Bibliografia
[1] Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. M. O.
Heller et al., J. Biomechanics 2005; 38: 1155–1163.
[2] The Contribution of Frictional Torque to Loosening at the Cement-Bone Interface in Tharies Hip Replacements. M. T. Mai et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996; 78:505–11.
[3] Analysis of Polyethylene Particles Produced in Different Wear Conditions in Vitro. O.
Calonius et al., Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2002; 399, pp. 219–230.
[4] A multidirectional motion pin-on-disk wear test method for prosthetic joint materials.
V. Saikko et al., J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 41: 58–64.
[5] Low wear rate of UHMWPE against zirconia ceramic (Y-PSZ) in comparison to alu- mina ceramic and SUS 316L alloy. Kumar et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1991; 25, 813–828.
[6] Friction and wear mechanisms in hip prosthesis: Comparison of joint materials behaviour in several lubricants. Gispert M. P. et al., Wear 2006; 260:149–158.
[7] Effect of contact pressure on wear and friction of ultra-high molecular weight polye- thylene in multidirectional sliding. V. Saikko, Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220:723–731.
[8] Constituents and pH changes in protein rich hyaluronan solution affect the biotribo- logical properties of artificial articular joints. T. Kitano et al., J. Biomechanics 34 (2001): 1031–1037.
[9] The Influence of Resting Periods on Friction in the Artificial Hip. R. Nassutt et al., Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 407 (2003): 127-138.
[10] A frictional study of total hip joint replacements. S. C. Scholes et al., Phys. Med.
Biol. 2000; 45:3721–3735.
[11] Stiction-friction of total hip prostheses and its relationship to loosening. S. R. Simon et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57:226–230.
[12] Frictional torque in surface and conventional hip replacement. S. M. Ma et al., J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65 (2):366–369.
77
78 BIBLIOGRAFIA [13] Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of elliptical contacts for materials of low elastic
modulus. B. J. Hamrock et al., Trans ASME, J Lubr Technol 1978; 100:236–245.
[14] The effects of material combination and lubricant on the friction of total hip prostheses. S. C. Scholes et al., Wear 2000; 241:209-213.
[15] The friction of explanted hip prostheses. R. M. Hall et al.British Journal of Rheumatology 1997; 36:20–26.
[16] Compliant layer acetabular cups: friction testing of a range of materials and designs for a new generation of prosthesis that mimics the natural joint. S. C. Scholes et al., Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220:583–596.
[17] Friction of Total Hip Replacements With Different Bearings and Loading Conditions.
C. Brockett et al., J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2007; 81B: 508-515.
[18] Ceramic-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties. S. Williams et al., Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2007; 465:23–32.
[19] Metal-on-Metal Bearing Wear with Different Swing Phase Loads. S. Williams et al., J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2004; 70B: 233–239.
[20] The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements. C. Brockett et al., J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2008 19:1575–1579.
[21] In vitro comparison of frictional torque and torsional resistance of aged conventional gamma-in-nitrogen sterilized polyethylene versus aged highly crosslinked polyethylene articulating against head sizes larger than 32 mm. B. R. Burroughs et al., Acta Orthopaedica 2006; 77 (5): 710–718.
[22] Effect of contact stress on friction and wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethy- lene in total hip replacement. A. Wang et al., Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 2001; 215: 133–139.
[23] Friction in hip-joint prostheses and its influence on the fixation of the artificial head.
R. Schafer et al., Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 1998; 9: 687–
690.
[24] Friction of ceramic and metal hip hemi-endoprostheses against cadaveric acetabula.
L. P. Muller et al., Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 681–687.
[25] A comparative study of total hip replacement prostheses. B. O. Weightman et al., J.
Biomechanics 1973; 6(3): 299–311.
[26] A three-axis hip joint simulator for wear and friction studies on total hip prostheses.
V. Saikko, Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 1996; 210: 175–185.
BIBLIOGRAFIA 79 [27] Low wear and friction in alumina/alumina total hip joints: A hip simulator study. V.
Saikko et al., Acta Orthopaedica 1998; 69(5): 443–448.
[28] Potential thermal artifacts in hip joint wear simulators. Z. Lu et al., J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 1999; 48: 458–464.
[29] The effect of frictional heating and forced cooling on the serum lubricant and wear of UHMW polyethylene cups against cobalt-chromium and zirconia balls. Y. S. Liao et al., Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3047–3059.
[30] Investigation on stick phenomena in metal-on-metal hip joints after resting periods.
M. A. Wimmer et al., Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220:
219–227.
[31] Friction moments of large metal-on-metal hip joint bearings and other modern desi- gns. N. E. Bishop et al., Med Eng Phys 2008; doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.01.001 (article in press)
[32] Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. M. Morlock et al., J. Biomechanics 2001; 34: 873–881.
[33] Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement.
T. P. Schmalzried et al., J Bone Joint Surg 1998; 80-A (1): 54–59.
[34] Fixation of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners to metal-backed acetabular cups. V. G. Williams et al., The Journal of Arthroplasty 1997; 12 (1): 25–31.
[35] Ultra-High-Molecular Weight Polyethylene wear: an in vitro comparison of acetabular metal types and polished surfaces. M. F. Shepard et al., The Journal of Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (7): 860–866.
[36] Wear of the polyethylene liner-metallic shell interface in modular acetabular compo- nents: an in vitro analysis. J. R. Lieberman et al., The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1996;
11 (5): 602–608
[37] Simulation of initial frontside and backside wear rates in a modular acetabular com- ponent with multiple screw holes. S. M. Kurtz et al., J. Biomechanics, 1999; 32:
967–976.
[38] Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss. M. A. Conditt et al.,J Bone Joint Surg, 2005; 87-A (2): 326–331.
[39] Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert.
O. K. Muratoglu et al., The Journal of Arthrolpasty, 2007; 22 (3): 435–444.
80 BIBLIOGRAFIA [40] Backside wear is low in retrieved modern, modular,and nonmodular acetabular liners.
A. G. Della Valle et al., Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2005; 440:
184–191.
[41] Type of motion and lubricant in wear simulation of polyethylene acetabular cup. V.
Saikko et al., Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 1999; 213: 301–310.
[42] Effect of femoral head surface roughness on the wear of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethyelene acetabular cups. A. Wang et al., The Journal of Arthrolpasty, 1998; 13 (6): 615–620.
[43] Effect of head surface roughness and sterilization on wear of UHMWPE acetabular cups. A. Jedenmalm et al., J Biomed Mater Res A, 2008; 31 (epublished ahead of printing).
[44] Predictive role of the Λ ratio in the evaluation of metal-on-metal total hip replace- ment. Affatato et al., Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2008; 222:
617–628.
[45] Effects of the sterilisation method on the wear of UHMWPE acetabular cups tested in a hip joint simulator. S. Affatato et al., Biomaterials, 2002; 23: 1439-1446.
