Edited by: Antonio Simone Laganà, University of Messina, Italy
Reviewed by: Helena Ban Frangez, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia Alessandro Favilli, University of Perugia, Italy
*Correspondence: Elisabetta Garavaglia garavaglia.elisabetta@hsr.it
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Obstetrics and Gynecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery Received: 31 May 2017 Accepted: 10 July 2017 Published: 25 July 2017 Citation: Garavaglia E, Sala C, Taccagni G, Traglia M, Barbieri C, Ferrari S, Candiani M, Panina-Bordignon P and Toniolo D (2017) Fertility Preservation in Endometriosis Patients: Anti-Müllerian Hormone Is a Reliable Marker of the Ovarian Follicle Density. Front. Surg. 4:40. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00040
Fertility Preservation in
endometriosis Patients:
anti-Müllerian hormone is a
reliable Marker of the Ovarian
Follicle Density
Elisabetta Garavaglia1*, Cinzia Sala2, Gianluca Taccagni3, Michela Traglia2,
Caterina Barbieri2, Stefano Ferrari1, Massimo Candiani1, Paola Panina-Bordignon4 and Daniela Toniolo2
1 Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 2 Genetics of Common Disorders, Division of
Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, 3 Pathology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute,
Milan, Italy, 4 Reproductive Sciences, Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
Objective: To analyze the ovarian reserve via measurement of follicular density and
anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in endometriosis patients participating to a clinical pro-gram of cortical ovarian cryopreservation.
Design: Retrospective analysis of serum AMH levels and prospective investigation of
ovarian follicle number.
setting: University Hospital.
Patient(s): Two hundred and two women with endometriosis and 400 controls. intervention(s): Blood samples and ovarian biopsies.
Main outcome measure(s): Correlation of serum AMH levels and the number of
non-growing follicles in the biopsied cortical tissues in endometriosis and control sub-jects, including age, type of AMH kit, and the laboratory performing the analysis as covariates.
result(s): AMH levels were shown to decrease with age in untreated endometriosis
patients (P < 1.0 × 10−5) but they were significantly lower in endometriosis compared
to controls only in patients over 36 years old (P = 2.7 × 10−4). The AMH decrease was
faster in endometriosis compared to controls (beta = 0.27, P = 4.0 × 10−4). Primordial
follicle number decreased with the reduction of AMH levels in both cases and controls (beta = 0.3; P = 0.04).
conclusion: AMH is a reliable marker of ovarian reserve in endometriosis patients, and
it can predict follicular density in women undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
inTrODUcTiOn
Fertility preservation represents a significant clinical challenge for the biomedical community. Initially developed for onco-logical patients (1), approaches to fertility preservation have been extended to women at risk to develop premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) as a consequence of genetic or environmental causes and/or gynecological treatments (2).
Available options for fertility preservation for adult women include the cryopreservation of oocytes, which, thanks to the devel-opment of vitrification protocols, allows the achievement of fertiliza-tion rates comparable to those with fresh gametes (3, 4). However, this approach cannot be applied to young women who have not yet reached sexual and psychological maturity, to patients who need to start an immediate anticancer treatment, or to women with hormone-sensitive malignancies. In these cases, cryopreservation of the ovarian cortical tissue could be proposed (5). Although about 60 babies were born so far after ovarian tissue transplantation (6), this method is still considered an experimental technique. Yet, new technologies for in vitro maturation of oocytes collected from the ovarian cortex during laparoscopic surgery have recently opened new horizons (7). However, low follicular density may limit the success of the fertility restoration and the identification of presurgical reliable markers of ovarian follicle density could help to avoid useless surgeries and, at the same time, give indications of the optimal age for tissue collection. To date, the most used non-invasive tests are the ovarian antral follicle count (AFC), evaluated by ultrasound, and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) (8) both considered predictive in assisted repro-ductive treatment (ART) or for age of menopause (9, 10).
Among the many iatrogenic and pathological conditions that compromise ovarian function, endometriosis, a sterile inflammatory disease characterized by growth of endometrial tissue at ectopic loca-tion, may represent a cause of early menopause, as indicated by its asso-ciation with infertility in more than 50% of affected patients (11, 12). The chronic clinical course of endometriosis, associated with its common bilateral involvement, and the frequently repeated surgical interventions suggest that ovarian cryopreservation might represent a promising option for fertility preservation in affected women.
The primary goal of this study was to evaluate presurgical serum AMH levels in a cohort of endometriosis patients under-going ovarian cortex resections for fertility preservation at our institution in the years 2011–2014, compared to a large control group, and then to test the hypothesis that the preoperative AMH values correlated with the individual follicular density.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that analyzed ovarian reserve through combined measurement of follicular density and serum AMH levels in the same endometriosis subjects. Even though a limited sample size was analyzed, we showed that AMH might be used as a marker of ovarian reserve in endometriosis cases.
MaTerials anD MeThODs
human subjects
Two hundred and two women with endometriosis undergo-ing surgery for the first time were included in the study. The
majority (156; 77.2%) presented with ovarian endometriosis, of which 35 (22.4%) had bilateral and 121 (77.6%) had unilateral endometriosis. All patients were in premenopausal period, with a mean age of 34.7 ± 5.9 years (19–48 age range). The AMH dosage was performed the day before surgery. Ovarian biopsies were collected from a subgroup of 25 patients at the beginning of the surgery to avoid thermal, vascular, chemical, and mechanical damage of the ovaries. Biopsies were collected with microscis-sors with cold blade from healthy ovarian cortex, either from the non-affected ovary or, in cases of bilateral disease, far from the cyst. Tissue samples of about 4 mm × 4 mm were transferred to the pathology laboratory in formaldehyde. For histochemistry analysis, samples were randomly collected far from the affected site, as a previous study reported that ovarian biopsies sampled at random show an error of 0.5% in estimating the non-growing follicles (13).
Control biopsies were taken from 33 patients undergoing surgery for causes different from endometriosis. Indications for surgery were uterine leiomyomas with menorrhagia (n = 14), ovarian cryopreservation for extra-gynecological oncologic reasons (n = 4), infertility due to tube obstruction (n = 7), and non-endometriotic cysts (n = 8).
Controls for serum AMH levels were subjects from two dif-ferent populations of premenopausal women all of Italian origin. They included 200 women randomly selected from the Italian Network of Genetic Isolates/Val Borbera population (14), a nor-mal population of North West Italy, and 200 randomly selected women from a cohort undergoing ART for male infertility at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute.
The study including the overall plan and the informed consent form was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of the San Raffaele Scientific Institute.
Tissue Preparation and Follicle counts
During the paraffin wax embedding, each ovarian biopsy was marked by Indian ink on the inner part in order to obtain a right orientation from ovarian surface to deep cortex. Paraffin block was then cut perpendicularly to ovarian surface into 5-μm sec-tions, at 50-µm intervals to avoid the overcounting of the same follicle (primordial and primitive follicles do not exceed this size). Sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All sections were analyzed using an Olympus microscope at 200× magnification. The developmental stages of follicles were defined according to Gougeon’s protocol (1986), which defines that the primordial follicle is a structure containing the primary oocyte surrounded by a single flat cells stratum, while the primitive fol-licle is an element assembled by the primary oocyte surrounded by the zona pellucida and by 1–2 cubical cells of the granulosa tissue (Figures 1A,B). The follicle density was determined by dividing the number of follicles counted in 10 non-adjacent fields of 1 mm2 each by the volume of tissue analyzed (0.5 mm3) and
expressed as number of follicles per mm3.
hormone assay
FigUre 1 | Histological analysis of cortical ovarian strips. (a) Hematoxylin/
eosin staining shows primordial, early, and mature primary follicles of one representative ovarian cortical strip of a control (125×). (B) Hematoxylin/eosin staining shows a few primordial follicles (severe ipotrophia for age of the patient) in a fibrosclerotic tonaca albuginea of one representative cortical strip of an endometriosis patient (200×).
TaBle 1 | Serum AMH concentrations in cases and controls.
number age (years)a aMh (ng/ml)a
Cases 201 34.72 ± 5.93 1.786 ± 1.87
Controls 387 35.30 ± 6.36 2.928 ± 2.28
aMean ± SD.
AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone.
available immunoenzymatic assays: the GenII ELISA (Beckman Coulter) and the EIA AMH/MHS kit (Immunotech, Beckman Coulter). The limit of detection (LOD) of both assays was 0.14 ng/ml. For participants with measurements below the LOD, values were replaced with LOD/√2 (15). AMH was detected in 8% of cases and 2.5% of controls. Intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 12.3 and 14.2%, respectively.
statistical analysis
In-house R 3.1.1 scripts (http://www.r-project.org) were used for descriptive and inferential statistics analyses of follicles counts and the levels of AMH in the total sample (N = 602). For each measurement, outlier values were excluded using a 3 SD threshold based on Shapiro–Wilk normality tests assessing the normality of the distributions. After outliers exclusion, we analyzed 588 AMH (201 cases and 387 controls) and 57 follicle counts (24 cases and 33 controls). Then, follicle counts were square root transformed to normalize. AMH dosage was transformed with a rank-based inverse normalization using the quantile R function qnorm (p, μ, σ) that converts proportions to quantiles. The continuous distributions of each transformed
trait were represented by density() R function. The R wilcox. test() function and/or t.test() function were used to estimate significant difference in the median and/or mean of case/con-trol population and in young and old (≤36 and >36 years old). The glm() R function was used to fit generalized linear models in regression analyses, and ggplot2 library was used for exploratory data analysis and plotting results.
resUlTs
aMh levels Were Progressively reduced
with age in Untreated endometriosis
Patients
Serum AMH values of 201 untreated endometriosis patients and 387 normal women were included in the analysis. The mean of AMH level was lower in cases compared to controls (Table 1). Since AMH levels were measured using two different kits by two independent laboratories, we tested the statistical dependence of AMH and the two confounding factors, kit and laboratory, in addition to age. All variables showed significant correlations (P < 1.0 × 10−5) assessed using the Spearman’s rank correlation
test, and were therefore included as covariates in all the analyses. Regression analysis, after the exclusion of the confounding effect of the whole set of covariates, showed that the median of the AMH residual levels was significantly lower in cases [median = −0.17 (−1.97 to 2.99)] compared to controls [median = 0.06 (−3.03 to 2.67)] (P = 1.0 × 10−3).
It has been estimated that women older than 36 years present a significant depletion of the ovarian reserve (16, 17). When the threshold of 36 years of age was used to subdivide the population in two groups, only >36 year-old cases had a significant decrease in AMH residual levels compared to controls: cases median of residues = −0.87 (−1.82 to 2.58) versus controls median of residues = −0.25 (−2.30 to 2.57) (P = 2.7 × 10−4).
To better describe the decrease of AMH levels with age in endometriosis patients, we performed a multiple regression analysis of AMH and age including all the above covariates. Serum AMH levels decreased with increasing age in patients and in controls as expected, but the decrease was faster in endome-triosis cases (Figure 2). To conclude that the effect of age was different in cases and controls, the interaction between age and affection status was included in the analysis: the interaction was highly significant (beta = 0.27, P = 4.0 × 10−4). The faster decrease
TaBle 2 | Primordial and primary follicle counts from ovarian biopsies in cases
and controls.
number Primordiala Primarya
Cases 24 12.25 ± 16.48 7.9 ± 7.35
Controls 33 14.42 ± 18.36 10.42 ± 12.16
aMean ± SD.
FigUre 2 | Multiple regression analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and age. AMH kit and laboratory were included as covariates. Scatter plot of the
correlation between AMH residues and age in cases (solid circles) and controls (solid triangles). Linear interpolation for cases (solid lines) and controls (dashed lines) together with confidence intervals (gray shadowed area) are reported.
Primordial Follicle counts correlated with
the Decrease in aMh levels in Both
cases and controls
Ovarian biopsies were performed in a subset of 24 endometriosis cases and 33 controls (Table 2). Counts of primordial follicles did not show significant differences between cases and controls. Primordial follicle numbers were slightly lower in endometrio-sis cases but the difference was not statistically significant even if only older cases (>36 years) were considered. As expected, the follicle number decreased with age both in endometriosis cases and controls (beta = −0.19; P = 2.15 × 10−5).
To test our primary hypothesis, that a correlation between AMH levels and follicle numbers could be established in endometriosis patients, we performed a regression analysis of AMH and follicle numbers including age and kit/laboratory as
covariates, as discussed above. Considering the entire dataset, including the endometriosis patients, a statistically significant correlation was observed between AMH residual levels and the numbers of primordial follicles (beta = 0.3; P = 0.04): lower AMH residual levels corresponded to lower numbers of primordial follicles. The beta of the regression curve was higher in cases, suggesting a faster depletion of primordial follicles in endometriosis patients (Table S1 in Supplementary Material); however, due to the small number of individuals available when the controls were analyzed separately or affection status was included in the analysis, the regression was not statistically significant.
DiscUssiOn
Anti-Müllerian hormone is the best available marker of ovarian reserve and an indicator of response to gonadotropin stimulation (9). Despite its variability, the threshold value of 1.28 ng/ml, identified as an indicator of sufficient immature oocyte yield (19), is currently used in in vitro fertilization. It has been shown repeatedly that AMH levels decrease in endome-triosis patients after surgery (20, 21), but only small studies have been published on presurgical serum AMH level, in patients of Asian origin to determine whether AMH is a reliable marker also for endometriosis-associated infertility and it could be used to predict follicular density for fertility preservation.
We here report a study of AMH levels and ovarian reserve in 201 untreated endometriosis patients of Italian origin undergoing surgery for the first time. The results showed that AMH levels before surgery were significantly lower in endometriosis cases compared to controls (P = 1.0 × 10−3), in agreement with a similar
analysis in a cohort of patients from Korea (22). Interestingly, by splitting our cohort into two different age groups, we showed that AMH levels might account for a difference between cases and controls only in women older than 36 years. When we analyzed older patients separately from younger patients, we showed that only in older women the mean value of AMH levels were signifi-cantly different in cases and controls (P = 2.7 × 10−4). Accordingly,
serum AMH levels decreased faster with increasing age in endo-metriosis cases compared to controls. The difference between cases and controls was statistically significant (P = 4.0 × 10−4).
The endometriosis localization did not seem to influence the observed faster decrease of the ovarian reserve in endometriosis patients, suggesting that it may be the general inflammation status, free radicals, hyperoxidation, and iron deposits or the genetic alterations that predispose to endometriosis to influence the ovarian reserve and possibly also worsen follicle quality in endometriosis (23).
Anti-Müllerian hormone levels and ovarian follicle numbers have been shown to correlate in previous studies. We now show that they appear directly correlated also in our study of endome-triosis patients. Despite the small number of individuals available, we could correlate the number of primordial follicles and the AMH levels in the same individual, giving our study a greater sensitivity than similar studies (10). The numbers of primordial and primary follicles were slightly lower but not significantly different in endometriosis cases, and the comparison between young (≤36 years) and older (>36 years) women did not change the results. Interestingly, by analysis of the entire dataset, we sig-nificantly associated AMH levels with the number of primordial follicles (beta = 0.3; P = 0.04): as expected, lower AMH level corresponded to a lower number of primordial follicles. When the affection status was included in the analysis, the difference between cases and controls was not statistically significant
(beta = −0.05; P = 0.87). The lack of significance could be due to the small number of individual pieces of ovarian cortex studied so far, as it is well known that follicle density may vary through the whole ovarian cortex (24). Indeed, analysis of larger dataset could add more power and demonstrate even small differences. It is interesting to note here that, when cases and controls were analyzed separately, the effect (beta) of the AMH level on the number of primordial follicles was higher in cases compared to controls. This suggests a faster decline of the number of primor-dial follicles associated with a faster decrease of AMH levels, and thus a direct effect of endometriosis on ovarian reserve.
The analysis of a larger cohort of patients could definitively add significance to the study, although our data already indicate that AMH represents a reliable marker of ovarian reserve in untreated endometriosis patients. Importantly, our study shows that AMH levels should be evaluated early during disease progression, to take into account the accelerated follicular depletion, and thus justify ovarian cryopreservation.
eThics sTaTeMenT
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommenda-tion and the guidelines of the Ethic Committee of San Raffaele Scientific Institute with written informed consent from all sub-jects. All subjects gave written informed consent in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Ethic Committee of San Raffaele Scientific Institute.
aUThOr cOnTriBUTiOns
EG has conceived the project. EG, SF, and MC performed the ovarian biopsies. GT performed the follicular count on each biopsy. CS, MT, and CB performed the statistical analyses. EG, DT, PP-B, and CS prepared the manuscript. All authors work at the San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
acKnOWleDgMenTs
We wish to thank Dr. Francesca Di Puppo for the setup of this study during the final year of her residency. We are grateful to all the patients who participated to the study. We acknowledge the financial support of “Ministero della Salute” Grant number: 29/ PE-2011-02347500.
sUPPleMenTarY MaTerial
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsurg.2017.00040/ full#supplementary-material.
reFerences
1. Rowland GF, Cohen J, Steptoe PC, Hewitt J. Pregnancy following in vitro fertilization using cryopreserved semen from a man with testicular teratoma. Urology (1985) 26(1):33–6. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(85)90250-X
2. Laml T, Schulz-Lobmeyr I, Obruca A, Huber JC, Hartmann BW. Premature ovarian failure: etiology and prospects. Gynecol Endocrinol (2000) 14(4): 292–292. doi:10.3109/09513590009167696
4. Doyle JO, Richter KS, Lim J, Stillman RJ, Graham JR, Tucker MJ. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autolo-gous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility pres-ervation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval. Fertil Steril (2016) 105(2):459–66. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026 5. Long CJ, Ginsberg JP, Kolon TF. Fertility preservation in children and
adoles-cents with cancer. Urology (2016) 91:190–6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.047 6. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Ovarian cortex transplantation: 60 reported
live births brings the success and worldwide expansion of the technique towards routine clinical practice. J Assist Reprod Genet (2015) 32(8):1167–70. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0544-9
7. Yin H, Jiang H, Kristensen SG, Andersen CY. Vitrification of in vitro matured oocytes collected from surplus ovarian medulla tissue resulting from fertility preservation of ovarian cortex tissue. J Assist Reprod Genet (2016) 33(6):741–6. doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0691-7
8. Muzii L, Achilli C, Bergamini V, Candiani M, Garavaglia E, Lazzeri L, et al. Comparison between the stripping technique and the combined excisional/ ablative technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a multicentre RCT. Hum Reprod (2016) 31(2):339–44. doi:10.1093/humrep/ dev313
9. La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Radi D, Argento C, Baraldi E, Artenisio AC, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update (2010) 16(2):113–30. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp036
10. Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Wright P, Nelson SM, Wallace WH. Data-driven assessment of the human ovarian reserve. Mol Hum Reprod (2012) 18(2): 79–87. doi:10.1093/molehr/gar059
11. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril (2012) 98(3):591–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031
12. Giudice LC. Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med (2010) 362(25):2389–98. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1000274
13. Massin N, Gougeon A, Meduri G, Thibaud E, Laborde K, Matuchansky C, et al. Significance of ovarian histology in the management of patients presenting a premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod (2004) 19(11):2555–60. doi:10.1093/ humrep/deh461
14. Traglia M, Sala C, Masciullo C, Cverhova V, Lori F, Pistis G, et al. Heritability and demographic analyses in the large isolated population of Val Borbera suggest advantages in mapping complex traits genes. PLoS One (2009) 4(10):e7554. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007554
15. Axelrad DA, Goodman S, Woodruff TJ. PCB body burdens in US women of childbearing age 2001–2002: an evaluation of alternate summary metrics of NHANES data. Environ Res (2009) 109:368–78. doi:10.1016/j. envres.2009.01.003
16. Wallace WH, Kelsey TW, Anderson RA. Ovarian cryopreservation: experi-mental or established and a cure for the menopause? Reprod Biomed Online (2012) 25(2):93–5. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.06.008
17. Lass A, Silye R, Abrams DC, Krausz T, Hovatta O, Margara R, et al. Follicular density in ovarian biopsy of infertile women: a novel method to assess ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod (1997) 12(5):1028–31. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.5.1028 18. Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian
reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril (2011) 95(1):170–5. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006
19. Fadini R, Comi R, Mignini Renzini M, Coticchio G, Crippa M, De Ponti E, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone as a predictive marker for the selection of women for oocyte in vitro maturation treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet (2011) 28(6):501–8. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9589-6
20. Seyhan A, Ata B, Uncu G. The impact of endometriosis and its treatment on ovarian reserve. Semin Reprod Med (2015) 33(6):422–8. doi:10.1055/s- 0035-1567820
21. Leone RMU, Gupta JK, Ferrero S. Treatment of endometrioma for improving fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2017) 209:81–5. doi:10.1016/j. ejogrb.2016.02.035
22. Jeon JH, Park SY, Lee SR, Jeong K, Chung HW. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels before surgery in patients with ovarian endometriomas com-pared to other benign ovarian cysts. J Menopausal Med (2015) 21(3):142–8. doi:10.6118/jmm.2015.21.3.142
23. Sanchez AM, Papaleo E, Corti L, Santambrogio P, Levi S, Viganò P, et al. Iron availability is increased in individual human ovarian follicles in close prox-imity to an endometrioma compared with distal ones. Hum Reprod (2014) 29(3):577–83. doi:10.1093/humrep/det466
24. Schmidt KL, Byskov AG, Nyboe Andersen A, Müller J, Yding Andersen C. Density and distribution of primordial follicles in single pieces of cortex from 21 patients and in individual pieces of cortex from three entire human ovaries. Hum Reprod (1997) 12(5):1028–31.
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that the research was con-ducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
