ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Scientia
Horticulturae
j o u r n a l ho me p ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / s c i h o r t i
Different
agronomic
and
fertilization
systems
affect
polyphenolic
profile,
antioxidant
capacity
and
mineral
composition
of
lettuce
Adriano
Sofo
a,∗,
Bengt
Lundegårdh
b,
Anna
Mårtensson
b,
Michele
Manfra
c,
Giacomo
Pepe
d,
Eduardo
Sommella
d,
Mauro
De
Nisco
e,
Gian
Carlo
Tenore
f,
Pietro
Campiglia
d,
Antonio
Scopa
aaSchoolofAgricultural,Forestry,FoodandEnvironmentalSciences,UniversityofBasilicata,Vialedell’AteneoLucano,10,I-85100Potenza,Italy bDepartmentofSoilandEnvironment,SLU—SwedishUniversityofAgriculturalSciences,Ullsväg17Ultuna,SE-75007Uppsala,Sweden cDepartmentofScience,UniversityofBasilicata,Vialedell’AteneoLucano10,I-85100Potenza,Italy
dDepartmentofPharmacy,UniversityofSalerno,ViaGiovanniPaoloII132,I-84084Fisciano,Salerno,Italy
ePharmaco-ChemicalDepartment,FacultyofPharmacy,UniversityofMessina,VialeAnnunziata,I-98168Messina,Italy fDepartmentofPharmacy,UniversityofNapoliFedericoII,ViaD.Montesano49,I-80131Napoli,Italy
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received18November2015 Receivedinrevisedform3April2016 Accepted4April2016
Availableonline14April2016 Keywords: Flavonols Lettuce Minerals Organicfarming Phenolicacids
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Thepresentpaperaimstoinvestigatephenolicprofiles,antioxidantcapacityandmineralcomposition oflettuce(LactucasativaL.,var.‘MaravilladeVerano’)grownunderconventional(CON)andanorganic (ORG)systemswithfourdifferentfertilizationtreatments.Thepolyphenolicprofilesofleafextractswere determinedbyultra-high-performanceliquidchromatography(UHPLC),thelevelsofmineralelements bymeansofinductivelycoupledplasmamassspectrometry,whereastotalphenoliccontentand antiox-idantcapacityweredeterminedspectrophotometrically.Yield,soilandmeteorologicalparameterswere measured.Inallthefertilizationtreatments,totalphenolicacidsandflavonolsinCONweresignificantly highercomparedtoORG.Atrendparalleltothatofsinglephenolswasobservedfortotalphenolic con-tentandtotalantioxidantcapacity.PlantmineraldistributionrevealedsignificantchangesbetweenCON andORGsystemsinsomeplantmacronutrients(N,Mg,S,Na,Fe)andmicronutrients(Se,Mn,Mo).The differencesamongfertilizationtreatmentsforalltheparametersconsideredwerealsodiscussed.From theoverallanalysisoftheresults,thehighercontentofphenolicsobservedinCONsystemcouldbe asso-ciatedtothepresenceofmorestressfulconditions,intermsofplantand/orsoilmineraldeficits.Onthe otherhand,theadoptionofanorganicmanagementdeterminedhigheryieldsandabetterplantmineral balance.
©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Green lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is primarily consumed as
wholeheads or fresh-cutproduct (Romaniet al.,2002).As
let-tuceworldwide consumption hassteadily increasedin the last
decades(Heimleretal.,2012),aseriesofstudieshavebeenrecently
conducted for studying its nutraceutical and health-promoting
Abbreviations: CON,conventionalsoilmanagement;DPPH•, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazylradical;ORG,organicsoilmanagement;DW,dryweight;FRAP, ferricreducingabilityofplasma;FW,freshweight;GAE,gallicacidequivalents; PAR,photosyntheticallyactiveradiation;TE,Troloxequivalents;UHPLC, ultra-high-performanceliquidchromatography.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:adriano.sofo@unibas.it(A.Sofo).
compounds(Ribas-Agustíetal.,2011;Heimleretal.,2012;
Abu-Reidahetal.,2013;Durazzoetal.,2014;Pepeetal.,2015).
Itwasdemonstratedthat lettuceisparticularlyrichof some
classes of polyphenols, plant secondary metabolites with free
radical-scavengingpropertiesthathaveevolvedforfacingabiotic
andbioticstressesexperiencedbytheplantsinthesurrounding
environment(Romanietal.,2002;Ohetal.,2009a).Polyphenols
are also important in humandiet, preventing cancer and
car-diovasculardiseases (Manachet al., 2004;Hooper and Cassidy,
2006).The health-promoting properties of lettuce polyphenols
wererecentlytestedbyPepeetal.(2015)andAdessoetal.(2016),
who demonstrated thatlettuce leaf extractsare abletoreduce
boththeinflammatoryandoxidativestressinmurinemonocyte
macrophagecells, bydecreasing reactiveoxygen species, nitric
oxiderelease,induciblenitricoxidesynthaseandcycloxygenase-2
expression,andpromotingthenucleartranslocationofthenuclear
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.04.003 0304-4238/©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
Table1
Compostandrockdustappliedeveryyear(2011–2013)forthedifferentfertilizationtreatments. Fertilization
treatment
Compost(tha−1yr−1) Rockdust(tha−1 yr−1) Calciumnitrate (kgNha−1yr−1) A Nofertilization 0 0 0 B Manure 12 0 0 C Rockdust 0 28.8 0
D Manure+rockdust 12 28.8 0
K Mineralfertilization(control) 0 0 150
factorsNrf2andNF-B.Consideringthatlettuceisacheapand pop-ularfoodwidelyconsumedfreshworldwideandthatthelackof cookingpreservethedegradationofthemorethermolabile chem-icalspeciesandavoidthelossofwater-solublecompounds,this vegetableisofkeyimportanceforthedietarysupply ofnatural antioxidants(Pepeetal.,2015).
Inlettuce,twoclassesofpolyphenolsaremainlypresent:
phe-nolicacidsandflavonols(Manachetal.,2004;Baslametal.,2013;
Lópezetal.,2014).Phenolicacidsarerarelyfoundinlettuce in
thefreeform,beingmostlypresentasboundforms,mainly
gly-cosylated derivatives or esters (e.g. chlorogenic acid, from the
combination of caffeic and quinic acids) (DuPont et al., 2000;
Mulabagaletal.,2010;Ribas-Agustíetal.,2011;MaiandGlomb,
2013). Flavonols are very frequent in lettuce, and their main
representativesaretheglycosylatedderivativesofquercetinand
kaempferol(Romanietal.,2002;HooperandCassidy,2006).
Greenhouse and soilless lettuce culture systems are today
increasingly widespread than open-air-grown lettuce (Romani
etal.,2002;Heimleretal.,2012;Durazzoetal.,2014).Whilethis
warrantsahigheryieldandbetterclimatic,phytopathogical,water
andnutritionalcontrol,itnotalwaysensuresagood
phytochemi-calprofileinthefinalproduct(Tomas-Barberanetal.,1997;Llorach
etal.,2008).Indeed,theadverseagronomicandenvironmental
fac-torsexperiencedbyplantsgrowninopenfield,suchashighorlow
temperature,ultravioletlight,insectattack,pathogeninfectionand
eventualnutrientdeficiencycanincreasetheamountsofphenolics
and/orchangetheirprofiles,evenwithadecreaseofcrop
produc-tivity(Tomas-Barberanetal.,1997;Llorachetal.,2004,2008;Oh
etal.,2009b).Forinstance,flavonolsareyellowpigmentsgenerally
consideredtoactasUVprotectantsandfreeradicalscavengers,
sotheirbiosynthesisisstimulatedintheouterandaerialtissues
(stemandleafepidermis)underexcesslight(Sofoetal.,2012).In
addition,thelevelsofphenolicacidsinlettucearesensitiveto
envi-ronmentalconditions(Liuetal.,2007;MaiandGlomb,2013).Forall
thesereasons,itisimportanttofindacompromisebetween
conve-nientagronomicpracticesandfoodnutritionalproperties.Onthe
otherhand,toobtaintopyieldsofhighqualityandpreserve
envi-ronmentalsustainability,itisindispensabletoadoptsustainable
agriculturaltechniques.Amongopenfieldagronomictechniques,
organicfarmingoffersmorebenefitsthanaconventionalapproach
intermsofsustainability,enhancedphysico-chemicaland
micro-biological soil fertility, and absence of synthetic fertilizers and
chemicalpesticides(Heimleretal.,2012;Durazzoetal.,2014)
Otherthanphenolics,lettucechemistryattheelementallevel,
thatincludesthecontentofallmineralnutrientsand trace
ele-ments,isofkeyimportance(KellyandBateman,2010).Indeed,it
isknownthat someinorganiccations,naturallypresentat
non-toxicconcentrationsinlettuce,suchasFe,CuandZn,participatein
theradical-scavengingreactionsfortheirroleofcofactorsinsome
antioxidantenzymes,Fe/Sproteinsandcytochromes.Inthecaseof
K,Na,Ca,Mg,SandP,theyareessentialtothehumanorganism
togetherwithsomemicronutrients(e.g.,Mn,SeandCo)thatactas
cofactorsinhumanvitaminsandenzymes.
Inthelastyears,greatimportancehasbeendevotedtothe
con-sumptionof lettuce since it is a source of natural antioxidants
(Llorach et al., 2008; Kelly and Bateman, 2010; Heimler et al., 2012;Abu-Reidahetal.,2013;LeeandScagel,2013).Basedonthis
acceptedknowledge,thepresentpaperaimsatinvestigating
phe-nolicprofiles,totalphenolcontent,totalantioxidantcapacityand
mineralcompositionoflettucegrownundertwodifferentfarming
systems(conventionalandorganic)andunderdifferent
fertiliza-tiontreatmentsinordertoestablishifthesemanagementpractices
canmodifyitsnutritionalquality.
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Experimentalsiteandplantmaterial
Theexperimentwasconductedin2011,2012and2013intwo
open-fieldfarmsatJärna,incentralSweden,notdistanteachother
andhavesimilarclimaticconditions.Thefirstfarm(‘Gerstaberg’;
CON)wasmanagedconventionallyforover50 years,cultivated
witharotationpotato/ryeinthelast12years(fertilizationusing
35kg N-NO3ha−1yr−1 and 20kg N-NH4ha−1yr−1, cropresidue
shredding,andploughingtwiceayearatasoildepthof30cm).The
secondonewasanorganicfarm(‘Nibblegarden’;ORG)amended
withdifferenttypesofanimalmanureandwithoutanysynthetic
fertilizersorchemicalpesticidessinceitsinceptionin1966,and
cultivatedwitharotationofwithpotato/clover/barleyinthelast12
years(minimumtillage,cropresiduesshreddedandincorporated
intothesoilafteralightharrowingat10-cmsoildepth).
Thelettuce(L.sativaL.)varietyusedinthisstudywas‘Maravilla
deVerano’.Startingfrom2011,bothfarms(CONandORG)were
dividedinfourblocks:oneunfertilizedcontrol(treatmentA)and
threefertilizationtreatments(treatmentsB,CandD)withdifferent
typesofsoilamendments(Table1).Anadditionalmineralfertilized
treatment(K)wasincludedinCONfieldwhereasitwasnotpossible
toincludeitintheORGsystemduetothestrictrestrictionsinthe
useofsyntheticfertilizers.
Cattlemanurecompostedforsixmonthswasusedfortreatment
B.Rockdust(treatmentC)wasobtainedbyfinelygrinding
(approx-imately0.5mmofdiameter)localrocksusingajawcrusher(Model
NordbergC100;MetsoMineralsLtd.,Tampere,Finland).Compost
mean composition wasthe following:water 248gkgFW−1, pH
7.98,totalN18gkgDW−1,organicC338gkgDW−1,organic
mat-ter583gkgDW−1,humus104gkgDW−1,P2O56.8gkgDW−1,K2O
14gkgDW−1, Zn 0.112gkgDW−1, Fe 5.53gkgDW−1, 0.065Cu
gkgDW−1,Mn0.114gkgDW−1.Rockdustmeancomposition(%
w/w)wasthefollowing:SiO2 65.21,K2O11.41,CaO9.06,Al2O3
5.42,MgO1.96,Na2O1.65,P2O51.28,FeO1.21,Fe2O31.02,MnO
0.07, other minerals 1.71. Compost stone meal (treatment D)
wasprepared by mixing thestone powder withcattle manure
(<0.2mm)fromdiabase,afterwhichthemixturewascomposted
for6months.FertilizersamountsofthetreatmentK(Table1)were
calculatedonthebasisofthevaluesofsoiltextureandNcontent
(Table2).Attheestablishmentofthetreatments,tencomposite
soilsampleweretakenbyrandomlycollectingthreesoilcoresper
eachfarmingsystemandfertilizationtreatment.Onthesesamples,
soiltexturewasdetermined,soilNwasmeasuredbytheanalytic
Table2
Soiltextureandnitrogencontentat0–30cmdepthintheconventional(CON)and organic(ORG)experimentalsitesatthebeginningoftheexperiment(n=10).
CON ORG
Soilorganicmatter(%w/w) 2.6 6.7
Clay(%w/w) 45.2 40.0
Silt(%w/w) 40.8 40.0
Sand(%w/w) 11.4 13.3
NO3-N(kgha−1) 47.4 81.0
NH4-N(kgha−1) 31.7 12.1
method,andsoilorganicmatterwasdeterminedbydrycombustion methodusingaLECO-SC230apparatus(LECOInstruments,UK).Soil wiltingpoint,fieldcapacityandsaturationwereestimatedfrom thevaluesofsoiltextureandsoilorganicmatterusingthesoftware SPAWHydrology(version6.02.74;USDAAgriculturalResearch Ser-vice,Washington,Pullman,WA,USA).
Lettuce was planted in late June of the three experimental yearsinboththesystems.Thedistancebetweentheplantswas 0.25×0.25m.Plantswerecoveredwithanylonclothtoreduce evaporation and protect them against pests. The harvest was carriedoutinlateJulyinboththesystems.Anumberof16 let-tuceheadspereachfertilizationtreatmentofbothCONandORG systemswererandomlyharvestedinthecentralpartofeach fertil-izationblockforavoidingboundaryeffectsamongthefertilization treatmentsandplacedinwhiteplasticbagstominimizewaterloss. Thebagswereimmediatelytransportedinthelaboratory,where theywereweighed.Theheads weredividedlengthwiseinhalf. Onehalfofeachheadwasputinaclothbag,weighedanddried at53◦Cfor48h.Thedrymatterwasweighed,groundandstoredin plastictinsforelementdetermination.Theremaininghalveswere usedfordeterminingphenolextractionandantioxidantcapacity. Thenumberofplantsrandomlychosenforyieldmeasurements expressedasgDW head−1 in each fertilization blockwas200. Meteorologicalvariablesweremonitoredbyweatherstationsof thenationalweathermeasuringsystemofSwedishMeteorological andHydrologicalInstitute,placedata50mfromtheexperimental fields.
2.2. Phenolicextractionanddetermination
Foreachplant,centralleavesweredetached,slightlywashed withdistilledwatertoremoveeventualresidues,andusedforthe followingmeasurements.Fivegramsoffreshleaftakenfromthe centralpartwerecollectedwithascalpelandplacedinan extract-ingsolutionof49mlmethanol+1mlHCl37%,accordingtoSofo etal.(2012).Thesolutionwascoveredwithparafilmtoavoid
evap-oration,shakenat 100rpmat 20◦C in thedarkfor 45min.The
extractswerefilteredthrough0.20mMinisartSFCAsterile
fil-ters(SartoriusStedimBiotechGmbG,Goettingen,Germany),and
immediatelystoredat−20◦C.Leafextractswereanalyzedby
high-performanceliquidchromatographyforthedeterminationofthe
phenolic compounds.The polyphenols contents of leafextracts
were determined by ultra-high-performance liquid
chromatog-raphy(UHPLC). Allleafextractswere filteredthrough0.45-m
Whatmanfilters.
UltrapurewaterwasobtainedbyaMilli-Qsystem(Millipore,
Milan,Italy).Allthechemicalsused werepurchased by
Sigma-Aldrich(Milan,Italy). The UHPLC analysiswas performedon a
ShimadzuNexeraUHPLCsystem,consisting ofa CBM-20A
con-troller,twoLC-30ADdual-plungerparallel-flowpumps,aDGU-20
A5degasser,anSPD-M20Aphotodiodearraydetector(equipped
withasemi-microflowcellof2.5l),aCTO-20Acolumnoven,a
SIL-30ACautosampler.TheUHPLCsystemwascoupledonlineto
anLCMS-IT-TOFmassspectrometerthroughanESI source
(Shi-madzu,Kyoto,Japan).LC–MSdataelaborationwasperformedby
theLCMSsolution®software(Version3.50.346,Shimadzu).Mobile
phaseswere:A=0.1%(v/v)HCOOHinwater;B=0.1%(v/v)HCOOH
inacetonitrile.Analyseswereperformedingradientelutionas
fol-lows:0–2.90min,15–20%B;2.90–3.10min,20%B;3.10–3.80min,
20–27% B; 3.80–5.30, 27–35% B, 5.30–6.60 35–55% B, 6.60–10
55–100%B.Columnoventemperaturewassetto48◦C.Injection
volumewas2lofmethanolicextract.ThefollowingPDA
parame-terswereapplied:samplingrate,40Hz;detectortimeconstant,
0.160s;celltemperature,40◦C. Dataacquisition wassetinthe
range190–400nmandchromatogramsweremonitoredat330and
350nmatthemaximumabsorbanceofthecompoundsofinterest.
UHPLCsystemwascoupledon-linetoahybridIT-TOFinstrument,
flowratefromLCwassplittedprioroftheESI sourcebymeans
ofastainlesssteelTeeunion(1/16in.,0.15mmbore;Valco
Instru-mentsCompanyInc.,Houston,TX,USA).Resolution,sensitivity,and
massnumbercalibrationoftheiontrapandtheTOFanalyzerwere
tunedusingastandardsamplesolutionofsodiumtrifluoroacetate.
MSdetectionwasoperatedinnegativeionizationmodewiththe
followingparameters:detectorvoltage,1.53kV;Interfacevoltage,
−3.5kV,CDL(curvedesolvationline)temperature,200◦C;block
heatertemperature,200◦C;nebulizinggasflow(N2),1.5lmin−1,
dryinggaspressure,100kPa.FullscanMSdatawereacquiredinthe
rangeof200–900m/zionaccumulationtime,40ms;IT,(repeat=2).
MS/MSexperimentswereconductedindatadependent
acquisi-tion,precursorionswereacquiredintherange150–800m/z;peak
width,3Da;ionaccumulationtime,60ms;CIDenergy,60%,
colli-siongas50%,repeat=1;executiontrigger(BPC)intensity,at95%
stoplevel.
Quantification of individual phenolic compounds was
per-formed by photodiode array detection (DAD) at the
maxi-mumabsorbance of the compounds of interest. Stock solution
(1mgmL−1)were preparedin methanol, the calibrationcurves
wereobtainedin a concentrationrangeof 1–100gmL−1 with
sixconcentrationlevels(1,5,10,25,50,100gmL−1)and
trip-licateinjectionofeachlevelwererun.Phenolicacidsderivatives
werequantifiedbycomparisonwithanexternalstandardofcaffeic
acidwhereflavonolswerequantifiedasquercetin3-O-glucoside.
Thequantificationofthecompoundsforwhichtherewerenota
standard availablewasmadeusing thecalibrationcurveofthe
compound that was included in their structure. Peak areas of
eachstandardwereplottedagainstcorrespondingconcentrations.
Theamountofthecompoundsin thesample wasexpressedas
milligrampergramofextract,linearregressionwasusedto
gen-erate calibrationcurve,R2 values were≥0.999,retention times
andareasrepeatabilitywasalsoevaluatedshowingRSD%values
below 0.80and 8.68respectively, furtherconfirmingthe
preci-sionofthemethod.Identificationofpolyphenolswascarriedout
usingbothDADspectraandMS/MSdata,comparingthe
fragmen-tationpattern withdata,whenpresent, inliterature. Molecular
formulawascalculatedbytheFormulaPredictorsoftware
(Shi-madzu),setting a low toleranceso that most of the identified
compoundswereinposition1in thelistofthepossible
candi-dates.Twodifferentcolumnsetupwereemployedinthiswork:a
KinetexC18150×2.1mm,2.6m(Phenomenex,CastleMaggiore,
Italy)forUHPLC–MS/MSqualitativeanalyses,anda KinetexC18
150×4.6mm,2.6mforUHPLC-PDAquantitativeanalysis.
TotalphenoliccontentwasdeterminedbytheFolin-Ciocalteu
colorimetricmethodusinggallicacidasastandard.Eachreaction
mixturecontained100lsamplesolution,6mldistilled-deionized
water,500lFolin-Ciocalteureagentand0.15mlofNa2CO3.For
theblank,acetone-water(1:1,v/v)replacedgallicacid.After2hof
reactionat20◦C,theabsorbancewasmeasuredat765nmusinga
JascoV-530UV–visspectrophotometer(JascoCorp.,Tokyo,Japan).
Totalphenoliccontentwasexpressedasmggallicacidequivalents
2.3. Totalantioxidantcapacity
The ability of leaf extracts to scavenge the DPPH•
(2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical was measured according to
Brand-Williams et al. (1995). Aliquots (20l) of leaf extract
wereaddedto3mlofDPPH• solution(6×10−5molL−1)andthe
absorbance was spectrophotometrically determined at 515nm
every5minuntilthesteadystate.
Theantioxidantpotentialofleafextractswasalsodetermined
usingaFRAPassay(FerricReducingAbilityofPlasma).Asolutionof
10mmolL−12,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine(TPTZ)in40mmolL−1HCl
and12mmolL−1FeCl2wasdilutedin300mmolL−1sodiumacetate
buffer(pH3.6)ataratioof1:1:10.Aliquots(20l)ofleafextract
wereaddedto3mloftheFRAPsolutionandtheabsorbancewas
spectrophotometricallydeterminedat 593nm every5minuntil
thesteadystatewasreached.Foreachantioxidantassay,aTrolox
aliquotwasusedtodevelopastandardcurveandalldatawere
expressedasTroloxequivalents(molTEg−1FW).
2.4. Elementdetermination
Analiquot (50g) of the sameleaves usedfor phenol
deter-minationwasdigestedinaHNO3:H2O2 solution(5:1,v/v)using
ahighperformancemicrowavedigestionunit(MLS-1200Mega,
Milestone Inc., CT, USA). Two millilitersof HNO3 (0.1M) were
addedandthenthesolutionwasmadeuptoa10mlwith
ultra-puredistilledwater.Thelevelsofelementsweredeterminedby
meansofquadrupoleinductivelycoupledplasmamass
spectrome-try,ICP-QMS(ElanDRCII,PerkinElmerSCIEX,CT,USA).Operational
parameterswerethefollowing:sampleuptakerate,1mlmin−1;
sample introduction system, Meinhard nebulizer withcyclonic
spraychamber;gasflowratesLmin−1:plasma,15;auxiliary,1.0;
nebulizer,0.85;dwelltime,50ms;interface,Ptcones;extraction
lens voltage,optimized for maximum detector response (56Fe).
HighpurityHe(99.9999%)andH2(99.9995%)wereused,inorder
tominimizethepotentialproblemscausedbyunidentified
reac-tivecontaminantspeciesinthecell.Theinstrumentwasequipped
withanoctopoleion guideenclosed ina collision/reactioncell.
Moreover,theinstrumentwasoperatedinanair-conditioned
lab-oratory(20–22◦C)equippedwithafiltertoremovedustparticles.
Non-metallicdeviceswerealwaysusedtocollectandtransportthe
samples.Consideringthattheinstrumentusedisasimultaneous
ICP-QMS,havinganarrayofphotomultipliertubespositionedto
lookatafixedsetofelements(wavelengths),thereference
wave-lengthsforeachmetalandmetalloidwereautomaticallychosen
bytheinstrumentsoftwareinordertoavoidinterferences with
theotherelementsanalyzed.Beforeuse,allglasswareand
plas-ticcontainerswerecleanedbywashingwith10%ultra-puregrade
HNO3foratleast24h,andthenrinsedcopiouslywithultra-pure
waterbeforeuse. Thecalibrationsolutionswerepreparedfrom
multi-elementalstandardstocksolutionsof1000mgL−1,andthe
calibrationcurveswereobtainedbyusing atleast6 calibration
solutions.Reagentblankscontainingultra-purewaterwere
addi-tionallyanalysedinordertocontrolthepurityofthereagentsand
thelaboratoryequipment.
2.5. Statisticalanalysis
Foreachmanagementsystemandfertilizationtreatment,data
ofpolyphenols,totalantioxidantcapacityandminerallevelswere
representedasthemeansofmeasurementson16differentplants
per treatmentperyear (n=48),while yield values were
repre-sentedasthemeansofmeasurementson100plantspertreatment
peryear(n=300).DatawereanalyzedusingSASversion9.2(SAS
InstituteInc.,Cary,NC,USA).Analysisofvariance (ANOVA)was
performedusingthePROCGLMprocedureofthesoftware,that
Fig.1.(A)Rainfall,(B)averageairtemperature,and(C)meandailyPARin2011 (greybars),2012(blackbars)and2013(whitebars).
usesthemethodofleastsquarestofitgenerallinearmodels.PROC
GLMenablestospecifyanydegreeofinteraction(crossedeffects)
andnestedeffects,andalsoprovidesforpolynomial,
continuous-by-class,andcontinuous-nesting-classeffects.Allthevaluesofthe
threeexperimentalyearswereconsideredasreplications,asno
significantdifferencewereobservedbetweentheyears.
Correla-tionanalysiswasperformedtodeterminetherelationshipbetween
the parameters independentof the agronomic and fertilization
treatmentsusingtheCORRprocedure,computingPearson
corre-lationcoefficientsasparametricmeasureofthelinearrelationship
betweenthevariables.Significantdifferencesamongmeanswere
determinedatP≤0.05,accordingtoFisher’sLSDtest.
3. Results
3.1. Climaticvariable,soilpropertiesandyieldparameters
In the period April-August (mean 2011–2013), there was
204mmofrainfall,withonly13mminJuly(Fig.1a).Theaverage
temperaturesreachedapeakof19◦C(mean2011–2013)inAugust
(Fig.1b).ThemeandailyPAR(photosyntheticallyactiveradiation)
increasedfromApriltoJuneandsuccessivelydecreasedduringthe
lastpartofthesummerinallthethreeexperimentalyears(Fig.1c).
Onthebasisoftheparametersofsoiltextureandsoilorganic
matter(Table2),CONsoilwasasiltyclayhaving26.8%(v/v)
wilt-ing point, 40.9% (v/v) field capacity and 52.3% (v/v) saturation,
whereasORGsoilwasasiltyclaywith24.9%wiltingpoint,39.9%
fieldcapacityand58.0%saturation.Soilorganicmatterandtotal
Table3
Yieldinconventional(CON)andorganic(ORG)managementsystems.The fertil-izationtreatmentsareindicatedinTable1.Meanvaluesintheperiod2011–2013 (n=300)±SDfollowedbydifferentlettersaresignificantlydifferentatP≤0.05, accordingtoFisher’sLSDtest.
Yield(gDWhead−1)
CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
A 4.55 2.36 d 12.41 0.69 b
B 10.74 1.25 c 13.46 1.84 ab
C 9.35 1.18 c 13.42 1.99 ab
D 7.57 3.16 cd 15.12 2.70 a
K 8.39 0.99 cd – – –
Forallthefertilizationtreatments,thevaluesofyieldwere sig-nificantlyhigherinORGthaninCON(Table3).Theunfertilized
treatment(A)ofORGhadsignificantlyhigheryield(12.41gDW
head−1)than themineralfertilizedtreatment(K), whileA-CON
showedverylowyieldvalues(Table3).Consideringallthe
treat-mentstogether,excludingK,inallofthethreeyearsofexperiment,
yieldwassignificantlyhigherintheORGsystem(Table7).
3.2. Levelsofphenolicacidsandflavonols
Thephenolicacidsandflavonolsrevealedinthelettucesamples,
sortedintheorderofthepeaksfoundintheUHPLCchromatograms,
areshowedinTable4.Inallthefertilizationtreatments,thelevels
oftotalphenolicacidsofCONfertilizationtreatmentswere
signifi-cantlyhighercomparedtoORG.IntheCONsystem,totalphenolic
acidsintheunfertilizatedtreatmentAweresignificantlyhigher
thaninthefertilizationtreatmentsincludingmanureand/orrock
dust(B,C,andD),wheresthistrendwasnotobservedintheORG
system.Comparedtotheothertreatments,thetotal
concentra-tionofphenolicacidsundermineralfertilization(treatmentK)was
0.845mgg−1FW,avaluesignificantlylowerrespecttoalltheCON
fertilizationtreatments.Feruloylquinicacid,caffeoylferuloyquinic
acid,andmethylcaffeoylferuloyltartaricacidisomerwerefoundto
bethemajorphenolicacidspresent,accountingonaveragefor32,
35and19%,respectively,ofthetotalcontentinphenolicacids.
As for total phenolic acids, statistical differences in total
flavonolswererevealedamongCONandORGfertilization
treat-ments. In the CON system, the levels of total flavonols were
significantlyhigherintheunfertilizedtreatment(A)compareto
thethreefertilizedtreatments(B,C,andD),showingsignificant
differencesrespecttothelowestvalue(0.381mgg−1 FW)found
inplantssubjectedtomineralfetilization(treatmentK).
Consider-ingonaverageallthetreatments,quercetin3-O-glucosidewasthe
mostabundantflavonol,accountingfor38%oftotalflavonols.
ExcludingthetreatmentD(manure+rockdust),thetotal
phe-noliccontentcalculatedbythesumofphenolicacidsandflavonols
resultedtobesignificantlyalwayshigherinCONfertilization
treat-mentsthaninORGones.
3.3. Totalphenolcontentandtotalantioxidantcapacity
As for phenol levels determined by UHPLC, the values of
totalphenolcontentmeasuredbytheFolin-Ciocalteucolorimetric
methodwashigherinalltheCONfertilizationtreatments
com-paredtoORG,showingthehighestlevelsintheA-CONtreatment
(2.25mg GAEg−1 FW)(Table5).Considering all thetreatments
together,excludingK,inallofthethreeyearsofexperimenttotal
phenolcontentwassignificantlyhigherintheleavesofplantsfrom
theCONsystem(Table7).Atrendparallel tothat oftotal
phe-nolswasobservedfortotal antioxidantcapacity determinedby
DPPH•andFRAPassays,withpeaksfoundinA/C-CONtreatments
(Table5).ThedifferencesinantioxidantcapacitybetweenCONand
ORGmanagementsystemswereallsignificant(Table5).
3.4. Elementcontent
MineraldistributionofmacroelementsrevealedthatORG
fer-tilizationtreatmentsdeterminedsignificantincreasesinN,Mg,S,
Na,andAlinallthetreatmentscomparedtotherespectiveCON
fertilizationtreatments,whereasnodifferencesinC,K,Ca,Pand
Fewereobserved(Table6).Regardingmicroelements,ORG
fertil-izationtreatmentshadsignificantlyhigherlevelsofCuandSe,and
lowerconcentrationsofMn,CdandMo,whereasnochangeswere
foundfor Zn,Ni,Crand Co(Table6).Thesetrendswere
gener-allyconfirmed,exceptingforsomeexceptionsintheunfertilized
tretments(A).TheORGfertilizationtreatmentsthatincluded
com-postand/orrockdustapplication(B/C/D)presentedavalueofN
contentcomparable tothatfoundinthetreatmentKwith
min-eralfertilization(Table6).Consideringallthetreatmentstogether,
excludingK,inallofthethreeyearsofexperimenttotalNcontent
wassignificantlyhigherinplantsfromtheORGsystem(Table7).
4. Discussion
4.1. Phenolicprofiles
TheextractionmethodandthedeterminationbyUHPLC
cou-pled withLCMS-IT-TOF here usedallowed todetect clearly 12
phenoliccompounds(eightphenolicacidsandfourflavonols),a
number comparable to that obtainedby other authors (
Ribas-Agustíetal.,2011;Abu-Reidahetal.,2013).Considering allthe
treatmentsandthecontrols(K),ferulicacidderivativeswerethe
largestgroupofphenolycacids,accountingonaveragefor56%of
totalphenolicacidcontent(Table4).AsfoundbyRibas-Agustíetal.
(2011)andAbu-Reidah etal.(2013),thelevelsof chicoricacid,
importantforhumanhealthduetoitsstrongantinflammatoryand
antimicrobicactions,andtoitsanti-cancerandanti-diabetic
prop-erties(Manachetal.,2004;Llorachetal.,2008;Mulabagaletal.,
2010;LeeandScagel,2013),representsagoodfractionofphenolic
acids(onaverage8%forboththecompounds).Amongflavonols,
thelevelsofquercetin,astronganti-tumoralagent(DuPontetal.,
2000;Llorachetal.,2008),wascomparabletothosefoundbyother
authorsindifferentvarietiesofconventionally-cultivatedlettuce
(approximately 100gg−1 FW)(Ribas-Agustíet al., 2011;
Abu-Reidahetal.,2013)(Table4).
4.2. Effectsofcropmanagementsystem
Generally,environmentalstresses,suchasheatshock,chilling
orhighlightintensity,causeahighersynthesisand/or
accumula-tionofphenolsinlettuce(Romanietal.,2002;Ohetal.,2009a,b).
Inothercases,asdepictedbyOrdidgeetal.(2010)forlettuce
cul-tivatedunderdifferentlevelsofUVradiationdeterminedbythe
useofplasticfilms,thereductionofthestressorsdonotproduce
decreases in phenolic content, allowing agronomic advantages
withoutphytochemicalpenalty.Theeffectsofagronomicpractices
onphenolcontentof lettucearenot alwaysstatistically
signifi-cantandoftenmilderthanthosedeterminedbyabioticstressors
(Heimler etal.,2012; Durazzoetal.,2014).Forinstance,inthe workofDurazzoetal.(2014),nodifferencesinsomephenolicacids
(chlorogenicacidand caffeicacid)werefoundbetweenorganic
andconventionallettucecultivatedundergreenhouseconditions.
Inouropinion,themissinglinkofmanyresearchesonphenols
incultivatedplantsisthestudyoftheeffectsofagronomic
prac-ticesonplant’snutritionalbalance,thatinturncanaffectphenol
A. Sofo et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 204 (2016) 106–115 111
Phenolicacidsandflavonolinleavesofgreenlettucegrownunderconventional(CON)andorganic(ORG)managementsystems.ThefertilizationtreatmentsareindicatedinTable1.Meanvaluesintheperiod2011–2013 (n=48)±SDfollowedbydifferentlettersaresignificantlydifferentbetweenrowsatP≤0.05,accordingtoFisher’sLSDtest.Legend:1=chlorogenicacid;2=feruloyltartaricacid;3=feruloylquinicacid;4=caffeicacid; 5=chicoricacid;6=caffeoylferuloyquinicacid;7=methylcaffeoylferuloyltartaricacid;8=methylcaffeoylferuloyltartaricacidisomer;10=chicoricacidmethylester;9=quercetin3-O-glucoside;10=isorhamnetin3-O-glucuronide; 11=kaempferide3-O-glucuronide;12=quercetin.
Phenolicacids Flavonols(gg−1FW)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Totalphenolicacids 9 10 11 12 Totalflavonols(mg) Totalphenols(mg)
(gg−1FW) (mgg−1FW) (gg−1FW) (mgg−1FW) A CONValue 28.01 38.41 564.90 26.71 31.74 314.89 42.34 176.08 1.223 257.88 136.48 181.65 113.79 0.690 1.913 SD 1.32 2.13 3.16 3.94 1.63 23.67 10.22 6.96 16.53 15.35 13.32 5.55 Stat a a a c a a a a a a a a a a a ORGValue 19.96 33.41 339.82 40.42 27.83 237.85 34.78 141.27 0.875 177.94 71.28 62.59 39.05 0.351 1.226 SD 2.73 2.21 15.32 2.47 4.95 24.88 5.63 21.00 12.72 5.26 4.86 8.29 Stat b b b a b b a b c b b b c d c B CONValue 20.39 24.50 432.16 52.73 31.95 230.04 31.37 130.22 0.953 111.26 66.35 183.01 119.79 0.480 1.434 SD 3.84 3.94 23.48 8.75 2.19 11.01 5.02 8.66 20.05 3.32 14.97 5.93 Stat b c ab a a b a b b c b a a c b ORGValue 22.51 36.49 331.40 25.57 30.02 252.46 27.14 143.59 0.869 192.05 73.13 78.99 44.05 0.388 1.257 SD 1.33 4.45 10.73 5.52 2.62 40.39 5.91 27.23 7.74 5.85 2.25 10.25 Stat b a b c a b a b c b b a c d c C CONValue 22.38 31.46 507.76 35.44 31.29 262.97 33.42 156.30 1.081 148.64 90.28 180.53 89.15 0.509 1.590 SD 1.63 1.36 20.65 5.01 3.56 13.44 2.53 19.65 8.25 9.43 11.73 5.46 Stat b b a b a b a ab b bc ab a b bc b ORGValue 20.35 33.65 332.37 53.85 26.29 241.25 34.74 171.81 0.914 196.87 66.10 63.27 39.78 0.366 1.280 SD 3.83 4.35 15.93 4.30 7.21 35.97 6.93 9.70 12.60 9.30 3.54 18.10 Stat b b b a b b a a c ab ab b c d c D CONValue 28.43 32.02 519.36 26.80 32.83 255.50 43.15 140.33 1.078 183.21 107.85 156.91 114.59 0.563 1.641 SD 7.08 1.13 39.09 9.22 8.20 19.98 9.12 9.03 16.3 3.75 12.19 6.06 Stat a b a c a b a a b b ab a a b ab ORGValue 20.38 34.22 350.59 25.10 27.48 244.62 36.81 169.83 0.909 233.42 82.38 73.32 26.23 0.474 1.553 SD 3.99 1.38 13.46 4.35 4.09 30.85 8.43 10.96 6.30 12.43 4.80 10.64 Stat b ab b c b b a a c a b b d c b K CONValue 19.40 40.62 257.31 34.80 22.45 281.63 37.68 151.11 0.845 97.87 46.79 162.28 74.39 0.381 1.226 SD 3.34 1.45 35.71 4.31 2.14 22.51 4.13 11.73 7.28 9.08 14.62 8.36 Stat b a c b a b a ab c d c a b d c
Table5
Totalphenolcontent(Folin-Ciocalteuassay)andtotalantioxidantcapacity(DPPH•andFRAPassays)inleavesofgreenlettucegrownunderconventional(CON)andorganic
(ORG)managementsystems.ThefertilizationtreatmentsareindicatedinTable1.Meanvaluesintheperiod2011–2013(n=48)±SDfollowedbydifferentlettersare significantlyatP≤0.05,accordingtoFisher’sLSDtest.GAE:gallicacidequivalents.TE:Troloxequivalents.
Totalphenols(mgGAEg−1FW)
CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
A 2.25 0.03 a 1.25 0.07 bc B 2.18 0.02 b 0.61 0.10 d C 1.76 0.16 b 0.85 0.10 d D 1.30 0.14 bc 0.79 0.07 d K 1.14 0.07 c – – DPPH•(molTEg−1FW) CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
A 40.26 0.29 a 28.35 0.27 c B 33.20 0.28 b 19.99 0.24 d C 40.25 0.30 a 24.43 0.41 d D 28.35 0.28 c 20.00 0.23 d K 20.01 0.23 d – – – FRAP(molTEg−1FW) CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
A 28.35 0.28 a 18.27 0.25 c
B 25.31 0.41 b 14.00 0.17 cd
C 26.31 0.38 a 14.01 0.16 cd
D 18.50 0.33 c 10.42 0.30 d
K 8.28 0.22 d – – –
betterdefinetherelationhipsbetweensoilphysico-chemical prop-erties(Table2),fertilizationplans(Table1)andplantmineralstatus (Table6).
FocusingonthelevelsofthephenolsdetectedbyUHPLC,
dif-ferenttrendswereobserved:thelevelsofphenolicacidsandtotal
phenolsweresignificantlyaffectedbythechoiceofthefarming
system,beinghigherinCONthaninORGforallthefertilization
treatments,whereasflavonolsdidnotsignificantlychangebetween
thetwosystems(Table4).Interestingly,thetotalphenolictrends
observed(Table4)aresimilartothosefoundbyRomanietal.(2002)
inacomparisonbetweengreenhouseandoper-air-grownlettuce,
withthislattershowingahighertotalphenoliccontent,
presum-ablybecausemoresubjectedtodifferentkindsofabioticstresses.
ThetrendsoftotalphenolsdeterminedbytheFolin-Ciocalteu
colorimetricmethod(Table5)appearedtobesimilartothatoftotal
phenolicsobtainedbythesumofthesinglephenoliccompounds
(phenolicacids+flavonols)(Table4).Consideringthe
normaliza-tionduetodryweightconversion,concentrationrangesandleaf
amountsanalyzed,thesevaluesarecomparabletothosefoundby
otherauthorsthatappliedsimilarculturalconditions(onaverage
1–2mgGAEg−1FW)(Heimleretal.,2007;Liuetal.,2007;Ohetal., 2009b).TheresultsofDPPH•methodfortheassayoftotal
antioxi-dantcapacitywereparalleltothatobtainedbyFRAPmethod,with
thehighestvaluesinCONtreatments(Table5).Thissuggeststhat
thetotal radicalscavengingactivityoflettuce sampleswas
cor-relatedtothephenolcontent,asdemonstratedbyotherauthors
(Llorach et al.,2004; Heimler et al.,2007; Llorachet al., 2008; Heimleretal.,2012),andhereconfirmedbythepositive
relation-shipbetweenthetwoparameters(R2=0.85)(Fig.2a).Thisdoes
notexcludethatotherimportantnon-phenolicantioxidantsof
let-tucecouldtakepartintheantioxidantcapacity. Forexample,it
isknownthatsomeminerals,suchasFe,CuandZncanstrongly
contributetoradicalscavenginginplantcells(Abu-Reidahetal.,
2013).Thisnotwithstanding,nosignificantcorrelationwasfound
between[Fe+Zn+Cu]contentandantioxidantcapacity(R2=0.33)
(Fig.2b).
Organicmanagementamelioratedthemineralstatusofplants
(Tables6and7).Particularly,mineralnitrogencontentinplants
waslikelythemainresponsibleforthehigheryields,asshownin
Fig.2c(R2=0.86).Conversely,totalphenols (valuesobtainedby
UHPLCdata)werenegatively correlatedwith[Fe+Zn+Cu]
con-tent,Ncontentand yield(R2=0.90,0.82 and0.79,respectively)
(Fig.2d–f,respectively),suggestingthatintheplantswithabetter
nutritionalstatus,thesynthesisand/oraccumulationofphenols
wasreduced.Thecorrelationbetweenplantmineralcontentand
phenolbiosynthesisandaccumulationisnotsurprising.The
activ-ityofphenylalanineammonialyase(PAL)polyphenoloxidaseand
someperoxidase isoforms,the key regulatory enzymesfor the
biosynthesisofplantphenoliccompounds,andthetranscription
ofmany PAL-encoding genes,is generallyincreasedby adverse
environmentalconditions,suchaslownutrientlevels,particularly
Nand metalmicroelements(Ruizetal., 2003;Velickovi ´cetal.,
2014;Wadaetal.,2014).AccordingtoGershenzon(1984),nitrogen
stressaccompaniedbyreducedgrowthandyield(Table2)could
lead,throughthedeaminationofphenylalanineduetoPAL
cataly-sis,toanenhancedproductionofsecondaryphenoliccompounds
andtotheuseofthereleasedNH3forotherpurposes.Thesame
authorspointedoutthattherateofproteinsynthesisslowsunder
conditionofNdeficiency,andtheunusedcarbohydratecouldbe
divertedtophenolicsynthesis.Inthisstudy,CONplantsshowed
byreducedyield(Tables3and7), phenolics(Tables4,5and7)
andN(Tables5and7)comparedtoORGplants,confirmingthis hypothesis.
4.3. Effectsofmineralfertilizationtreatment
Thesignificantlylowphenolsandantioxidantcapacityofthe
A. Sofo et al. / Scientia Horticulturae 204 (2016) 106–115 113
Mineralcontentinleavesofgreenlettucegrownunderconventional(CON)andorganic(ORG)managementsystems.ThefertilizationtreatmentsareindicatedinTable1.Meanvaluesintheperiod2011–2013(n=48)±SD followedbydifferentlettersaresignificantlydifferentbetweenrowsatP≤0.05,accordingtoFisher’sLSDtest.
C N K Ca P Fe Mg S Na Al Zn Mn Cu Ni Cr Cd Mo Co Se Total (mgg−1DW) (gg−1DW) (mgg−1DW) A CON Value 395.04 18.41 12.70 15.40 4.58 3.82 3.55 2.55 1.13 0.84 50.40 40.65 7.40 1.81 1.98 1.39 0.65 0.44 0.71 458.13 SD 9.07 4.35 3.21 2.80 0.22 0.52 0.61 0.30 0.86 0.50 7.23 18.73 1.46 0.60 1.28 0.43 0.30 0.29 0.45 Stat a d b a a a b b b a b a b a a a b a a b ORG Value 392.86 37.33 9.43 13.14 4.78 3.89 4.41 3.35 3.43 0.91 55.11 20.31 11.24 1.54 1.60 0.80 0.92 0.38 0.79 473.62 SD 7.85 2.03 2.74 1.51 0.33 0.41 0.74 0.09 1.85 0.16 2.05 0.39 1.57 0.26 0.17 0.11 0.15 0.08 0.42 Stat a b b a a a a a a a b b a a a b b a a a B CON Value 381.00 25.67 37.00 13.94 4.96 3.58 3.20 2.56 1.43 0.59 44.34 35.76 7.21 1.64 1.56 1.49 1.67 0.34 0.18 474.02 SD 10.49 4.94 5.45 2.06 0.43 0.69 0.22 0.46 0.11 0.20 5.27 3.94 1.44 0.39 0.64 0.08 0.38 0.07 0.08 Stat a c a a a a v b b b b a b a a a a a b b ORG Value 382.85 44.35 29.47 12.64 4.72 3.82 3.99 3.13 2.33 0.84 50.18 20.48 10.23 1.47 1.54 0.90 0.89 0.37 0.56 468.22 SD 3.46 1.81 5.10 0.78 0.54 0.69 0.59 0.14 0.75 0.67 5.19 8.79 1.18 0.64 1.18 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.31 Stat a a a a a a a a a a b b a a a b b a a a C CON Value 384.72 24.89 32.12 12.81 4.81 3.39 2.84 2.36 1.26 0.43 38.66 32.65 6.81 1.21 0.83 1.34 1.34 0.23 0.20 469.72 SD 8.20 4.15 3.88 1.06 0.48 0.80 0.22 0.46 0.13 0.25 7.67 2.47 0.81 0.17 0.38 0.14 0.53 0.08 0.06 Stat a c a a a a b b b c b a b a a a a a b b ORG Value 378.82 43.52 30.97 14.03 4.67 3.53 4.60 3.21 2.86 0.59 51.43 19.13 10.64 1.39 1.24 0.95 0.97 0.32 0.50 486.87 SD 3.26 3.12 2.11 1.19 0.23 0.86 0.35 0.09 0.76 0.18 3.14 3.09 1.43 0.16 0.14 0.05 0.12 0.04 0.19 Stat a a a a a a a a a b b b a a a b b a a a D CON Value 390.73 21.41 25.97 16.50 4.61 3.52 3.13 2.10 1.12 0.56 53.42 37.42 7.35 1.84 1.73 1.74 1.40 0.46 0.34 469.76 SD 5.74 3.23 6.36 0.95 0.32 0.48 0.12 0.32 0.06 0.20 17.58 2.26 2.11 0.68 0.98 0.43 0.45 0.27 0.15 b Stat a c a a a a v b b b b a b a a a a a b ORG Value 391.99 40.85 17.64 13.36 4.50 3.96 4.42 3.07 3.08 0.99 48.31 23.92 9.47 1.82 2.72 0.81 1.16 0.45 0.67 483.95 SD 4.15 2.47 4.12 1.63 0.28 0.43 0.68 0.20 0.63 0.47 3.01 6.68 0.57 0.42 1.17 0.07 0.18 0.14 0.31 Stat a a ab a a a a a a a b b a a a b b a a a K CON Value 407.07 39.01 8.01 13.24 4.85 3.64 4.37 3.68 2.02 0.63 65.65 46.35 11.17 2.61 2.08 1.74 0.99 0.45 0.41 486.66 SD 2.97 2.74 2.57 1.30 0.27 0.31 0.42 0.44 0.56 0.27 3.86 3.92 0.62 0.46 0.83 0.22 0.68 0.16 0.20 Stat a a b a a a a a ab b a a a a a a ab a ab a
Table7
Yield,totalphenolcontent(Folin-Ciocalteuassay),andmineralnitrogencontentinleavesofgreenlettucegrownunderconventional(CON)andorganic(ORG)management systems(period2011–2013).ForbothCONandORG,thevaluesaremeans(n=400foryieldandn=64fortotalphenolsandN)±SDofthefertilizationtreatmentsA,B,Cand D(indicatedinTable1).ValuesfollowedbydifferentlettersaresignificantlyatP≤0.05,accordingtoFisher’sLSDtest.GAE:gallicacidequivalents.
Yield(gDWhead−1)
CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
2011 7.85 2.67 b 12.15 3.12 a
2012 8.10 3.12 b 13.11 4.89 a
2013 8.21 3.98 b 15.53 3.20 a
Totalphenols(mgGAEg−1FW)
CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
2011 1.99 0.43 a 0.96 0.27 c
2012 1.76 0.14 ab 0.92 0.19 c
2013 1.87 0.62 a 0.76 0.12 cd
N(mgg−1DW)
CON ORG
Value SD Stat Value SD Stat
2011 19.29 3.35 c 39.28 3.16 ab
2012 24.30 3.87 c 40.01 2.09 ab
2013 24.20 2.52 c 45.23 3.22 a
Fig.2. Regressionanalysis(n=48;onlythemeansareshown)between(A)totalantioxidantcapacityandtotalphenolcontent.(B)totalantioxidantcapacityand[Fe+Zn+Cu] content.(C)yieldandnitrogencontent.(D)totalphenolcontentand[Fe+Zn+Cu]content.(E)totalphenolcontentandnitrogencontent.and(F)totalphenolcontentand yield.ThevaluesofR2areindicatedineverysubfigure.TotalphenolcontentswereobtainedbyUHPLCdata.TE:Troloxequivalents.
C,andD)oftheCONsystem(Tables4and5)seemstoconfirm
thatastrongmineralfertilization(Table1)wasabletoincrease
Nandtotalminerallevels(Table6)butnotthatofplantphenols
(Tables 4 and5).In supportof this hypothesis,theunfertilized
treatment(A)oftheCONsystemmaintainedasignificantlyhigh
totalphenolcontentandantioxidantpotentialcompared tothe
othertreatments, includingK (Tables 4–6).On the otherhand,
themostfertilizedtreatmentD-CON(manure+rockdust)hadan
oppositebehavior(Tables4–6).ThesituationinthefourORG
treat-mentsregarding phenols and antioxidant capacity seemstobe
morehomogeneous, withlessmarked differences,comparedto
CON(Tables4and6),likelyduetothehighlevelssoilorganicmatter
andNcontentsatthebeginningoftheexperiment(Table2).
Almostalltheinorganicmineralsarenaturallypresentinsoil
particles and/or soil solution but their levels can be strongly
andBateman,2010;Sofoetal.,2012).Thiswasconfirmedbythe
highplantNcontentinthetreatmentswithmanureandrockdust
aloneorincombination(B,C,D),comparedtotheunfertilizedone
(A)inboththesystems(Table6).
5. Conclusions
Fromtheoverallanalysisoftheresults,thehighercontentof
phenolicsobservedintheconventionaltreatmentscouldbe
asso-ciatedtothepresenceofmorestressfulconditions,intermsofplant
and/orsoilmineraldeficits.Ontheotherhand,theadoptionofan
organicmanagementdeterminedhigheryieldsandabetterplant
mineralbalance.Thesesoilparameters,togetherwiththe
fluctua-tionsofnutrientsinplants,cropyield,andindirectenvironmental
costsshouldbetakenintoconsiderationbeforeschedulinglettuce
farmingsystems.
Acknowledgments
ThisworkwaspartlysupportedbyaSTSMGrantfromZinc-Net
COSTActionTD1304.
References
Abu-Reidah,I.M.,Contreras,M.M.,Arráez-Román,D.,Segura-Carretero,A., Fernández-Gutiérrez,A.,2013.Reversed-phaseultra-high-performanceliquid chromatographycoupledtoelectrosprayionization-quadrupole-time-of-flight massspectrometryasapowerfultoolformetabolicprofilingofvegetables: Lactucasativaasanexampleofitsapplication.J.Chromatogr.A1313,212–227. Adesso,S.,Pepe,G.,Sommella,E.,Manfra,M.,Scopa,A.,Sofo,A.,Tenore,G.C.,Russo,
M.,DiGaudio,F.,Autore,G.,Campiglia,P.,Marzocco,S.,2016.
Anti-inflammatoryandanti-oxidantactivityofpolyphenolicextractsfrom Lactucasativa(var.MaravilladeVerano)underdifferentfarmingmethods.J. Sci.FoodAgric.,http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7622(Acceptedarticle). Baslam,M.,Morales,F.,Garmendia,I.,Goicoechea,N.,2013.Nutritionalqualityof
outerandinnerleavesofgreenandredpigmentedlettuces(LactucasativaL.) consumedassalads.Sci.Hortic.151,103–111.
Brand-Williams,W.,Cuvelier,M.E.,Berset,C.,1995.Useoffreeradicalmethodto evaluateantioxidantactivity.Lebensm.Wiss.Technol.28,25–30.
DuPont,M.S.,Mondin,Z.,Williamson,G.,Price,R.,2000.Effectofvariety, processing,andstorageontheflavonoidglycosidecontentandcompositionof lettuceandendive.J.Agric.FoodChem.48,3957–3964.
Durazzo,A.,Azzini,E.,Lazzé,M.C.,Raguzzini,A.,Pizzala,R.,Maiani,G.,Palomba,L., Maiani,G.,2014.AntioxidantsinItalianheadlettuce(Lactucasativavar: capitataL.)growninorganicandconventionalsystemsundergreenhouse conditions.J.Food.Biochem38,56–61.
Gershenzon,J.,1984.Changesinthelevelsofplantsecondarymetabolitesunder waterandnutrientstress.In:Timmermann,B.N.,Steelink,C.,Loewus,F.A. (Eds.),PhytochemicalAdaptationstoStress.Springer,NewYork,pp.273–320. Heimler,D.,Isolani,L.,Vignolini,P.,Tombelli,S.,Romani,A.,2007.Polyphenol
contentandantioxidativeactivityinsomespeciesoffreshlyconsumedsalads. J.Agric.FoodChem.55,1724–1729.
Heimler,D.,Vignolini,P.,Arfaioli,P.,Isolani,L.,Romani,A.,2012.Conventional, organicandbiodynamicfarming:differencesinpolyphenolcontentand antioxidantactivityofBatavialettuce.J.Sci.FoodAgric.92,551–556. Hooper,L.,Cassidy,A.,2006.Areviewofthehealthcarepotentialofbioactive
compounds.J.Sci.FoodAgric.85,1805–1813.
Kelly,S.D.,Bateman,A.S.,2010.Comparisonofmineralconcentrationsin commerciallygrownorganicandconventionalcrops—tomatoes(Lycopersicon esculentum)andlettuces(Lactucasativa).FoodChem.119,738–745. López,A.,Javier,G.-A.,Fenoll,J.,Hellín,P.,Flores,P.,2014.Chemicalcomposition
andantioxidantcapacityoflettuce:comparativestudyofregular-sized (Romaine)andbaby-sized(LittleGemandMiniRomaine)types.J.Food Compos.Anal.33,39–48.
Lee,J.,Scagel,C.F.,2013.Chicoricacid:chemistry,distribution,andproduction. Front.Chem.1,1–17.
Liu,X.,Ardo,S.,Bunning,M.,Parry,J.,Zhou,K.,Stushnoff,C.,Stoniker,F.,Yu,L., Kendall,P.,2007.TotalphenoliccontentandDPPHradicalscavengingactivity oflettuce(LactucasativaL.:)growninColorado.LWT-FoodSci.Technol.40, 552–557.
Llorach,R.,Tomás-Barberán,F.A.,Ferreres,F.,2004.Lettuceandchicorybyproducts asasourceofantioxidantphenolicextracts.J.Agric.FoodChem.52,
5109–5116.
Llorach,R.,Martínez-Sánchez,A.,Tomás-Barberán,F.A.,Gil,M.I.,Ferreres,F.,2008. Characterisationofpolyphenolsandantioxidantpropertiesoffivelettuce varietiesandescarole.FoodChem.108,1028–1038.
Mai,F.,Glomb,M.A.,2013.Isolationofphenoliccompoundsfromiceberglettuce andimpactonenzymaticbrowning.J.Agric.FoodChem.61,2868–2874. Manach,C.,Scalbert,A.,Morand,C.,Rémésy,C.,Jiménez,L.,2004.Polyphenols:
foodsourcesandbioavailability.Am.J.Clin.Nutr.79,727–747. Mulabagal,V.,Ngouajio,M.,Nair,A.,Zhang,Y.,Gottumukkala,A.L.,Nair,M.G.,
2010.Invitroevaluationofredandgreenlettuce(Lactucasativa)forfunctional foodproperties.FoodChem.118,300–306.
Oh,M.-M.,TrickHarold,N.,Rajashekar,C.B.,2009a.Secondarymetabolismand antioxidantsareinvolvedinenvironmentaladaptationandstresstolerancein lettuce.J.PlantPhysiol.166,180–191.
Oh,M.-M.,Carey,E.E.,Rajashekar,C.B.,2009b.Environmentalstressesinduce health-promotingphytochemicalsinlettuce.PlantPhysiol.Biochem.47, 578–583.
Ordidge,M.,García-Macías,P.,Battey,N.H.,Gordon,M.H.,Hadley,P.,John,P., Lovegrove,J.A.,Vysini,E.,Wagstaffe,A.,2010.Phenoliccontentsoflettuce, strawberry,raspberry,andblueberrycropscultivatedunderplasticfilms varyinginultraviolettransparency.FoodChem.119,1224–1227. Pepe,G.,Sommella,E.,Manfra,M.,DeNisco,M.,Tenore,G.C.,Scopa,A.,Sofo,A.,
Marzocco,S.,Adesso,S.,Novellino,T.,Campiglia,P.,2015.Evaluationof anti-inflammatoryactivityandfastUHPLC-DAD-IT-TOFprofilingof polyphenoliccompoundsextractedfromgreenlettuce(LactucasativaL.;var. MaravilladeVerano).FoodChem.167,153–161.
Ribas-Agustí,A.,Gratacós-Cubarsí,M.,Sárraga,C.,García-Regueiro,J.A.,Castellari, M.,2011.Analysisofelevenphenoliccompoundsincludingnovelp-coumaroyl derivativesinlettuce(LactucasativaL.)byultra-high-performanceliquid chromatographywithphotodiodearrayandmassspectrometrydetection. Phytochem.Anal.22,555–563.
Romani,A.,Pinelli,P.,Galardi,C.,Sani,G.,Cimato,A.,Heimler,D.,2002.Polyphenols ingreenhouseandopen-air-grownlettuce.FoodChem.79,337–342. Ruiz,J.M.,Rivero,R.M.,Lopez-Cantarero,I.,Romero,L.,2003.RoleofCa2+in
metabolismofphenoliccompoundsintabaccoleaves(NicotianatabacumL.). PlantGrowthRegul.41,173–177.
Sofo,A.,Nuzzo,V.,Tataranni,G.,Manfra,M.,DeNisco,M.,Scopa,A.,2012.Berry morphologyandcompositioninirrigatedandnon-irrigatedgrapevine(Vitis viniferaL.).J.PlantPhysiol.169,1023–1031.
Tomas-Barberan,F.A.,Velarde,J.L.,Bonfanti,A.,Saltveit,M.E.,1997.Early wound-andethylene-inducedchangesinphenylpropanoidmetabolisminharvested lettuce.J.Am.Soc.Hortic.Sci.122,399–404.
Velickovi ´c,J.M.,Dimitrijevi ´c,D.S.,Miti ´c,S.S.,Miti ´c,M.N.,Kosti ´c,D.A.,2014.The determinationofthephenoliccomposition,antioxidativeactivityandheavy metalsintheextractsofCalendulaofficinalisL.Adv.Technol.3,46–51. Wada,K.C.,Mizuuchi,K.,Koshio,A.,Kaneko,K.,Mitsui,T.,Kaneko,T.,2014.Stress
enhancesthegeneexpressionandenzymeactivityofphenylalanine ammonia-lyaseandtheendogenouscontentofsalicylicacidtoinduce floweringinpharbitis.J.PlantPhysiol.171,895–902.