• Non ci sono risultati.

Percutaneous angioplasty of internal jugular and azygous veins in patients with chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: preliminary results for a randomized controlled trial

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Percutaneous angioplasty of internal jugular and azygous veins in patients with chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency and multiple sclerosis: preliminary results for a randomized controlled trial"

Copied!
9
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Table II for clinical evaluation

Table IIa: Evaluation of improvement, between experimental group A and control group B,

Neurorehabilitative Tests

Neurorehabilitative Tests

N. patients

evaluationClinical

p-value 18. Stroop’s Test, colour-word A 10 1,000 B 7 22. Verbal Fluidity’s Test, Phonemic A 7 1,000 B 8 23. Verbal Fluency’s, Categorical A 9 1,000 B 11 22. Frontal Assessment Battery A 5 0,417 B 7 27. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test A 5 1,000 B 9 31. Clinical evaluation of voiding disorders A 19 0,741 B 20 32. Expanded Disability Status Scale A 18 0,510 B 19 33. 10 m walk test A 12 1,000 B 8 34. 6 min walk test A 3 NM B 7 35. Timed Up & Go A 18 0,378 B 18 36. Tinetti Balance

equilibrium A 9 1,000 B 14 37. Tinetti Balance walk A 10 0,990 B 14 38. Fatique Severity Scale A 24 0,530 B 21 39. Visual Analogic Scale A 19 0,391 B 17 40. HADS:

Anxiety Clinical Scale A 10 0,361 B 11 41. HADS:

Depression scale A 15 0,990 B 20 42. Barthel Index A 11 0,990 B 7 43. MSQOL- 54 Fisics A 27 NM B 31 44. MSQOL- 54 Mental A 28 NM B 32

(2)

Table IIb. Evaluation of improvement, between experimental group A and control group B,

Cinematics Test

Cinematics Test

patients

N.

evaluationClinical

p-value 45. Pointing Test Upper limb DX Err A 21 0,565 B 28 46. Pointing Test Upper limb DX PVtang A 13 1,000 B 20 47. Pointing Test Upper limb DX AsymL A 10 0,666 B 22 48. Pointing Test Upper limb DX LinearL A 23 0,818 B 20 49. Pointing Test Upper limb DX MovT A 14 0,385 B 14 50. Pointing Test Upper limb SX Err A 18 0,694 B 12 51. Pointing Test Upper limb SX PVtang A 14 0,456 B 17 52. Pointing Test Upper limb SX AsymL A 11 0,670 B 10 53. Pointing Test Upper limb SX LinearL A 21 0,497 B 25 54. Pointing Test Upper limb SX MovT A 13 1,000 B 13

(3)

Table IIc. Evaluation of worsening, between experimental group A and control group B,

Cinematics Test

Cinematics Test

N.

patients

Clinical evaluation

p-value 45. Pointing Test Upper limb DX Err A 21 1,000 B 28 46. Pointing Test Upper limb DX PVtang A 13 0,172 B 20 47. Pointing Test Upper limb DX AsymL A 10 0,276 B 22 48. Pointing Test Upper limb DX LinearL A 23 0,386 B 20 49. Pointing Test Upper limb DX MovT A 14 0,252 B 14 50. Pointing Test Upper limb SX Err A 18 0,105 B 12 51. Pointing Test Upper limb SX PVtang A 14 0,704 B 17 52. Pointing Test Upper limb SX AsymL A 11 0,048 B 10 53. Pointing Test Upper limb SX LinearL A 21 1,000 B 25 54. Pointing Test Upper limb SX MovT A 13 0,005 B 13

(4)

Table IId. Evaluation of worsening, between experimental group and control group,

Neurofunctional

Test

Neurofunctional Tests N.

patients evaluation Clinical

p-value 17. Attentive matrices A 25 0,356 B 28 18. Test di Stroop, colour-word A 19 0,426 B 26 19. Trail making test A A 25 0,967 B 26 20. Trail making test B A 25 NP B 28 21. Trail making test B-A A 27 0,193 B 33

22. Test di

Verbal Fluidity ,

phonemic A 24 0,932

B 27 23. Test di

Verbal Fluidity ,

categorical A 22 0,291 B 24 24. WEIGL A 28 0,322 B 29 25. Frontal Assessment Battery A 26 0,939 B 28 26. DSST A 27 0,362 B 33 27. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test A 25 0,312 B 25 28. MMSE A 30 0,271 B 32 29. Clinical evaluation of dysphagia A 25 0,706 B 32 30. Clinical evaluation of dysarthria A 30 0,157 B 31 31. Clinical evaluation of minority disorders A 11 0,990 B 15 32. Expanded Disability Status Scale A 15 0,990 B 17 33. 10 m walk test A 19 0,228 B 27 34. 6 min walk test A 28 0,788 B 28 35. Timed Up & Go A 11 0,476 B 10 36. Tinetti Balance equilibrium A 19 0,472 B 17 37. Tinetti Balance wolk A 18 NP B 17 38. Fatique Severity Scale A 7 0,990 B 14 39. Visual Analogic Scale A 12 0,990 B 17 40. HADS:

Anxiety Clinical Scale A 17 0,104 B 21 41. HADS:

Depression scale A 14 0,990 B 13 42. Barthel Index A 19 0,562 B 28

(5)

Table IIe. Evaluation of worsening, between experimental group and control group, PEV Test

PEV Test

N. patients

Clinical evaluation

p-value 1. PEV OD 60’ A 19 0,598 B 25 2. PEV OS 60’ A 17 0,723 B 29 3. PEV OD 15’ A 19 0,432 B 23 4. PEV OS 15’ A 18 0,622 B 22 5. TCMC AS Dx A 22 0,777 B 29 6. TCMC AS Sx A 18 0,890 B 26 7. TCMC AI Sx A 12 0,702 B 16 8. TCMC AI Sx A 11 0,990 B 15 9. TCMC direct AS Dx A 26 0,678 B 31 10. TCMC direct AS Sx A 26 0,221 B 34 11. TCMC direct AI Sx A 14 0,477 B 17 12. TCMC direct AI Sx A 13 0,990 B 16 13. TCMC indirect AS Dx A 13 0,990 B 17 14. TCMC indirect AS Sx A 11 0,395 B 15 15. TCMC indirect AI Sx A 11 0,689 B 15 16. TCMC indirect AI Sx A 7 0,346 B 14

(6)

Table III for standardised results

Evaluation of the improvement, between experimental group and control group, in cynematic (f) and

Neurorehabilitative tests (g) and the deterioration in evoked potential (h), using z-score.

(f)

Cinematic Tests N. Patients Difference z-score

Mean IC 95% DS p-value

1.

45. Pointing Test Upper limb DX Err

A 21 -0,204

-0,805 +0,089 0,866 0,114

2. B 28 0,153

3.

46. Pointing Test Upper limb DX PVtang

A 13 -0,221

-0, 937 +0,204 0,606 0,200

4. B 20 0,144

5.

47. Pointing Test Upper limb DX AsymL

A 10 0,178

-0,828 +1,511 1,27 0,550

6. B 22 -0,163

7.

48. Pointing Test Upper limb DX LinearL

A 23 0,178

-1,271 +0,522 1,69 0,404

8. B 20 0,195

9.

49. Pointing Test Upper limb DX MovT

A 14 -0,166

-0,965 +0,275 0,499 0,263

10. B 14 0,178

11.

50. Pointing Test Upper limb SX Err

A 18 -0,313

-2,090 +0,614 2,139 0,273

12. B 12 0,424

13.

51. Pointing Test Upper limb SX PVtang

A 14 0,106

-0,319 +0,556 0,489 0,583

14. B 17 -0,012

15.

52. Pointing Test Upper limb SX AsymL

A 11 -0,193

-1,767 +0,675 1,260 0,360

16. B 10 0,352

17.

53. Pointing Test Upper limb SX LinearL

A 21 -0,090

-1,045 +0,704 1,539 0,697

18. B 25 0,080

19.

54. Pointing Test Upper limb SX MovT

A 13 -0,381

-1,533 +1,771 0,701 0,016

20. B 13 0,474

(7)

Neurorehabilitative Tests

N.

patients Difference z-score

Mean IC 95% DS p-value

19. Stroop’s Test, colour-word A 10 -0,457 -0,857 +0,635 0,865 0,755 B 7 0,065 24. Verbal Fluidity’s Test, Phonemic A 7 -0,177 -1,172 +0,505 0,843 0,406 B 8 0,155 25. Verbal Fluency’s, Categorical A 9 -0,100 -0,814 +0,450 0,484 0,553 B 11 0,081 25. Frontal Assessment Battery A 5 0,248 -1,053 +1,903 0,822 0,536 B 7 -0,177 28. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test A 5 -1,802 -1,77 +0,653 0,806 0,334 B 9 0,600 45. Expanded Disability Status Scale A 18 -0,072 -0,282 -0,001 0,157 0,048 B 19 0,069 46. 10 m walk test A 12 -0,085 -0,639 +0,082 0,282 0,118 B 8 0,192 47. 6 min walk test A 3 -0,079 -0,748 +0,510 0,075 0,668 B 7 0,039 48. Timed Up & Go A 18 -0,145 -0,445 +0,055 0,484 0,124 B 18 0,090 49. Tinetti Balance equilibrium A 9 0,026 -0,181 +0,295 0,350 0,631 B 14 -0,030 50. Tinetti Balance wolk A 10 0,011 -0,330 +0,377 0,433 0,893 B 14 -0,011 51. Fatique Severity Scale A 24 -0,166 -0,875 +0,163 1,001 0,174 B 21 0,189 52. Visual Analogic Scale A 19 -0,269 -1,413 +0,270 1,215 0,177 B 17 0,301 53. HADS: Anxiety Clinical Scale A 10 -0,062 -0,889 +0,648 0,898 0,748 B 11 0,057 54. HADS: Depression scale A 15 -0,258 -1,109 +0,203 0,830 0,169 B 20 0,194 55. Barthel Index A 11 0,0583 -0,173 +0,473 0,338 0,340 B 7 -0,091 56. MSQOL- 54 Fisics A 27 0,105 -0,177 +0,057 0,909 0,297 B 31 -0,092 57. MSQOL- 54 Mental A 28 0,162 -0,140 +0,750 0,953 0,176 B 32 -0,142

(8)

Difference

z-score

PEV Test

N. patients

Mean IC 95% DS p-value

1. PEV OD 60’ A 19 1,794 -1,384 0,563 0,487 0,598 B 25 1,409 2. PEV OS 60’ A 17 1,437 -1,056 0,635 0,419 0,723 B 29 1,299 3. PEV OD 15’ A 19 1,671 -0,831 0,923 0,433

0,432 B 23 1,050 4. PEV OS 15’ A 18 1,318 -1,363 0,195 0,385 0,622 B 22 1,118 5. TCMC AS dx A 22 1,132 -1,173 0,195 0,393 0,777 B 29 1,559 6. TCMC AS sx A 18 1,210 -0,877 0,636 0,375 0,890 B 26 1,231 7. TCMC AI dx A 12 1,190 -1,241 0,893 0,519 0,702 B 16 1,471 8. TCMC AI sx A 11 0,818 -2,153 -0,276 0,454 0,990 B 15 1,330 9. TCMC dir AS dx A 26 0,631 -0,676 0,366 0,252 0,678 B 31 0,233 10. TCMC dir AS sx A 26 -0,043 -0,948 0,150 0,274 0,221 B 34 0,335 11. TCMC dir AI dx A 14 1,328 -0,746 1,355 0,513 0,477 B 17 1,497 12. TCMC dir AI sx A 13 1,041 -2,006 -0,417 0,478 0,990 B 16 1,385 13. TCMC indir AS dx A 13 1,407 -1,852 0,211 0,504 0,990

B 17 1,371 14. TCMC indir AS sx A 11 -0,052 -1,490 1,302 0,675 0,395 B 15 0,041 15. TCMC indir AI dx A 11 -0,067 -1,359 1,119 0,599 0,689 B 15 0,052 16. TCMC indir AI sx A 7 -0,696 -2,298 0,309 0,620 0,346 B 14 0,298

(h)

(9)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Instead, existing legal principles will be adapted and perhaps modified, either statutorily or judicially, to deal explicitly with smart contracts and other emerging

of sampled bales Holes in the plastic cover (n) Bale surface Covered by mould (%) Presence of Listeria spp.. Pearson correlation coefficients of bale silage chemical

The use of jazz music, a symbol of American popular culture, can be seen in Murakami’s fiction as a device to convey all the anxiety coming from the cultural clash between East

The application of GMP to manufacture medicinal products such as MSCs must ensure that clinical trials are unaffected by inadequate safety, quality, or

Le interviste effettuate dopo aver scattato le fotografie. Minuti Tema Bambino: Di. Qui è dove prendo il pulmino. Ci sono alberi e un po’ di scuola. Per salire sul pulmino,

Questo principio viene usato per definire la temperatura: due corpi sono alla stessa temperatura se e solo se sono all’equilibrio termico; un corpo di riferimento (ad esempio un

For these ground stations, Scenario 7 (or Scenario 6 mod) is used, in order to understand the access contact time and the behavior of the data per day in function

di una delle parti un onere di allegazione e di prova, il corretto sviluppo della dialettica processuale impone che l’altra parte prenda posizione in maniera precisa, rispetto