• Non ci sono risultati.

Scarica  1 MB [PDF]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Scarica  1 MB [PDF]"

Copied!
26
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

8

th

European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

EU Food-CT-2004-506508

Implementation of the Welfare Quality ® :

on-farm protocol for assessing broiler welfare

Ferrari P. 1 , Butterworth A. 2 , De Jong I.C. 3 , Brown S.N. 2 , Ferrante V. 4

1

CRPA, Research Centre on Animal Production, Italy

2

University of Bristol, UK

3

University of Wageningen, The Netherlands

4

University of Milan, Italy

(2)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Integration of animal welfare in the food quality chain:

from public concerns to improved welfare and transparent quality

Fork to farm approach

Based upon

consumer demands and

marketing requirements of retailers

Integrated project

(3)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Integrated project

 approx.150 scientists

 17 million with € 14.6 million EU contribution

 44 partners

 17 countries (13 EU, 4 Latin America)

 2004-2009

(4)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Welfare Quality aims to:

 accomodate societal concerns and market demands

 to develop reliable on-farm monitoring systems

 to develop product information systems

 to develop practical species-specific strategies to improve animal welfare

Integrated project

(5)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Aims of a welfare assessment

Animals on farms

during transport at slaughter

Animal based measures:

assessment of animal welfare

Product information

Consummers Retailers

Environment based measures:

identification

of causes of poor welfare

Remedial solutions proposed

Producers

Assessors

Advisors Animals

on farms

during transport at slaughter

Animal based measures:

assessment of animal welfare

Product information

Consummers Retailers

Environment based measures:

identification

of causes of poor welfare

Remedial solutions proposed

Producers

Assessors

Advisors advice

certification

(6)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Consensus on « what is in animal welfare»:

multidimensional concept

e.g. Five freedoms (FAWC 1992)

 Freedom from hunger and thirst

 Freedom from discomfort

 Freedom from pain, injury and disease

 Freedom to express normal behaviour

 Freedom from fear and distress

WQ assessment tool

(7)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Welfare principles

Welfare criteria

1 Absence of prolonged hunger Good feeding

2 Absence of prolonged thirst 3 Comfort around resting

4 Thermal comfort Good

housing

5 Ease of movement 6 Absence of injuries 7 Absence of disease Good health

8 Absence of pain induced by management procedures

9 Expression of social behaviours 10 Expression of other behaviours 11 Good human-animal relationship Appropriate

behaviour

12 Positive emotional state

WQ assessment tool

(8)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Overall assessment

M ea su re s C ri te ri a

Overall assessment

Pr in cp le s

~30 12 4 1

Raw data

Scale 0 - 100

Scale 0 - 100

Welfare categories Not classified

Acceptable Enhanced

Excellent Experts consulted:

animal and social scientists from WelfareQuality®

+ stakeholders (Advisory Committee)

(9)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Measures to assess broiler welfare

Welfare Criteria Measures 1

Absence of prolonged hunger

Feed withdrawal time before slaughter At slaughterhouse % of emaciated rejected birds

Good feeding

2 Absence of prolonged thirst

Drinker space

Feed withdrawal time before slaughter 3 Comfort

around resting

Plumage cleanliness, litter quality, dust sheet test

4 Thermal

comfort Panting, huddling Good

housing

5 Ease of

movement Stocking density

(10)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Welfare Criteria Measures 6 Absence of

injuries

Lameness, hock burn, foot pad dermatitis on farm and at slaughter

7 Absence of disease

On farm mortality, culls on farm

Ascites, dehydration, septicaemia, hepatitis, pericarditis, abscess from slaughterhouse rejection records

Good health

8

Absence of pain induced by

management procedures

No measure

9

Expression of social

behaviours

No measure

10

Expression of other

behaviours

Cover on the range, free range

11

Good

human-animal relationship

Touch Test Ratio (TTR) Appropriate

behaviour

12 Positive

emotional state Qualitative behavioural assessment (QBA)

Measures to assess broiler welfare

(11)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Implementation of WQ protocol

CRPA + UNIVERSITY OF MILAN > 18 Italian intensive farms UNIVERSITY OF WAGENINGEN > 18 Dutch intensive farms UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL > 10 English free range farms

2,20 2,25 2,30 2,35 2,40 2,45 2,50 2,55 2,60 2,65 2,70 2,75

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms

(10)

k g

(12)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Plumage cleanliness score: 1÷4 (1=clean 4=dirty)

54

40

17

2,5 2,3 0,7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms (10) Cleanliness 3+4 (%) Cleanliness score

Implementation of WQ protocol

(13)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Litter quality score: 1÷5

0. Completely dry and flaky

2. Dry but not easy to move with foot

3. Leaves imprint of foot and will form a ball if compacted, but ball does not stay together well

4. Stick to boots and sticks readily in a ball if compacted

5. Sticks to boots once the cap or compacted crust is broken

3,9

2,5 2,9

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms (10) Litter quality score

Implementation of WQ protocol

(14)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Lameness (gait score):

0. Normal, dextrous and agile 1. Slight abnormality, but difficult to define

2. Definite and identifiable abnormality

3. Obvious abnormality, affects ability to move

4. Severe abnormality, only takes a few steps

5. Incapable of walking

2,0

2,2

1,7

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms (10)

Implementation of WQ protocol

(15)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Hock burn:

0÷4 (absent to severe)

0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4

7

6

1,0 0,8

0,1 5,4

5,6 5,8 6,0 6,2 6,4 6,6 6,8 7,0

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms (10)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Hock burn 3+4 (%) Hock burn score

Implementation of WQ protocol

(16)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Foot Pad Dermatitis Score:

0÷4 absent to severe

0 1 2 3 4

53

35

15

1,5 1,8 0,7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms

(10)

FPD 3+4 (%) FPD score

Implementation of WQ protocol

(17)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

% On farm mortality (death + culled)

% Death On Arrival at slaughter

2,8

3,9

2,2

0,1 0,3

0,1 0,0

0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms (10)

(% )

Mortality (%) DOA (%)

Implementation of WQ protocol

(18)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Avoidance Touch Test Ratio: number of birds touched/number of birds in reach

Implementation of WQ protocol

0,53

0,22

0,26

0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range

farms (10)

(19)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Novel Object Test: number of birds less than 20 cm from the novel object is counted every 30 s for 2 mins

Implementation of WQ protocol

38

13

24

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Dutch intensive farms (18)

Italian intensive farms (18)

English free range farms (10)

N O T ( n r. )

(20)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

QBA - Qualitative Behaviour Assessment

Observe how the birds behave for 10 minutes at the entrance and in the middle of the house and score 23 adjectives qualifying the animal behaviour such as:

 Active

 Relaxed

 Helpless

 Comfortable

 Fearful

 Agitated

 Confident

 Depressed

 Calm

Implementation of WQ protocol

(21)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Measures during transport and at slaughter:

 Feed and water withdrawal time

 Journey time

 Waiting time in lairage area

Implementation of WQ protocol

(22)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Measures during transport and at slaughter:

 Stocking density in crates

 Panting huddling (% of birds)

Implementation of WQ protocol

(23)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Measures at slaughter:

 Check of the stunner settings

 Stunning efficiency at the sticking point, during bleeding and at the entrance of the scalding tank

Implementation of WQ protocol

(24)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Measures at slaughter:

 Hock Burn Score

 Foot Pad Dermatitis Score

 Breast Burn Score

Implementation of WQ protocol

(25)

8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

Potential applications

Broad categories of potential applications for animal welfare assessment systems:

 As a research tool

 To enforce legislation

 In Voluntary / Certification systems

 To Advice farmers to improve management

 Product information systems

(26)

Cervia, Italy, 18-22 May 2009

8

th

European Symposium on Poultry Welfare Worging Group 9 of the WPSA

EU Food-CT-2004-506508

Thanks for your kind attention

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

• Perdita di pazienti alla valutazione, simmetrica (withdrawal bias) o a carico prevalente di uno dei due gruppi a confronto (attrition bias).. Confidence − Relevance −

Nota c-Indicazioni AIFA: Pertuzumab è indicato in associazione a Trastuzumab e docetaxel in pazienti adulte con carcinoma mammario HER2-positivo non operabile o metastatico o

AGENZIE INTERNAZIONALI (come l'ANSA, l’AGI) raccolgono notizie in tutto il mondo e le distribuiscono in ambito nazionale.. AGENZIE NAZIONALI raccolgono notizie in ambito

Presented By Robert Charles Doebele, MD, PhD at 2013 ASCO Annual

• The molecular profile of solid tumors may significantly change following treatment with target based agents.. Challenges in

Cyprus Italy, Catanzaro Belarus Italy, Siracusa Italy, Salerno Italy, Palermo Italy, Mantova Italy, Brescia France, Vendée Italy, Sassari Italy, Reggio Emilia Italy, Ragusa

Paolo Chiodini – Parma AIOM – 19 Giugno 2015.. RELATIVO

nutrizionisti sono gli specialisti più attivi in rete e risultano oltre 5mila siti aggiornati di professionisti che oltre il proprio sito sono molto presenti anche nei vari