• Non ci sono risultati.

Epilepsy in Neurodegenerative Dementias: A Clinical, Epidemiological, and EEG Study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Epilepsy in Neurodegenerative Dementias: A Clinical, Epidemiological, and EEG Study"

Copied!
10
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Uncorrected Author Proof

IOS Press

Epilepsy in Neurodegenerative Dementias:

A Clinical, Epidemiological, and EEG

Study

1

2

3

Dario Arnaldi

a,b,∗

, Andrea Donniaquio

a

, Pietro Mattioli

a

, Federico Massa

a

, Matteo Grazzini

a

,

Riccardo Meli

a

, Laura Filippi

a

, Stefano Grisanti

a

, Francesco Fam`a

a,b

, Michele Terzaghi

c,d

,

Nicola Girtler

a,b

, Andrea Brugnolo

a,b

, Elisa Doglione

a

, Matteo Pardini

a,b

, Flavio Villani

b

and Flavio Nobili

a,b 4

5 6 7

aDepartment of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), Clinical Neurology, University of Genoa, Italy

8

bIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy

9

cUnit of Sleep Medicine and Epilepsy, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy

10

dDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

11

Accepted 27 January 2020

Abstract.

12

Background: Seizures are common in patients with dementia but precise epidemiologic data of epilepsy in neurodegenerative

dementia is lacking. 13

14

Objective: The first aim of the study was to investigate prevalence and clinical characteristics of epilepsy in a large cohort

of patients with neurodegenerative dementias. Subsequently, we explored clinical, neuropsychological, and quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) data of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients with epilepsy (AD-EPI) as compared to AD patients without epilepsy (AD-CTR).

15 16 17 18

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with a diagnosis of a neurodegenerative dementia and a clinically

diagnosed epilepsy that required antiepileptic drugs (AED). All patients underwent baseline comprehensive neuropsycho-logical assessment. A follow-up of at least one year was requested to confirm the dementia diagnosis. In AD patients, qEEG power band analysis was performed. AD-CTR and AD-EPI patients were matched for age, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and gender.

19 20 21 22 23

Results: Thirty-eight out of 2,054 neurodegenerative dementia patients had epilepsy requiring AED. The prevalence of

epilepsy was 1.82% for AD, 1.28% for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), 2.47% for dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and 12% for primary progressive aphasia. Epilepsy were more drug-responsive in AD than in non-AD dementias. Finally, no significant differences were found in neuropsychological and qEEG data between AD-EPI and AD-CTR patients.

24 25 26 27 28

Conclusion: In our cohort, AD, FTD, and DLB dementias have similar prevalence of epilepsy, even if AD patients were

more responsive to AED. Moreover, AD-EPI patients did not have significant clinical, neuropsychological qEEG differences compared with AD-CTR patients.

29 30 31

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, EEG, epilepsy, seizure 32

Correspondence to: Dario Arnaldi, Clinical Neurology,

Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), Largo P. Daneo 3, Genoa, 16132, Italy. Tel.: +39 010 5552397; Fax: +39 010 5556893; E-mail: dario.arnaldi@gmail.com. ORCID-ID: 0000-0001-6823-6069

INTRODUCTION 33 Although it is known that demented patients are 34 more prone to present seizures than subjects with- 35 out dementia [1, 2], precise epidemiologic data 36

of epilepsy in dementia is lacking [1] and, on 37

(2)

Uncorrected Author Proof

the other hand, it is known that old people with 38

epilepsy are at increased risk of cognitive decline 39

[3], as cognitive impairment across all domains 40

has actually been reported in these patients [4]. 41

Overall, cognitive decline over time in people with 42

epilepsy is faster compared to aging-related cognitive 43

decline in subjects without epilepsy [5]. Further-44

more, a bidirectional relationship between epilepsy 45

and dementia has been suggested [3]. Thus, the con-46

cept of an accelerated cognitive aging in patients 47

with epilepsy has been suggested [5], but it is still 48

unknown whether dementia worsens more rapidly 49

in demented patients with epilepsy compared to 50

those without. 51

Gowers first introduced the concept of epileptic 52

dementia, implying that in some subjects dementia 53

and epilepsy may be the consequence of the same 54

underlying disorder [6]. The association between 55

vascular dementia and epilepsy is common [7]. 56

Neurodegenerative dementias as well may develop 57

seizures. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most fre-58

quent cause of dementia and is frequently associated 59

with epilepsy [8], but non-AD dementia patients may 60

also have epilepsy [9]. However, most of the pub-61

lished studies investigating the association between 62

dementia and epilepsy did not evaluate the causes 63

of dementia. Moreover, neurophysiological and neu-64

ropsychological features of dementia patients with 65

dementia epilepsy are lacking. 66

This study has two aims: 1) to investigate the preva-67

lence and the clinical characteristics of epilepsy in 68

a large cohort of patients with neurodegenerative 69

dementias; and 2) to explore clinical, neuropsycho-70

logical, and electroencephalogram (EEG) data of AD 71

patients with epilepsy as compared to AD patients 72 without epilepsy. 73 METHODS 74 Subjects 75

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients 76

admitted to our University Hospital memory clinic 77

between January 1999 and December 2016. The main 78

inclusion criteria were 1) a diagnosis of neurodegen-79

erative dementia and 2) the presence of seizures under 80

antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment with an onset 81

close to the time of dementia diagnosis or later on 82

during the follow-up. 83

The patients underwent a baseline clinical assess-84

ment including neurological examination and neu-85

ropsychological evaluation. They underwent brain 86

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or computed 87

tomography in the case MRI was unfeasible. They 88 also underwent ambulatory scalp EEG during relaxed 89 wakefulness. When the clinical diagnosis was uncer- 90 tain, patients underwent brain radionuclide imaging, 91 including brain perfusion99mTc-ECD single photon 92 emission tomography (SPECT) or brain metabolism 93

18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET).

94 The main exclusion criteria were 1) a remote his- 95 tory of epilepsy (defined as seizure onset at least 5 96 years prior to cognitive symptoms [2]) and 2) a history 97 of stroke and/or a diagnosis of vascular dementia [10], 98 including mixed neurodegenerative/vascular demen- 99

tia, with cortical/iuxtacortical infarcts. 100

The diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia was 101

made according to the following criteria: 102

• AD: according to the 1984 NINCDS-ADRDA 103

Alzheimer’s Criteria [11] for patients diagnosed 104 between 1999 and 2011, and according to the 105 2011 NIA-AA criteria [12] for patients diag- 106

nosed from 2011. 107

• Frontotemporal dementia (FTD): according to 108 the 1998 criteria [13] for patients diagnosed from 109 1999 to 2011, after 2011 the criteria for behav- 110

ioral variant FTD (bvFTD) were used [14]. 111

• Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): according 112 to the 1996 criteria [15] for patients diagnosed 113 from 1999 to 2005, and according to the 2005 114 criteria of the international consortium on the 115

DLB [16] for patients from 2005. 116

• Parkinson’s disease dementia (PDD): according 117 to the Movement Disorder Society criteria [17]. 118 • Primary progressive aphasia (PPA): according 119 to the 1987 criteria [18] for patients diagnosed 120 from 1999 to 2011, and according to the 2011 121

criteria [19] for patients from 2011. 122

• Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA): according to 123 the criteria of Benson and collaborators of 1988 124

[20]. 125

The patients underwent six month-based clinical 126 follow-up after the baseline assessment. A follow- 127 up of at least one year was requested to confirm the 128

diagnosis. 129

For each patient, a case report form (CRF) was 130 created, including age, gender, years of education, 131 type of dementia diagnosis, the onset of seizures 132 (before, after or concomitant with the diagnosis of 133 dementia), and the type of seizure at onset (focal, 134 generalized or unknown), seizure type classification 135 basic version [24], AED treatment and the response to 136 therapy (seizure-free, improved, and not improved). 137

(3)

Uncorrected Author Proof

Patients were considered improved by therapy when 138

an improvement in either frequency or intensity of 139

seizures was judged clinically significant by the neu-140

rologist. 141

The study protocol met the approval of the local 142

Ethics Committee, and all participants signed an 143

informed consent form in compliance with the 144

Helsinki Declaration of 1975. 145

Neuropsychological evaluation

146

The following neuropsychological evaluation was 147

performed at baseline: 1) categorical and phono-148

logical verbal fluency to asses language [21]; 2) 149

Trail-Making Test (TMT) A [22], Stroop color-word 150

test [23], and digit span [24] to evaluate attention and 151

working memory; 3) TMT B [22], Stroop color test 152

[23], and symbol-digit [25] for executive functions; 153

4) Clock Drawing Test (CDT) [26] and figure copy-154

ing of the mental deterioration battery (simple copy 155

and copy with guiding landmarks) [27] for visuospa-156

tial capabilities; and 5) Rey auditory learning verbal 157

test [28] (RALVT, immediate and delayed recall) and 158

Corsi’s block design [29] to investigate memory. 159

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [30] 160

was performed as a general measure of cognitive 161

functioning. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) 162

[31] was used to investigate the presence of depres-163

sion. 164

EEG recording and data processing

165

EEG recordings were obtained from patients 166

seated in a recliner with eyes closed. EEG electrodes 167

were placed using standard 10–20 EEG electrode 168

positions: Fp2, F4, Fp1, F3, and Fpz (frontal); F8, 169

T4, T6, F7, T3, and T5 (temporal); C4 P4, C3, P3, 170

PZ, and CZ (centro-parietal); O2 and O1 (occipital). 171

Recordings were referenced to the Fpz electrode, Oz 172

electrode served as ground. EEG was recorded with 173

a sampling rate of 256 Hz, at a bandpass filter of 174

0.5–70 Hz. 175

EEG data were manually analyzed off-line to 176

reject artifacts. One minute of artifact-free EEG data 177

was re-referenced to common average for further 178

analysis. Quantitative EEG (qEEG) power spectrum 179

was calculated with the Fourier Transform (Welch 180

method), applied to 2-s segments with 2-s overlap 181

(Tukey window), for each brain area (i.e., frontal, 182

temporal, centro-parietal, and occipital). The EEG 183

spectrum was then divided into the following fre-184

quency bands: delta (2.10–4 Hz), theta (4.10–8 Hz), 185

alpha (8.10–12 Hz), sigma (12.10–16 Hz), and beta 186 (16.10–24 Hz) and relative power was computed for 187 each band as normalized to the total EEG power. In 188 order to evaluate EEG power distribution in a large 189 band (2–16 Hz), the power-weighted mean frequency 190

(MF) was calculated for each brain area. 191

Statistical analysis 192

The first analysis was aimed at evaluating the rela- 193 tionship between epilepsy and the different types 194 of neurodegenerative dementia. The prevalence of 195 epilepsy was calculated for each type of neurode- 196 generative dementia. Then, a logistic regression was 197 performed, using the diagnosis of neurodegenerative 198 dementia as the dependent variable (categorical vari- 199 able) and the characteristics of epilepsy included in 200 the CRF, as detailed before, were the independent 201

variables. 202

The second analysis was aimed at comparing clin- 203 ical features, neuropsychological tests scores and 204

qEEG data of subjects suffering from AD and 205

epilepsy (AD-EPI) with subjects suffering from AD, 206 without epilepsy (AD-CTR). The two groups were 207 matched for age, MMSE score, and gender. Contin- 208 uous variables were analyzed by unpaired t test and 209 categorical variables with the chi-square test. 210

RESULTS 211

Epilepsy and neurodegenerative dementias 212

From 1996 to 2016, we found in our clinical 213

database 2,054 patients with diagnosis of neurode- 214 generative dementia (Supplementary Figure 1). 1,645 215

were AD (80.09%), 235 bvFTD (11.44%), 81 DLB 216

(3.94%), 64 PDD (3.12%), 25 PPA (1.2%), and 4 217

PCA (0.19%). 218

Among these patients, 38 (1.85%) were affected by 219 epilepsy (Fig. 1). Among these, 30 were diagnosed 220

with AD (78.95%), 3 had bvFTD (7.89%), 3 PPA 221

(7.89%), and 2 DLB (5.26%). 222

Large epidemiology studies have shown that the 223 prevalence of epilepsy in the elderly ranged from 0.5 224 % [9] to 0.97 % [2]. In our cohort of neurodegenera- 225 tive dementias, prevalence of epilepsy is significantly 226 higher compared to literature data of epilepsy in the 227

elderly (p < 0.001, Fisher Exact Test). 228

In our cohort of neurodegenerative dementias, the 229 prevalence of epilepsy was 1.82% for AD, 1.28% for 230 bvFTD, 2.47% for DLB, and 12% for PPA (Supple- 231

(4)

Uncorrected Author Proof

Fig. 1. Distribution of neurodegenerative dementias in the study group of dementia patients with concomitant epilepsy. AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DLB, dementia with Lewy Bodies; bvFTD, fronto-temporal dementia, behavioral variant; PPA, primary pro-gressive aphasia.

mentary Figure 2). The characteristics of epileptic 232

seizures are shown in Table 1. 233

Logistic regression showed a significant correla-234

tion (p < 0.0001) between dementia and treatment 235

response. In particular, 23 patients with AD (76.7%) 236

were seizure free after using AEDs. 237

Epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease

238

Eight patients in the AD-EPI group had an EEG 239

with insufficient quality to perform qEEG analysis, 240

thus 22 AD-EPI patients were considered for subse-241

quent analysis. Main clinical and demographic data 242

of AD patients with and without epilepsy are summa-243

rized in Table 2. Per selection criteria of AD patients 244

without epilepsy that were chosen so as to be age and 245 severity-matched with those with epilepsy, no statis- 246 tically significant difference was found between the 247

two groups. 248

Neuropsychological tests score of AD patients 249 with and without epilepsy are shown in Table 3. 250 Considering that the two groups were matched for 251 age, gender, education, and MMSE, raw neuropsy- 252 chological data were used. No statistically significant 253

difference was found between the two groups. 254

QEEG data of AD patients with and without 255

epilepsy are shown in Table 4. AD-EPI group showed 256 higher relative power values in the sigma band com- 257 pared with the AD-CTR group, which however did 258 not survive to Bonferroni’s correction for multiple 259

comparisons. 260

DISCUSSION 261

In the present study, we evaluated a large cohort 262 of consecutive outpatients admitted to our univer- 263 sity memory clinic from 1999 to 2016. We selected 264 patients who received a diagnosis of neurodegener- 265 ative dementia and who also were suffering from 266 epilepsy. We exclude patients who had a remote 267 onset of epilepsy, in order to investigate the possi- 268 ble relationship between the onset of epilepsy and 269 the neurodegenerative process underlying dementia. 270 The first result is that the prevalence of epilepsy 271

was similar for AD, bvFTD, and DLB dementias. 272

Instead, PPA patients showed higher prevalence of 273 epilepsy. However, this result must be interpreted 274 with caution, considering the limited number of PPA 275

Table 1

Characteristics of epileptic seizures in patients affected by neurodegenerative dementias. For age, mean values± standard deviation are shown

Total AD bvFTD DLB PPA

38 30 3 2 3

Age 72.7± 7.7 71.9± 8.0 71.3± 5.5 67.0± 7.1 67.3± 4.5

Epilepsy Onset

-After Dementia diagnosis 21 (55.3%) 15 1 2 3

-Before Dementia diagnosis 7 (18.4%) 5 2 0 0

-Concomitant with Dementia diagnosis 7 (18.4%) 7 0 0 0

-Unknown 3 (7.9%) 3 0 0 0

Seizures type at onset

-Generalized 17 (44.7%) 15 1 1 0 -Focal 15 (39.5%) 10 1 1 3 -Unknown 6 (15.79%) 5 1 0 0 Treatment Response -Seizure Free 24 (63.2%) 23 0 0 1 -Improved 3 (7.9%) 0 2 1 0 -Not Improved 11 (28.9%) 7 1 1 2

AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; bvFTD, frontotemporal dementia, behavioral variant; PPA, primary progressive aphasia.

(5)

Uncorrected Author Proof

Table 2

Main clinical and demographic data in subjects with dementia due to AD and epilepsy (AD-EPI) and subjects with dementia due to AD without epilepsy (AD-CTR). Mean values± standard

deviation (range) are shown

AD-EPI AD-CTR p N 22 22 Age, y 71.95± 8.00 (57–90) 72.27± 6.85 (54–82) n.s. Gender 26F/4M 17F/5M n.s. Education, y 7.41± 4.06 (0–17) 9.45± 4.60 (2–17) n.s. MMSE 24.14± 4.36 (10–30) 23.95± 3.64 (15–30) n.s. GDS 5.05± 3.22 (0–12) 5.14± 3.09 (2–15) n.s. AChE-inhibitors 11 (50%) 4 (23%) n.s. Hypertension 16 (73%) 10 (46%) n.s. Diabetes 3 (14%) 2 (9%) n.s. Heart disease 6 (27%) 7 (32%) n.s. Hypercholesterolemia 12 (54%) 11 (50%) n.s. Follow-up, mo 54.0± 34.0 (8–118) 50.8± 30.7 (5–124) n.s. Follow-up MMSE 13.8± 7.7 (4–30) 11.4± 8.27 (1–28) n.s.

AChE-inhibitors, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; F, female; GDS, Geriatric depression scale; M, male; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; n.s., not significant.

Table 3

Neuropsychological tests raw scores in subjects with dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy (AD-EPI) and subjects with dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease without epilepsy

(AD-CTR). Mean values± standard deviation (range) are shown

AD-EPI AD-CTR p TMT A (s) 125.94± 95.37 (29–350) 112.63± 71.95 (41–300) n.s. TMT B (s) 362.44± 171.54 (88–533) 343± 180.51 (89–533) n.s. Symbol-digit 16.00± 11.87 (1–42) 16.50± 9.55 (1–34) n.s. Stroop Color 29.06± 6.52 (18–45) 28.94± 8.74 (9–43) n.s. Stroop Color-word 10.74± 6.06 (1–21) 8.13± 4.90 (3–17) n.s. Corsi’s Span 3.29± 1.36 (0–5) 3.73± 1.22 (2–6) n.s. Digit’s Span 5.76± 2.56 (3–15) 4.87± 0.64 (4–6) n.s. RALVT immediate 23.35± 9.96 (6–49) 19.89± 6.91 (11–34) n.s. RALVT delayed 2.40± 2.68 (0–7) 2.16± 2.57 (0–9) n.s. CDT 3.83± 3.15 (0–7) 4.41± 3.02 (0–7) n.s.

Figure copying, simple copy 6.95± 2.22 (2–10) 7.57± 2.31 (3–12) n.s.

Figure copying, with guiding landmarks 56.21± 12.58 (24–68) 59.05± 9.75 (38–70) n.s.

Categorical verbal fluency 13.01± 5.03 (2–23) 12.93± 3.83 (8–21) n.s.

Phonological verbal fluency 24.30± 9.81 (0–39) 20.14± 9.65 (10–49) n.s.

CDT, Clock drawing test; n.s., not significant; RALVT, Rey Auditory Learning Verbal Test; TMT, Trail Making Test.

subjects in our sample, which is notoriously rare 276

[19]. The second result is the statistically significant 277

association between the response to AED and the 278

diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementia. In partic-279

ular, among the various type of dementias, patients 280

with AD showed a better response to AED therapy. 281

However, it has to be noted that the other groups were 282

smaller than the AD group, thus this result also must 283

be taken with caution. 284

AD is the most common neurodegenerative 285

dementia [32]. Growing literature data are suggest-286

ing the association between brain amyloidosis and 287

epilepsy [8, 33]. Indeed, seizures can also precede 288

cognitive symptoms in AD patients [34]. In agree-289

ment with literature data, in our cohort AD is the 290

most common cause of degenerative dementia and 291 it is also the most common cause of dementia in 292 the group of patients with neurodegenerative demen- 293 tias and concomitant epilepsy. However, in our study 294 the prevalence of epilepsy of other common neu- 295 rodegenerative dementias (FTD and DLB) is at least 296

comparable with AD. 297

Few studies have investigated epilepsy in non-AD 298 neurodegenerative dementias. A recent epidemio- 299 logical study in the United States showed that AD 300 dementia had a higher risk of developing seizures 301 and epilepsy compared with non-AD dementias [9]. 302 However, in that study all non-AD dementias were 303 considered, including vascular and other secondary 304 dementias. Moreover, it was a study based on an 305

(6)

Uncorrected Author Proof

Table 4

qEEG data in subjects with dementia due to AD and epilepsy EPI) and subjects with dementia due to AD without epilepsy

(AD-CTR). Mean values± standard deviation (range) are shown

AD-EPI AD-CTR p Relative bandpower DELTA (2.10–4 Hz) -Frontal 7.73± 3.16 7.59± 3.84 n.s. -Temporal 8.81± 4.10 7.59± 2.89 n.s. -Centro/Parietal 7.72± 3.29 7.30± 3.32 n.s. -Occipital 6.50± 3.05 6.87± 3.61 n.s. THETA (4.10–8 Hz) -Frontal 18.93± 8.66 18.35± 9.66 n.s. -Temporal 20.92± 9.65 19.90± 9.89 n.s. -Centro/Parietal 19.77± 8.99 19.31± 9.35 n.s. -Occipital 17.48± 8.27 19.20 ± 10.04 n.s. ALPHA (8.10–12 Hz) -Frontal 20.17± 11.72 17.55 ± 9.14 n.s. -Temporal 20.73± 9.08 18.95± 8.39 n.s. -Centro/Parietal 25.82± 12.28 24.59 ± 11.57 n.s. -Occipital 32.39± 19.88 28.73 ± 15.00 n.s. SIGMA (12.10–16 Hz) -Frontal 6.29± 2.70 4.69± 2.57 0.033∗ -Temporal 6.61± 2.23 5.21± 2.34 0.034∗ -Centro/Parietal 8.97± 3.78 6.72± 2.99 0.023∗ -Occipital 6.88± 2.66 5.73± 2.73 n.s. BETA (16.10–24 Hz) -Frontal 8.03± 2.90 7.59± 5.04 n.s. -Temporal 7.23± 2.57 6.89± 3.21 n.s. -Centro/Parietal 9.59± 3.58 8.59± 4.25 n.s. -Occipital 6.49± 2.87 6.42± 3.21 n.s. Mean frequency -Frontal 11.14± 1.44 10.82± 1.66 n.s. -Temporal 10.96± 1.22 10.74± 1.19 n.s. -Centro/Parietal 9.72± 1.05 9.45± 1.02 n.s. -Occipital 10.68± 1.41 10.62± 1.14 n.s.

Not surviving Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparison.

administrative database, thus it was unknown whether 306

the epilepsy was of new or remote onset. Another 307

recent study was aimed at evaluating the relative 308

incidence of seizures in neurodegenerative demen-309

tias [35] showing that the cumulative probability of 310

developing seizures after dementia onset was higher 311

in AD and DLB compared with FTD. It has to be 312

noted that FTD patients have shorter life expectancy 313

than non-FTD dementias and this may contribute to 314

their lower cumulative probability of seizures. How-315

ever, that study was aimed at identifying the incidence 316

of seizures, but it is not known whether the patients 317

further develop epilepsy that needed antiepileptic 318

treatment. According to international criteria, a single 319

seizure is not enough to make epilepsy diagno-320

sis [36], unless a chronic predisposing factor for 321

developing successive seizures may be demonstrated. 322

Indeed, several causes of provoked seizures has been 323

described, especially in the elderly [37]. In the present 324

study, we selected only those patients who were diag-325

nosed as having epilepsy, with causes of provoked 326 seizures being excluded, and therefore underwent 327 antiepileptic treatment. This is because we believe 328 that this approach would increase the probability 329 that the pathophysiology of seizures in the evalu- 330 ated patients is directly related to the pathophysiology 331 of neurodegenerative dementias. With this specific 332 study design, we found that the prevalence of def- 333 inite epilepsy that requested antiepileptic treatment 334 is similar for AD and non-AD neurodegenerative 335 dementias and it is lower range with respect to the 336 reported prevalence of seizures in literature studies, 337 which ranges from 0.5 to 64% [38]. However, the 338 largest epidemiological study conducted so far on 339 more than 3 million AD patients found a seizure 340 prevalence of 1.43% [9], thus very close to the preva- 341 lence in the present study. Moreover, the weighted 342 average prevalence of epilepsy in AD, according to 343 literature data [38], is 1.5%. A recent study [39] 344 found an epilepsy prevalence of 25.7% in a cohort 345 of patients with dementia or mild cognitive impair- 346 ment. However, this study has several methodological 347 discrepancies in comparison with our, including the 348 presence of vascular dementia and the inclusion of 349 patients with clinical suspect of epilepsy, but with- 350 out anti-epileptic treatment. If the same criteria used 351 in our study are applied to Baker et al dataset, the 352 epilepsy prevalence would decrease to 2.1 %, thus 353

comparable to our result. 354

The underlying mechanism of epileptogenesis in 355 neurodegenerative dementias is thought to be related 356 to an increased cortical excitability due to corti- 357 cal deposition/aggregation of pathological proteins. 358 In AD, network hyperexcitability has been related 359 to aberrant network activity due to amyloid-␤ [33]. 360 However, both increased seizure susceptibility and 361 aberrant network excitability have been related to the 362 overexpression of both tau protein and␣-synuclein 363 in animal models of FTD [40] and DLB [41]. Thus, 364 the precise cause of epileptic seizures in patients with 365 neurodegenerative dementias has not been fully elu- 366 cidated yet, and it is likely underlined by complex 367 mechanism and heterogeneous neuropathology. For 368 instance, it has been proposed that both amyloid- 369 ␤ and tau protein abnormalities must be present to 370 produce aberrant excitatory activity that results in 371 epileptic seizures [42]. Moreover, in non-demented 372 patients suffering from refractory temporal lobe 373 epilepsy, the presence of tau pathology has been 374 related cognitive decline [43]. Thus, the role of tau 375 protein seems relevant in determining the increased 376 risk of epilepsy [44]. Indeed, tau pathology is present 377

(7)

Uncorrected Author Proof

in AD, but it may also be present in FTD and DLB 378

[44]. The results of the present study seem to sug-379

gest a preponderant role of tau protein among all 380

misfolded ones. Indeed, combining PDD and DLB, 381

where␣-synuclein is invariable and amyloid-␤ very 382

common, the frequency of epilepsy is extremely low 383

(approximately 0.7%), while the highest frequency 384

has been observed in PPA, of which the non-fluent 385

type is mainly related to tau deposition. This is in 386

agreement with recent literature data highlighting the 387

role of tau protein in increasing seizure susceptibility 388

and aberrant network excitability [4, 44]. 389

A novel finding of the present study is that epilepsy 390

in AD dementia seems to be more drug-responsive 391

than epilepsy in non-AD dementias. As discussed 392

before, this result must be taken with caution consid-393

ering the limited number of subjects. Nevertheless, 394

considering that AD is the most frequent cause of 395

neurodegenerative dementia, we performed a sec-396

ond analysis aimed at evaluating whether patients 397

with AD and epilepsy (AD-EPI) had different clin-398

ical, neuropsychological and EEG characteristics 399

compared with patients with AD without epilepsy 400

(AD-CTR). The two groups were matched for age, 401

education, and MMSE score in order to evaluate the 402

real effect of epilepsy on such patients. No signif-403

icant differences were found in neuropsychological 404

and qEEG data between the two groups. AD-EPI 405

patients tended to have higher values of relative 406

power in the sigma band (12.10–16 Hz) in several 407

brain regions, without surviving Bonferroni’s cor-408

rection for multiple comparison. This finding could 409

have different interpretations. The first hypothesis 410

is that the increase in the sigma band may be an 411

expression of an increased neuronal excitability due 412

to epileptic pathology in AD-EPI subjects. The sta-413

tistical significance may not be achieved because of 414

the relatively limited number of subjects. The second, 415

more likely, hypothesis is that the increase of rapid 416

EEG frequencies is due to the chronic effect of AED 417

therapy. 418

Several literature data showed the effect of AED 419

on qEEG data. For example, “old generation” AEDs 420

(such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobar-421

bital) tend to increase the relative power of slow 422

bands [45–47]. On the other hand, “new generation” 423

AEDs (such as levetiracetam and lamotrigine) tend 424

to increase the relative power of the fast bands [48, 425

49]. Unfortunately, in our study, considering the lim-426

ited number of subjects, it was not possible to make 427

a more detailed analysis of this phenomenon. How-428

ever, in the AD-EPI group, about half (12/25) of the 429

subjects took levetiracetam while the remainder took 430

“old generation” AEDs. 431

The qEEG can be considered an indirect marker 432 of neurodegeneration in AD [50]. In our study, the 433 qEEG data were found to be substantially overlapping 434 between AD-EPI and AD-CTR patients while, as a 435 descriptive finding, interictal epileptiform discharges 436 were more likely found in the AD-EPI group. Further- 437 more, the two study groups did not show statistically 438 significant difference in cognitive test performance. 439 Therefore, although previous studies have reported an 440 association between epilepsy and amyloidosis in AD 441 [8, 33], in the present study subjects with concomitant 442 AD and epilepsy did not have a more severe clinical 443 phenotype or a more sever neurodegeneration, mea- 444 sured indirectly with the EEG. Indeed, clinical studies 445 have reported only a moderate correlation between 446 cerebral amyloidosis markers and neurodegeneration 447 markers in AD [51–53]. The clinical significate of this 448 result remains to be investigated through the study of 449

amyloidosis and neurodegeneration markers. 450

As a descriptive finding, the presence of seizures 451 was perceived as a major clinical problem by patients 452 and caregivers, especially those with seizures with 453 motor component. Besides that, no clinically relevant 454 association with concomitant medications, comor- 455 bidities or rate of worsening during the clinical 456 follow-up was found. In particular, AD-EPI did not 457 have a worse cognitive outcome compared with AD- 458 CTR patients, thus suggesting that the presence of 459 epilepsy does not significantly interfere with the clin- 460

ical course of the disease. 461

The present study has some limitations. The first 462 is that the data were collected retrospectively. How- 463 ever, the data were collected homogeneously over the 464 years by the same researchers and with standardized 465 diagnostic procedures. Nevertheless, the retrospec- 466 tive nature of the study may have led to a slight 467 underestimation of the epilepsy prevalence in our 468 study. The second limit is the lack of biomarkers for 469 brain amyloidosis and tau protein. Unfortunately, for 470 most patients this marker was not available in our cen- 471 ter yet, considering that the study period is from 1999 472 to 2016. Third, non-AD dementias were less repre- 473 sented than AD in our sample, thus larger studies are 474

needed to draw definite conclusions. 475

In conclusion, we have found that in our cohort 476 of neurodegenerative dementia, AD, FTD, and DLB 477 dementias have similar prevalence of epilepsy, even 478 if AD patients were more responsive to antiepileptic 479 treatment. Moreover, AD patients with epilepsy did 480 not have significant clinical, neuropsychological of 481

(8)

Uncorrected Author Proof

qEEG differences compared with AD patients with-482

out epilepsy. Larger studies are needed to confirm 483

these findings. 484

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

485

Authors’ disclosures available online (https:// 486

www.j-alz.com/manuscript-disclosures/19-1315r1). 487

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

488

The supplementary material is available in 489

the electronic version of this article: https:// 490

dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-191315. 491

REFERENCES

492

[1] Subota A, Pham T, Jette N, Sauro K, Lorenzetti D,

Holroyd-493

Leduc J (2017) The association between dementia and

494

epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia

495

58, 962-972.

496

[2] Zelano J, Brigo F, Garcia-Patek S (2019) Increased risk of

497

epilepsy in patients registered in The Swedish Dementia

498

Registry. Eur J Neurol 27, 129-135.

499

[3] Breteler MM, Van Duijn CM, Chandra V, Fratiglioni L,

500

Graves AB, Heyman A, Jorm AF, Kokmen E, Kondo K,

501

Mortimer JA, Rocca WA, Shalat SL, Soininen H, Hofman

502

A, for the Eurodem Risk Factors Research Group (1991)

503

Medical history and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: A

col-504

laborative re-analysis of case-control studies. EURODEM

505

Risk Factors Research Group. Int J Epidemiol 20 Suppl 2,

506

S36-42.

507

[4] Sen A, Capelli V, Husain M (2018) Cognition and dementia

508

in older patients with epilepsy. Brain 141, 1592-1608.

509

[5] Breuer LE, Boon P, Bergmans JW, Mess WH, Besseling

510

RM, De Louw A, Tijhuis AG, Zinger S, Bernas A, Klooster

511

DC, Aldenkamp AP (2016) Cognitive deterioration in adult

512

epilepsy: Does accelerated cognitive ageing exist? Neurosci

513

Biobehav Rev 64, 1-11.

514

[6] Gowers W (1881) Epilepsy and Other Chronic

Convul-515

sive Diseases: Their Causes, Symptoms and Treatment,

516

Churchill, London.

517

[7] Imfeld P, Bodmer M, Schuerch M, Jick SS, Meier CR (2013)

518

Seizures in patients with Alzheimer’s disease or vascular

519

dementia: A population-based nested case-control analysis.

520

Epilepsia 54, 700-707.

521

[8] Vossel KA, Tartaglia MC, Nygaard HB, Zeman AZ, Miller

522

BL (2017) Epileptic activity in Alzheimer’s disease: Causes

523

and clinical relevance. Lancet Neurol 16, 311-322.

524

[9] Sherzai D, Losey T, Vega S, Sherzai A (2014) Seizures and

525

dementia in the elderly: Nationwide inpatient sample

1999-526

2008. Epilepsy Behav 36, 53-56.

527

[10] O’Brien JT, Thomas A (2015) Vascular dementia. Lancet

528

386, 1698-1706.

529

[11] Mckhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D,

530

Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s

dis-531

ease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under

532

the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services

533

Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34, 939-944.

534

[12] Mckhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, 535

Jack CR, Jr., Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly 536

JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Schel- 537

tens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH 538

(2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s dis- 539

ease: Recommendations from the National Institute On 540

Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnos- 541

tic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimers Dement 542

7, 263-269. 543

[13] Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, 544

Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, 545

Boone K, Miller BL, Cummings J, Benson DF (1998) 546

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical 547

diagnostic criteria. Neurology 51, 1546-1554. 548

[14] Piguet O, Hornberger M, Mioshi E, Hodges JR (2011) 549

Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: Diagnosis, 550

clinical staging, and management. Lancet Neurol 10, 162- 551

172. 552

[15] Mckeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, Perry EK, Dickson 553

DW, Hansen LA, Salmon DP, Lowe J, Mirra SS, Byrne EJ, 554

Lennox G, Quinn NP, Edwardson JA, Ince PG, Bergeron C, 555

Burns A, Miller BL, Lovestone S, Collerton D, Jansen EN, 556

Ballard C, De Vos RA, Wilcock GK, Jellinger KA, Perry RH 557

(1996) Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic 558

diagnosis of dementia with Lewy dodies (DLB): Report of 559

the Consortium on DLB International Workshop. Neurology 560

47, 1113-1124. 561

[16] Mckeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O’Brien JT, 562

Feldman H, Cummings J, Duda JE, Lippa C, Perry EK, 563

Aarsland D, Arai H, Ballard CG, Boeve B, Burn DJ, Costa 564

D, Del Ser T, Dubois B, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Goetz 565

CG, Gomez-Tortosa E, Halliday G, Hansen LA, Hardy J, 566

Iwatsubo T, Kalaria RN, Kaufer D, Kenny RA, Korczyn A, 567

Kosaka K, Lee VM, Lees A, Litvan I, Londos E, Lopez OL, 568

Minoshima S, Mizuno Y, Molina JA, Mukaetova-Ladinska 569

EB, Pasquier F, Perry RH, Schulz JB, Trojanowski JQ, 570

Yamada M (2005) Diagnosis and management of demen- 571

tia with Lewy bodies: Third report of the DLB Consortium. 572

Neurology 65, 1863-1872. 573

[17] Emre M, Aarsland D, Brown R, Burn DJ, Duyckaerts C, 574

Mizuno Y, Broe GA, Cummings J, Dickson DW, Gauthier 575

S, Goldman J, Goetz C, Korczyn A, Lees A, Levy R, Litvan 576

I, Mckeith I, Olanow W, Poewe W, Quinn N, Sampaio C, 577

Tolosa E, Dubois B (2007) Clinical diagnostic criteria for 578

dementia associated with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 579

22, 1689-1707; Quiz 1837. 580

[18] Mesulam MM (1987) Primary progressive aphasia– 581

differentiation from Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 22, 582

533-534. 583

[19] Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, 584

Mendez M, Cappa SF, Ogar JM, Rohrer JD, Black S, Boeve 585

BF, Manes F, Dronkers NF, Vandenberghe R, Rascovsky 586

K, Patterson K, Miller BL, Knopman DS, Hodges JR, 587

Mesulam MM, Grossman M (2011) Classification of pri- 588

mary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 76, 589

1006-1014. 590

[20] Benson DF, Davis RJ, Snyder BD (1988) Posterior cortical 591

atrophy. Arch Neurol 45, 789-793. 592

[21] Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, Laiacona N, Vallar G, 593

Cappa S (1986) Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione 594

lessicale. Taratura su soggetti normali. Arch Psicol Neurol 595

Psichiatr 47, 477-506. 596

[22] Amodio P, Wenin H, Del Piccolo F, Mapelli D, Montag- 597

nese S, Pellegrini A, Musto C, Gatta A, Umilta C (2002) 598

(9)

Uncorrected Author Proof

Line Trait Test in normal people. A normative study

tak-600

ing into account age-dependent decline and sociobiological

601

variables. Aging Clin Exp Res 14, 117-131.

602

[23] Barbarotto R, Laiacona M, Frosio R, Vecchio M, Farinato

603

A, Capitani E (1998) A normative study on visual reaction

604

times and two Stroop colour-word tests. Ital J Neurol Sci

605

19, 161-170.

606

[24] Orsini A, Grossi D, Capitani E, Laiacona M, Papagno C,

607

Vallar G (1987) Verbal and spatial immediate memory span:

608

Normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children. Ital J

609

Neurol Sci 8, 539-548.

610

[25] Smith A (1968) The Symbol-Digit Modalities Test: A

611

Neuropsychologic Test of Learning and Other Cerebral

Dis-612

orders, Seattle.

613

[26] Watson YI, Arfken CL, Birge SJ (1993) Clock completion:

614

An objective screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc

615

41, 1235-1240.

616

[27] Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G (1996) The

617

Mental Deterioration Battery: Normative data, diagnostic

618

reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment.

619

The Group for the Standardization of the Mental

Deteriora-620

tion Battery. Eur Neurol 36, 378-384.

621

[28] Rey A (1958) L’examin Clinique An Psychologie, Paris.

622

[29] Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Italian standardization and

623

classification of neuropsychological tests. The Italian Group

624

on the Neuropsychological Study of Aging. Ital J Neurol Sci

625

Suppl 8, 1-120.

626

[30] Folstein MF, Folstein SE, Mchugh PR (1975)

Mini-627

Mental State. A practical method for grading the cognitive

628

state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12,

629

189-198.

630

[31] Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey

631

M, Leirer VO (1982) Development and validation of a

geri-632

atric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J

633

Psychiatr Res 17, 37-49.

634

[32] Rizzi L, Rosset I, Roriz-Cruz M (2014) Global

epidemiol-635

ogy of dementia: Alzheimer’s and vascular types. Biomed

636

Res Int 2014, 908915.

637

[33] Palop JJ, Chin J, Roberson ED, Wang J, Thwin MT, Bien-Ly

638

N, Yoo J, Ho KO, Yu GQ, Kreitzer A, Finkbeiner S, Noebels

639

JL, Mucke L (2007) Aberrant excitatory neuronal activity

640

and compensatory remodeling of inhibitory hippocampal

641

circuits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron

642

55, 697-711.

643

[34] Picco A, Archetti S, Ferrara M, Arnaldi D, Piccini A,

Ser-644

rati C, Di Lorenzo D, Morbelli S, Nobili F (2011) Seizures

645

can precede cognitive symptoms in late-onset Alzheimer’s

646

disease. J Alzheimers Dis 27, 737-742.

647

[35] Beagle AJ, Darwish SM, Ranasinghe KG, La AL,

Kara-648

georgiou E, Vossel KA (2017) Relative incidence of seizures

649

and myoclonus in Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy

650

bodies, and frontotemporal dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 60,

651

211-223.

652

[36] Fisher RS, Acevedo C, Arzimanoglou A, Bogacz A, Cross

653

JH, Elger CE, Engel J Jr., Forsgren L, French JA, Glynn M,

654

Hesdorffer DC, Lee BI, Mathern GW, Moshe SL, Perucca E,

655

Scheffer IE, Tomson T, Watanabe M, Wiebe S (2014) ILAE

656

Official Report: A practical clinical definition of epilepsy.

657

Epilepsia 55, 475-482.

658

[37] Bhalla D, Godet B, Druet-Cabanac M, Preux PM (2011)

659

Etiologies of epilepsy: A comprehensive review. Expert Rev

660

Neurother 11, 861-876.

661

[38] Horvath A, Szucs A, Barcs G, Noebels JL, Kamondi A 662

(2016) Epileptic seizures in Alzheimer disease: A review. 663

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 30, 186-192. 664

[39] Baker J, Libretto T, Henley W, Zeman A (2019) The preva- 665

lence and clinical features of epileptic seizures in a memory 666

clinic population. Seizure 71, 83-92. 667

[40] Garcia-Cabrero AM, Guerrero-Lopez R, Giraldez BG, 668

Llorens-Martin M, Avila J, Serratosa JM, Sanchez MP 669

(2013) Hyperexcitability and epileptic seizures in a 670

model of frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Dis 58, 671

200-208. 672

[41] Morris M, Sanchez PE, Verret L, Beagle AJ, Guo W, Dubal 673

D, Ranasinghe KG, Koyama A, Ho K, Yu GQ, Vossel KA, 674

Mucke L (2015) Network dysfunction in alpha-synuclein 675

transgenic mice and human Lewy body dementia. Ann Clin 676

Transl Neurol 2, 1012-1028. 677

[42] Roberson ED, Scearce-Levie K, Palop JJ, Yan F, Cheng 678

IH, Wu T, Gerstein H, Yu GQ, Mucke L (2007) Reducing 679

endogenous tau ameliorates amyloid beta-induced deficits 680

in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Science 316, 750- 681

754. 682

[43] Tai XY, Koepp M, Duncan JS, Fox N, Thompson P, 683

Baxendale S, Liu JY, Reeves C, Michalak Z, Thom 684

M (2016) Hyperphosphorylated tau in patients with 685

refractory epilepsy correlates with cognitive decline: 686

A study of temporal lobe resections. Brain 139, 687

2441-2455. 688

[44] Sanchez MP, Garcia-Cabrero AM, Sanchez-Elexpuru G, 689

Burgos DF, Serratosa JM (2018) Tau-induced pathology in 690

epilepsy and dementia: Notions from patients and animal 691

models. Int J Mol Sci 19, E1092. 692

[45] Duncan JS, Smith SJ, Forster A, Shorvon SD, Trimble MR 693

(1989) Effects of the removal of phenytoin, carbamazepine, 694

and valproate on the electroencephalogram. Epilepsia 30, 695

590-596. 696

[46] Besser R, Hornung K, Theisohn M, Rothacher G, Kramer G 697

(1992) EEG changes in patients during the introduction of 698

carbamazepine. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 83, 699

19-23. 700

[47] Meador KJ, Loring DW, Abney OL, Allen ME, Moore EE, 701

Zamrini EY, King DW (1993) Effects of carbamazepine and 702

phenytoin on EEG and memory in healthy adults. Epilepsia 703

34, 153-157. 704

[48] Cho JR, Koo DL, Joo EY, Yoon SM, Ju E, Lee 705

J, Kim DY, Hong SB (2012) Effect of levetiracetam 706

monotherapy on background EEG activity and cognition 707

in drug-naive epilepsy patients. Clin Neurophysiol 123, 708

883-891. 709

[49] Marciani MG, Stanzione P, Mattia D, Spanedda F, Bassetti 710

MA, Maschio M, Bernardi G (1998) Lamotrigine add- 711

on therapy in focal epilepsy: Electroencephalographic and 712

neuropsychological evaluation. Clin Neuropharmacol 21, 713

41-47. 714

[50] Smailovic U, Koenig T, Kareholt I, Andersson T, 715

Kramberger MG, Winblad B, Jelic V (2018) Quanti- 716

tative EEG power and synchronization correlate with 717

Alzheimer’s disease CSF biomarkers. Neurobiol Aging 63, 718

88-95. 719

[51] Jagust W (2016) Is Amyloid-Beta Harmful To The 720

brain? Insights from human imaging studies. Brain 139, 721

23-30. 722

[52] Murray ME, Lowe VJ, Graff-Radford NR, Liesinger AM, 723

(10)

Uncorrected Author Proof

RC, Kantarci K, Ross OA, Duara R, Knopman DS, Jack

724

CR Jr., Dickson DW (2015) Clinicopathologic and

11C-725

Pittsburgh Compound B implications of Thal amyloid

726

phase across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Brain 138,

727

1370-1381.

728

[53] Nelson PT, Alafuzoff I, Bigio EH, Bouras C, Braak H,

729

Cairns NJ, Castellani RJ, Crain BJ, Davies P, Del Tredici K,

730

Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Haroutunian V, Hof PR, Hulette

731

CM, Hyman BT, Iwatsubo T, Jellinger KA, Jicha GA, Kovari

732

E, Kukull WA, Leverenz JB, Love S, Mackenzie IR, Mann

733

DM, Masliah E, Mckee AC, Montine TJ, Morris JC,

Schnei-der JA, Sonnen JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Troncoso JC, 734

Wisniewski T, Woltjer RL, Beach TG (2012) Correlation of 735

Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive 736

status: A review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 737

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

With regard to the different waste fractions, case B presented a higher production of paper, due to the presence of offices in the building, and of light packaging, while the amounts

Più nello specifico sono stati analizzati i meccanismi di collasso locali della chiesa e del suo campanile; inoltre sono state realizzate delle analisi statiche non lineari

Accreting white dwarfs: the accretion rate (left Y- axis) is a key prediction of the evolution models (solid and dashed tracks), and together with the white dwarf mass determines its

1 Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing 100049, People ’s Republic of China 2.. Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People ’s Republic

Methods An international Delphi study was performed to identify relevant score items for adhesion-related complications, including small bowel obstruction, female

Rac1 accumulates in the nucleus during G2 The stochastic nature of the expression of GFP-Rac1 in the nu- cleoplasm and nuclear envelope in individual cells ( Fig. 1 A )

Tale tema, investendo la tutela di diritti fondamentali, ha progressivamente interessato la giurisprudenza della CEDU, secondo una interpretazione espansiva dell’art. 3