Fig 1-8: MacLennan GT, Hinman F. Prostate and urethral sphincters in Hinman's atlas of urosurgical anatomy. MacLennan GT, Hinman F Editors. 2012. Elsevier/Saunders Philadelphia.
Fig. 9: Immagine di mia proprietà
Fig. 10: a) Hinata N, Sejima T, Takenaka A. Progress in pelvic anatomy from the viewpoint of radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2013 Mar;20(3):260-70. b) Myers RP. Anatomy: Anatomic Considerations for Efficiency and Precision in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Atlas of Robotic Prostatectomy. Hubert J, Wiklund P, Jörn HW Editors. 2013. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Fig. 11: Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T, Salomon G, Engel O, Michl U, Haese A, Graefen M, Huland H. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011 Aug;60(2):320-9. Fig. 12: Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, Wang Y, Hanske J, Sammon JD, Cole AP, Preston MA, Dasgupta P, Menon M, Chung BI, Trinh QD. Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database. Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):837-845.
Fig. 13: Intuitive Surgical Investor Presentation – Q1 2017
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MzY3MzYwfENoaWxkSUQ9LTF8VHlwZT0z&t=1&cb=6362296914883 09586
Fig. 14: Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Gustafsson O, Hugosson J, Bjartell A, Wilderäng U, Wiklund NP, Steineck G, Haglind E; LAPPRO steering committee. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):660-70.
Fig. 15, 16: Diaz M, Peabody JO, Kapoor V, Sammon J, Rogers CG, Stricker H, Lane Z, Gupta N, Bhandari M, Menon M. Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1168-76. Fig. 17: Hu JC, O'Malley P, Chughtai B, Isaacs A, Mao J, Wright JD, Hershman D, Sedrakyan
A. Comparative Effectiveness of Cancer Control and Survival after Robot-Assisted versus Open Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):115-121.
Fig. 18: Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, Ahlering TE, Carroll PR, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Patel VR, Shariat SF, Tewari AK, Van Poppel H, Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Rosen RC, Wilson TG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012
Sep;62(3):382-404.
Fig. 19: Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. Fig. 20: Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Menon M, Mottrie A, Patel VR, Van der Poel H, Rosen RC, Tewari AK, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Montorsi F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30.
Fig. 21-23: Thompson JE, Egger S, Böhm M, Haynes AM, Matthews J, Rasiah K, Stricker PD. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):521-31.
