Observation of the decay Λ b0 → ψ(2S)pπ−

JHEP08(2018)131

Published for SISSA by Springer

Received: June 22, 2018 Accepted: August 9, 2018 Published: August 21, 2018

Observation of the decay Λ

0_b

→ ψ(2S)pπ

−

The LHCb collaboration

E-mail: Ivan.Belyaev@itep.ru

Abstract: The Cabibbo-suppressed decay Λ0b → ψ(2S)pπ− is observed for the first time

using a data sample collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions cor-responding to 1.0, 2.0 and 1.9 fb−1 of integrated luminosity at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV, respectively. The ψ(2S) mesons are reconstructed in the µ+_µ− _final

state. The branching fraction with respect to that of the Λ0_b → ψ(2S)pK− decay mode is measured to be B Λ0 b → ψ(2S)pπ −
B Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pK−
= (11.4 ± 1.3 ± 0.2)% ,

where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. The ψ(2S)p and ψ(2S)π− mass spectra are investigated and no evidence for exotic resonances is found.

Keywords: B physics, Flavor physics, Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments), Spectroscopy

JHEP08(2018)131

Contents

1 Introduction 1

2 Detector and simulation 2

3 Event selection 3

4 Signal yields and efficiencies 4

5 Systematic uncertainties 6

6 Results and summary 7

The LHCb collaboration 12

1 Introduction

The Λ0_b baryon is the isospin-singlet ground state of a bound system of a beauty quark and two light quarks. The high production rate of b quarks at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1–5], along with the excellent mass resolution and hadron-identification capabil-ities of the LHCb detector, give access to a variety of decay channels of the Λ0

b baryon,

including multibody, rare, charmless and semileptonic decays [6–25]. The high signal yield of the Λ0_b → J/ψ pK− _{decay [15] facilitated a precise measurement of the Λ}0

b lifetime [26],

while the relatively low energy released in the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK− and Λ0_b→ χcpK− decays

allowed for precise measurements of the Λ0_b mass [16, 22]. A six-dimensional amplitude analysis of the Λ0_b→ J/ψ pK− _{decay resulted in the observation of the P}

c(4380)+ and

Pc(4450)+ pentaquark states decaying into the J/ψ p final state [27]. Later, these states

were confirmed using a model-independent technique [28]. Subsequently, an analysis of Cabibbo-suppressed Λ0_b → J/ψ pπ− _{decays found evidence for contributions from}

the Pc(4380)+ and Pc(4450)+ pentaquarks and from the Zc(4200)− tetraquark [29].

The first observation of Λ0

b decays to the excited charmonium state ψ(2S) was made

in the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)Λ decay mode by the ATLAS collaboration [30]. Later, the decay Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK− _{was observed by the LHCb collaboration [16]. The Cabibbo-suppressed}

analogue of the latter decay, Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ−, is of particular interest because of possible contributions from exotic states in both the ψ(2S)p system, similar to the Pc(4380)+ and

Pc(4450)+ pentaquark states, and in the ψ(2S)π− system, analogous to the charged

char-monium-like state Zc(4430)− studied in detail by the Belle and LHCb collaborations in

B → ψ(2S)π−K decays [31–35]. Depending on the nature of a proposed exotic state, its coupling with the ψ(2S) meson can be larger than with the J/ψ meson. For example,

JHEP08(2018)131

the decay rate of the X(3872) particle to the ψ(2S)γ final state was found to exceed the corresponding decay rate to the J/ψ γ final state [36,37].

This paper reports the first observation of the decay Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− using a data sample collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions corresponding to 1.0, 2.0 and 1.9 fb−1 of integrated luminosity at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV, respectively. A measurement is made of the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− _{branching fraction relative to}

that of the Cabibbo-favoured decay Λ0

b→ ψ(2S)pK−, Rπ/K≡ B Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pπ −
B Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pK−
, (1.1)

where the ψ(2S) mesons are reconstructed in the µ+µ− final state. Throughout this paper the inclusion of charge-conjugated processes is implied.

2 Detector and simulation

The LHCb detector [38, 39] is a single-arm forward spectrometer covering the pseudo-rapidity range 2 < η < 5, designed for the study of particles containing b or c quarks. The detector includes a high-precision tracking system consisting of a silicon-strip vertex detector surrounding the pp interaction region, a large-area silicon-strip detector located upstream of a dipole magnet with a bending power of about 4 Tm, and three stations of silicon-strip detectors and straw drift tubes placed downstream of the magnet. The track-ing system provides a measurement of the momentum of charged particles with a relative uncertainty that varies from 0.5% at low momentum to 1.0% at 200 GeV/c. The minimum distance of a track to a primary vertex (PV), the impact parameter (IP), is measured with a resolution of (15 + 29/pT) µm, where pT is the component of the momentum transverse

to the beam, in GeV/c. Different types of charged hadrons are distinguished using informa-tion from two ring-imaging Cherenkov detectors (RICH). Photons, electrons and hadrons are identified by a calorimeter system consisting of scintillating-pad and preshower detec-tors, an electromagnetic calorimeter and a hadronic calorimeter. Muons are identified by a system composed of alternating layers of iron and multiwire proportional chambers.

The online event selection is performed by a trigger [40], which consists of a hardware stage, based on information from the calorimeter and muon systems, followed by a software stage, which applies a full event reconstruction. The hardware trigger selects muon candi-dates with high transverse momentum or dimuon candicandi-dates with high value of the product of the pT of each muon. The subsequent software trigger is composed of two stages, the

first of which performs a partial event reconstruction, while full event reconstruction is done at the second stage. In the software trigger, each pair of oppositely charged muons forming a good-quality two-track vertex is required to be significantly displaced from all PVs and the mass of the pair is required to exceed 2.7 GeV/c2.

The techniques used in this analysis are validated using simulated events. In the simula-tion, pp collisions are generated using Pythia [41] with a specific LHCb configuration [42]. Decays of hadronic particles are described by EvtGen [43], in which final-state radiation

JHEP08(2018)131

is generated using Photos [44]. The interaction of the generated particles with the de-tector, and its response, are implemented using the Geant4 toolkit [45, 46] as described in ref. [47].

3 Event selection

The signal Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ−and the normalization Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK− decays are both recon-structed using the decay mode ψ(2S) → µ+µ−. Similar selection criteria, based on those used in ref. [16], are applied to both channels.

Muon, proton, pion and kaon candidates are identified using combined information from the RICH, calorimeter and muon detectors. They are required to have a transverse momentum larger than 550, 900, 500 and 200 MeV/c, respectively. To allow for an efficient particle identification, kaons and pions are required to have a momentum between 3.2 and 150 GeV/c, whilst protons must have a momentum between 10 and 150 GeV/c. To reduce the combinatorial background due to particles produced in the pp interaction, only tracks that are inconsistent with originating from a PV are used.

Pairs of oppositely charged muons consistent with originating from a common vertex are combined to form ψ(2S) → µ+µ− candidates. The mass of the dimuon candidate is required to be between 3.67 and 3.70 GeV/c2_{, where the asymmetric mass range around}

the known ψ(2S) mass [48] is chosen to account for final-state radiation. The position of the reconstructed dimuon vertex is required to be inconsistent with that of any of the reconstructed PVs.

To form signal (normalization) Λ0_b candidates, the selected ψ(2S) candidates are com-bined with a proton and a pion (kaon) of opposite charges. Each Λ0_b candidate is associated with the PV with respect to which it has the smallest χ2

IP, where χ2IP is defined as the

dif-ference in the vertex-fit χ2 of a given PV reconstructed with and without the particle under consideration. To improve the Λ0_bmass resolution, a kinematic fit [49] is performed. This fit constrains the four charged final-state particles to form common vertex, the mass of the µ+µ−combination to the known ψ(2S) mass and the Λ0_bcandidate to originate from the associated PV. A good quality of this fit is required to further suppress combinatorial background. In addition, the measured decay time of the Λ0_b candidate, calculated with respect to the associated PV, is required to be between 0.2 and 2.0 mm/c to suppress poorly reconstructed candidates and background from particles originating from the PV.

To suppress cross-feed from B0 _{→ ψ(2S)K}+_π− _{decays with the positively charged}

kaon (negatively charged pion) misidentified as a proton (antiproton) for the signal (nor-malization) channel, a veto is applied on the Λ0_b candidate mass recalculated with a kaon (pion) mass hypothesis for the proton. Any candidate with a recalculated mass consistent with the nominal B0 mass is rejected. A similar veto is applied to suppress cross-feed from B0_s → ψ(2S)K−_K+_{decays with the positively charged kaon misidentified as a proton,}

and additionally for the signal channel, the negatively charged kaon misidentified as a pion. Finally, to suppress cross-feed from the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)Λ decay, followed by a Λ → pπ− decay, candidates with a pπ− mass that is consistent with the nominal Λ mass [48] are rejected.

JHEP08(2018)131

5.6 5.65 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 5.6 5.65 1 10 2 10 3 10 Candidates/(5 Me V /c 2) Candidates/(2 Me V /c 2 ) mψ(2S)pπ− GeV/c2 m_ψ(2S)pK− GeV/c2 LHCb LHCb Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pπ − background total fit Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pK − background total fit q data q data

Figure 1. Mass distributions of the (left) Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ−_{and (right) Λ}0

b→ ψ(2S)pK−candidates.

4 Signal yields and efficiencies

The mass distributions for the selected Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− _{and Λ}0

b→ ψ(2S)pK− candidates

are shown in figure 1. The signal yields are determined using unbinned extended maxi-mum-likelihood fits to these distributions. For each distribution the Λ0_b component is de-scribed by a modified Gaussian function with power-law tails on both sides [50,51]. The tail parameters are fixed to values obtained from simulation, and the peak position and reso-lution of the Gaussian function are free to vary in the fit. The combinatorial background component is described by a monotonic second-order polynomial function with positive cur-vature. The resolution parameters obtained from the fits are found to be 5.23 ± 0.55 MeV/c2 for the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− _{channel and 3.96 ± 0.13 MeV/c}2 _{for the Λ}0

b→ ψ(2S)pK− channel,

which are in good agreement with expectations from simulation. The signal yields are determined to be 121 ± 13 and 806 ± 29 for the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− and Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK−decay modes, respectively.

The resonance structure of the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− decay is investigated using the sPlot technique [52] for background subtraction, with the reconstructed ψ(2S)pπ− mass as the discriminating variable. The background-subtracted mass distributions of ψ(2S)p, ψ(2S)π− and pπ−combinations are shown in figure2, along with those obtained from sim-ulated decays generated according to a phase-space model. The ψ(2S)p and ψ(2S)π−mass distributions show no evidence for contributions from exotic states. The mass distribution of the pπ− combination differs from the phase-space model, indicating possible contribu-tions from excited N0and ∆0states. Further studies with a larger data sample will provide a deeper insight into the underlying structure of the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− decay.

The ratio of branching fractions Rπ/K, defined in eq. (1.1), is measured as

Rπ/K = N_Λ0 b→ψ(2S)pπ− N_Λ0 b→ψ(2S)pK − ε_Λ0 b→ψ(2S)pK− ε_Λ0 b→ψ(2S)pπ − , (4.1)

JHEP08(2018)131

4.8 5 5.2 5.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4 4.2 4.4 4.6 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 NΛ 0 b / (50 Me V /c 2) NΛ 0 b / (50 Me V /c 2) NΛ 0/ b (50 Me V /c 2 )

mψ(2S)pGeV/c2 mψ(2S)π−GeV/c2 m_pπ− GeV/c2

LHCb LHCb LHCb

simulation simulation simulation

q data q data q data

Figure 2. Background-subtracted mass distributions of the (left) ψ(2S)p, (centre) ψ(2S)π− and (right) pπ+_{combinations in the Λ}0

b→ ψ(2S)pπ− decay compared with distributions obtained from

a phase-space simulation.

where N represents the measured yield and ε denotes the efficiency of the corresponding decay. The efficiency is defined as the product of the geometric acceptance and the detec-tion, reconstrucdetec-tion, selection and trigger efficiencies. The hadron-identification efficien-cies as functions of kinematics and the event multiplicity are determined from data us-ing the followus-ing calibration samples of low-background decays: D∗+→ D0_{(→ K}−_π+_)π+_,

K0S→ π

+_π− _{and D}+

s → φ(→ K+K−)π+ for kaons and pions; and Λ → pπ− and

Λ+_c → pK+_π− _{for protons [53, 54]. The remaining efficiencies are determined using}

sim-ulation. The pT and rapidity spectra and the lifetime of the Λ0b baryons in simulated

samples are adjusted to match those observed in a high-yield low-background sample of reconstructed Λ0_b→ J/ψ pK− decays. The simulated samples are produced according to a phase-space decay model. The simulated Λ0_b → ψ(2S)pK− decays are corrected to reproduce the pK− mass and cos θ_pK− distributions observed in data, where θ_pK− is

the helicity angle of the pK− system, defined as the angle between the momentum vec-tors of the kaon and Λ0_b baryon in the pK− rest frame. To account for imperfections in the simulation of charged tracks, corrections obtained using data-driven techniques are also applied [55].

The efficiencies are determined separately for each data-taking period and are combined according to the corresponding luminosity [56] for each period and the known production cross-section of bb pairs in the LHCb acceptance [1–5]. The ratio of the total efficiency of the normalization channel to that of the signal channel is determined to be

ε_Λ0 b→ψ(2S)pK − ε_Λ0 b→ψ(2S)pπ− = 0.761 ± 0.004 , (4.2)

where only the uncertainty that arises from the sizes of the simulated samples is given. Additional sources of uncertainty are discussed in the following section. The kaon identi-fication efficiency, entering into ε_Λ0

b→ψ(2S)pK

−, is the main factor causing non-equality of

JHEP08(2018)131

5 Systematic uncertainties

Since the signal and normalization decay channels have similar kinematics and topologies, most systematic uncertainties cancel in the ratio R_π/K, e.g. those related to muon identi-fication. The remaining contributions to the systematic uncertainty are listed in table 1

and discussed below.

To estimate the systematic uncertainty related to the fit model, pseudoexperiments are sampled from the baseline fit models with all parameters fixed from those obtained from the fits to the data. For each pseudoexperiment fits are performed with a number of alternative models for the signal and background components and the ratio R_π/K is computed. A generalized Student’s t-distribution [57] and an Apollonios function [58] are used as alternative models for the signal component, while polynomial functions of the second and the third order with various constraints for monotonicity and convexity are used as alternative backgrounds. The maximum relative bias found for Rπ/K is 0.7%,

which is assigned as a relative systematic uncertainty.

The uncertainty related to the imperfect knowledge of the Λ0_b decay model used for the simulation of the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK− _{decays is estimated by varying the correction}

factors obtained from kinematic distributions observed in data. Changing these correc-tion factors within their statistical uncertainties causes a negligible variacorrec-tion of the effi-ciency ε_Λ0

b→ψ(2S)pK−. For the Λ

0

b→ ψ(2S)pπ− signal decays the observed two-body mass

distributions are in agreement with the phase-space model used in the simulation. The cor-responding uncertainty due to the unknown decay kinematics of the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ−_signal

decays is small and therefore neglected.

An additional uncertainty arises from the differences between data and simulation, in particular those affecting the efficiency for the reconstruction of charged-particle tracks. The small difference in the track-finding efficiency between data and simulation is corrected using a data-driven technique [55]. The uncertainties in these correction factors together with the uncertainties in the hadron-identification efficiencies, related to the finite size of the calibration samples [53,54], are propagated to the ratio of total efficiencies by means of pseudoexperiments. This results in a systematic uncertainty of 0.2% associated with the track reconstruction and hadron identification.

The systematic uncertainty on the efficiency of the trigger has been previously studied using high-yield B+_{→ J/ψ K}+ _{and B}+_{→ ψ(2S)K}+ _{decays by comparing ratios of trigger}

efficiencies in data and simulation [59]. Based on these comparisons a relative uncertainty of 1.1% is assigned.

Another source of uncertainty is the potential disagreement between data and simula-tion in the estimasimula-tion of efficiencies, due to effects not considered above. This is studied using a high-yield low-background sample of Λ0_b→ J/ψ pK−decays, by varying the selection criteria in ranges that lead to as much as ±20% differences in the measured signal yields. The resulting variations in the efficiency-corrected yields do not exceed 1% for all inspected selection criteria. The value of 1% is taken as a corresponding systematic uncertainty.

Finally, the 0.5% relative uncertainty in the ratio of efficiencies from eq. (4.2) is assigned as a systematic uncertainty due to the finite size of the simulated samples.

JHEP08(2018)131

Source Uncertainty [%]

Fit model 0.7

Track reconstruction and hadron identification 0.2

Trigger 1.1

Selection criteria 1.0

Size of the simulation samples 0.5

Total 1.7

Table 1. Relative systematic uncertainties for the ratio of branching fractions. The total uncer-tainty is the quadratic sum of the individual contributions.

6 Results and summary

The Cabibbo-suppressed decay Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− is observed using a data sample collected by the LHCb experiment in proton-proton collisions corresponding to 1.0, 2.0 and 1.9 fb−1 of integrated luminosity at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV, respectively. The ob-served yield of Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− _{decays is 121 ± 13. Using the Λ}0

b→ ψ(2S)pK− decay as

a normalization channel, the ratio of the branching fractions is measured to be Rπ/K = B Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pπ −
B Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pK−
= (11.4 ± 1.3 ± 0.2)% ,

where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. Neglecting the reso-nance structures in the Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ− and Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK− decays, the calculated value for the ratio R_π/K is

R_π/Kth ≈ Φ3 Λ 0 b→ ψ(2S)pπ −
Φ3 Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK−
× tan 2_θ C' 11% ,

where Φ3 denotes the full three-body phase-space and θC is the Cabibbo angle [60].

The measured value is in a good agreement with this estimate. The branching fraction B Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ−

is calculated using the value of B Λ0 b→ ψ(2S)pK−
= 6.29 ± 0.23 ± 0.14+1.14−0.90
× 10−5 [16] as B Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pπ−
= 7.17 ± 0.82 ± 0.33+1.30 −1.03
× 10 −6 ,

where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic (including the statistical and systematic uncertainties from B Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK−
_{) and the third arises from the}

uncer-tainties in the branching fractions of the Λ0

b→ J/ψ pK−, ψ(2S) → J/ψ π+π−, ψ(2S) → e+e−

and J/ψ → e+e− decays [48].

The ψ(2S)p and ψ(2S)π− mass spectra are investigated and no evidence for contribu-tions from exotic states is found. With a larger data sample a detailed amplitude analysis of this decay could be performed, making it possible to search for small contributions from exotic states.

JHEP08(2018)131

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC. We thank the technical and administrative staff at the LHCb institutes. We acknowledge support from CERN and from the national agencies: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERJ and FINEP (Brazil); MOST and NSFC (China); CNRS/IN2P3 (France); BMBF, DFG and MPG (Germany); INFN (Italy); NWO (Netherlands); MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MEN/IFA (Romania); MinES and FASO (Russia); MinECo (Spain); SNSF and SER (Switzerland); NASU (Ukraine); STFC (United Kingdom); NSF (U.S.A.). We acknowledge the computing resources that are provided by CERN, IN2P3 (France), KIT and DESY (Germany), INFN (Italy), SURF (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), GridPP (United Kingdom), RRCKI and Yandex LLC (Russia), CSCS (Switzerland), IFIN-HH (Romania), CBPF (Brazil), PL-GRID (Poland) and OSC (U.S.A.). We are indebted to the communities behind the multiple open-source software packages on which we depend. Individual groups or members have received support from AvH Foundation (Germany), EPLANET, Marie Sk lodowska-Curie Actions and ERC (European Union), ANR, Labex P2IO and OCEVU, and R´egion Auvergne-Rhˆone-Alpes (France), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of CAS, CAS PIFI, and the Thousand Talents Program (China), RFBR, RSF and Yandex LLC (Russia), GVA, XuntaGal and GENCAT (Spain), Herchel Smith Fund, the Royal Society, the English-Speaking Union and the Leverhulme Trust (United Kingdom).

Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

[1] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of σ(pp → bbX) at√s = 7 TeV in the forward region, Phys. Lett. B 694 (2010) 209[arXiv:1009.2731] [INSPIRE].

[2] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of J/ψ production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV ,Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1645[arXiv:1103.0423] [INSPIRE].

[3] LHCb collaboration, Production of J/ψ and Υ mesons in pp collisions at√s = 8 TeV , JHEP 06 (2013) 064[arXiv:1304.6977] [INSPIRE].

[4] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of forward J/ψ production cross-sections in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV ,JHEP 10 (2015) 172[Erratum ibid. 05 (2017) 063] [arXiv:1509.00771]

[INSPIRE].

[5] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the b-quark production cross-section in

7 and 13 TeV pp collisions,Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 052002[Erratum ibid. 119 (2017) 169901] [arXiv:1612.05140] [INSPIRE].

[6] LHCb collaboration, Measurements of the branching fractions for B(s)→ D(s)πππ and

Λ0_b→ Λ+

cπππ,Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 092001[Erratum ibid. D 85 (2012) 039904]

JHEP08(2018)131

[7] LHCb collaboration, Measurements of the Λ0

b→ J/ψ Λ decay amplitudes and the

Λ0

b polarisation in pp collisions at

√

s = 7 TeV ,Phys. Lett. B 724 (2013) 27 [arXiv:1302.5578] [INSPIRE].

[8] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the differential branching fraction of the decay Λ0

b→ Λµ+µ−, Phys. Lett. B 725 (2013) 25[arXiv:1306.2577] [INSPIRE].

[9] LHCb collaboration, Study of beauty baryon decays to D0ph− and Λ+ch− final states, Phys.

Rev. D 89 (2014) 032001[arXiv:1311.4823] [INSPIRE].

[10] LHCb collaboration, Searches for Λ0

b and Ξ0b decays to K0Spπ

− _{and K}0

SpK

− _{final states with}

first observation of the Λ0_b→ K0

Spπ

− _{decay,JHEP 04 (2014) 087[arXiv:1402.0770]}

[INSPIRE].

[11] LHCb collaboration, Study of beauty hadron decays into pairs of charm hadrons,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 202001[arXiv:1403.3606] [INSPIRE].

[12] LHCb collaboration, Study of the kinematic dependences of Λ0

b production in pp collisions

and a measurement of the Λ0

b→ Λ+cπ− branching fraction,JHEP 08 (2014) 143

[arXiv:1405.6842] [INSPIRE].

[13] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the Λ0

b→ J/ψ pπ

− _{decay,JHEP 07 (2014) 103}

[arXiv:1406.0755] [INSPIRE].

[14] LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of Λ0

b→ Λµ

+_µ− _{decays,JHEP 06 (2015) 115[arXiv:1503.07138] [}

INSPIRE].

[15] LHCb collaboration, Study of the productions of Λ0_b and B0hadrons in pp collisions and first measurement of the Λ0

b→ J/ψ pK− branching fraction,Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 011001

[arXiv:1509.00292] [INSPIRE].

[16] LHCb collaboration, Observation of Λ0_b→ ψ(2S)pK− _{and Λ}0

b→ J/ψ π

+_π−_pK− _{decays and}

a measurement of the Λ0

bbaryon mass,JHEP 05 (2016) 132[arXiv:1603.06961] [INSPIRE].

[17] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the Λ0

b→ Λφ decay,Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 282

[arXiv:1603.02870] [INSPIRE].

[18] LHCb collaboration, Observations of Λ0 b→ ΛK

+_π− _{and Λ}0 b→ ΛK

+_K− _{decays and searches}

for other Λ0

band Ξ0b decays to Λh+h− final states,JHEP 05 (2016) 081[arXiv:1603.00413]

[INSPIRE].

[19] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the suppressed decay Λ0 b→ pπ

−_µ+_µ−_{,JHEP 04 (2017)}

029[arXiv:1701.08705] [INSPIRE].

[20] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the decay Λ0_b→ pK−_µ+_µ− _{and a search}

for CP violation,JHEP 06 (2017) 108[arXiv:1703.00256] [INSPIRE].

[21] LHCb collaboration, Study of the D0p amplitude in Λ0_b→ D0_pπ− _{decays,JHEP 05 (2017)}

030[arXiv:1701.07873] [INSPIRE].

[22] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the decays Λ0

b→ χc1pK− and Λ0b→ χc2pK−,Phys. Rev.

Lett. 119 (2017) 062001[arXiv:1704.07900] [INSPIRE].

[23] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the shape of the Λ0 b→ Λ

+

cµ−ν¯µ differential decay rate,

Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 112005[arXiv:1709.01920] [INSPIRE].

[24] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of branching fractions of charmless four-body Λ0_b and Ξ0_b decays,JHEP 02 (2018) 098[arXiv:1711.05490] [INSPIRE].

JHEP08(2018)131

[25] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the decay Λ0

b→ Λ +

cppπ−,Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 101

[arXiv:1804.09617] [INSPIRE].

[26] LHCb collaboration, Precision measurement of the ratio of the Λ0 b to B

0 _{lifetimes,Phys.}

Lett. B 734 (2014) 122[arXiv:1402.6242] [INSPIRE].

[27] LHCb collaboration, Observation of J/ψ p resonances consistent with pentaquark states in Λ0

b→ J/ψ pK− decays,Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 072001[arXiv:1507.03414] [INSPIRE].

[28] LHCb collaboration, Model-independent evidence for J/ψ p contributions to Λ0

b→ J/ψ pK−

decays,Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 082002[arXiv:1604.05708] [INSPIRE].

[29] LHCb collaboration, Evidence for exotic hadron contributions to Λ0

b→ J/ψ pπ− decays,Phys.

Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 082003[arXiv:1606.06999] [INSPIRE].

[30] ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the branching ratio Γ(Λ0

b→ ψ(2S)Λ

0_)/Γ(Λ0

b→ J/ψ Λ

0_{) with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B 751 (2015) 63}

[arXiv:1507.08202] [INSPIRE].

[31] Belle collaboration, S.-K. Choi et al., Observation of a resonancelike structure in the π±ψ0 mass distribution in exclusive B → Kπ±ψ0 decays,Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 142001 [arXiv:0708.1790] [INSPIRE].

[32] Belle collaboration, R. Mizuk et al., Dalitz analysis of B → Kπ+_ψ0 _{decays and}

the Z(4430)+,Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 031104[arXiv:0905.2869] [INSPIRE].

[33] Belle collaboration, K. Chilikin et al., Experimental constraints on the spin and parity of the Z(4430)+,Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 074026[arXiv:1306.4894] [INSPIRE].

[34] LHCb collaboration, Observation of the resonant character of the Z(4430)− state,Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 222002[arXiv:1404.1903] [INSPIRE].

[35] LHCb collaboration, Model-independent confirmation of the Z(4430)− state,Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 112009[arXiv:1510.01951] [INSPIRE].

[36] BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Evidence for X(3872) → ψ(2S)γ

in B±→ X(3872)K± _{decays and a study of B → ccγK,Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 132001}

[arXiv:0809.0042] [INSPIRE].

[37] LHCb collaboration, Evidence for the decay X(3872) → ψ(2S)γ, Nucl. Phys. B 886 (2014) 665[arXiv:1404.0275] [INSPIRE].

[38] LHCb collaboration, The LHCb detector at the LHC,2008 JINST 3 S08005[INSPIRE].

[39] LHCb collaboration, LHCb detector performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530022 [arXiv:1412.6352] [INSPIRE].

[40] R. Aaij et al., The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011,2013 JINST 8 P04022 [arXiv:1211.3055] [INSPIRE].

[41] T. Sj¨_{ostrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A brief introduction to Pythia 8.1,}Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852[arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].

[42] I. Belyaev et al., Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework,J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032047[INSPIRE].

[43] D.J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462 (2001) 152[INSPIRE].

JHEP08(2018)131

[44] P. Golonka and Z. Was, Photos Monte Carlo: A precision tool for QED corrections in Z

and W decays,Eur. Phys. J. C 45 (2006) 97[hep-ph/0506026] [INSPIRE].

[45] Geant4 collaboration, J. Allison et al., Geant4 developments and applications,IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270.

[46] Geant4 collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., Geant4: A simulation toolkit,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250[INSPIRE].

[47] M. Clemencic et al., The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience,J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032023 [INSPIRE].

[48] Particle Data Group, M. Tanabashi et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [http://pdg.lbl.gov/].

[49] W.D. Hulsbergen, Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 552 (2005) 566[physics/0503191] [INSPIRE].

[50] T. Skwarnicki, A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Υ0 and Υ resonances, Ph.D. Thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow (1986), DESY-F31-86-02 [INSPIRE].

[51] LHCb collaboration, Observation of J/ψ -pair production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV , Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 52[arXiv:1109.0963] [INSPIRE].

[52] M. Pivk and F.R. Le Diberder, sPlot: A statistical tool to unfold data distributions,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 555 (2005) 356[physics/0402083] [INSPIRE].

[53] M. Adinolfi et al., Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2431[arXiv:1211.6759] [INSPIRE].

[54] R. Aaij et al., Selection and processing of calibration samples to measure the particle identification performance of the LHCb experiment in Run 2,arXiv:1803.00824[INSPIRE].

[55] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the track reconstruction efficiency at LHCb,2015 JINST 10 P02007[arXiv:1408.1251] [INSPIRE].

[56] LHCb collaboration, Precision luminosity measurements at LHCb,2014 JINST 9 P12005 [arXiv:1410.0149] [INSPIRE].

[57] S. Jackman, Bayesian analysis for the social sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.A. (2009).

[58] D. Mart´ınez Santos and F. Dupertuis, Mass distributions marginalized over per-event errors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 764 (2014) 150[arXiv:1312.5000] [INSPIRE].

[59] LHCb collaboration, Measurement of relative branching fractions of B decays to ψ(2S) and J/ψ mesons,Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2118[arXiv:1205.0918] [INSPIRE].

JHEP08(2018)131

The LHCb collaboration

R. Aaij27, B. Adeva41, M. Adinolfi48, C.A. Aidala73, Z. Ajaltouni5, S. Akar59, P. Albicocco18, J. Albrecht10_{, F. Alessio}42_{, M. Alexander}53_{, A. Alfonso Albero}40_{, S. Ali}27_{, G. Alkhazov}33_,

P. Alvarez Cartelle55_{, A.A. Alves Jr}41_{, S. Amato}2_{, S. Amerio}23_{, Y. Amhis}7_{, L. An}3_,

L. Anderlini17_{, G. Andreassi}43_{, M. Andreotti}16,g_{, J.E. Andrews}60_{, R.B. Appleby}56_{, F. Archilli}27_,

P. d’Argent12, J. Arnau Romeu6, A. Artamonov39, M. Artuso61, K. Arzymatov37, E. Aslanides6, M. Atzeni44_{, B. Audurier}22_{, S. Bachmann}12_{, J.J. Back}50_{, S. Baker}55_{, V. Balagura}7,b_{, W. Baldini}16_,

A. Baranov37_{, R.J. Barlow}56_{, S. Barsuk}7_{, W. Barter}56_{, F. Baryshnikov}70_{, V. Batozskaya}31_,

B. Batsukh61, V. Battista43, A. Bay43, J. Beddow53, F. Bedeschi24, I. Bediaga1, A. Beiter61, L.J. Bel27_{, N. Beliy}63_{, V. Bellee}43_{, N. Belloli}20,i_{, K. Belous}39_{, I. Belyaev}34,42_{, E. Ben-Haim}8_,

G. Bencivenni18_{, S. Benson}27_{, S. Beranek}9_{, A. Berezhnoy}35_{, R. Bernet}44_{, D. Berninghoff}12_,

E. Bertholet8_{, A. Bertolin}23_{, C. Betancourt}44_{, F. Betti}15,42_{, M.O. Bettler}49_{, M. van Beuzekom}27_,

Ia. Bezshyiko44, S. Bhasin48, J. Bhom29, S. Bifani47, P. Billoir8, A. Birnkraut10, A. Bizzeti17,u, M. Bjørn57_{, M.P. Blago}42_{, T. Blake}50_{, F. Blanc}43_{, S. Blusk}61_{, D. Bobulska}53_{, V. Bocci}26_,

O. Boente Garcia41_{, T. Boettcher}58_{, A. Bondar}38,w_{, N. Bondar}33_{, S. Borghi}56,42_{, M. Borisyak}37_,

M. Borsato41_{, F. Bossu}7_{, M. Boubdir}9_{, T.J.V. Bowcock}54_{, C. Bozzi}16,42_{, S. Braun}12_,

M. Brodski42, J. Brodzicka29, A. Brossa Gonzalo50, D. Brundu22, E. Buchanan48, A. Buonaura44, C. Burr56_{, A. Bursche}22_{, J. Buytaert}42_{, W. Byczynski}42_{, S. Cadeddu}22_{, H. Cai}64_,

R. Calabrese16,g_{, R. Calladine}47_{, M. Calvi}20,i_{, M. Calvo Gomez}40,m_{, A. Camboni}40,m_,

P. Campana18, D.H. Campora Perez42, L. Capriotti56, A. Carbone15,e, G. Carboni25, R. Cardinale19,h_{, A. Cardini}22_{, P. Carniti}20,i_{, L. Carson}52_{, K. Carvalho Akiba}2_{, G. Casse}54_,

L. Cassina20_{, M. Cattaneo}42_{, G. Cavallero}19,h_{, R. Cenci}24,p_{, D. Chamont}7_{, M.G. Chapman}48_,

M. Charles8_{, Ph. Charpentier}42_{, G. Chatzikonstantinidis}47_{, M. Chefdeville}4_{, V. Chekalina}37_,

C. Chen3, S. Chen22, S.-G. Chitic42, V. Chobanova41, M. Chrzaszcz42, A. Chubykin33, P. Ciambrone18_{, X. Cid Vidal}41_{, G. Ciezarek}42_{, P.E.L. Clarke}52_{, M. Clemencic}42_{, H.V. Cliff}49_,

J. Closier42_{, V. Coco}42_{, J.A.B. Coelho}7_{, J. Cogan}6_{, E. Cogneras}5_{, L. Cojocariu}32_{, P. Collins}42_,

T. Colombo42, A. Comerma-Montells12, A. Contu22, G. Coombs42, S. Coquereau40, G. Corti42, M. Corvo16,g, C.M. Costa Sobral50, B. Couturier42, G.A. Cowan52, D.C. Craik58, A. Crocombe50, M. Cruz Torres1_{, R. Currie}52_{, C. D’Ambrosio}42_{, F. Da Cunha Marinho}2_{, C.L. Da Silva}74_,

E. Dall’Occo27_{, J. Dalseno}48_{, A. Danilina}34_{, A. Davis}3_{, O. De Aguiar Francisco}42_{, K. De Bruyn}42_,

S. De Capua56, M. De Cian43, J.M. De Miranda1, L. De Paula2, M. De Serio14,d, P. De Simone18, C.T. Dean53_{, D. Decamp}4_{, L. Del Buono}8_{, B. Delaney}49_{, H.-P. Dembinski}11_{, M. Demmer}10_,

A. Dendek30_{, D. Derkach}37_{, O. Deschamps}5_{, F. Desse}7_{, F. Dettori}54_{, B. Dey}65_{, A. Di Canto}42_,

P. Di Nezza18_{, S. Didenko}70_{, H. Dijkstra}42_{, F. Dordei}42_{, M. Dorigo}42,y_{, A. Dosil Su´arez}41_,

L. Douglas53, A. Dovbnya45, K. Dreimanis54, L. Dufour27, G. Dujany8, P. Durante42, J.M. Durham74_{, D. Dutta}56_{, R. Dzhelyadin}39_{, M. Dziewiecki}12_{, A. Dziurda}29_{, A. Dzyuba}33_,

S. Easo51_{, U. Egede}55_{, V. Egorychev}34_{, S. Eidelman}38,w_{, S. Eisenhardt}52_{, U. Eitschberger}10_,

R. Ekelhof10, L. Eklund53, S. Ely61, A. Ene32, S. Escher9, S. Esen27, T. Evans59, A. Falabella15, N. Farley47, S. Farry54, D. Fazzini20,42,i, L. Federici25, P. Fernandez Declara42,

A. Fernandez Prieto41_{, F. Ferrari}15_{, L. Ferreira Lopes}43_{, F. Ferreira Rodrigues}2_{, M. Ferro-Luzzi}42_,

S. Filippov36_{, R.A. Fini}14_{, M. Fiorini}16,g_{, M. Firlej}30_{, C. Fitzpatrick}43_{, T. Fiutowski}30_,

F. Fleuret7,b, M. Fontana22,42, F. Fontanelli19,h, R. Forty42, V. Franco Lima54, M. Frank42, C. Frei42_{, J. Fu}21,q_{, W. Funk}42_{, C. F¨arber}42_{, M. F´eo Pereira Rivello Carvalho}27_{, E. Gabriel}52_,

A. Gallas Torreira41_{, D. Galli}15,e_{, S. Gallorini}23_{, S. Gambetta}52_{, Y. Gan}3_{, M. Gandelman}2_,

P. Gandini21_{, Y. Gao}3_{, L.M. Garcia Martin}72_{, B. Garcia Plana}41_{, J. Garc´ıa Pardi˜nas}44_,

J. Garra Tico49, L. Garrido40, D. Gascon40, C. Gaspar42, L. Gavardi10, G. Gazzoni5, D. Gerick12, E. Gersabeck56_{, M. Gersabeck}56_{, T. Gershon}50_{, D. Gerstel}6_{, Ph. Ghez}4_{, S. Gian`ı}43_{, V. Gibson}49_,

JHEP08(2018)131

O.G. Girard43_{, L. Giubega}32_{, K. Gizdov}52_{, V.V. Gligorov}8_{, D. Golubkov}34_{, A. Golutvin}55,70_,

A. Gomes1,a_{, I.V. Gorelov}35_{, C. Gotti}20,i_{, E. Govorkova}27_{, J.P. Grabowski}12_{, R. Graciani Diaz}40_,

L.A. Granado Cardoso42, E. Graug´es40, E. Graverini44, G. Graziani17, A. Grecu32, R. Greim27, P. Griffith22, L. Grillo56, L. Gruber42, B.R. Gruberg Cazon57, O. Gr¨unberg67, C. Gu3,

E. Gushchin36_{, Yu. Guz}39,42_{, T. Gys}42_{, C. G¨obel}62_{, T. Hadavizadeh}57_{, C. Hadjivasiliou}5_,

G. Haefeli43_{, C. Haen}42_{, S.C. Haines}49_{, B. Hamilton}60_{, X. Han}12_{, T.H. Hancock}57_,

S. Hansmann-Menzemer12, N. Harnew57, S.T. Harnew48, T. Harrison54, C. Hasse42, M. Hatch42, J. He63_{, M. Hecker}55_{, K. Heinicke}10_{, A. Heister}10_{, K. Hennessy}54_{, L. Henry}72_{, E. van Herwijnen}42_,

M. Heß67_{, A. Hicheur}2_{, R. Hidalgo Charman}56_{, D. Hill}57_{, M. Hilton}56_{, P.H. Hopchev}43_{, W. Hu}65_,

W. Huang63_{, Z.C. Huard}59_{, W. Hulsbergen}27_{, T. Humair}55_{, M. Hushchyn}37_{, D. Hutchcroft}54_,

D. Hynds27, P. Ibis10, M. Idzik30, P. Ilten47, K. Ivshin33, R. Jacobsson42, J. Jalocha57, E. Jans27, A. Jawahery60_{, F. Jiang}3_{, M. John}57_{, D. Johnson}42_{, C.R. Jones}49_{, C. Joram}42_{, B. Jost}42_,

N. Jurik57_{, S. Kandybei}45_{, M. Karacson}42_{, J.M. Kariuki}48_{, S. Karodia}53_{, N. Kazeev}37_,

M. Kecke12, F. Keizer49, M. Kelsey61, M. Kenzie49, T. Ketel28, E. Khairullin37, B. Khanji12, C. Khurewathanakul43, K.E. Kim61, T. Kirn9, S. Klaver18, K. Klimaszewski31, T. Klimkovich11, S. Koliiev46_{, M. Kolpin}12_{, R. Kopecna}12_{, P. Koppenburg}27_{, I. Kostiuk}27_{, S. Kotriakhova}33_,

M. Kozeiha5_{, L. Kravchuk}36_{, M. Kreps}50_{, F. Kress}55_{, P. Krokovny}38,w_{, W. Krupa}30_,

W. Krzemien31, W. Kucewicz29,l, M. Kucharczyk29, V. Kudryavtsev38,w, A.K. Kuonen43, T. Kvaratskheliya34,42_{, D. Lacarrere}42_{, G. Lafferty}56_{, A. Lai}22_{, D. Lancierini}44_{, G. Lanfranchi}18_,

C. Langenbruch9_{, T. Latham}50_{, C. Lazzeroni}47_{, R. Le Gac}6_{, A. Leflat}35_{, J. Lefran¸cois}7_,

R. Lef`evre5_{, F. Lemaitre}42_{, O. Leroy}6_{, T. Lesiak}29_{, B. Leverington}12_{, P.-R. Li}63_{, T. Li}3_{, Z. Li}61_,

X. Liang61, T. Likhomanenko69, R. Lindner42, F. Lionetto44, V. Lisovskyi7, X. Liu3, D. Loh50, A. Loi22_{, I. Longstaff}53_{, J.H. Lopes}2_{, G.H. Lovell}49_{, D. Lucchesi}23,o_{, M. Lucio Martinez}41_,

A. Lupato23_{, E. Luppi}16,g_{, O. Lupton}42_{, A. Lusiani}24_{, X. Lyu}63_{, F. Machefert}7_{, F. Maciuc}32_,

V. Macko43, P. Mackowiak10, S. Maddrell-Mander48, O. Maev33,42, K. Maguire56,

D. Maisuzenko33, M.W. Majewski30, S. Malde57, B. Malecki29, A. Malinin69, T. Maltsev38,w, G. Manca22,f_{, G. Mancinelli}6_{, D. Marangotto}21,q_{, J. Maratas}5,v_{, J.F. Marchand}4_{, U. Marconi}15_,

C. Marin Benito7_{, M. Marinangeli}43_{, P. Marino}43_{, J. Marks}12_{, P.J. Marshall}54_{, G. Martellotti}26_,

M. Martin6, M. Martinelli42, D. Martinez Santos41, F. Martinez Vidal72, A. Massafferri1,

M. Materok9_{, R. Matev}42_{, A. Mathad}50_{, Z. Mathe}42_{, V. Matiunin}34_{, C. Matteuzzi}20_{, A. Mauri}44_,

E. Maurice7,b_{, B. Maurin}43_{, A. Mazurov}47_{, M. McCann}55,42_{, A. McNab}56_{, R. McNulty}13_,

J.V. Mead54_{, B. Meadows}59_{, C. Meaux}6_{, F. Meier}10_{, N. Meinert}67_{, D. Melnychuk}31_{, M. Merk}27_,

A. Merli21,q, E. Michielin23, D.A. Milanes66, E. Millard50, M.-N. Minard4, L. Minzoni16,g, D.S. Mitzel12_{, A. Mogini}8_{, J. Molina Rodriguez}1,z_{, T. Momb¨acher}10_{, I.A. Monroy}66_{, S. Monteil}5_,

M. Morandin23_{, G. Morello}18_{, M.J. Morello}24,t_{, O. Morgunova}69_{, J. Moron}30_{, A.B. Morris}6_,

R. Mountain61, F. Muheim52, M. Mulder27, C.H. Murphy57, D. Murray56, A. M¨odden10, D. M¨uller42, J. M¨uller10, K. M¨uller44, V. M¨uller10, P. Naik48, T. Nakada43, R. Nandakumar51, A. Nandi57_{, T. Nanut}43_{, I. Nasteva}2_{, M. Needham}52_{, N. Neri}21_{, S. Neubert}12_{, N. Neufeld}42_,

M. Neuner12_{, T.D. Nguyen}43_{, C. Nguyen-Mau}43,n_{, S. Nieswand}9_{, R. Niet}10_{, N. Nikitin}35_,

A. Nogay69, N.S. Nolte42, D.P. O’Hanlon15, A. Oblakowska-Mucha30, V. Obraztsov39, S. Ogilvy18, R. Oldeman22,f_{, C.J.G. Onderwater}68_{, A. Ossowska}29_{, J.M. Otalora Goicochea}2_{, P. Owen}44_,

A. Oyanguren72_{, P.R. Pais}43_{, T. Pajero}24,t_{, A. Palano}14_{, M. Palutan}18,42_{, G. Panshin}71_,

A. Papanestis51_{, M. Pappagallo}52_{, L.L. Pappalardo}16,g_{, W. Parker}60_{, C. Parkes}56_,

G. Passaleva17,42, A. Pastore14, M. Patel55, C. Patrignani15,e, A. Pearce42, A. Pellegrino27, G. Penso26_{, M. Pepe Altarelli}42_{, S. Perazzini}42_{, D. Pereima}34_{, P. Perret}5_{, L. Pescatore}43_,

K. Petridis48_{, A. Petrolini}19,h_{, A. Petrov}69_{, S. Petrucci}52_{, M. Petruzzo}21,q_{, B. Pietrzyk}4_,

G. Pietrzyk43, M. Pikies29, M. Pili57, D. Pinci26, J. Pinzino42, F. Pisani42, A. Piucci12, V. Placinta32_{, S. Playfer}52_{, J. Plews}47_{, M. Plo Casasus}41_{, F. Polci}8_{, M. Poli Lener}18_,

JHEP08(2018)131

A. Poluektov50_{, N. Polukhina}70,c_{, I. Polyakov}61_{, E. Polycarpo}2_{, G.J. Pomery}48_{, S. Ponce}42_,

A. Popov39_{, D. Popov}47,11_{, S. Poslavskii}39_{, C. Potterat}2_{, E. Price}48_{, J. Prisciandaro}41_,

C. Prouve48, V. Pugatch46, A. Puig Navarro44, H. Pullen57, G. Punzi24,p, W. Qian63, J. Qin63, R. Quagliani8, B. Quintana5, B. Rachwal30, J.H. Rademacker48, M. Rama24, M. Ramos Pernas41, M.S. Rangel2_{, F. Ratnikov}37,x_{, G. Raven}28_{, M. Ravonel Salzgeber}42_{, M. Reboud}4_{, F. Redi}43_,

S. Reichert10_{, A.C. dos Reis}1_{, F. Reiss}8_{, C. Remon Alepuz}72_{, Z. Ren}3_{, V. Renaudin}7_,

S. Ricciardi51, S. Richards48, K. Rinnert54, P. Robbe7, A. Robert8, A.B. Rodrigues43, E. Rodrigues59_{, J.A. Rodriguez Lopez}66_{, M. Roehrken}42_{, A. Rogozhnikov}37_{, S. Roiser}42_,

A. Rollings57_{, V. Romanovskiy}39_{, A. Romero Vidal}41_{, M. Rotondo}18_{, M.S. Rudolph}61_{, T. Ruf}42_,

J. Ruiz Vidal72_{, J.J. Saborido Silva}41_{, N. Sagidova}33_{, B. Saitta}22,f_{, V. Salustino Guimaraes}62_,

C. Sanchez Gras27, C. Sanchez Mayordomo72, B. Sanmartin Sedes41, R. Santacesaria26, C. Santamarina Rios41_{, M. Santimaria}18_{, E. Santovetti}25,j_{, G. Sarpis}56_{, A. Sarti}18,k_,

C. Satriano26,s_{, A. Satta}25_{, M. Saur}63_{, D. Savrina}34,35_{, S. Schael}9_{, M. Schellenberg}10_,

M. Schiller53, H. Schindler42, M. Schmelling11, T. Schmelzer10, B. Schmidt42, O. Schneider43, A. Schopper42, H.F. Schreiner59, M. Schubiger43, M.H. Schune7, R. Schwemmer42, B. Sciascia18, A. Sciubba26,k_{, A. Semennikov}34_{, E.S. Sepulveda}8_{, A. Sergi}47,42_{, N. Serra}44_{, J. Serrano}6_,

L. Sestini23_{, A. Seuthe}10_{, P. Seyfert}42_{, M. Shapkin}39_{, Y. Shcheglov}33,†_{, T. Shears}54_,

L. Shekhtman38,w, V. Shevchenko69, E. Shmanin70, B.G. Siddi16, R. Silva Coutinho44,

L. Silva de Oliveira2_{, G. Simi}23,o_{, S. Simone}14,d_{, N. Skidmore}12_{, T. Skwarnicki}61_{, J.G. Smeaton}49_,

E. Smith9_{, I.T. Smith}52_{, M. Smith}55_{, M. Soares}15_{, l. Soares Lavra}1_{, M.D. Sokoloff}59_,

F.J.P. Soler53_{, B. Souza De Paula}2_{, B. Spaan}10_{, P. Spradlin}53_{, F. Stagni}42_{, M. Stahl}12_{, S. Stahl}42_,

P. Stefko43, S. Stefkova55, O. Steinkamp44, S. Stemmle12, O. Stenyakin39, M. Stepanova33, H. Stevens10_{, S. Stone}61_{, B. Storaci}44_{, S. Stracka}24,p_{, M.E. Stramaglia}43_{, M. Straticiuc}32_,

U. Straumann44_{, S. Strokov}71_{, J. Sun}3_{, L. Sun}64_{, K. Swientek}30_{, V. Syropoulos}28_{, T. Szumlak}30_,

M. Szymanski63, S. T’Jampens4, Z. Tang3, A. Tayduganov6, T. Tekampe10, G. Tellarini16, F. Teubert42, E. Thomas42, J. van Tilburg27, M.J. Tilley55, V. Tisserand5, M. Tobin30, S. Tolk42, L. Tomassetti16,g_{, D. Tonelli}24_{, D.Y. Tou}8_{, R. Tourinho Jadallah Aoude}1_{, E. Tournefier}4_,

M. Traill53_{, M.T. Tran}43_{, A. Trisovic}49_{, A. Tsaregorodtsev}6_{, G. Tuci}24_{, A. Tully}49_{, N. Tuning}27,42_,

A. Ukleja31, A. Usachov7, A. Ustyuzhanin37, U. Uwer12, A. Vagner71, V. Vagnoni15, A. Valassi42, S. Valat42_{, G. Valenti}15_{, R. Vazquez Gomez}42_{, P. Vazquez Regueiro}41_{, S. Vecchi}16_,

M. van Veghel27_{, J.J. Velthuis}48_{, M. Veltri}17,r_{, G. Veneziano}57_{, A. Venkateswaran}61_,

T.A. Verlage9_{, M. Vernet}5_{, M. Veronesi}27_{, N.V. Veronika}13_{, M. Vesterinen}57_,

J.V. Viana Barbosa42, D. Vieira63, M. Vieites Diaz41, H. Viemann67, X. Vilasis-Cardona40,m, A. Vitkovskiy27_{, M. Vitti}49_{, V. Volkov}35_{, A. Vollhardt}44_{, B. Voneki}42_{, A. Vorobyev}33_,

V. Vorobyev38,w_{, J.A. de Vries}27_{, C. V´azquez Sierra}27_{, R. Waldi}67_{, J. Walsh}24_{, J. Wang}61_,

M. Wang3, Y. Wang65, Z. Wang44, D.R. Ward49, H.M. Wark54, N.K. Watson47, D. Websdale55, A. Weiden44, C. Weisser58, M. Whitehead9, J. Wicht50, G. Wilkinson57, M. Wilkinson61, I. Williams49_{, M.R.J. Williams}56_{, M. Williams}58_{, T. Williams}47_{, F.F. Wilson}51,42_,

J. Wimberley60_{, M. Winn}7_{, J. Wishahi}10_{, W. Wislicki}31_{, M. Witek}29_{, G. Wormser}7_,

S.A. Wotton49, K. Wyllie42, D. Xiao65, Y. Xie65, A. Xu3, M. Xu65, Q. Xu63, Z. Xu3, Z. Xu4, Z. Yang3_{, Z. Yang}60_{, Y. Yao}61_{, L.E. Yeomans}54_{, H. Yin}65_{, J. Yu}65,ab_{, X. Yuan}61_,

O. Yushchenko39_{, K.A. Zarebski}47_{, M. Zavertyaev}11,c_{, D. Zhang}65_{, L. Zhang}3_{, W.C. Zhang}3,aa_,

Y. Zhang7_{, A. Zhelezov}12_{, Y. Zheng}63_{, X. Zhu}3_{, V. Zhukov}9,35_{, J.B. Zonneveld}52_{, S. Zucchelli}15

1

Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas F´ısicas (CBPF), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

2 _{Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil} 3 _{Center for High Energy Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China}

4 _{Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IN2P3-LAPP, Annecy, France} 5 _{Clermont Universit´e, Universit´e Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC, Clermont-Ferrand, France}

JHEP08(2018)131

6 _{Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, France}

7 _{LAL, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France} 8

LPNHE, Sorbonne Universit´e, Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France

9

I. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

10

Fakult¨at Physik, Technische Universit¨at Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

11

Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Kernphysik (MPIK), Heidelberg, Germany

12

Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universit¨at Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

13

School of Physics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

14

INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy

15 _{INFN Sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy} 16 _{INFN Sezione di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy} 17 _{INFN Sezione di Firenze, Firenze, Italy}

18 _{INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy} 19 _{INFN Sezione di Genova, Genova, Italy}

20

INFN Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy

21

INFN Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy

22

INFN Sezione di Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy

23

INFN Sezione di Padova, Padova, Italy

24

INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

25

INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy

26

INFN Sezione di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy

27 _{Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, Netherlands}

28 _{Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam,}

Netherlands

29 _{Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krak´ow, Poland} 30 _{AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science,}

Krak´ow, Poland

31

National Center for Nuclear Research (NCBJ), Warsaw, Poland

32

Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania

33

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute (PNPI), Gatchina, Russia

34

Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), Moscow, Russia

35

Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University (SINP MSU), Moscow, Russia

36 _{Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (INR RAS), Moscow, Russia} 37 _{Yandex School of Data Analysis, Moscow, Russia}

38 _{Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia} 39 _{Institute for High Energy Physics (IHEP), Protvino, Russia} 40 _{ICCUB, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain} 41

Instituto Galego de F´ısica de Altas Enerx´ıas (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

42

European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland

43

Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland

44

Physik-Institut, Universit¨at Z¨urich, Z¨urich, Switzerland

45

NSC Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology (NSC KIPT), Kharkiv, Ukraine

46

Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences (KINR), Kyiv, Ukraine

47

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

48 _{H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom} 49 _{Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom} 50 _{Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom} 51 _{STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom}

52

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

53

JHEP08(2018)131

54 _{Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom}

55 _{Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom} 56

School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

57

Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

58

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States

59

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States

60

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States

61

Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States

62

Pontif´ıcia Universidade Cat´olica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, associated to2

63 _{University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, associated to} 3

64 _{School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, associated to}3 65 _{Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China,}

associated to3 66

Departamento de Fisica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia, associated to8

67

Institut f¨ur Physik, Universit¨at Rostock, Rostock, Germany, associated to 12

68

Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, associated to27

69

National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia, associated to34

70

National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Moscow, Russia, associated to34

71

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia, associated to34

72

Instituto de Fisica Corpuscular, Centro Mixto Universidad de Valencia - CSIC, Valencia, Spain, associated to40

73 _{University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States, associated to}61

74 _{Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, United States, associated to} 61 a _{Universidade Federal do Triˆangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba-MG, Brazil}

b

Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, Palaiseau, France

c

P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Science (LPI RAS), Moscow, Russia

d

Universit`a di Bari, Bari, Italy

e

Universit`a di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

f

Universit`a di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

g

Universit`a di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy

h

Universit`a di Genova, Genova, Italy

i _{Universit`a di Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy</sub> j <sub>Universit`a di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy} k _{Universit`a di Roma La Sapienza, Roma, Italy}

l _{AGH - University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science, Electronics and}

Telecommunications, Krak´ow, Poland

m

LIFAELS, La Salle, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain

n

Hanoi University of Science, Hanoi, Vietnam

o

Universit`a di Padova, Padova, Italy

p

Universit`a di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

q

Universit`a degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy

r

Universit`a di Urbino, Urbino, Italy

s

Universit`a della Basilicata, Potenza, Italy

t

Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy

u _{Universit`a di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy}

v _{MSU - Iligan Institute of Technology (MSU-IIT), Iligan, Philippines} w _{Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia}

x _{National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia} y

Sezione INFN di Trieste, Trieste, Italy

z

JHEP08(2018)131

aa _{School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University (SNNU), Xi’an, China}

ab _{Physics and Micro Electronic College, Hunan University, Changsha City, China} †