• Non ci sono risultati.

Handbook of Obesity Prevention

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Handbook of Obesity Prevention"

Copied!
21
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Handbook of Obesity Prevention

(2)

Shiriki Kumanyika Ross C. Brownson

Editors

Handbook of Obesity Prevention

A Resource for Health Professionals

Foreword by Dr. David Satcher

(3)

ISBN-13: 978-0-387-47859-3 e-ISBN-13: 978-0-387-47860-9

Library of Congress Control Number: 2007926434

© 2007 Springer Science⫹Business Media, LLC

All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science⫹Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden.

The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.

Printed on acid-free paper.

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com Editors

Shiriki Kumanyika, PhD, RD, MPH Ross Brownson, PhD Center for Clinical Epidemiology St. Louis University School

and Biostatistics of Public Health

University of Pennsylvania School 3545 Lafayette Ave

of Medicine St. Louis MO, USA 63104

423 Guardian Drive Philadelphia 19104-6021

(4)

To Christiaan and Chenjerai, who provide strength and inspiration.

S.K.K.

To Carol, for her support, guidance, and good humor.

R.C.B.

(5)

In the Surgeon General’s Report: A Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Overweight and Obesity, we referred to the “epidemic” of overweight and obesity. This was an unusual designation for a chronic disease or condition but we felt it quite appropriate. In public health, where “epidemic”

has generally referred to an unusual outbreak or increase in incidence of an infectious disease, this application of the term to a chronic condition such as obesity was unusual but appropriate. The increase in overweight and obesity in America over the last two to three decades has been both dramatic and unprecedented and certainly unexpected. We reported that in children over- weight had increased two-fold from 1980 to 2000 and almost tripled in ado- lescents. A similar trend was also seen in adults in America. There was no sign of abatement of this increase as we entered the 21stcentury.

Although this dramatic increase in overweight and obesity affected all groups in the nation it impacted some much more than others. African Americans, Hispanics and American Indians were most severely impacted.

These were the groups which had been targeted for improvement in health out- comes with the 2010 goal of eliminating disparities in health. But the epidemic of overweight and obesity not only threatens to derail this goal but it also threatens to undue much of the progress in control of chronic diseases that we made in the last half of the 21stcentury. The concern about overweight and obesity was not about cosmetics and appearances, as we pointed out in the report, it was about health. There are beautiful people who are overweight and obese and there are beautiful people who are thin but this epidemic is about health. The epidemic of overweight and obesity is a threat to our health now and in the future. It was and is a threat to increase morbidity and mortality from diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and osteoarthritis. It interferes with learning in children by increasing risks for asthma and other causes of absenteeism from school and the ability to concentrate in school. It also dra- matically increases costs in the healthcare system. Children who are over- weight, and especially into their adolescent years are most likely to be obese as adults. Thus childhood overweight must be particularly targeted.

The cause of this epidemic of overweight and obesity is not altogether clear but it is clear that two major forces in our society have contributed greatly to the epidemic. Those two forces have been the pressures for us to consume

vii

Foreword

(6)

more calories and at the same time to be less physically active. With the pro- duction and sale of more and more food, the pressure to consume more calo- ries faces us on every corner and with every other commercial. More fast foods have not only meant faster food but also more fat, more sugar and more salt.

The other force has been the growing disincentive for us to be physically active. In 1996 the Surgeon General’s Report on Physical Activity was released. As director of the CDC I was involved in the development of that report. We pointed to the dramatic decrease in physical activity by American children and adults. We found, for example, that less than 30% of teenagers were taking physical education in school, and this represented a trend for all students. Physical education was seen as competing with classroom activities geared toward preparing children for standardized exams. Of course we know now that physical activity and good nutrition can improve learning and per- formance by children on math and reading tests, as well as writing. But the trend to eat more and to be less physically active is not easy to reverse in children or adults.

While it is true that treatment is sometimes indicated and possible to deal with obesity, as with other epidemics, it is not the answer to the epidemic. The challenge we face is to prevent overweight and obesity, especially in children but also in adults. In a nation and in a health system where health promotion and disease prevention have never been priorities, except for infectious diseases, we are faced with a daunting challenge to prevent overweight and obesity. Most studies show that we as a nation spend less than two to three percent of our health budget on population based prevention, and population based prevention is what is needed to fight this epidemic. In the language of McKinlay and others this epidemic must be fought, downstream, midstream, and upstream.

Downstream we must educate, motivate and mobilize individuals and fam- ilies toward healthy lifestyles that militate against overweight and obesity. As surgeon general I took seriously my designation as “The Nation’s Doctor” and among other things wrote an actual prescription for the American people. On this prescription I encourage physical activity at least 30 minutes a day, five days a week. I also prescribed good nutrition focusing on the consumption of at least five servings of fruits and vegetables per day. The other recommenda- tions related to the avoidance of toxins and being responsible in one’s sexual behavior. Clearly individuals and families must respond to the epidemic by increasing physical activity and consuming a more nutritious, low fat, low calorie diet and becoming significantly more physically active. But this is not enough.

We must also act at midstream or in the community where environments can facilitate or militate against healthy lifestyles or eating habits. The school curriculum, the safety of our streets and the general quality of the nat- ural and built environments are critical to allowing and encouraging healthy lifestyles. In the community there must be a commitment especially to cre- ating the kind of environment that encourages children to develop lifetime habits of physical activity and good nutrition. Today children are most sus- ceptible to our “obesogenic” environments, from fast foods to T.V. watching and their related advertisements. Finally, overlooking what individuals can and will be incentivized to do as well as how communities and their institu- tions respond to this epidemic are the local, state and federal policies. This viii Foreword

(7)

upstream function is critical to our success in stopping and reversing the trend of overweight and obesity.

At the end of the Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Prevent and Decrease Overweight in Obesity we listed several settings for action. Among those set- tings we included the home and community, schools, workplace, healthcare, and media/communication. These settings are all very important for attacking the epidemic of overweight and obesity. In many cases they must work together.

The program “Action for Healthy Kids,” which we started in the Fall of 2002 and is now nationwide with over 6,000 volunteers, begins by encouraging schools to return to physical education K-12 and to model good nutrition as well as to educate parents, teachers, students and others about the value of physical activity and good nutrition. This strategy is geared toward habituat- ing children to healthy lifestyles in such a way that they will be on the path to good health for life.

But this midstream intervention was given new life and a major boost in 2004 when congress passed the Wellness Act (upstream). This act required local school districts that received federal funds for programs such as free breakfast and lunches to put in place policies and programs to help children develop habits of regular physical activity and good nutrition. Already we have seen major movement on the part of school districts to respond to this federal policy.

In one program, we are attempting to attack the problem of overweight and obesity at all three levels. This is the 100 Black Men’s Health Challenge started in Atlanta and recently discussed and described in the January issue of the Journal of Health Education. Downstream the program focuses on getting black men to change their lifestyle toward more physical activity and better nutrition. There is close monitoring and group challenge and support for these changes. In midstream the program takes advantage of the men’s power/

influence in the community and the fact that they often serve as mentors of children from the housing projects. They are in a very good position to work to make the community more supportive of physical activity and good nutri- tion. They can help to make the streets safer and the parks more attractive.

Upstream, these men often occupy positions on the school board and even in the legislature and can help to get policies in place that lead to environments which encourage/support healthy lifestyles. Thus the 100 Black Men Health Challenge is a three-dimensional challenge

It is especially great to attempt to pull together in one handbook virtually all that we know about the nature and distribution of overweight and obesity and about the various strategies for intervening to prevent and reduce overweight and obesity. Those who are on the front line of the battle against overweight and obesity have come together to put forth the status of our knowledge and experience with the efforts to reverse this dangerous public health trend. This sharing of knowledge and experiences and research strategies is critical if we are to be successful in our efforts. As many new minds and bodies join the efforts against this epidemic they do not need to start from scratch or “reinvent the wheel.” What is already known and experienced in terms of strategies that work and do not work and methodologies that are being applied to further advance knowledge are available in this Handbook of Obesity Prevention.

The editors of this handbook are well established and respected for their leadership in public health and especially research related to the nature and

Foreword ix

(8)

causes of overweight and obesity and the assessment of strategies for amelio- rating this problem. Thus the book reflects their oversight and the tremendous input of several outstanding investigators and program developers.

Dr. David Satcher Director, Center of Excellence on Health Disparities and The Satcher Health Leadership Institute Initiative Poussaint-Satcher-Cosby Chair in Mental Health Morehouse School of Medicine Atlanta, Georgia x Foreword

(9)

Preface

xi The statistics are alarming. Over the past decades we have watched the weight

levels of the U.S. population shift steadily upward. Media coverage of obesity conveys a continuing sense of crisis—for the population at large, especially children and youth, and for the health care system. We hear threats of spiral- ing health and societal costs related to obesity within the United States as well as dour predictions of the millions affected globally by obesity and its adverse health consequences. It is now clear that the society at large, not just the health sector, has a stake in ensuring that obesity is controlled. So we know that obe- sity must be controlled. The question is how to control it.

Without being overly technical, we frame, organize, and explain information relevant to obesity prevention, providing general background and perspective and reviewing how solutions to the problem might proceed within different set- tings or with different audiences. This book attempts to get to the “nuts and bolts” of how to halt and eventually reverse the obesity epidemic. In so doing, we are not starting at the beginning. In fact, the high level of action, energy, and discourse devoted to curbing the obesity epidemic has given us both the moti- vation and mandate for developing this book. Efforts are underway in the pop- ulation at large, in community organizations, in local, state, and federal govern- ment agencies, in voluntary organizations, and within the commercial sector and the media. Some are relatively spontaneous; others have developed more purposely. These efforts encompass a spectrum of initiatives directed both to individual behavior and to aspects of the environments that influence individ- ual behavior. Numerous reports and evidence reviews have been developed.

There are national, state, and local action plans that spell out what needs to be done broadly as well as more specific guidelines and tools, while research to build the evidence base is ongoing. Yet, as described in the book, many of the ongoing efforts are not well coordinated and therefore are not obtaining maxi- mum synergy.

This book comes at a time when obesity prevention has emerged as a specific topic within the broader fields of public health, health promotion, and preven- tive medicine—and especially as distinct from the well established clinical and research focus on obesity treatment. In part, we attempt to counter the tenden- cy to talk about obesity “prevention and treatment” while allowing the more familiar, treatment perspective to dominate. Stopping the epidemic means

(10)

preventing the gain of unhealthy excess weight in the population at large, and this can only be done through preventive strategies. Obesity treatment will con- tinue to be important in obesity control efforts, but treatment affects the prob- lem very far “downstream”, i.e., after the problem has already taken hold.

Treatment may be only partly effective over the long term, and—even when successful—is unlikely to reverse all of the long term effects of having carried the excess weight. Most important, if the forces underlying the epidemic remain unchecked, the numbers who need to be treated will continue to rise far beyond our capacity to provide individualized treatment to all who need it—especially as the potential to gain excess weight is lifelong.

Population-based, public health approaches are needed to address the under- lying forces that influence—at a population level—how people eat and how physically active they are. These forces are “upstream” of the individual-level.

Individual choices about eating and physical activity ultimately determine their weight levels (within very flexible physiological boundaries). Obesity preven- tion must alter the relevant physical, economic, and social environments and the policies that structure these environments in ways that make choices conducive to healthy weights easier or more desirable than others. Changing these envi- ronments will require collaboration and coordination across diverse sectors such as public health, agriculture, urban planning, and transportation. A signif- icant challenge, yet entirely within our reach when one considers other major challenges that have been faced and met by public health initiatives in the past, including the eradication of smallpox or the reduction in tobacco-related diseases.

We have aimed for comprehensiveness, with a focus on the most recent literature, highlighting aspects of obesity prevention from multiple vantage points that, taken together, will tell the entire story. A key objective is to focus obesity prevention on both children and adults rather than in children only—as some might expect. Another is to increase understanding of the environmental and policy influences on obesity prevention, particularly in areas heretofore unfamiliar or insufficiently appreciated as affecting the success of lifestyle change programs (e.g., How might new school policies affect rates of childhood obesity?). A third objective is to facilitate strategic approaches to planning and executing obesity prevention initiatives in a way that draws upon established principles of public health practice and social change to find new approaches.

The three main sections of the book: Overview, Understanding the Landscape, and Crafting Solutions—progress from upstream, societal-level perspectives to downstream, community- and individual-level perspectives.

This organization roughly follows the now widespread application of ecologi- cal frameworks in addressing public health issues. Considerations underlying interventions for adults and children have been integrated where appropriate, but important differences by life stage are highlighted in separate chapters.

Intervention options are addressed separately for settings and population groups—to fit with these two different but related approaches to programming.

For example, there are chapters on interventions in school and child care set- tings and in worksites, but there are also chapters on interventions in children and youth by developmental stage and in adults. Almost all chapters integrate issues related to both food and physical activity. Several chapters highlight special issues for subgroups defined by ethnicity or socioeconomic status, xii Preface

(11)

because these are the population groups with the highest current and future potential burden of obesity.

Our goal is to offer guidance and inspiration for the teachers, students, and professionals from the diverse array of disciplines whose efforts are needed in order to solve the obesity problem. We hope the book will be useful for aca- demic institutions, state and local health agencies, non-profit organizations, health care organizations, and national public health agencies—to help these various audiences to use the information about obesity prevention that we have now and that will develop in the coming years to keep pace with continuing cultural and other environmental changes.

While we focus mainly on the U.S. context, the principles and approaches apply in most other countries. The problem is inherently global in nature, and both the problem of obesity and its eventual solutions must extend across the globe. However, the character of the epidemic and the potential feasibility and effectiveness of various solutions varies across countries and, within countries, in different regions, localities, and neighborhoods.

In spite of the rapidly increasing rates of obesity and the future implications of these trends, there is considerable hope for change and improvement. Many sectors of society now recognize the importance of obesity prevention, and we have more information and tools at our fingertips than ever before to meet this challenge. We therefore offer this handbook to all who can be enlisted in craft- ing solutions to the obesity problem and to foster the societal transformation that this implies.

Shiriki Kumanyika and Ross C. Brownson

Preface xiii

(12)

Acknowledgments

xv We are only the editors of this book and, therefore, attribute any value that it

will have to the talents of the authors who have generously given their time and energies to produce the chapters. We were extremely fortunate in attracting an outstanding group of contributors—scholars who are leading the science and practice on diverse aspects of obesity prevention and for whom the opportunity to share the insights they have gleaned to date became an irresistible challenge.

We are deeply indebted to these very busy people, and to the people who have worked with them behind the scenes, for their willingness to sign on to this project and for their exceptionally collaborative spirit in shaping the individ- ual chapters to fit with our vision and organizational schema. We also acknowledge the key role of Bill Tucker at Springer for his initiative in sug- gesting this project initially to Shiriki and for his ongoing encouragement and support throughout the writing and editing process.

(13)

Contents

xvii

Foreword vii

David Satcher

Preface xi

Acknowledgments xv

About the Editors xxi

Contributors xxiii

Section 1. Overview and Background

Chapter 1. Why Obesity Prevention? 1

Shiriki Kumanyika and Ross C. Brownson

Chapter 2. What is Obesity? Definitions Matter 25 Robert J. Kuczmarski

Chapter 3. Descriptive Epidemiology of Obesity in the United States 45 Youfa Wang and Shiriki Kumanyika

Chapter 4. Costs of Obesity 73

Graham A. Colditz and Cynthia Stein

Chapter 5. Obesity Prevention Concepts and Frameworks 85 Shiriki Kumanyika

Section 2. Understanding the Landscape

Chapter 6. Consumer Perspectives and Consumer Action 115 Kelly D. Brownell

(14)

Chapter 7. The Role of Government in Preventing Obesity 129 Debra Haire-Joshu, Christopher Fleming

and Rebecca Schermbeck

Chapter 8. Planning and the Built Environment:

Implications for Obesity Prevention 171

Susan Handy and Kelly Clifton

Chapter 9. The Food Industry Role in Obesity Prevention 193 Brian Wansink and John C. Peters

Chapter 10. Media, Marketing and Advertising and Obesity 209 Sarah E. Samuels, Lisa Craypo, Sally Lawrence,

Elena O. Lingas, and Lori Dorfman

Chapter 11. Global Context of Obesity 227

Barry M. Popkin

Section 3. Crafting Solutions

Part 1: Influencing Systems and Institutions

Chapter 12. Organizational Change for Obesity Prevention –

Perspectives, Possibilities and Potential Pitfalls 239 Barbara L. Riley, John M. Garcia and Nancy C. Edwards Chapter 13. Community-Based Approaches to Obesity Prevention:

The Role of Environmental and Policy Change 263 Alice S. Ammerman, Carmen D. Samuel-Hodge,

Janice K. Sommers, May May Leung, Amy E. Paxton, and Maihan B. Vu

Chapter 14. Health Care System Approaches to Obesity

Prevention and Control 285

David L. Katz and Zubaida Faridi

Chapter 15. Workplace Approaches to Obesity Prevention 317 Antronette K. Yancey, Nico P. Pronk and Brian L. Cole

Chapter 16. Obesity Prevention in School

and Group Child Care Settings 349

Eileen G. Ford, Stephanie S. Vander Veur, and Gary D. Foster

Part 2. Influencing Individuals and Families

Chapter 17. Individual Behavior Change 377

Myles S. Faith and Eva Epstein xviii Contents

(15)

Chapter 18. Obesity Risk Factors and Prevention in Early Life:

Pre-Gestation Through Infancy 403

Nicolas Stettler

Chapter 19. Obesity Prevention During Preschool and

Elementary School-Age Years 429

Marilyn S. Nanney

Chapter 20. Obesity Prevention During Preadolescence

and Adolescence 459

Alison E. Field

Chapter 21. Obesity Prevention During Adulthood 489 Suzanne Phelan, Meghan Butryn, and Rena R. Wing

Section 4. Conclusion

Chapter 22. Obesity Prevention: Charting a Course

to a Healthier Future 515

Ross C. Brownson and Shiriki Kumanyika

Index 529

Contents xix

(16)

About the Editors

xxi Shiriki K. Kumanyika, PhD, RD, MPH, is Professor of Epidemiology in

Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Pediatrics (Nutrition), Associate Dean for Health Promotion, and Disease Prevention, and was the Founding Director of the Graduate Program in Public Health Studies at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (Penn). At Penn she is also a Senior Fellow in the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, and the Institute on Aging and is a Faculty Associate at the Penn Institute for Urban Research. Dr. Kumanyika holds a B.A. in Psychology from Syracuse University, an M.S. in Social Work from Columbia University, PhD in Human Nutrition from Cornell University, and Master of Public Health (MPH) from the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. She has authored or co-authored more than 200 scientific arti- cles, book chapters and monographs related to nutritional epidemiology, obe- sity and minority health.

Dr. Kumanyika directs a National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Project EXPORT Center of Excellence whose focus is on research, outreach and train- ing to reduce obesity and related health disparities. She is also engaged in the development of AACORN (African American Collaborative Obesity Research Network) a national initiative which she created to further the quality and quantity of research to foster healthy weights in African American communi- ties. Dr. Kumanyika is an elected member of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences and has served on three IOM commit- tees related to obesity prevention and weight control. She currently serves on the NIH Clinical Obesity Research Panel and, since 1996, has chaired the Prevention Group of the International Obesity Task Force of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. Dr. Kumanyika has been actively engaged in public health research and training for more than 30 years and cur- rently serves as Vice Chair of the Executive Board of the American Public Health Association.

Ross C. Brownson, PhD, is Professor of Epidemiology and Director of the Prevention Research Center at Saint Louis University School of Public Health, St. Louis, MO. He also is a Research Member and Co-Director for Prevention and Control at the Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of

(17)

Medicine. Dr. Brownson directs the Centre for Evidence-Based Chronic Disease Prevention, which is sponsored by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization. He is a chronic disease epidemiologist whose research has focused on tobacco use prevention, promotion of physical activity, evaluation of community-level interventions, and the influence of environmental and policy factors on chronic disease risk. He received his Ph.D. in environmental health and epidemiology at Colorado State University and was formerly a Division Director with the Missouri Department of Health.

In the state health department, Dr. Brownson was responsible for overall administration and direction of research activities for the state programs in chronic disease prevention including representation to the Missouri General Assembly, voluntary health agencies, federal agencies, and health care providers.

Dr. Brownson’s research is funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. He was a member of two Institute of Medicine Committees on Obesity Prevention in Children and Youth. He is an associate editor of the Annual Review of Public Health and serves on four editorial boards.

Dr. Brownson also was a founding member of the 15-person CDC Task Force developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services. He is active in numerous professional associations, including the American Public Health Association and the Missouri Public Health Association. He has authored or co-authored more than 200 scientific articles, book chapters and monographs and is the editor or author of the books: Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Control, Applied Epidemiology, Evidence-Based Public Health, Community- Based Prevention, and Communicating Public Health Information Effectively:

A Guide for Practitioners.

xxii About the Editors

(18)

Contributors

xxiii Alice Ammerman, Dr.P.H., R.D., Center for Health Promotion and Disease

Prevention and Department of Nutrition, Schools of Public Health and Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Kelly D. Brownell, Ph.D., Departments of Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale Center for Weight and Eating Disorders, Institute for Social Policy Studies, and Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Ross C. Brownson, Ph.D., Prevention Research Center and Department of Community Health, School of Public Health, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A,

Meghan Butryn, M.S., The Miriam Hospital and Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.

Kelly Clifton, Ph.D., Urban Studies and Planning Program, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A.

Graham A. Colditz, M.D., Dr.P.H., Department of Surgery and Alvin J.

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.

Brian L. Cole, Dr. P.H., Department of Health Services, University of California at Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

Lisa Craypo, M.P.H., R.D., Samuels & Associates, Oakland, California, U.S.A.

Lori Dorfman, Dr. P.H., Berkeley Media Studies Group, Oakland, California, U.S.A.

Nancy C. Edwards, Ph.D., School of Nursing and Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

(19)

Eva Epstein, M.A., Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Myles S. Faith, Ph.D., Center for Weight and Eating Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Zubaida Faridi, M.B.B.S., M.P.H., Prevention Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Derby, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Alison E. Field, Sc.D., Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Children’s Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School and Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Christopher Fleming, M.P.H., Obesity Prevention Center and Department of Community Health, School of Public Health, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.

Eileen G. Ford, M.S., R.D., Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Gary D. Foster, Ph.D., Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

John M. Garcia, M.Sc., Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario and Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Debra Haire-Joshu, Ph.D., Obesity Prevention Center and Department of Community Health, School of Public Health, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.

Susan Handy, Ph.D., Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, Davis, California, U.S.A.

David L. Katz, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P.M., F.A.C.P., Prevention Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Derby, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Robert J. Kuczmarski, Dr. P.H., Obesity Prevention and Treatment Program, Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.

Shiriki Kumanyika, Ph.D., R.D. M.P.H., Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Pediatrics (Nutrition), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Sally Lawrence, M.P.H., Samuels & Associates, Oakland, California, U.S.A.

xxiv Contributors

(20)

May May Leung, M.S., R.D, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Elena O. Lingas, Dr. P.H., M.P.H., Berkeley Media Studies Group, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.

Marilyn S. Nanney, Ph.D., M.P.H., R.D., Program in Health Disparities, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Amy E. Paxton, Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

John C. Peters, Ph.D., Nutrition Science Institute, Food and Beverage Technology Division, The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.

Suzanne Phelan, Ph.D., The Miriam Hospital and Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.

Barry M. Popkin, Ph.D., School of Public Health and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Nico P. Pronk, Ph.D., M.A., F.A.C.S.M., F.A.W.H.P., Center for Health Promotion, HealthPartners Research Foundation, HealthPartners, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Barbara L. Riley, Ph.D., National Cancer Institute of Canada/Canadian Cancer Society, Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation and Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Carmen D. Samuel-Hodge, Ph.D., M.S., R.D., Department of Nutrition, Schools of Public Health and Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Sarah E. Samuels, Dr..P.H., President, Samuels & Associates, Oakland, California, U.S.A.

David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D., Center of Excellence on Health Disparities and the Satcher Health Leadership Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A.

Rebecca Schermbeck, M.P.H., M.S., R.D., Obesity Prevention Center and Department of Community Health, School of Public Health, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A.

Janice K. Sommers, M.P.H., Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Contributors xxv

(21)

Cynthia Stein, M.D., M.P.H., Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention, Harvard School of Public Health and Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Nicolas Stettler, M.D., M.S.C.E., The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Stephanie S. Vander Veur, M.P.H., Center for Obesity Research and Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Maihan B. Vu, Dr.P.H., M.P.H., Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Youfa Wang, M.D., Ph.D., Center for Human Nutrition, Departments of International Health and Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

Brian Wansink, Ph.D., Department of Applied Economics and Management, Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, U.S.A.

Rena R. Wing, Ph.D., The Miriam Hospital and Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.

Antronette K. Yancey, M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.P.M., Department of Health Services and Center to Eliminate Health Disparities. University of California at Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.

xxvi Contributors

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The present study focuses on the relation between the number of single-station seismic noise measurements employed and resulting inferred slip surfaces for landslides. The aim is

☐ S-3 Capitale Naturale ed Ecosistemi Marini ed Oceanici ☐ S-4 Capitale Naturale ed Ecosistemi Lagunari o di Transizione ☐ S-5 Capitale Naturale ed Ecosistemi delle Acque Interne

framework) aims at designing in detail the most urgent improvements to the current generation of Engineering Simulators for Gen II – Gen III NPPs in order to define the key

Liberali e partiti di ispirazione religiosa sono opposti in quanto i primi riconoscono nella libertà dell’individuo il bene primario, i secondi insistono sull’esigenza che

The good news is that 41.1% of samples tested, 40.9% biscuits and 41.7% breakfast cereals, showed an AA concentration below 100  µg/kg, which can be consid- ered a low value, even

Funded in 2016 by the Italian Health Ministry through the research programs of the National Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CCM), the QUADIM Project

Phase II study of first-line LY231514 (multi-targeted antifolate) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colo- rectal cancer: An NCIC Clinical Trials Group study. John W,

While all provisions of the Nelson Mandela Rules relating to prison-based rehabilitation programmes and social reintegration support services equally apply to women prisoners, the