• Non ci sono risultati.

CONSOLE Project - Deliverable 1.3 - "Practice abstract on a framework for AECPG contract design – Intermediate (M15)"

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "CONSOLE Project - Deliverable 1.3 - "Practice abstract on a framework for AECPG contract design – Intermediate (M15)""

Copied!
4
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

2

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement GA 817949

CONSOLE

CONtract SOLutions for Effective and lasting delivery of agri-environmental-climate public goods by EU agriculture and forestry

Research and Innovation action: H2020 - GA 817949

Original title: D1.3 EIP-AGRI Abstract on a framework for AECPG contract

design – Intermediate

Amended Title: Deliverable D1.3 Practice abstract on a framework for

AECPG contract design – Intermediate (M15)

Authors: Viaggi D.

Comments and contributions by: Dupraz P., Runge T., Schaller L.

Project CONSOLE

Project title CONtract SOLutions for Effective and lasting delivery of agrienvironmental-climate public goods by EU

agriculture and forestry Work Package 1

Deliverable D1.3 Period covered M4 – M15 Publication date 02.11.2020 Dissemination level Public

(2)

3

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement GA 817949

Project Consortium

Nº Participant organisation name Country

1 ALMA MATER STUDIORUM - UNIVERSITA DI BOLOGNA IT

2 REGIONE EMILIA ROMAGNA IT

3 CONSORZIO DELLA BONIFICA DELLA ROMAGNA OCCIDENTALE IT

4 UNIVERSITAET FUER BODENKULTUR WIEN AT

5 Ecorys Brussels N.V. BE

6 EUROPEAN LANDOWNERS ORGANIZATION BE

7 ASSOCIATION OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL FARMERS BG

8 INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS BG

9 JOHANN HEINRICH VON THUENEN-INSTITUT, BUNDESFORSCHUNG- INSTITUT FUER LAENDLICHE RAEUME, WALD UND FISCHEREI DE

10 EVENOR TECH SL

ES

11

ASOCIACIÓN AGRARIA JÓVENES AGRICULTORES DE SEVILLA ES

12 UNIVERSIDAD POLITECNICA DE MADRID ES

13 LUONNONVARAKESKUS FI

14 ASSEMBLEE DES REGIONS EUROPEENNES FRUITIERES LEGUMIERES ET HORTICOLES FR

15 ASSOCIATION TRAME FR

16 CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRS FR

17 INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE FR

18 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK - NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORK IE

19 UNIVERSITA DI PISA IT

20 ZEMNIEKU SAEIMA LV

21 STICHTING VU NL

22 STICHTING HET WERELD NATUUR FONDS-NEDERLAND NL

23 SZKOLA GLOWNA GOSPODARSTWA WIEJSKIEGO PL

(3)

2

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement GA 817949

EIP Practice abstract

Short title:

Description from DoA: Summary of main dimensions of the framework and of the contractual solutions identified in non-technical language. 

Short summary for practitioners (in English):

An operational framework supporting the design of contractual solutions for the voluntary provision of agri-environmental-climate public goods (AECPGs) entails the representation of four interconnected dimensions: i) context variables related to the farming/forest system; ii) contractual features; iii) contract’s performance variables; iv) processes description. Context variables include a wide variety of aspects such as farm structure, social/cultural context and environmental priorities. They affect the feasibility and the impact of contract solutions. Contractual features include characteristics such as: a) object of contract (e.g. AECPG addressed); b) actors/parties involved; c) reference parameter for payment; d) other payment characteristics; e) role of cooperation among farmers/actors; f) connection with private goods; g) tenure-related prescriptions; h) length of contract; i) information to land managers; k) monitoring and sanctions; l) enforcement; m) adaptability. Contract features may be used to classify different contract types, e.g. result-based or collective. However, experience shows that in practice tailored mixes of contract parameters, rather than rigid categories, are required. Key parameters for performance evaluation are: effectiveness; longevity; acceptance; targeting; flexibility; equity/fairness; compatibility; profitability; social/cultural capital; feasibility; trust. Processes (e.g. incentive distribution) describe the connection among points i), ii) and iii) and how they contribute to the final contract performance.

The framework will serve as a basis for the design of successful contracts, supported by practical examples from real-life implementation.

(4)

3

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement GA 817949

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

After the base calling step, two different files are generated: one file containing the sequence data (the nucleotide sequence, normally in FASTA format) and the

E’ fondamentale cercare di capire cosa può aver provocato queste reazioni emotive ; le cause possono essere diverse , ma può per esempio succedere che il paziente possa

turazione agraria , cit.; un dato che, se confermato da altri, potrebbe far nascere l’ipotesi di una connessione tra ripresa della coltura del miglio e

Durante la progressione della malattia renale cronica, la concentrazione della creatinina plasmatica e la VFG sono inversamente correlate per cui nelle prime fasi della IRC, la

Simona Sica UOC Ematologia e Trapianto di Midollo, Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli, Roma, Italy Giovanna Valentini Servizio

In particular, high school and other university students (i.e. those not enrolled in health or medical professional studies) believed more strongly than medical stu- dents that