IL NUOVO CIMENTO VOL. 112 B, N. 11 Novembre 1997
Wormhole wave function in the Einstein-Yang-Mills theory (*)
Z.-Q. TAN(1) (2) and Y.-G. SHEN(1) (**)
(1) CCAST (World Laboratory) - P.O. Box 8730, Beijing 100080, PRC
(2) Department of Physics, Guangxi University - Nanning, Guangxi 530004, PRC
(ricevuto il 30 Ottobre 1996; approvato il 25 Giugno 1997)
Summary. — In this paper, the wormhole wave function in the
Einstein-Yang-Mills theory is presented by using the method proposed by Hawking.
PACS 98.80.Hw – Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology; quantum cosmology. PACS 04.20.Cv – Fundamental problems and general formalism.
PACS 04.60 – Quantum gravity.
In recent years, quantum cosmology, baby universe and wormhole have been widely studied [1]. It is known that for the Wheeler-De Witt equation [2] two kinds of solutions exist [ 3 , 4 ]. One kind of solution is the solution of quantum cosmology. This kind of solution gives a wave function of the universe and coincides with the evolution of the universe. In the classical forbidden zone (a EH21, here a is a scale factor of the
Robertson-Walker metric, and H 4kLO3 with the cosmological constant L) the wave
function decreases exponentially. In the classical permissible zone (a DH21), the wave
function is of oscillatory type. Another kind of solution is the solution of quantum wormhole. In the classical permissible zone (corresponding to a from 0 to r0A LP, here
LPis the Planckian scale), this solution is of oscillatory type. In the classical forbidden
zone (corresponding to a from r0to Q), the solution decreases exponentially. It is just a
reasonable picture of the baby universe and the corresponding wormhole.
In general, classical wormholes are instantons, solutions of the Euclidean Einstein field equations [5-9], which consist of two large regions of space-time connected by a throat. And the quantum wormholes are solutions of the Wheeler-De Witt equation with definite boundary conditions [4, 10-13]. Hawking, Page et al. have pointed out [ 4 , 12 ] that these kinds of boundary conditions make the present wave functions to exponentially decrease in a large three-dimensional space, and to remain canonical in some proper way when the three dimensions tend to zero.
(*) The authors of this paper have agreed to not receive the proofs for correction. (**) Permanent address: Shanghai Observatory, Academia Sinica, Shanghai 200030, PRC.
Z.-Q.TANandY.-G.SHEN
1516
In this paper, by using the Hawking method [10] in the Einstein-Yang-Mills theory, we give the corresponding Wheeler-De Witt equation and calculate the wave function of the wormhole.
It is known that the Einstein gravity coupled to SU( 2 ) Yang-Mills gauge field is described by the action [14]
S 4
M d4xk9g
L 02 1 16 pGR 1 1 16 pag Fa mnFamn1 iu 16 p2F a mnFAamn1 (1) 1 iu 8 48 p2RmnabR Amnab 1 gRAmnabRAmnabh
2 ¯M dSkh 1 8 pG(K 2K0) . Here agfg2O4 p denotes the fine-structure constant of the SU( 2 ) gauge field. L0denotes the cosmological constant. The CP-violating parameters in the Yang-Mills and the Einstein gravity theories are u and u8, respectively. The induced metric on the boundary is denoted by hmnfgmn2 nmnn, where nm is the unit normal vector on the boundary ¯M . The extrinsic curvature at the boundary M is denoted by K.
We take the metric as [14] dS2 4
g
3 p 2 Gh
21 [N2(t) dt2 1 a2(t) sa 7 sa] 4g
3 p 2 Gh
21 [em 7 em] (2)and the ansatz of the gauge field, in A04 0 gauge,
Aamdxm4 ( 1 1 H(t) ] sa. (3)
The one-form sasatisfies the SU( 2 ) Maurer-Cartan structure equation dsm
1 eabcsbR sc 4 0 . (4)
In the above gauge the field strength is
Fa 4 H n N dt Ls a 1 (H22 1 ) 1 2e abcsbR sc 4 (5) 4 dai
y
H n Nae 0R ei 1g
H 2 2 1 a2h
1 2 eijke jR ekz
. Let L040. Using the ansatz of eq. (3) and the field strength eq. (5), the action becomesS 4 1 2
dt Na3y
2gg
a n Nah
2 1 1 a2h
1 r02 a4u
(H 2 2 1 )21u
H n a Nv
2v
z
; (6)here the rescaled fine-structure constant is
r22 0 4
2 ag
3 p . (7)
As a matter of convenience, we choose a conformal gauge
N(t) 4a(t) .
WORMHOLE WAVE FUNCTION IN THE EINSTEIN-YANG-MILLS THEORY 1517
Hereafter, a dot above the symbols denotes the derivative with respect to conformal time. The equation of motion of the Yang-Mills field follows from the variation of the action with respect to H(t):
H
n n
22 H(H22 1 ) 4 0 . (9)
Using eq. (5), it is easy to prove the Bianchi identity
D R Fa4 0 (10)
to be satisfied. The first integral of motion of eq. (9) is the conserved energy density of the gauge field:
[H
n
2(H22 1 )2] 42E . (11)
From eqs. (11), (8) and (6), we have
S 4 1 2
dt[2(an2 1 a2) 1r2 0( 2 H n 2 1 E) ] . (12) Let 2 r02H n 2 4 Wn2, (13)then eq. (12) becomes
S 4 1
2
dt[2an22 a21 Wn21 r02E] .
(14)
By canonical quantization, we have the Wheeler-De Witt equation as follows:
y
1 ap ¯ ¯aa p ¯ ¯a 2 ¯2 ¯W2 2 2 a 2 1 2 r02Ez
C(a , W) 40 , (15)where p denotes the operator-ordering ambiguity in quantum gravity, and we take p40. Let
C(a , W) 4c(a) c(W) . (16)
By separating eq. (15), we get 1 c(a) d2c(a) da2 2 2 a 2 4 2l , (17) 1 c(W) d2c(W) dW2 2 2 r0 2 E 42l , (18) where l is a constant. From eq. (17) we obtain
d2c(a)
da2 1 (l 2 2 a 2
) c(a) 40 (19)
and its solutions are
c(a) 4N1e2a
2
Hn(k2 a) , (20)
Z.-Q.TANandY.-G.SHEN 1518 with l 42n11 , n 40, 1, 2, R . (21) Equation (18) becomes d2c(W) dW2 1 (l 2 2 r 2 0E) c(W) 40 . (22)
The analogous model to eq. (11) is that of a particle moving in the inverted double-well potential V(H) 42(H2
2 1 )2with a total energy 2 E. The classical motion is possible only if the total energy is in the range 21 G2EG0. So, from eq. (20) we can choose properly l to make l D2r2
0E . Thus, the solution of eq. (22) is
c(W) 4N2eikl 22r 2 0EW. (23) Then C(a , W) 4N1N2e2a 2 Hn(k2 a) exp ikl 22r2 0EW; (24)
here N1and N2are normalized constants.
From the conclusion obtained by the ref. [14] we have
k2 r0
k
1 2kE GW(t) Gk2 r0k
1 1kE,(25)
0 Ga(t) E1Q . (26)
From eq. (21), it is known [13] that the wave function will oscillate in a for a2
ElO2, and decrease exponentially for a2
D lO2 . So the wave function obtained is the wave function described for the quantum wormhole.
* * *
The authors would like to thank Prof. YUAN-ZHONG ZHANG for helpful discussions. The work is partly granted by the National Science Foundation of China.
R E F E R E N C E S
[1] DUNCANM. J., preprint UMN-TH-916O90. [2] DEWITTB. S., Phys. Rev., 160 (1967) 1113.
[3] HARTLET. B. and HAWKINGS. W., Phys. Rev. D, 28 (1983) 2960. [4] HAWKINGS. W. and PAGED. N., Phys. Rev. D, 42 (1990) 2655. [5] GIDDINGSS. B. and STROMINGERA., Nucl. Phys. B, 306 (1988) 890. [6] COLEMANS. and LEEK., Nucl. Phys. B, 329 (1990) 387.
[7] GUPTAA. K., HUGHESJ., PRESKILLJ. and WISSM. B., Nucl. Phys. B, 333 (1990) 167. [8] HOSOYAA. and OGURAW., Phys. Lett. B, 225 (1989) 117.
[9] SHENY. G., GAOH. Y., TANZ. Q. and DINGH. G., Phys. Rev. D, 44 (1991) 1331. [10] HAWKINGS. W., Phys. Rev. D, 37 (1988) 904.
[11] CAMPBELLL. M. and GARAYL. J., Phys. Lett. B, 254 (1991) 49. [12] HAWKINGS. W., Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 5 (1990) 453.
[13] LYONSA., Nucl. Phys. B, 324 (1989) 253. [14] REYS. J., Nucl. Phys. B, 336 (1990) 146.