• Non ci sono risultati.

PM , PM and PM acidity during spring and summer at one Po Valley site.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "PM , PM and PM acidity during spring and summer at one Po Valley site."

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

PM

2.5

, PM

1

and PM

0.4

acidity during spring and summer at one Po Valley site.

G. Sangiorgi1, L. Ferrero1, M.G. Perrone1 and E. Bolzacchini1

1POLARIS Research Centre, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan,

I-20126, Italy

Keywords: water soluble compounds, acidity, water content, PM2.5/PM1/PM0.4. Presenting author email: giorgia.sangiorgi1@unimib.it

Nitrate, sulphate and ammonium are the three main important water-soluble inorganic ions of PM. Typically, they account for 30-60% of the total PM mass (Seinfled and Pandis, 2006; Lonati et al, 2005). In the Po Valley, they show a typical seasonal trend: during the summer sulphate is the dominant inorganic ion (13% of PM1 and

PM2.5; Perrone et al, 2010) because of the strong

atmospheric photochemistry, while during the winter nitrate becomes the most abundant inorganic ion (23-29% of PM1 and PM2.5; Perrone et al, 2010). This

seasonal pattern affects the characteristics of aerosol acidity, because sulphuric and nitric acids are two of the most important aerosol precursors. Typically, ammonia is the main neutralizing species. The goal of this study is to expand the knowledge about aerosol acidity characteristics.

PMx samples (Table 1) were collected at

Sannazaro de’ Burgondi (Pavia, Italy), a rural site located in the middle of the Po Valley (North of Italy). Three dimensional sizes of PM were sampled: PM2.5 (4-h

filters), PM1 (8-h filters) and PM0.4 (24-h filters). The

sampling period was 24 March – 19 April (spring) and 10 June – 2 July 2010 (summer). All the collected filters were extracted in ultra-pure water and analyzed by IC to determine the concentration of water soluble inorganic ions (Na+, NH4 + , K+, Mg2+, Ca2+; F-, Cl-, NO3 -, PO4 3-, SO42-) and mono-/dicarboxylic acids (acetic, propionic,

formic, glutarric, succinic, malonic, maleic, oxalic acids).

Table 1. Mean ± standard deviation of PMx

concentration (μg/m3).

PM2.5 PM1 PM0.4 PM1/PM2.5 PM0.4/PM1

SPRING 21±14 12±8 3±1 0.61±0.12 0.23±0.05 SUMMER 13±8 12±7 5±1 0.64±0.13 0.35±0.08 While the ammonium concentration was at the same level during spring (e.g., PM1=1.2±1.1 μg m-3) and

summer (e.g., PM1=1.4±1.0 μg m-3), nitrate and sulphate

showed the typical seasonal pattern described above. For example in PM1, NO3- was three times higher during

spring (spring: 2.9±3.2 μg m-3; summer: 0.8±1.0 μg m-3); on the contrary, SO42- was three times higher during

summer (spring: 1.0±0.8 μg m-3; summer: 2.9±2.3 μg m

-3).

All the samples (regardless of season, time of the day, and PM size) were ammonium-rich, i.d. [NH4+]/[SO42-] molar ratio was always >1.5. Moreover, it

was clearly visible that the ammonium concentration increased at the increasing of the nitrate concentration,

suggesting that nitrate formation was a consequence of the gas-phase reaction between ammonia and nitric acid.

However, the spring strong correlation between excess of NH4+ (excess NH4+=[NH4+]–[SO42-]) and NO3

-(R2≥0.98) was lost during the summer (R2≥0.46) (Figure 1), suggesting that the presence of ammonium in PM samples could not be attributed to this inorganic ion.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 50 100 150 200 NO 3 -; mo l -n mo l m -3 Excess NH4+ nmol m-3

PM1: summer

NO3-

mol-Figure 1. Relationship between excess of NH4+ and NO3

-concentration.

The summer higher level of ammonium in PMx

could be explained by the increased concentration of mono- and dicarboxylic acids, due to stronger photochemical processes than in spring. In fact, the concentration of these acids was double in summer (e.g., PM1=0.20±0.19 μg m-3) than in spring (e.g.,

PM1=.011±0.10 μg m -3

).

In addition to strong acidity (i.e., H+ derived from strong acids in an aqueous extract of PM samples; Pathak et al, 2004), also free acidity (i.e., the actual concentration of free H+; Pathak et al, 2004) is an important parameter to describe the aerosol acidity characteristics. Then, a thermodynamic model (E-AIM) will be used to determine free acidity for the collected samples.

Lonati, G., Giugliano, M., Butelli, P., Romele, L. and Tardivo, R. (2005) Atmos. Environ. 39, 1925-1934. Pathak, R.K., Louie, P.K.K., Chan, C.K. (2004) Atmos.

Environ. 38, 2965-2974.

Perrone, M.G., Gualtieri, M., Ferrero, L., Lo Porto, C., Udisti, R., Bolzacchini, E., Camatini, M. (2010)

Chemosphere 78, 1368-1377.

Seinfeld, J.H. and Pandis, S.N. (2006) Atmospheric

Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons: New York,

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Da detta rappresentazione si può nota- re la notevole variazione delle concentrazio- ni nel sito ad alto traffico veicolare durante la giornata con 2 massimi registrati tra le

The first two steps aim is to identifying the differences in the statistical properties of measurement results comparable sets of new portable devices in relation to reference device

Since the second half of ’80s, high quality elemental analyses on size segregated aerosol samples have been performed using the Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) and

To better and deeper understand air pollution in the study area, in particular PM2.5 and the secondary inorganic aerosol fraction, a collaboration between

(1997) to one study variable ensures the larger efficiency gains over equal allocation when the parameters of the models are optimal. Moreover, it also performs better than equal

The lack of efficacy of blocking exosome secretion led us to speculate that, although TEX are increased in some types of cancer and are likely the most

The ionic balance was very close to neutrality (all the samples were ammonium rich and tot H + and free H +.. concentrations were

Humidographs for particle with diameter less than 2.5 µm and 1 µm were derived from collected data and compared to that estimated using the E-AIM model.. Figure 2