• Non ci sono risultati.

La chemioterapia neoadiuvante nei sarcomi: novità e attuali indicazioni

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "La chemioterapia neoadiuvante nei sarcomi: novità e attuali indicazioni"

Copied!
48
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

La chemioterapia neoadiuvante nei sarcomi:

novità e attuali indicazioni Lorenzo D’Ambrosio, MD PhD

Divisione di Oncologia Medica

Istituto di Candiolo – Fondazione del Piemonte per l’Oncologia. IRCCS

12° CONGRESSO NAZIONALE AIOM GIOVANI – PERUGIA 6-7 LUGLIO 2018

(2)

Standard treatment at diagnosis (I)

NO radiotherapy: low grade liposarcoma

Low-grade sarcoma

(3)

Standard treatment at diagnosis (II)

+/- +

High-grade sarcoma

(4)

First question:

do we need chemotherapy?

Yes, we do !

40% of the patients die

of their sarcoma

(5)

RFS OS

Adjuvant therapy did not improve survival

-60% smaller than 8 cm -13% low-grade tumors

-52% compliance to chemotherapy

(6)

RFS OS

Adjuvant therapy did improve survival

-60% larger than 10 cm -0% low-grade tumors

-83% compliance to chemotherapy

(7)

EORTC data

(8)

EORTC data

25%

40%

(9)

Let’s meta-analyze !

The updated meta-analysis confirms an overall advantage with a

reduction of the risk of death in the range of 14%

(10)

Europe as of today … on chemo in STS

Roman empire 31 BC – 14 AD

(11)

The need for a definite setting

Patient related:

- dimension - grading - histotype - age

- performance - site

- …..

Standard chemotherapy approach may exist only within definite clinical settings

Chemotherapy related:

- drugs - dose

- intensity

- ……

(12)

Nomograms 2.0

(13)

Prognostic stratification on EORTC data

(14)

VARIABLES HR lHR hHR P-VALUE Low pr-OS 0.46 0.23 0.94 0.033 Intermediate pr-OS 1.00 0.53 1.88 0.987 High pr-OS 1.08 0.61 1.90 0.801

Overall Survival

High

Intermediate

Low

10-yr OS pr

66%

51%

(15)

VARIABLES HR lHR hHR P-VALUE Low pr-OS 0.46 0.24 0.89 0.021 Intermediate pr-OS 0.74 0.41 1.34 0.320 High pr-OS 0.90 0.54 1.50 0.685

Relapse-free survival

High

Intermediate

Low

10-yr OS pr

66%

51%

(16)

Sarcoma heterogeneity

Adipocytic tumours

Well differentiated / dedifferentiated liposarcoma Myxoid / round cell liposarcoma

Pleomorphic liposarcoma ………

Fibroblastic /myofibroblastic tumours Fibromatosis (desmoid)

Solitary fibrous tumour / haemangiopericytoma Low grade myofibroblastic tumour

Infantile fibrosarcoma Adult fibrosarcoma Mixofibrosarcoma ………

So-called fibrohistiocytic tumours

Pleomorphic MFH / Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma ………

Smooth muscle tumours Leiomyosarcoma ………

Skeletal muscle tumours

Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma Vascular tumours

Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma Angiosarcoma of soft tissue ………

Chondro-osseous tumours

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma Extraskeletal osteosarcoma Tumours of uncertain differentiation

Synovial sarcoma Epithelioid sarcoma

Alveolar soft part sarcoma Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue ...

(17)

Sarcoma histologic complexity

(18)

Tumor type Cytogenetic aberration Molecular genetics Well-

differentiated

adipocytic

Ring chromosomes and giant markers (12q 13-15)

Amplification (mdm2, CDK4) HMGA2)

sclerosing inflammator y

One histology with several different entities

Pleomorphic Complex karyotype P53 mutated in 60%;

NF1 in 5%

Spindle cell Monosomy 7 rearrangement 13q

Loss Rb Dedifferentiated Ring chromosomes and

giant markers (12q 13-15)

Amplification (mdm2, CDK4) HMGA2)

Myxoid t(12;16)(q13;p11)

t(12;22)(q13;q22)

DDIT3/FUS

DDIT3/EWSR1

(19)

Sarcoma several layers of heterogeneity

heterogeneity Uterus

Retroperitoneum Head &Neck

Limb

leiomyosarcoma

(20)

Clinical details ………

(21)

• The disease:

– histology, grading, size, site

• The patient:

– performance status, organ function, willingness, ….

• The logistic:

– institution, social status, residence, ….

• The doctor/The team:

– experience, facilities, …..

Who: some hints

This is always a complex and personalized decision

(22)

chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas

(23)

Chemotherapy:

the struggle to become standard

At diagnosis

Before surgery : neo-adjuvant strategies

After surgery : adjuvant strategies : lim

(24)

• Chemotherapy has never been shown detrimental:

– SMAC meta-analysis, Pervaiz update, EORTC 62931, …

• Several studies showed tumor control:

– Issels’ study, Dutch study, Eilber’s trial …..

• Combination chemotherapies are superior (response):

– EORTC 62012, Italiano’s study (FSG on CBR), ….

The Italian way:

“weak” but consistent evidences

… of course, histology makes the difference

(25)

Guidelines: chemo isn’t standard, but ….

-Surgery is “the” standard

-RT: DFT 50 Gy neoadj; 66 Gy adj (boost) -CT adjuvant: 6% OS

-CT neo-Adj: local surgical benefit

-Locally advanced: TNF-a + Mel Hyperthermia

(26)

Why MTB is crucial

(27)

SURGEON ONCOLOGIST

RADIO THERAP IS T

WHO GOES FIRST?

(28)

If you make the step, do it right!

(29)

Aggressive chemotherapy more effective

Which therapy matters

(30)

13% were amputated

Adjuvant/neo-adjuvant therapy: CT + RT

-70% of pts affected by large, G3, STS are cured by CT+RT

- After, “more” chemo is useless

(31)

-trabectedin: second-line all STS

-high-dose ifosfamide: “non-leiomyosarcoma”

-pazopanib: second-line non-adipocytic sarcoma -gemcitabine: leiomyosarcoma

angiosarcoma

-gemcitabine +/- docetaxel: soft tissue sarcomas

uterine leiomyosarcoma -dacarbazine + gemcitabine: soft tissue sarcomas -paclitaxel: angiosarcoma

-eribulin: liposarcoma

Doxorubicin and its friends

(32)

Adjuvant/neo-adjuvant therapy: what’s next?

(33)

Study design

(34)

Relapse Free Survival is superior with anthracycline + ifosfamide

Table 2. EUROSARC: RFS - Cox’s univariate HR and its 95% Confidence Intervals

Treatment ARM HR 95% CI p

Standard 1 (ref.) -

0.007

Tailored 1.955 1.119-3.190

P=0.004

Median FU: 12.34 months (IQ range: 25.45)

0.62

0.38

(35)

Table 4. EUROSARC: OS - Cox’s univariate HR and its 95% Confidence Intervals

Treatment ARM HR 95% CI p

Standard 1 (ref.) -

0.034

Tailored 2.687 1.104-6.937

P=0.033

Overall Survival is superior with anthracycline + ifosfamide

Median FU: 12.34 months (IQ range: 25.45)

0.89

0.64

(36)

RFS by histology subtype

(37)

Abs#10517 Hendifar et al, ASCO 2013

RANDOMIZED PHASE III TRIAL OF TRABECTEDIN VERSUS DOXORUBICIN- BASED CHEMOTHERAPY AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY IN

TRANSLOCATION-RELATED SARCOMAS

IMPRESSIVE RESULTS IN

MYXOID LIPOSARCOMAS

(38)

RFS and quality of surgical resection

(39)

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

(40)

IMMUNOTHERAPY

(41)

T-VEC + pembrolizumab

Kelly CM, et al. Abs #11516

(42)

T-VEC + pembrolizumab - responses

7/20 responses (6/8 in loc adv) ORR 35% (75% in loc adv)

DCR 70%

Kelly CM, et al. Abs #11516

(43)

UPS, DDLPS, pleoLPS

>5 cm G2-3

>50% DM @2 yrs

R A N D O M I Z A T I O N

RT (50 Gy)

Pembro 200 mg x 3

Phase 2 randomized trial

1:1

S U R G E R Y RT (50 Gy)

Pembro 200 mg x 14

SARC 032 / NCT03092323

(44)

matched population total population

0,0%

5,0%

10,0%

15,0%

20,0%

25,0%

30,0%

35,0%

40,0%

Doxorubicin alone Doxorubicin + ifosfamide

Doxorubicin + Dacarbazine

25,6%

19,5%

30,9%

25,9%

21,5%

36,8%

Doxorubicin plus dacarbazine, doxorubicin plus ifosfamide or doxorubicin alone as first line treatment for advanced, metastatic or unresectable leiomyosarcoma (research project 1637): a

retrospective study from the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

D’Ambrosio L, et al. Abs#11574 ASCO 2018

Doxo + DTIC for LMS?

Overall Response Rate

(45)

Retroperitoneal LMS

SURGERY alone

Doxorubicin + DTIC x 3

R A N D O M I Z A T I O N

1:1

DFS@5 years from 29% to 48% (HR= 0.6) ∼ 120 events.

230 randomized patients, accrued in ∼ 5years, study duration is expected to be ∼ 7.5 years.

Phase 3 Randomized trial

SURGERY

Doxo + DTIC for LMS – STRASS2

(46)

Localized High Risk STS of extremities/trunk wall

Conclusions

Chirurgia unica strategia

curativa

R0

RFS / PFS

OS

Chemioterapia

dose-intense

preoperatoria

(47)

If you make the step, do it right!

(48)

THANKS FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION!

lorenzo.dambrosio@ircc.it

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Furthermore, we found that birthweight is the strongest determi- nant for neonatal hypoglycemia among a population of women exposed to antenatal steroids while type of ACS

• Gastrointestinal stromal tumor and Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor have been added to the list of histologic types for this site.. • Fibrosarcoma grade I has

Wide local resection for grossly clear margins only Resect en bloc only organs where sarcoma is

Per Ingegneria, la percentuale più alta di rispondenti è tra gli iscritti al terzo anno: dal confronto con la Tabella 3, si può evincere che la maggior parte degli

In the third part we present the re- sults emerging from the focus groups held in the first phase of the research involv- ing twenty privileged witnesses in the fields

Table 2 Number and annual incidence rates per million of Kaposi's sarcoma as an AIDS-defining illness (AIDS-KS) by year of diagnosis and sex in selected European countries and

Molecular and functional characterization of three different postzygotic mutations in PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) patients: Effects on Pi3k/Akt/mTOR signaling

To set the GT operating conditions, the IGV angle and external temperature are used throughout the network as global variables and used as input variables to control the