• Non ci sono risultati.

Re-use of Materials in Asphalt Pavements. Interest of Society. Environmental and Sustainability Issues: Benefits and Drawbacks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Re-use of Materials in Asphalt Pavements. Interest of Society. Environmental and Sustainability Issues: Benefits and Drawbacks"

Copied!
19
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Re-use of Materials in Asphalt Pavements.

Interest of Society. Environmental and Sustainability Issues: Benefits and

Drawbacks

Gordon Airey

Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre University of Nottingham

United Kingdom

Asphalt Recycling and Materials Re-use in Asphalt Pavements 6th International Congress on Valorization and Recycling of Industrial

Waste L’Aquila, Italy 28th June 2008

(2)

Social and Environment

Environmental impact

– Construction only a small contribution compared to entire infrastructure operation (usage)

– Part of overall operation under our control

Emissions & energy consumption

– Warm and cold (construction & maintenance) processes

– Pollution absorbing roads (Titanium oxide slurry surfacing)

Use of finite resources

– Local recycling (Reduce need for transport) – Insitu (Mobile plant)

(3)

Key Players

WRAP (UK)

AggRegain (UK)

SAMARIS

EAPA

RILEM TC 206 ATB, TG5 Recycling

FP7 consortia

(4)

Future Strategy

Integrating material flows

Life cycle assessment (LCA)

Design for maintenance

Marketing

(5)

Integrating Material Flows

(Waste management)

Network level

Generating asphalt planings

Linked to recycling needs

(6)

Design for Maintenance

(Automotive industry)

Aim of recycling built into initial construction

Currently use recycled material in ‘lower spec’ application

Keeping good records

(7)

Marketing

(Appliances)

Energy rating

‘Road materials’ with targets (green house gas emissions)

(8)

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

LCA is a tool to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with stages of a product’s lifecycle from cradle to grave

ISO 14040

Sensitivity analysis

Quantify environmental impacts

Target green house gas emissions

Manufacturing & maintenance versus transport

(9)

Phases of LCA

(10)

Inventory Analysis

Manufacturing Operation

Landfill Recycling

Construction

Maintenance

Dismantling and disposal

Transportation

Environmental impact assessment of track

systems

(11)

Inventory Analysis

Inputs:

Materials………...…steel, cement, aggregate, grout, etc.

Travelling distance………...materials, plant, workers?

Fuel consumption………...non-combined and combined

Type of machinery………...energy consumption during construction

Life expectancy of components…….replacement and renewal

Maintenance period………....replacement and renewal

Recycling percentage……….during maintenance and demolition

Outputs:

Energy consumption……….………throughout the life cycle

Emission to air……….………...from materials, fuel and manufacturing stage

Emission to water………...materials, manufacturing and construction

Waste and land fill…....……….materials, construction, maintenance and demolition

Noise pollution………construction and demolition

(12)

FP7 – Re-road

Re-road – End of life strategies of asphalt pavements

FEHRL proposal

A level of re-use of 99% for recovered

asphalt concrete, to be reintroduced into new mixes with a minimum of

downgrading of the material and a minimal introduction of virgin material

(13)

Material Re-use

Crumb rubber tyres

Industrial slags

Waste products – glass cullet & plastics

Bio-materials

(14)

Crumb rubber

y = 1823.8x-1.0418 R2 = 0.6344

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Viscosity (mPa.s)

Absorption Rate (% per hour) Middle East Bitumens Venezuelan Bitumens

Wet process – small quantities

& compete with synthetic PMBs

Dry process – absorption &

reduced material performance

(15)

Slags & Glass Cullet

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

0 1 2 3 4

Number of Conditioning Cycles

Stiffness Modulus Ratio

Grit MB = 6.2% Vv = 1.0% Mix #8 Grit MB = 6.0% Vv = 2.5% Mix #9

Slag BFS Filler MB = 6.0% Vv = 4.1% Mix #10 Slag Limestone Filler MB = 6.0% Vv = 3.0% Mix #11 Slag Limestone Filler MB = 5.5% Vv = 2.9% Mix #12

(16)

Slags & Glass Cullet

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0 900 1800 2700 3600

Number of Load Cycles

Axial Strain (%)

Limestone Mix #1 Limestone + Glass Mix #2 Limestone + Glass Mix #3 Slag MB = 4% Mix #4 Slag MB = 5% Mix #6

Mix #1

Mix #2

Mix #3 Mix #6

Mix #4 Glass

Slag

(17)

Asphalt Recycling - RAP

Growing use to overcome bitumen cost increase and aggregate shortage

RAP not generally mandatory

Main techniques involve hot recycling

RAP contents limited, <50%, usually <30%,

<10% surfacings

Cold cycling – 100%

Usually in base and binder layers

(18)

Final Thoughts

More holistic approach needs to be taken to material re-use and asphalt recycling

Experience needs to be shared amongst researchers, practitioners and clients

(19)

Thank You

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

 fatigue resistance of WMA mixture with slags is slightly lower than that of the corresponding material prepared with mineral aggregates (WLM), probably because of the

Keywords: Reinforced asphalt pavements, composite reinforcements, interface bonding 20..

Santagata, Honorary President of SIIV, Italy Antonio Montepara, University of Parma, Italy.. Andrea Grilli, University of the Republic of San Marino,

It is not impossible to have public or indipendent fundings; public authorities It is not impossible to have public or indipendent fundings; public authorities encourage recycling

[r]

In general, the complex modulus of the asphalt 10% TiO 2 is increasing at low and high load frequency as the phase angle slightly lower than original asphalt (refer Fig. 4) that

• industrial and technological types of technogenic resources – technological process, in the course of which technogenic raw materials, storage type, degree of study, geotechnical

Although long-term aged samples showed the highest resilient modulus for the asphalt mixtures compared with the unaged and short-term aged conditions, the change in resilient