Angelo Farina
Dip. di Ingegneria Industriale - Università di Parma Parco Area delle Scienze 181/A, 43100 Parma – Italy
[email protected] www.angelofarina.it
ACOUSTICS part – 4
Sound Engineering Course
Indoors acoustics
Indoors acoustics
Indoors: generalities Indoors: generalities
A sound generated in a closed room produces an acoustic field that results from the superposition of direct waves and reflected waves.
Direct waves come directly from the source to the listener, as in an open field.
Reflected Waves are produced by all the reflections on the walls of the room.
The amount of energy reflected by the boundary surfaces is dependent on their acoustic behavior, described by their coefficients of absorption, reflection and transmission (a,r and t).
ricevente
sorgente
Indoors sound propagation methods
Dot source s o r g e n t e p u n t i f o r m e
receiver direct sound
reflected sounds
Direct Sound
Reflected sound
Indoors r,a,t coefficients, 1
Reflection, absorption and transmission coefficients
The energy balance equation for a wave reflected on a wall is:
• Wo = Wr + Wa + Wt
dove Wo is the power of the incoming wave, Wr is the reflected power, Wa is the power absorbed and converted into heat and Wt is the power going through the wall.
Indoors r,a,t coefficients, 2
Dividing by Wo we obtain: 1 = r + a + t
where r = Wr/ Wo , a = Wa/ Wo and t = Wt/ Wo are, respectively, the reflection, absorption and transmission coefficients of the wall relative to the incoming acoustic energy.
The value of coefficients r, a, t varies between 0 and 1 0 r,a,t 1 And depents on the material of the wall as well as on frequency and angle of the sound pressure wave.
We can define the apparent acoustic absorption coefficient as
= 1 – r Apparent indicates that the acoustic energy going into the wall is only partly absorbed, but does not return in the originating room.
Free field, reverberant field, semi-reverberant field Free field, reverberant field, semi-reverberant field
In a closed environment the acoustic field can be of three different kinds:
• Free field
• Reverberant field
• Semi-reverberant field
Free Field Free Field
A field is defined as free when we are close to the source, where the direct energy component prevails, compared to which the contribution of all the reflections becomes negligible.
In this case, the field is the same as outdoors, and only depends on source distance and directivity, Q.
The sound pressure level is:
In which LW is the level of source sound power, Q its directivity, and d is the distance between source and receiver. In a free field, the sound level decreases by 6 dB eache time distance d doubles.
w 2
p 4 d
log Q 10 L
L
Reverberant field Reverberant field
A field is said to be reverberant if the number of side wall reflections is so elevated that it creates a uniform acoustic field (even near the source).
The equivalent acoustic absorption area is defined as:
A = S = (m2)
where is the average absorption coefficient and S is the total interior surface area (floor, walls, ceiling, etc.)
The sound pressure level is:
A reverberant field may be obtained in so called reverberant chambers, where the absorption coefficients of different materials are also measured.
L A
Lp w 4
log 10
i
i S
iSemi-reverberant field (1) Semi-reverberant field (1)
A field is said to be semi-reverberant when it contains both free field zones (near the source, where the direct sound prevails) and reverberant field zones (near the walls, where the reflected field prevails). In normally sized rooms, we can suppose that the acoustic field is semi-reverberant.
The sound pressure level is:
In a semi-reverberant acoustic field, the density of sound energy in a point is therefore given by the sum of the direct and indirect acoustic fields.
A
4 d
4 log Q 10 L
Lp w 2
Semi-reverberant field (2) Semi-reverberant field (2)
Reduction of the sound level in the environment via an acoustic treatment of the walls:
• close to the source, the attenuation will be very small, even if the value of R is increased considerably;
• far from the source, (mainly reverberant acoustic field) the sound level reduction can be quite noticeable.
• the straight line (A = ) represents the limit case for a free field (6dB for each doubling of distance d).
• the dotted and shaded line marks a zone on whose right the acoustic field is practically reverberant.
Sound level as a function of source distance
Critical distance, at which direct and reflected sound are
the same
Critical Distance
Critical Distance
W 2 i i
p S
4 d
4 lg Q 10
L d
L
Direct sound
Reflected sound
16
S d Q
S 4 d
4 Q
2 cr
Reverberation time
Reverberation time
Reverberation time (1) Reverberation time (1)
Let’s consider a room containing an active sound source, and let’s abruptly interrupt the emission of sound energy. We define as reverberation time RT (s) of an environment, the time necessary for the sound energy density to decrease to a millionth (60 dB) of the value it had before the source was switched off.
Sound energy density
Source cut-off time
Reflected field
interpolation
Direct wave
For the decrease of the reflected field
-60 dB
Reverberation time T
60Lp (dB)
Time (s) 70 dB
T60 0 dB
Sabine’s Formula (3) Sabine’s Formula (3)
If the environment is perfectly reverberant the value of the reverberation time is the same in all points and is
• (s)
where V is the volume of the environment. This relation is known as “Sabine’s formula”.
By measuring the reverberation time, it is possible to determine:
•
equivalent area of acoustic absorption
i
i
i
S
T V
) 16 (
.
60
0
tot i
i
i S S
A
( ) Sabine’s Formula
60 20
60
16 . 0 16
. 0
T A V
S T V
T
i i
60
cr 60 T
V 100
Q T
V 16 . 0 16
d Q
Substituting in the critical distance formula:
Acoustical
Parameters from Impulse
Response
Basic sound propagation scheme
Omnidirectional receiver Direct Sound
Reflected Sound
Point Source
Direct Sound
Reverberant tail
ISO 3382 acoustical parameters
From Impulse Response to Sound Decay
• Schroeder’s backward integral
• Makes it possible to
reconstruct the decay of a stationary source by backward integration of the measured impulse response
0
A B
t
g t d t2
0 ' '
g t d t
t
2 ' '
g t d t
t 2
0 ' '
Schroeder’s BW Integration
Pressure Impulse Response
Energetic Impulse Response (in dB) Stationary Sound Decay (in dB)
Reverberation time T20 Reverberation time T20
Lp (dB)
Time (s)
>35 dB
-5 dB
-25 dB
T20
ISO 3382 Reverberation Time(s)
Early Decay Time (EDT):
extrapolated from 0 to -10 dB
Reverberation Time T
10: extrapolated from -5 to -15 dB
Reverberation Time T
20: extrapolated from -5 to -25 dB
Reverberation Time T
30:
extrapolated from -5 to -35 dB
Early – Late energy evaluation
Useful Energy Detrimental Energy
Early-Late parameters
ms ms
dτ τ
p
dτ τ
p C
80
2 80
0 2
80
10 lg
Clarity Index C
80(symphonic music):
Clarity Index C
50(speech):
Optimal Value = +/- 1 dB
Optimal Value = +/- 1 dB
ms ms
dτ τ
p
dτ τ
p C
80
2 50
0 2
50
10 lg
Early-Late parameters
Center Time t
S:
0 2 0
2
d p
d p
ts
100 d
p
d p
D
0 2 ms 50
0 2
Definition Index D:
Other acoustical parameters
•
Strenght:
dB 31
L SPL
G w
d t h
d h
d t h
h t
s2 d2
s d
IACC:
SPL at 10 m
Other acoustical parameters
ms
ms W ms
ms
W Y
LFC
d h
d h
h
J 80
0
2 80
5
LFC:
msms W ms
ms Y LF
d h
d h
J
800
2 80
5
2
Lateral Fraction:
IACC “objective” spatial parameter
• It was attempted to “quantify” the “spatiality” of a room by means of “objective”
parameters, based on 2-channels impulse responses measured with directive microphones
• The most famous “spatial” parameter is IACC (Inter Aural Cross Correlation), based on binaural IR measurements
LeftLeft
Right Right
80 ms 80 ms
p pLL(())
p pRR(())
t t
1ms... 1ms
Max IACC
d t p
d p
d t p
p
t E
ms 80
0 2R ms
80 0
2L ms 80
0
R L
LF “objective” spatial parameter
• Another “spatial” parameter is the Lateral Energy ratio LF
• This is defined from a 2-channels impulse response, the first channel is a standard omni microphone, the second channel is a
“figure-of-eight” microphone:
Figure Figure
of 8of 8 Omni Omni
80ms
ms 0
o2 ms 80
ms 5
82
d h
d h
LF
hhoo(())
hh88(())
Are IACC measurents reproducible?
• Experiment performed in anechoic room - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 5 binaural dummy heads
Are IACC measurents reproducible?
• Diffuse field - huge difference among the 4 dummy heads
IACCe - random incidence
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000
Frequency (Hz)
IACCe B&K4100
Cortex Head Neumann
Are LF measurents reproducible?
• Experiment performed in the Auditorium of Parma - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 4 pressure-velocity microphones
Are LF measurents reproducible?
• At 25 m distance, the scatter is really large
Comparison LF - measure 2 - 25m distance
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000
Frequency (Hz)
LF
Schoeps Neumann Soundfield B&K
Post processing of impulse responses
• A special plugin has been developed for performing
analysis of acoustical parameters according to ISO-3382
Post processing of impulse responses
• A special plugin has been developed for the computation of STI according to IEC-EN 60268-16:2003