• Non ci sono risultati.

Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of potential new drugs based on ongoing clinical studies as of 2019

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review of potential new drugs based on ongoing clinical studies as of 2019"

Copied!
7
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Digestive

and

Liver

Disease

j o ur n a l ho me p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / d l d

Review

article

Immunotherapy

for

hepatocellular

carcinoma:

A

review

of

potential

new

drugs

based

on

ongoing

clinical

studies

as

of

2019

Francesco

Tovoli

a,∗,1

,

Andrea

Casadei-Gardini

b,1

,

Francesca

Benevento

a

,

Fabio

Piscaglia

a aUnitofInternalMedicine,DepartmentofMedicalandSurgicalSciences,UniversityofBologna,Bologna,Italy

bUnitofOncology,DepartmentofOncology,UniversityHospitalofModenaandReggioEmilia,Modena,Italy

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory: Received24December2018 Accepted1May2019 Availableonlinexxx Keywords:

Immunecheckpointinhibitors Nivolumab

Pembrolizumab Tremelimumab

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Inthelatestyears,antineoplasticimmunotherapyrevolutionisedthetherapeuticlandscapeinoncology. Firstshowntobeeffectiveinmelanomaandnon-smallcelllungcarcinoma,immunecheckpointinhibitors arenowbeingtestedforthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC).Preliminaryresultshavebeen particularlypromising.Asaconsequence,anincreasingnumberofclinicaltrialsareunderway.Theroleof theimmunesystemincarcinogenesis(withparticularreferencetotumourescapeimmunemechanisms), aswellasthecurrentimmunotherapytrialsforHCCinitsdifferentclinicalscenarios,arethesubjectof thisreview.Inparticular,weaimtoprovidefreshupdatesaboutthesenoveltherapeuticagentswhich promisetoshapethefuturetherapeuticscenarioofHCC.

©2019EditriceGastroenterologicaItalianaS.r.l.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most deadly cancersworldwide,despitesurveillanceprogramsandmany avail-abletreatments,includinglivertransplantation,surgicalresection, percutaneousand endovascularprocedures,aswellas pharma-cologicaltreatments[1].ThemajorityofHCCsoccurin patients whose liver suffered some degree of inflammation. The main risk factors for HCC include, in fact, HBV,HCV, obesity, exces-sive alcohol consumption and metabolic diseases, all of which contributetoaconditionofchronichepatitis,eventuallyleading tofibrosisandcirrhosis,heldaspre-neoplasticsituations. There-forethistumorappearsveryintriguingtotrytounderstandthe relationshipbetweentheimmunesystem,inflammationand can-cerdevelopment[2,3].It hasbeenhypothesised thatanaltered livermicroenvironmentcontributestoproduceHCCby reprogram-mingtheinflammatoryenvironment[4].Thus,anin-depthlookat liverimmunologyinHCCwouldimproveourunderstandingofthe immunologicalmechanismsthatoccurduring hepatocarcinogen-esisandcouldleadtonewandimprovedtreatmentstrategiesfor thisdeadlydisease.

∗ Correspondingauthorat:UnitofInternalMedicine,DepartmentofMedicaland SurgicalSciences,UniversityofBologna,HospitalS.OrsolaMalpighi,viaAlbertoni 15,40148Bologna,Italy.

E-mailaddress:francesco.tovoli2@unibo.it(F.Tovoli). 1 Co-sharedfirstauthorship.

This review concisely illustrates the mechanism of tumor immune escape and presents a complete standpoint of immunotherapy drugs under current clinical investigation for HCCasof2019.

Duringcarcinogenesis,thetransformationofnormalcellsinto malignant cells is associated with the expression of tumour-associated antigens (TAAs), that will be presented on the cell surfacebyagroupofproteinsknownasthemajor histocompat-ibilitycomplex(MHC)[5] (Fig.1A).Theseantigenswill alsobe retrievedandpresentedbyantigen-presentingcells(APCs).

TheAPCsmigratetolymphnodeswheretheydisplayTAAsto theT-cellreceptors(TCR)locatedonthesurfaceofimmatureT-cells (Fig.1B).However,thesimplebindingofTAAswithTCRsis insuf-ficienttoactivateimmatureT-cells,butratheraco-stimulationis necessary.Inparticular,APCsandimmatureT-cellsco-stimulation requirethebindingofB7proteins(CD80/B7-1and CD86/B7-2), which are hosted on antigen-presenting cells, to CD28, which insteadispresentedbyimmatureT-cells.Thisbindingandthe con-sequentco-stimulationleadstotheactivationofsuchT-cells,which become CD8+T-cells (trigger phase) (Fig. 1C). The activated T-cellssubsequentlymigratefromthelymphnodestothelymphatic vessels andthen tothebloodstream untilreachingthetumour microenvironment. In thetumormicroenviroment CD8+T-cells recognisetheTAAspresentedbytheMHConthecancercellsand attackthem(effectorphase)(Fig.1D),eventuallyeliminatingtumor cells[5–7].

Thisprocessisobviouslyfinelymodulatedatalocalandgeneral level.Themostrelevantstepsforsuchfinemodulationdiscovered

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.006

(2)

Fig.1. Interactionsbetweencancercellantigens(CCA)andtheimmunesystem. Aftertheirrelease,CCAreachtheantigenpresentingcells(A).Theidentification ofCCAbytheantigenpresentingcellsleadstoaprimingoftheT-cellsandtheir eventualmigrationintothetumor(B).Thisphenomenonisnormallyfollowedbya T-cell-mediatedrecognition(C)andkilling(D)ofthecancercells.

sofararethoseinvolvingtheimmunecheckpointinhibitors, con-sistinginmoleculesboundtotheoutermembraneoftheimmune systemcells. Themostlargelystudiedimmune checkpointsare cytotoxicTlymphocyticprotein4(CTLA-4)andprogrammedcell deathprotein1(PD-1).

CTLA-4isessentialfortheactivationofCD4+T-cellsandthe triggeringphaseoftheimmuneresponse.ItsmainligandsareCD80 andCD86inactivatedT-cells.ThebindingofCTLA-4withthese ligandspreventtheirinteractionwithCD28,finallyresultingina decreaseinT-cellactivationbyantigenpresentation(Fig.2A).

CTLA-4is alsoconstitutively expressedbyregulatoryT-cells (Tregs)which areCD4+T-cellscharacterised by theexpression of CD25, CTLA-4, CD62L and FoxP3 molecules [8]. Once acti-vated,TregsinhibittheimmuneresponsethroughIL-2orproduce immunosuppressivefactorssuchasTGF-b,IL-10oradenosine[9]. TheyalsoneedCTLA-4tobeabletoexerttheirsuppressive activ-ity.Inadditiontoitsroleinmodulatingthetriggerphasethrough ablockoftheCD28,CD80andCD86interactions,CTLA-4also pro-motesimmunosuppressionwithinthetumour byinducingTreg activityanddifferentiation.

PD-L1 and PD-L2 are the PD-1 ligands (Fig. 2B). PD-L1 is expressedonimmunesystemcells(antigen-presentingcellsand

MDSCs),whereasPDL-2 isgenerallyexpressedinthe hemopoi-etic compartment. Severalcytokines, in particular, IFN-gamma, regulate PD-L1 [10]. After binding to its ligands, PD-1 inhibits CD8+T-cellactivationbyblockingTCRsignallingandalsoinhibits theactivationandproliferationofCD4+byincreasingIL-10 secre-tion.CancercellsexpressPD-L1andPD-L2,usingthismechanismto escapeimmunosurveillance.Infact,IFN-gammaproducedby TAA-specificT-cellsinasituationofchronicantigenexposure,induces PD-1expressioninT-reactivelymphocytesand upregulates PD-L1in APCsandtumour cells.ThePD-1–PD-L1graftthen blocks TCRsignallingandinhibitstheproliferationandsecretionof cyto-toxic T-cellmediatorsin a processknownas T-cellexhaustion. AltogetherthereforetheCTL4and PD-1/PD-L1pathwaysappear relevant in achieving (tumor) or blocking (therapy) the cancer immuneescape.

Accordingly,thepossibilitytotargetthecheckpointinhibitors pathway hasbeen a radical innovation in thefield of the sys-temictreatmentsforHCCinrecent years[11].Theinhibitionof themostcriticalimmunecheckpointcanbereachedbyblocking CTLA-4,PD-1oritsligandPD-L1.Ipilimumabandtremelimumab are themostlonglytested CTLA-4 inhibitors.Nivolumab, pem-brolizumab,spartalizumab,camrelizumab,andtislelizumabhave shown a strong PD-1 inhibitory activity. PD-L1 blockers have beendevelopedmore recently,currentlyincludingdurvalumab, avelumabandatezolizumab.

2. Concludedtrials

Historically,tremelimumabwasthefirstcheckpointinhibitor testedexplicitlyinHCCpatients.Inaninvestigator-initiatedPhase IIopen-label,multicenter clinicaltrial,Sangro etalrecruited21 patientswithHCV-related HCC [12]. Most patients(57.1%) had anadvanced stagediseaseandwerenaïvetosorafenib (76.2%). Patientsweretreateduntiltumour progressionorunacceptable toxicity.Objectiveresponseanddiseasecontrolratewere17.6and 76.4%, respectively.Median time toprogression (TTP) was6.48 months(95%CI:3.95–9.14).Notoxicitiesrequiringsystemicsteroid treatmentwereregistered.

These favourable resultswere followed shortly afterby the announcement of a multicohort Phase 1b/2 trialof nivolumab alone or combined with ipilimumab in HCC (Checkmate-040, NCT01658878).Theresultsfromthedoseescalationandexpansion cohortsdisplayedanunprecedentedoverallresponserate(ORR)for systemictherapyinHCC[13].Acrossdoseescalationandexpansion

Fig.2.RolesofPD-1andCTLA-4checkpointsintheimmuneresponsetocancercells.WhiletheCTLA-4checkpointismainlyinvolvedthedendriticcells-mediatedpriming ofT-lymphocytes,thePD-1pathwayisprimarlyinvolvedintheinthedirectinteractionbetweenT-lymphocytesandtumorcells.

(3)

phases(262patients),grade3/4treatment-relatedadverseevents occurredin20%.TheORRwas20%(95%CI:15–26)in214patients treatedin thedoseexpansionphasewithamedian durationof responseof9.9monthsandadiseasecontrolrateof64%(95%CI: 58–71).

Similar therapeutic efficacy was observed in another open-labelnonrandomizedPhase2trialofpembrolizumabinpatients who progressed or were intolerant to sorafenib (Keynote-224) [14].Thismulticentrestudyenrolled104patientswhoreceived 200mgpembrolizumabintravenouslyeverythreeweeksuntil dis-easeprogressionorunacceptabletoxicity.TheORRwas17%,and thediseasecontrolratewas61%.Grade3treatment-relatedevents werereported in 24%of patients, and the mostcommonwere increasedaminotransferasesandfatigue.Asinglegrade4 (hyper-bilirubinemia)andagrade5treatment-relatedevent(ulcerative oesophagitis)occurred.Ofnote,immune-relatedhepatitisoccurred inthreepatientsbutwaseasilymanaged.Mostrecently,theresults ofnivolumabinthededicatedCohort5oftheCheckmate-040study wererevealed.In49treatedpatients(25sorafenib-naïveand24 sorafenibexperienced),theoverallresponseratewas10.2%with adiseasecontrolrateof55.1%, amedian overallsurvival of7.6 months,andasafetyprofilecomparablewiththatofChild-Pugh Apatients[15].

BasedontheresultsoftheCheckmate-040andKeynote-224 tri-als,theUnitedStatesFoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)granted onacceleratedapproval tonivolumab inSeptember2017and a priorityreview topembrolizumab for thesecond linesystemic treatmentofHCCinJuly2018.InJuly2018,theFDAalsogranteda breakthroughtherapydesignationforHCCtothecombination ate-zolizumabplusbevacizumabfollowingamulticenterPhase1btrial inwhichpatientswererandomisedin5differenttreatmentarms [16].Amongstthe23patientsassignedtothecombinationarm, 14(61%)hadanobjectiveresponsetotreatment.Otherregulatory agencies,suchastheEuropeanMedicineAgency(EMA),havebeen morecautioussofarandwillwaitformoreevidencebefore approv-ingthesemoleculesforHCC,eveninanondefinitivemodality.This callforcautionhasbeenshowntobejustifiedmostrecently,asthe Phase3Keynote-240trialdidnotconfirmtheresultoftheprevious Phase2trials,failingtodemonstratethebenefitofpembrolizumab overplacebointhesecondlinesetting[17].Inthefinalanalysis ofthestudy,therewasanimprovementinOSforpatientstreated withpembrolizumabcomparedtoplacebo,howevertheseresults didnotmeetstatisticalsignificanceperthepre-specified statisti-calplan(HR=0.78[95%CI,0.611–0.998];p=0.0238).Resultsfor PFSwerealsofavorableinthepembrolizumabarmcomparedwith placebobutdidnotreachstatisticalsignificance(HR=0.78[95%CI, 0.61–0.99];p=0.0209)[17].

3. Immune-relatedadverseeventsandoverallsafetyof immunecheckpointinhibitorsimmune-relatedadverse eventsandoverallsafetyofimmunecheckpointinhibitors

Inhibition of the physiological immune checkpoints can be associatedwithimmune-relatedadverseevents,bothorganand non-organspecific.Virtually,anytissueandorgancanbeinvolved [18,19].Intheseminalclinicaltrialsofnivolumab,theskin,gut, thyroid,adrenalglands,lungandliverwerethemostfrequent tar-getofimmune-relatedadverseevents[13].However,nivolumab wasoverallwelltoleratedandassociatedwithaverylowrateof grade≥3events, includingdiarrhea,pemphigoid-likeskin reac-tion,adrenal failure,and hepatitis [13].Ipilimumab aloneor in combinationwithnivolumab,wasinsteadassociatedwitha rel-ativelyhigher rateof aminotransferaseelevation (45%and 25% foraspartateandalanineaminotransferase,respectively)[12,20]. Theseimmune-relatedadverseeventsweregenerallyeasily

man-agedwithascheduledelayandcorticosteroidsinthemostsevere and/orunresponsivecases.Onlyaverylimitednumberoffatal out-comesduetoimmune-relatedpneumonitis[21]andmiocarditis [22]havebeendescribedsofarinthetreatmentofdifferent can-cers.Untilnow,asinglecaseofatreatment-relatedfataleventwas reportedinHCCtrialsofimmunecheckpointinhibitors(ulcerative oesophagitis)[14].

Despitethisreassuringsafetyprofile,theuseofimmune check-point inhibitors in the fragile setting of cirrhotic patients was initiallyaccompaniedwithajustifiabledoseofsafetyconcerns.In particular,theriskofimmune-mediatedhepatitisandthe possi-blesideeffectsderivingfromtheuseofcorticosteroidsincirrhotic patients were seen as critical elements. In the seminal study of tremelimumab in HCC by Sangro et al. [12], almost half of patientshada aminotransferaseincrease aftertreatment.These alterations were transient,never associated with liverfunction impairment,and didnotrequireprescriptionofcorticosteroids. IntheCheckmate-040study,anincreaseinaminotrasferase lev-els was found in 22–30% of the patients receiving nivolumab. A similar ratewas also described in the Keynote-224study of pembrolizumab [14]. These data have been also confirmed in thepreliminaryanalysisofotherPhases1–2trialsinvestigating differentagents, includingdurvalumab, camrelizumab,and ate-zolizumab[23–26].Theneedforcorticosteroidstotreatimmune relatedadverseeventshasbeenrelativelylow(maximum6%)so far[26].Overall,thesafetyprofileofimmunecheckpointinhibitors inHCCpatientswasconsistentwiththatreportedinprevious stud-iesformelanomaandlungcancer,suggestingthatthesepatients do notsufferanincreasedriskofliverimmune-relatedadverse events.Thesecomfortingdatafoundfurtherconfirmationinthe recentlypresenteddataofnivolumabinChild–PughBpatients.In thiscohortofparticularlyfrailpatients,treatmentrelatedhepatic adverseeventsweredescribedinonly4outof49patients,leading totreatmentdiscontinuationin2patients[15].

Inconclusion,immunecheckpointinhibitorsseemtobe gen-erally welltoleratedeven in patientswithHCC and underlying livercirrhosis.Todate,however,cautionisstillneededsincethese agents havebeentestedonlyintheveryrecent period,butare knowntopotentiallyproducealsodelayedtoxicities. More evi-dencederivingfromthelongtermfollowupofresponderpatients willhelpelucidatethisspecificpoint.

4. Ongoingtrials

Unsurprisingly, the interest toward immune checkpoint inhibitorsisontheriseinOncologyoverallandHCCisno excep-tion.Currently,morethan60studiesofthesemoleculeshavebeen registeredinClinicaltrials.gov.Thedesignofthesestudiesisvaried. Forinstance,checkpointinhibitorsarebeinginvestigatedassingle agentsorincombinationwithotherintheadvancedaswellasin theadjuvantandneoadjuvantsetting.Inthenextparagraphs,we willsummarisethesecurrentlyongoingstudies.

4.1. Advancedsetting—monotherapyorcombinationoftwo immunecheckpointinhibitors

Bytheendof2018,tothebestofourknowledge,fivePhase3 randomisedclinicaltrials(RCTs)areexploringthissetting(Table1). In thesecondlinescenario,theKeynote-240 hasbeen recently announcedtohavefaileditsprimaryendpointofincreasedOSover placeboinaWesternsetting.TheKeynote-394trial,howeverisstill ongoingandtryingtoconfirmthesuperiorityofpembrolizumab overplaceboinEasternpopulations.

The competition is tougher in the first line scenario, where nivolumab, tislelizumab and the combination

(4)

tremeli-Table1

Ongoingclinicaltrialsexploringimmunecheckpointinhibitorsastreatmentforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma.

NCT Phase Studydrug(s) Line Primaryendpoint Estimatedendoftrial

NCT02576509 3 Nivolumabvssorafenib 1 OS Dec2019

NCT03298451 3 Tremelimumab(+durvalumab)vssorafenib 1 OS Mar2021

NCT03062358 3 Pembrolizumabvsplaceboa 2 OS Apr2021

NCT02702401 3 Pembrolizumabvsplacebo 2 OS,PFS Feb2019

NCT03412773 3 Tislelizumabvssorafenib 1 OS May2022

NCT02519348 2 Tremelimumab(+durvalumab) 2 AEs,DLT Dec2019

NCT02658019 2 Pembrolizumab >2 DCR,AEs Apr2020

NCT02702414 2 Pembrolizumab 1–2 ORR May2020

NCT03163992 2 Pembrolizumab 2 ORR Dec2019

NCT03389126 2 Avelumab 2+ ORR Mar2020

NCT03419897 2 Tislelizumab 2+ ORR Sep2021

NCT01658878b 1B/2 Nivolumabvssorafenib 1 ORR Jul2019

NCT01658878b 1B/2 Nivolumab+ipilimumab 2+ ORR Jul2019

NCT02423343 1B/2 Nivolumab+galunisertib 2 MTD,AEs Dec2019

NCT02828124 1/2 Nivolumab Any AE Oct2020

NCT02940496 1/2 Pembrolizumab 2 Biomarker Dec2019

NCT:numberofclinicaltrial(Clinicaltrials.gov);OS:overallsurvival;PFS:progressionfreesurvival;AEs:adverseevents;DLT:doselimitingtoxicities;DCS:diseasecontrol rate;MTD:maximumtolerateddose.

aStudyperformedinAsianpopulationonly. b Multi-cohortstudy.

mumab/durvalumab are being tested versus sorafenib in their respectivePhase3RCTs.Theresultsofthesetrialsareexpected noearlier thanmid2019.In themeantime,preliminaryresults ofthetrials ofcamrelizumaband, durvalumabinmonotherapy orin combination withtremelimumab havebeen recently pre-sentedinabstractformatrelevantoncologymeetingsandseemto confirmanobjectiveresponserateof15–20%withagoodsafety profile[23–26]. Other interestingpreliminary datamight come fromsomeof thestill ongoing Phase 2 RCTs.In particular,the resultsoftheCohort3(nivolumabvssorafenib)andoftheCohort 4(nivolumab+ipilimumabvsplacebo)ofthealreadymentioned Checkmate-040studyareexpectedinlate2019.

4.2. Advancedsetting—combinationofimmunecheckpoint inhibitorswithotheragents

Thepossibilitytocombinethetherapeuticeffectsofdrugswith differentmechanism of action hasalways beenintriguing. The simultaneousblockadeofmanyneoplasticcrossroadsoffers,infact, ahigherprobabilityofobtainingadiseasecontrol.Inthespecific caseofHCC,thecombinationofanti-VEGFRagentsandimmune checkpointinhibitorscouldalsohavesynergisticeffectsgiventhe factthatmoleculartargetagentscouldcollectivelyblockthe sig-nallingfromvariousgrowthfactorsandaffectimmuneeffectors andthevasculature[27,28].Asaconsequence,mostclinical tri-alsofcombinedtherapyareexploringimmunotherapypairedwith oraltyrosineinhibitors(mainlysorafenib,lenvatinib,regorafenib, cabozantinib,vorolanib,andaxitinib)orintravenousanti-VEGFR monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab, ramucirumab) (Table 2). Howeveramorepotentantitumoreffectisnotnecessarily asso-ciatedwithlongersurvivalinthespecificsettingofHCC,sincethis tumormostcommonlyarisesinabackgroundofadvancedliver disease,whoseworseningmightbeaslethalasthetumor progres-sion.ThisriskwasshownbythefailedsunitibvssorafenibPhase3 trial[29]wherethepotencyoftheantitumoraleffectwas under-minedbytheoccurrenceofseverecirrhosisrelatedadverseevents atthechoosendosage.

Inthefrontlinesetting,aPhase3RCTofatezolizumabplus beva-cizumabvssorafenibiscurrentlyongoingtoconfirmtheresultsof thePhase1btrialwhichledtheFDAtograntabreakthrough ther-apydesignationtothiscombination.Interestingdatacameformthe Phase1btrialofpembrolizumabpluslenvatinib.Amongstthe18 participantsofthestudy,almosthalf(46%)hadapartialresponsein

absenceofnewsafetyconcernssignals[30].Otherinteresting infor-mationmaycomefromtheCohort6oftheCheckmate-040study, inwhichthecombinationnivolumab(withorwithoutipilimumab) pluscabozantinibisbeingtested bothina mixedpopulationof sorafenib-naïveandpretreatedpatients.

Combinationstrategies of theimmune checkpointinhibitors arenot limitedtotheanti-VEGFR drugs. Inparticular,different trialsarealsoevaluatingcombinationswithtransforminggrowth factor-beta oral inhibitors (galunisertib), c-MET oral inhibitors (capmatinib),anti-phosphatidylserineantibodies(bavituxumab), andheatshockprotein90inhibitors(XL-888).Ofparticular inter-est,sometrials areexploringthemechanismsthatmayleadto thetumourresistance(andeventualprogressions)tothecurrently knowncheckpointinhibitors.The mainaimis toidentifyother modulatorsoftheimmunesystemwhichmayhelpin overcom-ingthisresistance.Forinstance,INCAGN01876isamodulatorof glucocorticoid-inducedtumournecrosisfactorreceptorwhichis beingtestedincombinationwithnivolumabplusipilimumaband pembrolizumab in two distinct Phase 1b/2 trials.Also, theC-C chemokinereceptor 4(CCR4) inhibitormogalizumabis claimed to enhance the antibody-dependenT-cell-mediated cytotoxicity and is currently being tested in combination with nivolumab. Similarly, EPACADOSTAT and INCAGN01949 are two drugs tar-getingindoleamine2,3-dioxygenaseandtheT-cellcostimulatory molecule CD134 which are being tested in combination with the current checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, the combination of immunotherapy and anticancer vaccines (Pexavec, T-VEC and p53MVA)isalsobeingexplored.

Whethersuchcombinationtherapieswillproduceahigherrate ofand/orlongerlastingantitumoraleffectandwilltranslateinto prolongedsurvivalforHCCpatientswillrequiresomeyearstobe demonstrated.

4.3. Adjuvantandneoadjuvantsetting

Toprevent,oratleastdelayrecurrenceafterachievinga com-pleteresponseoftheprimaryHCCwithresectionorlocoregional therapyhasalwaysbeenatargetofprimaryimportance.Infact patientsmaysufferspreadoftheprimarytumororoccurrenceof adenovotumordue totheunderlyingcirrhosis.Unfortunately, nodrugs have been foundable toachieve this goal in HCC so far.Inparticular,theSTORMtrialdidnotshowanyadvantagein patientstreatedwithsorafenibcomparedtoplacebointermsof

(5)

Table2

Ongoingclinicaltrialsexploringimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincombinationwithotheragentsastreatmentforadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma.

NCT Phase Studydrug(s) Line Primaryendpoint Estimatedendoftrial

NCT03434379 3 Atezolizumab+bevacizumabvssorafenib 1 OS,ORR JUN2022

NCT03439891 2 Nivolumab+sorafenib 1 MTD,ORR Dec2020

NCT03519997 2 Pembrolizumab+bavituximab 1 ORR Apr2021

NCT01658878a 1B/2 Nivolumab(+ipilimumab)+cabozantinib Any ORR Jul2019

NCT02423343 1B/2 Nivolumab+galunisertib 2 MTD,AEs Dec2019

NCT03126110 1B/2 Nivolumab+ipilimumab+INCAGN01876 3 AE,ORR Mar2020

NCT02509507 1B/2 Pembrolizumab+T-VEC Any DLT,ORR Mar2023

NCT03211416 1B/2 Pembrolizumab+sorafenib 1 ORR Oct2019

NCT03418922 1B Nivolumab+lenvatinib 1 AEs,DLT Jun2020

NCT03511222 1B Pembrolizumab+vorolanib 2 RP2D Feb2022

NCT03289533 1B Avelumab+axitinib 1 AEs Aug2020

NCT02705105 1A/2 Nivolumab+mogamulizumab 3 MTD,DLT Oct2018

NCT02859324 1A/2 Nivolumab+avadomide 1–3 DLT,AEs,ORR Mar2020

NCT03241173 1A/2 Nivolumab+ipilimumab+INCAGN01949 2b AEs,ORR Nov2021

NCT02178722 1A/2 Pembrolizumab+epacadostat 2–3 DLT,ORR Feb2020

NCT03277352 1A/2 Pembrolizumab+INCAGN01876 Any AEs,ORR Feb2020

NCT03071094 1–2A Nivolumab+pexavec 1 AEs,ORR Oct2019

NCT03475953 1–2 Avelumab+regorafenib 2+ RP2D,ORR Apr2021

NCT02795429 1–2 Spartalizumab(+capmatinib) 1 DLT,ORR Dec2019

NCT03382886 1 Nivolumab+bevacizumab 2–3 MTD, Mar2023

NCT03006926 1 Pembrolizumab+lenvatinib 1/2 AEs,DLT,ORR Dec2020

NCT03347292 1 Pembrolizumab+regorafenib 1 AEs,DLT Oct2020

NCT03095781 1 Pembrolizumab+XL888 2 RP2D Jun2023

NCT02432963 1 Pembrolizumab+p53MVA Any AEs Feb2019

NCT:numberofclinicaltrial(Clinicaltrials.gov);OS:overallsurvival;ORR:overallresponserate;MTD:maximumtolerateddose;AEs:adverseevents;DLT:doselimiting toxicities;RP2D:recommendeddoseforPhase2.

aMulti-cohortstudy.

bOnlyafterfailureofprevioustreatmentwithimmunecheckpointinhibitors.

Table3

Ongoingclinicaltrialsexploringimmunecheckpointinhibitorsintheadjuvantandneoadjuvantsetting.

NCT Phase Studydrugs Setting Primaryendpoint Estimatedendoftrial

NCT03383458 3 Nivolumabvsplacebo ADJ RFS Jun2025

NCT03222076 2 Nivolumabvsnivolumab+ipilimumab NADJ AEs Sep2023

NCT03510871 2 Nivolumab+ipilimumab NADJ ORRa Dec2012

NCT03337841 2 Pembrolizumab NADJ 1Y-RFS Oct2020

NCT03299946 1 Nivolumab+cabozantinib NADJ AE,FEASABILITY Mar2022

NCT:numberofclinicaltrial(Clinicaltrials.gov);ADJ:adjuavant;RFS:recurrencefreesurvival;NADJ:neoadjuvant;AEs:adverseevents;1Y-RFS:1-yearrecurrencefree survival.

aExpressedasrateofpatientsachievingatargetlesionshrinkage>10%.

recurrence-freesurvival[31].Moreover,thelowrateofobjective responseofsorafenibandothertyrosinekinasemadethesedrugs particularlyunsuitableintheneoadjuvantsetting.Immune check-pointinhibitorsmaytheoreticallyhavetheabilitytoenhancethe immuneresponseagainstresidualtumourcellsafterliver resec-tion.Furthermore,theirrelativelyhighrateofobjectiveresponse, particularlywhengivenincombination,couldalsobehelpfulin reducingtumourburdenwithinthecriteriaofsurgical resectabil-ityinsomepatientswithintermediateorevenadvanceddisease. Thevalidityofthefirstpointhasbeenconfirmedbytheresultsofa Phase1trialoftremelimumabincombinationwithlocalablation procedures.Inthisstudy,32patientsweregiventremelimumab attwodifferentdoselevels,followedbysubtotalradiofrequency ablationorchemoablationatDay36.Nineteenpatientswere evalu-ableforresponse.Fiveofthemachievedacompleteradiological response.Nodoselimitingtoxicitieswerefound.Evenmore inter-estingly,tumorbiopsiesperformed6weeksaftertremelimumab revealedanaccumulationofintratumoralCD8+Tcells.TheAuthors thereforeconcludedthatthere-activatedimmunesystemcould potentiallyrecognizeandkillthecancerleftbehindbyasubtotal ablation[32].

Currently,nivolumab is beinginvestigatedversusplacebo in theadjuvantsetting followingcurativetreatments(resectionor localablation)inPhase3CHECKMATE-9DXtrial(Table3).Therole ofnivolumabaloneorincombinationwitheitheripilimumabor cabozantinibrespectivelyisalsounderinvestigationasa

presurgi-caltreatment.Similarly,atrialofpembrolizumabisalsoongoing intheneoadjuvantsetting.

4.4. Combinationofimmunecheckpointinhibitorswithlocal treatments

In rare circumstances, localised treatment of a metastatic tumourcanleadconcurrentlytoashrinkageofboththecancer lesiontarget(orwithinscope)oftherapyandofotheruntreated lesionslocalizedelsewhereinthebody.Describedforthefirsttime afterlocalradiotherapytreatment,thisphenomenonhassincebeen named“abscopaleffect”.Ithasbeenpostulatedthattheliberation oftumour-associatedantigensafterthelocaldestructionleadto theprimingofimmunecells. Theoretically,immunecheckpoint inhibitorsmayenhancethisphenomenon.Asmentionedearlier, theCHECKMATE-9DXtrial willevaluatetheputativebenefit of nivolumabnotonlyafterliverresectionbutalsoafterlocalablation. Phase2trialsarealsoevaluatingtremelimumabinasimilarsetting (Table4).Similarlytothelocalablationtreatments,even transar-terialtreatmentsmaypromotetheliberationoftumour-associated antigens.Combined treatmentsoftransarterial chemoemboliza-tionplusnivolumaborpembrolizumabareongoing.Transarterial radioembolization promotes radiation-induced tumour damage whichispartiallysimilartothatinducedbystereotacticbody radi-ationtherapy.Bothtechniquesarealsoexpectedtobeassociated withvariousimmunecheckpointinhibitorsindifferenttrials.

(6)

Table4

Ongoingclinicaltrialsexploringimmunecheckpointinhibitorsincombinationwithlocaltherapies.

NCT Phase Studydrugsandprocedures Line Primaryendpoint Estimatedendoftrial

NCT02837029 1 Nivolumab+SIRT Any MTD Jul2020

NCT03033446 2 Nivolumab+SIRT Any ORR Dec2019

NCT03380130 2 Nivolumab+SIRT 1 AEs Oct2019

NCT03099564 1 Pembrolizumab+SIRT 1 PFS Jan2020

NCT03572582 2 Nivolumab+TACE 1 ORR Sep2022

NCT03397654 1B Pembrolizumab+TACE 1 AEs Dec2019

NCT03143270 1 Nivolumab+debTACE 1 AEs Apr2019

NCT03638141 2 Tremelimumab(+durvalumab)+debTACE 1 ORR Sep2020

NCT03203304 1 Nivolumab/ipilimumab+SBRT 1 AEs Aug2020

NCT03482102 2 Trememumab(+durvalumab)+SBRT 2 ORR Oct2025

NCT03316872 2 Pembrolizumab+SBRT 2 ORR Apr2022

NCT01853618 1 Tremelimumab+localablation 1 AEs Dec2019

NCT02821754 2 Tremelimumab+localablation 1 PFS Apr2021

NCT03630640 2 Nivolumab+electroporation 1 RFS Sep2020

NCT:numberofclinicaltrial(Clinicaltrials.gov);SIRT:selectiveintraarterialradiationtreatment;MTD:maximumtolerateddose;ORR:overallresponserate;AEs:adverse events;PFS:progressionfreesurvival;TACE:transarterialchemoembolization;debTACE:drugelutingbeadstransarterialchemoembolization;SBRT:stereotacticbody radiationtherapy;RFS:recurrencefreesurvival.

5. Conclusion

In conclusionimmunotherapy for HCCappears tobe a very intensefieldofinvestigation,raisingthehopethatnewvery effec-tivetreatmentopportunitieswillbecomesoonavailableleadingto newstrategiesinthemanagementofpatientswithHCC.Itis cur-rentlydifficulttomakepredictionsabouttheprecisescenarioof immunotherapyforHCC.Thetrialsunderwayarenumerousand theirfieldofapplicationrangefromtheneoadjuvantsettingtothe secondlinesystemictreatment,passingthroughtheadjuvantand frontlinesettings.Thecurrentscenarioisthereforeverydifferent fromthose historicallyfoundinOncology,whereanewdrugis initiallytestedinthesecondline,theninthefrontlinesettingif successful,andonlylaterintheadjuvantandneoadjuvantsetting. Itisthereforedifficult,ifnotimpossible,tomaketodaypredictions onpossibletherapeuticalgorithmsconcerningsequentialor simul-taneoustreatmentswithtyrosinekinaseandimmunecheckpoint inhibitors.Inadditiontotheresultsoftheindividualongoingtrials, otherfactorswillprobablybeinvolvedinthesealgorithms.Firstly, theimmunecheckpointinhibitorsarehigh-costdrugsanddifferent healthsystemscouldimplementdifferentalgorithmstakinginto accountsomeeconomicfactors.Secondly,thesafetyofthesedrugs iscurrentlyregardedasacceptableforpatientswithanHCCwhich isinitsadvancedstageorrefractorytoregionalsitetreatments. Thesepatientshaveinfactlimitedtherapeuticperspectivesanda poorprognosisinabsenceofanytherapy.Theadjuvantsetting,in whichpatientsreceivethesamedrugsbutwithabsentorminimal residualdisease,requiresgreatercautionandamorecareful assess-mentoftheriskoffataladverseeffects.Tothisextent,theresults of the numerous ongoing trials will help to betterunderstand thelong-termtoxicityprofileandthereforetoassesswhetherthe risk/benefitratioisacceptableevenintheadjuvant/neoadjuvant setting.Last,butnotleast,theresearchofbiomarkerpredictiveof responseismandatorytobetteridentifywhichpatientswillbetter respondtoimmunecheckpointinhibitorsandforwhichpatients thetreatmentwouldinsteadbefutile.Atthemoment,theonlysafe midtermpredictionisthatimmunotherapywillremainoneofthe hottesttopicsaboutHCCtreatmentinmanyofitsstages.

Conflictofinterests

FrancescoTovoli:consultantforBayer;

AndreaCasadeiGardini:consultantforBayer,advisoryboardfor Eisai;

FabioPiscaglia:speakerforBayer, Bracco, Eisai,GE,LaForce, AstraZeneca;advisoryboard forTizianaLifeSciences;research contractfromEsaote;

FrancescaBeneventohasnoconflictstodeclare.

Acknowledgement

None.

References

[1]El-SeragHB.Hepatocellularcarcinoma:recenttrendsintheUnitedStates.

Gas-troenterology2004;127(5Suppl1):S27–34.

[2]CoffeltSB,deVisserKE.Cancer:inflammationlightsthewaytometastasis.

Nature2014;507(7490):48–9.

[3]Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature

2002;420(6917):860–7.

[4]Prieto J, Melero I, Sangro B.Immunological landscapeand

immunother-apy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol

2015;12(12):681–700.

[5]ChenDS,MellmanI.Oncologymeetsimmunology:thecancer-immunitycycle.

Immunity2013;39(1):1–10.

[6]SangroB,PalmerD,MeleroI.Immunotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma.

HepatOncol2014;1(4):433–46.

[7]I ˜narrairaeguiM,MeleroI,SangroB.Immunotherapyofhepatocellular

carci-noma:factsandhopes.ClinCancerRes2018;24(7):1518–24.

[8]Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, Fehervari

Z, et al. CTLA-4 controlover Foxp3+ regulatory T-cellfunction. Science

2008;322(5899):271–5.

[9]HanY,ChenZ,YangY,JiangZ,GuY,LiuY,etal.HumanCD14+CTLA-4+

reg-ulatorydendriticcellssuppressT-cellresponsebycytotoxicT-lymphocyte

antigen-4-dependentIL-10andindoleamine-2,3-dioxygenaseproductionin

hepatocellularcarcinoma.Hepatology2014;59(2):567–79.

[10]PhilipsGK,AtkinsM.Therapeuticusesofanti-PD-1andanti-PD-L1antibodies.

IntImmunol2015;27(1):39–46.

[11]KudoM.Immunecheckpointblockadeinhepatocellularcarcinoma:2017

update.LiverCancer2017;6(1):1–12.

[12]SangroB,Gomez-MartinC,delaMataM,I ˜narrairaeguiM,GarraldaE,Barrera

P,etal.AclinicaltrialofCTLA-4blockadewithtremelimumabinpatientswith

hepatocellularcarcinomaandchronichepatitisC.JHepatol2013;59(1):81–8.

[13]El-KhoueiryAB,SangroB,YauT,CrocenziTS,KudoM,HsuC,etal.Nivolumabin

patientswithadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma(CheckMate040):an

open-label,non-comparative,phase1/2doseescalationandexpansiontrial.Lancet

2017;389(10088):2492–502.

[14]ZhuAX,FinnRS,CattanS,EdelineJ,OgasawaraS,PalmerDH,etal.

KEYNOTE-224:pembrolizumab inpatientswith advancedhepatocellularcarcinoma

previouslytreatedwithsorafenib.JClinOncol2018;4(Suppl209):209.

[15]KudoM,MatillaA,SantoroA,MeleroI,CubilloGracianA,Acosta-RiveraM,

etal.Checkmate-040:nivolumab(NIVO)inpatients(pts)withadvanced

hep-atocellularcarcinoma(aHCC)andChild-PughB(CPB)status.JClinOncol

2019;37(Suppl327):327.

[16]SteinS,PishvaianMJ,SangminLeeM,LeeKH,HernandezS,KwanA.Safety

andclinicalactivityof1Latezolizumab+bevacizumabinaphaseIbstudyin

hepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC).JClinOncol2018;15(Suppl4074):4074.

[17]

https://investors.merck.com/news/press-release-details/2019/Merck- Provides-Update-on-KEYNOTE-240-a-Phase-3-Study-of-KEYTRUDA-

pembrolizumab-in-Previously-Treated-Patients-with-Advanced-Hepatocellular-Carcinoma/default.aspx.

[18]CappelliLC,GutierrezAK,BaerAN,AlbaydaJ,MannoRL,HaqueU,etal.

Inflam-matoryarthritisandsiccasyndromeinducedbynivolumabandipilimumab.

(7)

[19]Richter MD, Crowson C, Kottschade LA, Finnes HD, Markovic SN,

Tha-narajasingamU.Rheumaticsyndromesassociatedwithimmunecheckpoint

inhibitors:asingle-centercohortofsixty-onepatients.ArthritisRheumatol

2019;71(3):468–75.

[20]NishidaN,KudoM.Immunecheckpointblockadeforthetreatmentofhuman

hepatocellularcarcinoma.HepatolRes2018;48(8):622–34.

[21]Shohdy KS,Abdel-RahmanO.Riskofpneumonitiswithdifferentimmune

checkpointinhibitorsinNSCLC.AnnTranslMed2017;5(17):365.

[22]JohnsonDB,BalkoJM,ComptonML,ChalkiasS,GorhamJ,XuY,etal.

Fulmi-nantmyocarditiswithcombinationimmunecheckpointblockade.NEnglJMed

2016;375(18):1749–55.

[23]QinSK,RenZG,MengZQ,ChenZD,ChaiXL,XiongJP,etal.Arandomized

multicenteredphaseIIstudytoevaluateSHR-1210(PD-1antibody)insubjects

withadvancedhepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC)whofailedorintolerableto

priorsystemictreatment.AnnOncol2018;29(Suppl8),mdy424.029.

[24]WainbergZA,SegalNH,JaegerD,LeeKH,MarshallJ,AntoniaSJ,etal.Safetyand

clinicalactivityofdurvalumabmonotherapyinpatientswithhepatocellular

carcinoma(HCC).JClinOncol2017;35(Suppl15):4071.

[25]KelleyRK,Abou-AlfaGK,BendellJC,KimTY,BoradMJ,YongWP,etal.PhaseI/II

studyofdurvalumabandtremelimumabinpatientswithunresectable

hepa-tocellularcarcinoma(HCC):PhaseIsafetyandefficacyanalyses.JClinOncol

2017;35(Suppl15):4073.

[26]PishvaianMJ,LeeMS,RyooB,SteinS,LeeK,VerretW,etal.Updatedsafetyand

clinicalactivityresultsfromaphaseIbstudyofatezolizumab+bevacizumab

inhepatocellularcarcinoma(HCC).AnnOncol2018;29(Suppl8),mdy424.029.

[27]KudoM.Combinationcancerimmunotherapyinhepatocellularcarcinoma.

LiverCancer2018;7(1):20–7.

[28]Kudo M. Combination cancer immunotherapy with molecular targeted

agents/anti-CTLA-4 antibody for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer

2019;8(1):1–11.

[29]ChengAL,KangYK,LinDY,ParkJW,KudoM,QinS,etal.Sunitinibversus

sorafenibinadvancedhepatocellularcancer:resultsofarandomizedphaseIII

trial.JClinOncol2013;31(32):4067–75.

[30]IkedaM,SungMW,KudoM,KobayashiM,BaronAD,FinnRS,etal.Aphase

1btrialoflenvatinib(LEN)pluspembrolizumab(PEM)inpatients(pts)with

unresectablehepatocellularcarcinoma(uHCC).JClinOncol2018;36(Suppl

15):4076.

[31]BruixJ,TakayamaT,MazzaferroV,ChauGY,YangJ,KudoM,etal.Adjuvant

sorafenibforhepatocellularcarcinomaafterresectionorablation(STORM):

aphase3,randomised,double-blind,placebo-controlledtrial.LancetOncol

2015;16(13):1344–54.

[32]DuffyAG,UlahannanSV,Makorova-RusherO,RahmaO,WedemeyerH,PrattD,

etal.Tremelimumabincombinationwithablationinpatientswithadvanced

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

More precisely, we apply two torus surgeries simultaneously to a closed symplectic 6-manifold to construct a stable generalized complex structure with the type change jump on a

47/48, che punisce la pubblicazione di immagini di avvenimenti (anche soltanto immaginari) che rechino turbamento al “comune sentimento della morale”. Quest’ultima, pur

L’archevêque de turin choisit alors de qualifier le suaire d’« icône* » renonçant du même coup au terme de relique : « En remettant à la science l’éva- luation de

Data l’intrinseca natura della teoria dell’attaccamento, con il suo costante riferimento alla reciproca interazione tra la dimensione biologica, quella psicologica e

We have first analysed the solar conditions associated with each CME by considering their association with other solar activity features such as active regions, solar flares,

La significatività delle differenze nel contenuto di singole ammine e di AB totali tra i formaggi prodotti con latte pastorizzato e quelli prodotti con latte crudo analizzati a 2

 Il sarcasmo e l’ironia, nelle loro innumerevoli sfumature, non sono sempre facili da tracciare e il software può segnalare come positiva una frase che in

Ad esempio, nel Trattato dell'Unione Europea e nel Libro Bianco sullo sport della Commissione Europea (2007) lo sport ha solamente un ruolo di supporto