acceleration,

Anthurium chucantiense is characterized by its epiphytic habit, short stems (ca. 10 cm long), short internodes at apex of stem, brown cataphylls persisting as fibers at younger

Thyroid hormone levels have been reported to be normal, increased, and decreased in obese patients (4); this discrepancy among studies probably reflects the fact that patients

Data distribution in a connected element interferometer is governed by two considerations; all the inputs for the same frequency channels for each time step must be presented to

Gli altri tre, invece, hanno ritenuto fosse la sequenza di lettere il compito maggiormente importante o più coinvolgente, cercando di selezionare la lettera della sequenza tra

Tale diffi coltà diventa ancora più evidente se si considera la ricaduta pubblica delle immagini e degli immaginari sociali e il fatto che proprio i repertori di sapere simbolico