• Non ci sono risultati.

La salute dell’osso nelle pts in trattamento adiuvante

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "La salute dell’osso nelle pts in trattamento adiuvante"

Copied!
36
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

La salute dell’osso nelle pazienti in trattamento adiuvante

Airoldi Mario - S.C. Oncologia Medica 2

Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

(2)
(3)
(4)

BONE STRENGTH

• OSTEOPOROSIS  SKELETAL DISORDER COMPROMISING BS LEADING TO

INCREASED RISK OF FRACTURE

• BS HAS TWO COMPONENTS:

MICROARCHITECTURE (QUALITY) , BONE DENSITY (QUANTITY)

• BMDDXA (<2.5 T SCORE=OSTEOPOROSIS)

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

FRAX ALGORITHM

understimates AI effect

(10)

-1.3% and -2.9% - AXELSEN

(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)

Outcomes

Extended Duration AI beyond 5 yrs

N

(% N+)

Duratio n

ET/AI

DFS Benefit

OS

Benefit

New BC Benefit

MA-17R 1918

(53%)

10-15 5-10

Y* N Y

B-42 3966

(42%)

5-10 2-10

N N Y

IDEAL 1824

(74%)

7.5-10 2.5-10

N N Y

DATA 1912

(67%)

5-9 3-6

N N N

SOLE 4884

(99%)

5-10

5-10cont

N N ?

ABCSG16 3484 (31%)

7-10 2-10

N N N

(21)

AEs

Extended Duration AI beyond 5 yrs

Arthalgia AI/Plc

Hot Flashes AI/Plc

Vaginal Dryness AI/Plc

Cardio vascular AI/Plc

Fractures AI/Plc

MA-17R

53 50

38 37

11 10

12 10

14 9

B-42 5.4

4.8 IDEAL 14.7

13.2

13.1 10.5

5 2.8 DATA 60

54

15 14

10 8 SOLE 68

66

54 52

10 9 ABCSG1

6

6.3

4.7

(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)

ABCSG-18: study design

Gnant M, et al. Lancet 2015;386:433–43 (and supplementary appendix).

*5 patients withdrew consent to use their data;

Defined as having undergone a bilateral oophorectomy, ≥ 60 years of age, or < 60 years of age but with follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol levels in the postmenopausal range;

Oral BP treatment if taken for 3 years or longer continuously or if taken for between 3 months and 3 years unless the patient had a washout period of at least 1 year before randomisation, or any use during the 3 months before randomisation.

IV, intravenous; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ER, oestrogen receptor; Q6M, every 6 months;

PR, progesterone receptor; SC, subcutaneous; SERM, selective oestrogen receptor modulator.

Enrolled N = 3425*

Denosumab 60 mg SC Q6M

n = 1711

Placebo SC Q6M n = 1709

R A N D O M I S A T I O N

Daily supplementation with

calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (≥ 400 IU) were recommended throughout study treatment

Key inclusion criteria

• Postmenopausal women

• Histologically confirmed non-metastatic ER+

and/or PR+ adenocarcinoma of the breast

• Receiving or due to receive adjuvant non-steroidal AI therapy

• ECOG performance score: 0 or 1

Key exclusion criteria

• AI therapy for > 24 months before trial inclusion

• Previous or concurrent treatment with SERMs

• Evidence of metastatic disease

• Ongoing or previous IV BPs; oral BPs

• Previous denosumab therapy

• Known history of: Paget’s disease, Cushing’s disease,

hyperprolactinaemia, hypercalcaemia, hypocalcaemia or other active metabolic bone disease

• Major surgery or traumatic injury < 4 weeks before randomisation

(27)

• Exploratory endpoints were: the percentage change in total lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD from baseline to Months 12 and 24 (at preselected sites); the percentage change in total lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck BMD from baseline to Months 12, 24 and 36 (at all participating clinical sites); new

and new or worsening vertebral fractures

at Months 12 and 24

• Safety endpoints were: incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); clinically significant changes in laboratory values; anti-denosumab antibody formation

ABCSG-18: outcomes

Gnant M, et al. Lancet 2015;386:433–43.

*Defined as clinically evident fractures with associated symptoms, except for those of the skull, face, fingers, and toes, which are typically not associated with osteoporosis;

Morphometric fractures identified from study radiographs and clinical vertebral fractures confirmed by radiographs.

Time to first clinical fracture*

• Percentage change in total lumbar spine,

total hip and femoral neck BMD from baseline to Month 36

• Incidence of new vertebral fractures at Month 36

• Incidence of new or worsening of pre-existing vertebral fractures at Month 36

• Disease-free survival (DFS)

• Bone metastasis-free survival (BMFS)

• Overall survival (OS)

Primary endpoint Secondary endpoints

(28)

ABCSG-18: denosumab significantly increased BMD in the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck

vs placebo

Gnant M, et al. Lancet 2015;386:433–43.

*Note: these data represent an exploratory endpoint of the study;

Note: these data represent a secondary endpoint of the study. Error bars are 95% CIs.

5.75% difference at Month 12*

8.28% difference at Month 24*

10.02% difference at Month 36

3.86% difference at Month 12*

5.85% difference at Month 24*

7.92% difference at Month 36

3.30% difference at Month 12*

5.19% difference at Month 24*

6.51% difference at Month 36

(n = 992) (n = 717) (n = 468)

Lumbar spine Total hip Femoral neck

Placebo Denosumab

A d ju s te d m e a n c h a n g e in BM D ( % )

Months since randomisation

(n = 986) (n = 725) (n = 475) (n = 995) (n = 723) (n = 469)

P < 0.0001 at all bone sites and time points

(29)

Do not copy or distribute.

(30)

Placebo: n = 84/775 Denosumab: n = 49/773

72 66 60 54 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Ris k o f f ra c tu re ( % )

Months since randomisation

50 50 88 95 134 137 187 198 245 248 300 307 369 370 423 433 481 494 563 580 664 660 754 750 775 773 Number at risk

Placebo Denosumab

ABCSG-18: denosumab significantly reduced the

incidence of clinical fractures vs placebo regardless of baseline BMD

Percentage risk of fracture based on Kaplan–Meier time-to-event analysis within each treatment group at 6-month intervals. The HR and P value were calculated from a Cox model including treatment groups as the independent variable and stratified by the randomisation stratification factors.

HR = 0.44 (95% CI: 0.31–0.64) P < 0.0001

Normal BMD

(baseline T-score ≥ –1.0)

Overall cumulative incidence of first clinical fractures

HR = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.40–0.82) P = 0.002

Overall cumulative incidence of first clinical fractures

Low BMD

(baseline T-score < –1.0)

Placebo: n = 92/934 Denosumab: n = 43/938

72 66 60 54 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Ris k o f f ra c tu re ( % )

Months since randomisation

62 66 97 126 141 168 197 234 268 301 337 381 416 453 498 532 588 624 702 717 806 828 906 915 934 938 Number at risk

Placebo Denosumab

Placebo Denosumab

Gnant M, et al. Lancet 2015;386:433–43 (and supplementary appendix).

(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Le deposizioni raccolte furono in linea di massima contrarie alle richieste dell’abate, ma la sentenza, sulla base soprattutto della donazione del 1078 della contessa

I primi tentativi di esplorare i formalismi e le tecnologie connessi al web semantico – ed in particolar modo le ontologie ed i linked open data – sono in parte riconducibili a due

The longest follow-up reported then comparing cumulative revision rates with 2 different diameter femoral heads was up to 12 years and did not show any difference in CRR depended

For this study, the concentrations of total gaseous mercury in baseline air masses arriving at Mace Head, Ireland have been analyzed for possible trends in the atmospheric

Spinal manifestations of sports injuries or of overuse at the spine mainly result from activities in certain trend sports with high deceleration or from monoto-

Current spinal endoscopic exposures in- clude: (1) posterolateral (arthroscopic microdiscecto- my, AMD) and interlaminar (microendoscopic discec- tomy, MED; Medtronic Sofamor

The aim of the present study is to evaluate at mid- term follow-up clinical and radiographic outcomes in a group of patients who underwent total hip replace- ment using a

[r]