JPediatr(RioJ).2016;92(1):4---6
www.jped.com.br
EDITORIAL
Bullying
behavior,
youth’s
disease
and
intervention:
which
suggestions
from
the
data
for
research
on
bullying
in
the
Brazilian
context?
夽,夽夽
Comportamento
de
bullying,
doenc
¸as
na
juventude
e
intervenc
¸ão:
quais
são
as
sugestões
das
pesquisas
sobre
bullying
no
contexto
brasileiro?
Simona
C.S.
Caravita
a,∗,
Barbara
Colombo
b,caCenterforResearchonEvolutionaryDynamicsandEducational(CRIdee),DepartmentofPsychology,UniversitàCattolica delSacroCuore,Milano,Italy
bDepartmentofPsychology,UniversitàCattolicadelSacroCuore,Milano,Italy cEducationandHumanStudies,ChamplainCollege,Burlington,UnitedStates
Since the influential work by Dan Olweus,1 bullying has
emergedasamajorproblemofthesocietyalloverworldand
acrosssocieties. Theinternational literaturereports rates
ofchildrenandadolescentsinvolvedinbullyingindifferent
countriesranging from7%to43% for victimsandfrom5%
to44%forbullies.2Moreover,thestudiesagreein
highlight-inghowbullyingconstitutesafactorofrisk forthehealth
aswellasthesocialandpsychologicaladjustmentofboth
thebulliedandthebullyingyouth.Childrenandadolescents
whosuffer victimization bypeerscan beaffected by
sev-eralhealth problems,includingphysical andpsychological
diseasesymptoms,both concurrently andprospectively.3,4
Likewise,thereisevidencethatbulliescanalsosufferfrom
depressionandotherdiseases,4andthattheyareatriskof
externalizingbehaviorandinvolvementincriminalactivities
inlateadolescenceandadulthood.5
夽 Please citethis article as:Caravita SC, Colombo B. Bullying behavior,youth’sdiseaseandintervention:whichsuggestionsfrom thedataforresearchonbullyingintheBraziliancontext?JPediatr (RioJ).2016;92:4---6.
夽夽SeepaperbydeOliveiraetal.inpages32---9. ∗Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:simona.caravita@unicatt.it(S.C.S.Caravita).
Inadditiontobulliesandvictims,otherschool-and
class-mates participate inbullying byplaying different roles in
the phenomenon. They can act as helpers or reinforcers
of the bullies; a minority act asdefenders of the bullied
peers;otherpupilsserveaspassivebystanders,who
with-draw from the bullying situations by not taking side for
thebulliesor thevictims,henceindirectlyreinforcingthe
bullies’ behavior.6 Being involved in bullying as an active
or passive bystander can alsoaffect psychological
adjust-ment during youth,because witnessing bullying has been
found toincrease the levelsof bystanders’distress.7 This
framework,aswellasthehighcoststosocietyofbullying,
makesinvestigatingthephenomenon,anddeveloping
inter-ventionprogramsthatareabletofightbullyingspecifically
andeffectively,apriorityforanycountryinwhichbullying
isdetected.
Severalproposalsfortheanti-bullyinginterventionshave
beendeveloped,withdifferenttheoreticalapproachesand
different levels of effectiveness.8 However, all of them
recommendstartingfromanaccuratescreeningofthe
phe-nomenoninthecontextoffutureintervention.Indeed,one
ofthemainassumptionsforanti-bullyinginterventionisthat
bullying,incomparisontootherformsofaggressiveand
anti-socialbehaviors,hasahighercomplexity,whichneedstobe
investigatedinthespecificcontexttobefoughteffectively.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.11.002
Bullyingbehavior,youth’sdiseaseandintervention 5
In thisframework,theoriginalityand theworthof the
paperbydeOliveiraetal.9isevident,especiallyconsidering
thescarcityofstudiesonbullyingatschoolinBrazil10and,in
abroaderperspective,inSouthAmerica.Thisstudyprovides
relevantdataontheprevalence ofbullies inapopulation
sampleof109,104eighth-gradepupils;20.8%ofthesample
reportedbullying behavior at school. These data indicate
ahighrateofbullyinginBrazilianschoolsincomparisonto
othercountries,anditcomesfromself-reportevaluationsby
theparticipants.Thisisimportantbecause,astheauthors
themselves consider, self-reports may have increased the
risk of under-estimating the prevalence of bullying.
How-ever,theuseofself-reportsforinitialscreeningofbullying
isinlinewiththeusualprocedureadoptedininternational
studies.Thus,eventhoughadministeringthestandard
mea-suretoassessbullyingforcross-nationalcomparisons(i.e.,
theOlweusBully/VictimQuestionnaire)1,5,11 wasnot
possi-bleinthisstudy,theresearchbydeOliveiraetal.provided
dataonbullying thatiscomparablewiththeinternational
literature.Moreover,thelargesizeofthesamplealso
guar-antees a reliable assessment of the situations of bullying
in Brazilian elementary schools. Hence, the high rate of
bullies that hasbeen found by deOliveira etal. suggests
that addressing bullyingis a possible priorityfor research
andfutureinterventioninBrazil.
In order todevelop Brazilian programs toprevent and
fight bullying at school effectively, an accurate analysis
of the correlates associated to a higher risk of behaving
bullying amongBrazilian pupilsisneeded. Thisis the
sec-ondrelevantcontributionprovidedbydeOliveiraetal.to
theresearchonbullying.Indeed,thisstudyexaminessome
indexes of possible social and psychological adjustment
disorders of bullies, and some family dimensions possibly
relatedtoahigherprobabilitytobullypeersatschool.This
allowsfortheconstructionofaninitialprofileofthebullies
thatisspecifictotheBraziliansociety.Thepictureemerging
fromthe study indicates that malegender and older
rel-ative age are associated withan increasedprobability to
beanaggressor.Thesefindings,aswellasthoseregarding
scarcefamilysupervisioninbullies’families,anddomestic
violence experiencedby bullies,aresimilartothe results
obtainedinotherinternationalliterature.However,the
out-comeson theethnicity ofthe bullies, together withdata
derived from the comparison between private and public
school,highlightsomeelementsthatarespecifictoBrazilian
culture andthat call for furtherinvestigation. In
particu-lar,theauthorsfoundthatblackandAsianyouthaswellas
pupilsattendingprivateschoolsaremorelikelytobebullies.
In light of the literature on bullying, these findings
can-notbeadequatelyinterpretedwithoutalargerperspective
thatsimultaneouslyexaminesthecontextsinwhichbullying
occursmoredeeply.Indeed,bullyingisnotonlya
particu-larformofaggression,whichisproactive,12,13 intentional,
andaimedatacquiringapowerfulpositionamongpeers,14
butit alsorepresentsatypeof antisocialbehaviorthatis
largelyinfluencedbythepeercontext.Theliteratureonthis
phenomenonhasconsistentlyshowedthatthestatuswithin
thepeergroup15,16andfactorsatthepeergrouplevel,such
asinformalnormsandattitudessharedamongschool-and
classmates,17playarelevantroleinexplainingthisbehavior.
Therefore,thefeaturesofthepeercontextinwhich
bully-ingamongBrazilianstudentshappensneed tobecarefully
considered.Followingthislineofreasoning,thefindingthat
belongingtospecificethnicitiesincreasestheriskofbeing
abullycannotbereadasan‘‘absolute’’index,butrather
requiresinvestigationofthemajority/minorityproportions
ofethnic groups in the schools where the data were
col-lected,and,inabroadenperspective,withintheBrazilian
context.These data, indeed,may mirrorthe presence of
formsofdiscriminatorybullying,18ofin-/out-groupeffects,
orofinformalpeer-groupnorms,17whichmaybeestablished
withingroupsofpeerssharingthesameethnicity.Wealsodo
notknowenoughaboutwhowerethevictimsofthebullying
actions:forinstance,whetherthebulliedpeersbelongedto
thesameortoadifferentethnicgroupofbullies.
Accord-ingly,if,in Brazil, pupilsattending privateschools are at
higherrisk toshow bullying behaviors, thereis a need to
furtherexaminethefeaturesoftheprivateschoolcontext,
whichmayfavor bullying inBrazil. Is itpossible that
bul-lyingis actually favored by specific characteristics of the
pupilsattendingtheseschoolsandtheirfamilies?Ormayit
dependonfeaturesoftheorganizationandthedisciplinary
normsthataretypicaloftheprivateschoolenvironmentin
Brazil?Moreover,theschoolatmosphereandtheteachers’
attitudeshavebeenfoundtocontributeinpromotingor
hin-deringtheoccurrenceofbullying.19Therefore,thestudyby
deOliveiraetal.callsforfurtherresearchfocusingonthe
peer-andschool-contextdimensionsthatmaybeassociated
tobullyingbehavior in theBrazilian reality,which canbe
addressedbyanti-bullyinginterventions.
AthirdnovelcontributionfromthestudybydeOliveira
etal.consists ofthe analysisof thehealth-risk behaviors
associated to being an aggressor among Brazilian pupils.
The profile of bullies emerging from their investigation
confirmsthat bullying is an indicator of multidimensional
psychological and social adjustment disorders in youth.
Apparently,therearehigherprobabilitiesofBrazilianbullies
reporting risky behaviors in comparison to non-bully
peers.Reportedrisky behaviorsranged from consumption
oftobacco,alcohol,andillicitdrugs,tomissingclassesand
earlysexualintercourse.Thispictureisnottotallynovelin
theinternationalliteratureonbullying.20However,
unfortu-nately,thecross-sectionalnatureofdatafromthestudyby
deOliveiraetal.doesnotallowunderstandingwhether
bul-lyingisapredictorofotherrisk-behaviorsamongBrazilian
childrenor ---more likely--- whether it mirrors a complex
social and psychological maladjustment profile of
Brazil-ianbullies.Thisalsomaybepossiblyrelatedtodistortions
inmoraldevelopment,assomerecentliteratureon
bully-ingsuggests.21Nevertheless,undoubtedlythisfindingbyde
Oliveiraetal.highlightshowthesocialcostsassociatedto
bullyingarehighinBraziltoo,andthatbeingabully
dur-ingelementaryschool in Brazilmay bean early indicator
ofmultifaceted disease,requiring multidimensionalforms
ofintervention, addressing the familyand,moreover, the
peers.Infact,peerinfluencehasbeenshowntoberelevant
inincreasingthe probabilitytobully andtoperformrisky
behaviors.19
The fact that bullying can be a possible indicator of
multi-dimensionaldifficultiesinyouthfindsafurther
confir-mation in its associations with psychological and social
maladjustment, and health-problem symptoms, including
insomnia, feelings of loneliness, and lack of friends, as
6 CaravitaSC,ColomboB
feelings of loneliness and of being isolated by peers, in
particular,indicate thatbullying behavior is linkedtothe
emotional and social diseases of bullies. Reading these
feelingsasrepresentingpossiblehealthproblemsofbullies,
requesting health intervention is a reality, and is very
legitimate.However,amorecomplexreadingmayhighlight
somebullies’skillsthatarepossibleresourcestohelpthese
children. Indeed, the international literature on bullies’
socialcompetenceshowsthatpeersattributebullieswitha
highsocialstatus,asvisibleandinfluentialwithinthegroup,
butthattheyalsoreporttoactuallydislikebullies.15Hence,
bullies’feelingsoflonelinessandisolationmayreflectthe
actualisolationthatiscausedbybullies’behavior,showing
thatbullieshaveadequateskillsinunderstandingthepeer
interactions.Theseskillscanbeconsideredwhenplanning
healthintervention.Lastly,thereisalsothepossibilitythat
thefeelingsoflonelinessexperiencedbybulliesalsodrive
and promote the bullying behavior. Unfortunately, since
thedataprovidedbydeOliveiraetal.arecross-sectional,
wecannotfurtherexplorethishypothesis,but,again,this
studydefinitelypromotesfutureresearchonbullying,and
onitscorrelatesandmotivesamongBrazilianstudents.
Insummary,notwithstandingsomepossiblelimitations
---whicharecorrectlyidentifiedbytheauthors---thestudyby
deOliveiraetal.constitutesaninterestingcontributionto
literatureonbullying,andprovidessomeclearindications
for future research on this topic in Brazil. These
indica-tionsarealsohelpfultodevelopinterventionprogramswith
maximizedeffectivenessintheBraziliancontext.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
References
1.OlweusD.Aggressionintheschools.Bulliesandwhippingboys. London:JohnWiley&Sons;1978.
2.CookCR, WilliamsKR, GuerraNG,Kim TE.Variabilityinthe prevalenceofbullyingandvictimization:across-nationaland methodologicalanalysis.In:JimersonSR,SwearerS,Espelage DL,editors.Handbookofbullyinginschools:aninternational perspective.NewYork:Routledge/Taylor&FrancisGroup;2010. p.347---62.
3.DueP,HolsteinBE,LynchJ,DiderichsenF,GabhainSN,Scheidt P,etal. Bullyingand symptomsamongschool-aged children: internationalcomparativecrosssectionalstudyin28countries. EurJPublicHealth.2005;15:128---32.
4.Espelage DL, Holt MK. Suicidal ideation and school bullying experiencesaftercontrollingfordepressionand delinquency. JAdolescHealth.2013;53:S27---31.
5.Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Lösel F, Loeber R. The predic-tive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending:
asystematic/meta-analyticreviewoflongitudinalstudies.Crim BehavMentHealth.2011;21:80---9.
6.Salmivalli C,LagerspetzK, BjörkqvistK, ÖstermanK, Kauki-ainen A. Bullying as a group process: participant roles and theirrelationstosocialstatuswithinthegroup.AggressBehav. 1996;22:1---15.
7.BarhightLR,HubbardJA,HydeCT.Children’sphysiologicaland emotionalreactions to witnessingbullying predictbystander intervention.ChildDev.2013;84:375---90.
8.TtofiMM,FarringtonDP.Effectivenessofschool-basedprograms toreducebullying:asystematicandmeta-analyticreview.JExp Criminol.2011;7:27---56.
9.deOliveiraWA,SilvaMA,daSilvaJL,deMello FC,doPrado RR, Malta DC.Associationsbetween the practiceof bullying and individualand contextual variablesfrom theaggressors’ perspective.JPediatr(RioJ).2016;92:32---9.
10.RechRR,HalpernR,TedescoA,SantosDF.Prevalenceand char-acteristicsofvictimsandperpetratorsofbullying.JPediatr(Rio J).2013;89:164---70.
11.SolbergME,OlweusD.Prevalenceestimationofschool bully-ingwiththeOlweusBully/VictimQuestionnaire.AggressBehav. 2003;29:239---68.
12.CamodecaM,GoossensFA.Aggression,socialcognitions,anger andsadnessinbulliesandvictims.JChildPsycholPsychiatry. 2005;46:186---97.
13.SijtsemaJJ,VeenstraR,LindenbergS,SalmivalliC.Empirical testofbullies’statusgoals:assessingdirectgoals,aggression, andprestige.AggressBehav.2009;35:57---67.
14.Caravita SC, Cillessen AH. Agentic or communal? Associa-tionsbetweeninterpersonalgoals, popularity,andbullyingin middle childhood and early adolescence. Soc Dev. 2012;21: 376---95.
15.CaravitaSC, DiBlasioP,Salmivalli C.Unique andinteractive effectsofempathyandsocialstatusoninvolvementinbullying. SocDev.2009;18:140---63.
16.DeBruynEH,CillessenAH,WissinkI.Associationsofpopularity withbullyingand victimizationinearly adolescence.JEarly Adolesc.2010;30:543---66.
17.SalmivalliC,VoetenM.Connectionsbetweenattitudes,group norms,and behaviourinbullyingsituations.IntJBehavDev. 2004;28:246---58.
18.RussellST,SinclairKO,PoteatVP,KoenigBW.Adolescenthealth and harassment based on discriminatory bias. Am J Public Health.2012;102:493---5.
19.GendronBP, Williams KR,GuerraNG. Ananalysisofbullying amongstudentswithinschools:estimatingtheeffectsof indi-vidualnormativebeliefs,self-esteem,andschoolclimate.JSch Violence.2011;10:150---64.
20.PeplerDJ,CraigWM,ConnollyJ,HendersonK.Bullying,sexual harassment,datingviolence, and substance useamong ado-lescents.In: Wekerle C, WallAM, editors.The violenceand addictionequation:theoreticalandclinicalissuesinsubstance abuseandrelationshipviolence.NewYork:Brunner-Routledge; 2002.p.153---68.
21.SijtsemaJJ,RambaranJA,CaravitaSC,GiniG.Friendship selec-tionandinfluenceinbullyinganddefending:effectsofmoral disengagement.DevPsychol.2014;50:2093---104.