• Non ci sono risultati.

SiPM for MEG2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "SiPM for MEG2"

Copied!
8
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

SiPM for MEG2

On behalf of the italianTC group

Fukuoka 23 Oct 2013

(2)

Current TC time resolution

Intrinsic TC resolution at BTF is ~40 ps In MEG degradation due to B and to large dynamic range

40 ps → 50 ps expected

Additional degradation due

to DRS ( σ DrS(t) ~30-50ps) → 60 ps ( measured with triple, 65 ps is an

overestimation )

(3)

Current t e γ resolution

Dominant contribution from t

γ

σ( TC+DRS) =

σ( BTF)(1+ σ( MEG))+

σ( DRS) =

40x(1 + 0.25) + 40 = 60 ps

σ( BTF) intrinsec ( from BTF ) σ( MEG) relative degradation due to B (low G), large

signal dynamic range

σ( DRS) due to DRS

(4)

Upgrade TC time resolution

Resolution σ (t

TC

) = 30 (33) ps measured

MEG Additional error (B, extra dynamic range): 1.1 Reduced DRS error: 25 ps

Calibration: 30 ps(???)

(5)

Upgrade t e γ resolution

MEG MEG2(my) MEG2(proposal)

Intrinsec 40 ps → 30 ps 35 ps MEG factor 0.25 0.1

DRS 40 ps 25 ps TC calib 40 ps 30 ps

Le/c 75 ps 35 ps 11 ps ---

t

e

107 ps 63 ps 37 ps

t

γ

67 ps → 64 ps 76 ps

---

t

eγ

122 ps 90 ps 84 ps

(6)

t e γ in alternative scenarios

• t

TC

intrinsic = 20 ps -> t

= 87 ps

• t

TC

intrinsic = 30 ps -> t

= 90 ps (Hamamatsu)

• t

TC

intrinsic = 33 ps -> t

= 91 ps (AdvanSId)

• t

TC

intrinsic = 40 ps -> t

= 93 ps

• σ (calibration) = 30ps

• The change are tiny.

• Limit on µ ->e γ scales linearly with resolution

• But 1 more week/y per extra calibration or

commissioning would waste a 3% gain

(7)

Calibration and σ( t e γ )

Relative calibration between TC counter

(and with XEC) can strongly influence σ (t

eγ

) 

Stability of the SiPM is of paramount importance

In particular the thermal coefficients dV/dT should be as small as possible

That is the discriminating parameters for devices with comparable σ (t

TC

)

dV/dT = 50 mV/

o

C for (Hamamatsu)

dV/dT = 25 mV/

o

C for (AdvanSid)

(8)

Conclusion

Hamamatsu and AdvanSid are equivalent from the point of view of the effect on t

eγ

time resolution

AdvanSid offers better performance from the point of view of stability needed for precise cailbration

AdvanSid is our preferred choice for MEG2

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Isolated bone marrow mastocytosis was diagnosed in 46 of 84 patients (54.7%) referred for unexplained/recurrent anaphylaxis or severe allergic reactions to hymenoptera sting

When we investigated the differences between PedsQL median scores of children and their parents, we found that parent scores were lower for Emotional Functioning, Psychosocial

We applied a choice experiment where a hypothetical market was designed to analyze five characteristics of breadsticks (country of origin, vegan product certification,

- Equipping a few bars with different geometry read by SiPM - Test in laboratory with radiation sources. - Test in BTF compared with a

To the new group, to the new Editors and As- Statistiche degli ultimi anni della rivista.. Last years

An extremely naïve assumption has crumbled before our eyes: some used to believe science communication was a transfer of information between those who know (scientists) and those

La scienza – e la tecnologia che della scienza è, insieme, figlia e madre – sono sempre più elementi essenziali della nostra vita, in ogni e ciascuna delle sue

State Research Center of Russian Federation, Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia 107 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Physics and Vinca Institute of Nuclear