BritishJournalofOralandMaxillofacialSurgeryxxx(2019)xxx–xxx
ScienceDirect
Postoperative
complications
after
removal
of
pleomorphic
adenoma
from
the
parotid
gland:
A
long-term
follow
up
of
297
patients
from
2002
to
2016
and
a
review
of
publications
Paola
Bonavolontà
a,
Giovanni
Dell’Aversana
Orabona
a,
Fabio
Maglitto
b,
Vincenzo
Abbate
a,
Umberto
Committeri
b,∗,
Giovanni
Salzano
b,
Giovanni
Improta
c,
Giorgio
Iaconetta
e,
Luigi
Califano
daDepartmentNeurosciences,ReproductiveandOdontostomatologicalSciences,FedericoIIUniversityofNaples,Naples,Italy bDepartmentNeurosciences,ReproductiveandOdontostomatologicalSciences,FedericoIIUniversityofNaples,Naples,Italy cDepartmentofPublicHealth,FedericoIIUniversityofNaples,Naples,Italy
dFedericoIIUniversityofNaples,Naples,Italy
eDepartmentofNeurosurgery,UniversityofSalerno,Salerno,Italy
Accepted13August2019
Abstract
Pleomorphicadenomasarerounded,lumpy,capsulatedlesionsthataremorecommoninwomen.Theyaretypicallybenign,butcanbe associatedwithmalignancyinaminorityofcases(suchascarcinomaexpleomorphicadenoma),between3%-12%ofthetime,accordingto availabledata.Thepurposeofourstudywastoevaluateclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithbenignparotidglandtumoursafterextracapsular dissection(ECD)orsuperficialparotidectomy(SP).Wemadearetrospectivestudyof297patientswhohadhadbenigntumoursoftheparotid gland,andhadbeenreferredtoourdepartmentfrom2002–2016tohaveeitherprocedure.Wemeasuredthestatisticaldifferencesbetweenthe twotechniques(evaluatedrecurrencerateandcomplications)withthechisquaredtest.Thechosenlevelofstatisticalsignificancewasp<0.05. Median(range)follow-uptimewas43months(25–168)months.HaematomaandhypoaesthesiaweresignificantlymorecommonafterSP thanafterECD(8.9%comparedwith7.7%,and16.8%comparedwith5.6%,respectively).Transientfacialnerveinjury,Freysyndrome,and facialparalysisweresignificantlymorecommonafterSPthanafterECD(23.6%comparedwith1.5%,6.7%comparedwith1%and6,7% comparedwith0%,respectively).ECDhadtheadvantageofreducedoperatingtime,lowermorbidityandlowerrecurrencerate,andcould beconsideredthetreatmentofchoiceforpleomorphicadenomaoftheparotidglandup(to3cm)whicharemobileandsitedinthesuperficial lobeoftheparotidgland.
©2019TheBritishAssociationofOralandMaxillofacialSurgeons.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.Allrightsreserved.
Keywords:pleomorphicadenoma;extracapsulardissection;superficialparotidectomy
∗Correspondingauthorat:ViaPansinin.5Napoli80100,Italy.
Tel.:0817462175,Fax:0817462190
E-mailaddresses:p.bonav@gmail.com(P.Bonavolontà), umbertocommitteri@gmail.com(U.Committeri).
Introduction
Tumoursofthesalivaryglandsarenotcommon,and gener-allycomprise2%-4%ofneoplasmsintheheadandneck.1 Three-quartersofthemarebenign,andmostoriginateinthe parotid gland (70%). Amongthem, pleomorphicadenoma isbyfarthe mostcommonbenignepitheliallesion(81%), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.08.008
50%-70%aresalivarytumours,andcystoadenolymphoma orWarthintumouraccountforabout25%.2
Pleomorphic adenomas, also known as “benign mixed tumours”, are rounded,lumpy, capsulated lesions that are more common in women, and most are found in adult-hood.Theyaretypicallybenign,butcanbeassociatedwith malignancyinaminority of cases(such as carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma), between 3% - 12% of the time, accordingtoavailabledata.2
Surgicaltreatmentsfor benignparotid glandneoplasms began with enucleation in the late 1800s, but during the late1900s,technicalprocedureswerechangedtoremovethe masswithaportionofsurroundingnormalparotidgland tis-sue,toavoidrecurrence,butindoingsocreatedanincreasein complications.3 Parotidglandsurgeryremainschallenging, becausethereisnoconsensusontreatment,butthetwomost commontechniquesareextracapsulardissection(ECD),and superficialparotidectomy(SP).1,4Althoughthenumbersfor recurrenceafterthesetechniquesareacceptable,5dissection ofthefacialnerveanditsbranchesforremovalofpartsofthe glandcanleadtocomplicationspostoperativelythatarenot acceptableforthetreatmentofabenignlesion.Typical com-plicationsofparotidglandsurgeryinclude:defectivewound healing;woundinfections; dehiscence;hypertrophic scars; seromas;haematomas;sialocoeles;salivaryfistulas; anaes-thesiaandparaesthesiaaround dermalincisionsorthearea suppliedbythegreatauricularnerve;temporaryand perma-nentfacialparesis;Freysyndrome;andgustatorysweating.6 TheaimofourstudywastocomparetheresultsofECD andSP,toreducecomplicationsandrecurrence.Weanalysed ourdataintermsofthesuccessoftreatment,amountof com-plications,andrecurrence,onalargeseriesofpatients(297), withlong-termfollowup.
Methods
We carried out a retrospective study of all patients who hadhadbenigntumoursoftheparotidgland,andhadbeen referredtoourdepartmentfrom2002-2016.Wecollected generalinformation(age,sex,coexistingconditions),aswell asspecificclinicaldata.Bimanualpalpationoftheglandsand neckweredonetoobtainacharacterisationofthe localisa-tion,dimension, mobility, andtensionrelatedtothe effect of the mass. Clinical assessment of facial nerve function was made preoperatively according to House and Brack-manncriteria.6Ultrasoundscan(US),computedtomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),or both, and fine-needlecytologywerecarriedoutinallpatients preoper-atively.
Exclusioncriteriawere:diagnosisof amalignantlesion orotherbenignlesiondifferentfrompleomorphicadenoma, eitherbeforeorafteroperation;anygradeoffacialnerve dys-functionpreoperatively;patientswhohadbeenlostatregular followupand;thosewhowerebeingtreatedforrelapse.
AccordingtothecategoriesdevelopedbyQueretal,7we usedECDforallcasesofasingle,mobile,lesionof3cmor lessindiameter(Quer’sCategoryI)thatwerelocated super-ficiallywithinthelaterallobeoftheparotidgland,thathad beendiagnosedasbenignpreoperatively.
Weused parotidectomy for tumourswithadiameter of 3cmorlessthatweresiteddeepintheparotidlobe(Quer’s CategoryII),orthosethatwerelargerthan3cmindiameter (Quer’sCategoryIII-IV).
Allpatientshadregularfollowup,andcomplicationswere documentedimmediatelypostoperatively,duringtheirstayin hospital,andateachsubsequentfollow-upvisit.
Thisstudywasapprovedasan“exemptstudy”bythe Insti-tutionalReviewBoardattheUniversityFedericoIIofNaples. Thisinvestigation observedthe DeclarationofHelsinkion medicalprotocolandethics.
Operativetechnique
Extracapsulardissection
WeconsideredECDtobetheselectiveresectionofatumour withsafemargins.Inparticular,thesurgeonmadeaskin inci-sionthatconvertedtoamodifiedBlairincision,whichisa modificationof the facelift technique.Itis donetoreduce the aesthetic impactof the surgical scar, and allows care-fuldissectionofthetumour,andrespectsandpreservesthe capsule,withnoidentificationofthefacialnerve.Inthis tech-niqueonlytheareaoftheglandthatinvolvesthetumouris removedwithamarginof1.5cm.
Superficialparotidectomy
SPistheremovalofthesuperficialparotidlobewithcomplete nervedissection.TheskinincisionstartswithamodifiedBlair techniquefromthepreauricularregionandextendsuptothe internalmarginofthetragus,reachestheearlobe,andthen goesonposteriorlyfor2-3cmonthemastoid.Thesuperficial muscularaponeuroticsystemisraised,andthegreater auric-ularnerveisidentifiedandpreserved.Thecommontrunkof thefacialnerve,afteritsidentification,isdissected,isolated, and controlled by means of faradic stimulation. After the removalofthetumour,haemostasisisconfirmed,thefascial planesarestitched,andtheskinisclosedwithnon-resorbable sutures.
Statisticalanalysis
Statistical calculations were done with the aid of SPSS (version 17.0).The statistical differences betweenthe two techniquesrelatingtoevaluatedrecurrencerateand compli-cationsweremeasuredwiththechisquaredtest.Probabilities oflessthan0.05wereacceptedassignificant.
Fig. 1.Postoperative complications after extracapsular dissections and superficialparotidectomies.
Results
From2002to2016,thediagnosisofpleomorphicadenoma wasgivenin297/441patientswhohadhadbenignparotid tumoursurgery(67%).
Amongthese,14patientswereexcludedfromthisstudy becauseofirregularfollowuporbecausetheyhadevidence offacialnervepalsyevenbeforeoperation.Forthisreason, we enrolled283 patients (154 femaleand129 male)aged between26and79,mean(SD)age52(10.6)years.
Ofthese,wedidextracapsulardissectionin194patients, andsuperficialparotidectomyin89.Median(rangefollow-up timewas43(25–168)months.Postoperativecomplications aresummarisedinFig.1.
Achisquaredtestwasalsocalculatedbetweentwogroups (complicationsYES/complicationsNO)andtheoperations. Apvalueof<0.00001wasfoundwiththistest,whichwas sig-nificant(n=283;X2(9)=104.39,p<0.001;likelihoodratio (X2(9))=108.11,p<0.001).
Transient facial nerve injury, hypoaesthesia, Frey syn-drome,andfacialparalysisweresignificantlymorecommon aftersuperficialparotidectomythanafterextracapsular dis-section(23.6%comparedwith1.5%,16.8%comparedwith 5.6%, 6.7% compared with 1% and6,7% compared with 0%,respectively)(Observationfrequencies,Fig.2A-Dand Table1).
Discussion
Pleomorphic adenoma is a slow growing, usually demar-cated, and mobile tumour that occurs more commonly in olderwomen.Itconstitutesabout40%-60%ofbenign sali-varyglandtumourssitedinthesuperficialparotidglandlobe inabout80%ofpatients.2
The most relevant structural components of this kind of lesion are the capsule, parenchyma, andstroma. Many authors have described parenchyma-rich and stroma-rich
Table1
Comparisonofextracapsulardissectionsandsuperficialparotidectomy.Data arenumber(%). Complication Extracapsular dissection (n=194) Superficial parotidectomy (n=89) pvalue Haematoma 15(7.7) 8(8.9) 0.719 Seroma 3(1.5) 5(5.6) 0.055 Fistula 2(1) 4(4.49) 0.060 Hypoaesthesia 11(5.6) 15(16.8) 0.002 Prominentscar 4(2) 3(3.3) 0.510 Freysyndrome 2(1) 6(6.7) 0.007
Transientfacialinjury 3(1.5) 21(23.6) <0.001
Facialparalysis 0 6(6.7) <0.001
Recurrence 8(4.1) 4(4.49) 0.886
subtypes.Thecapsuleisusually0.015-1.75mmthick,andis thickerinparenchyma-richtumoursthanstroma-richones.2 The close association betweenthe gland and the facial nerve, and the considerable prospect of recurrence, has shapedsurgicaltechniquesforparotidglandneoplasmsover theyears.8
Parotid surgery for pleomorphic adenoma has been developed considerably in the past century, passing from enucleation of the tumour to parotidectomy, which was associatedwithmorecomplications.9,10Surgicalexperience and familiarity with the complex anatomy of the facial nerveandotheradjacentvascularandneural structuresare strictlyrequiredtoavoidcomplications,particularlywhenthe anatomy couldhavebeenalteredbyinflammation, lesions, previous operations or radiation treatments, or both. The choiceofthemostappropriatetreatmentintheexcisionof theparotidglandisessential,asisintraoperative identifica-tionandpreservationofthepseudocapsulethatsurroundsthe lesion.11
Generally, the choice of treatment isintended toavoid postoperative complications. Major advances in surgical techniqueshaveshiftedthefocusfromrecurrenceandfacial nervedamagetothemanagementofotheroutcomes,suchas damagetothegreatauricularnerveandFreysyndrome.12
ECD is a technique that involves a total excision of a benignparotidtumourthatissurroundedbyhealthy glandu-lartissue,withsafemarginsandcompletenervedissection. PreviouspublicationshaveshownthatlimitedECDdoesnot resultinanincreasedincidenceofrecurrence.13
In1993,Dalleraetalshowedtheirresultsafter71patients withpleomorphicadenomawhohadECDwitharecurrence rate of 5.4%.14 In 1996, McGurk et al found no differ-enceinrecurrencebetweenpatientswhohadECDandthat recorded inthose whohadSP.15 In their meta-analysisof 2014,Forestaetalemphasisedthatinpatientswithunilateral pleomorphicadenoma(ofless3cmindiameter)ECDwasa viableapproachinconsiderationofsuccessfuloutcomesand safety.13In2015,Mantsopoulosetalproposedandfocused attentiononthepossibilityofaminimally-invasiveapproach forECD,becauseoftheconsiderablereductioninoperating time.16
Fig.2.Comparisonbetweenobservationfrequenciesrelatedtothefollowingpostoperativecomplications:(A)Transientfacialnerveinjury;(B)Hypoaesthesia; (C)Facialparalysis;(D)Freysyndrome.
Albergottietal17 showedthatECDhasasimilar recur-rencerateasSPwithfewsurgicalcomplications.ECDwas doneinmostcasesofmobiletumoursthatweresitedinthe superficiallobeoftheparotid,andwithdiametersoflessthan 3cm,(2–2.5cm).18 McGurk15reportedareductionof inci-denceofFrey’ssyndromefrom32%incasestreatedbySP, to5%inECD.Shehataetal19 showedthatECDis associ-atedwithreducedoperativetime,lowmorbidity,andshorter hospitalstay,confirmingthatthiskindoftechniqueseemsto besafeintrainedhands.
TheaimofSPistoallowtheremovalofthebenignparotid masswithadequatemarginsofsafetyparotidtissuearound it.Itwasdone inmost casesthat comprisedlarger,firmer, and more deeply-sited lesions. As reported by Patey and Thackray,complicationssuchasFreysyndrome,haematoma, fistula, and injury tothe greater auricular nerve are more commonlyseenafterparotidectomythanafterextracapsular dissection.20
AspromptedbyKadletzetal.,1regardingpermanentfacial palsyandrecurrentdisease,SPstillremainsthetreatmentof choiceintermsofsuperiorclinicaloutcome,eventhoughit ismoretime-consumingthanECD.
From2013the useofendoscopic toolsinmaxillofacial surgeryhasbeenimprovedfortheapproachtolesionsofthe salivaryglands.
AsreportedbyAbbate etal21 in acadavericstudy,the endoscopicapproachcanbeanalternativetoassessthe acces-soryparotidgland.22 Itwould beadvisable toincreasethe
studyoftheendoscopicanatomyoftheparotidarea,toextend thesurgicalendoscopicindications.Chenshowedhisresults of the aesthetic outcomes in 11 young patients who had endoscopically-assisted ECD of benign pleomorphic ade-nomas of the parotid gland through apostauricular sulcus approach.Thistechniqueseemedtobesimpleandfeasible, anditachievedexcellentaestheticresults.23
Allthedifficultiesandlimitationsofaminimally-invasive operation may be considered, such as restrictedspace for manoeuvring that isassociated withalimited fieldof vis-ibility, the need for lengthytraining, and asteep learning curve.
In conclusion, our large study enabled us to compare theadvantagesandweaknessesofbothsurgicalapproaches. Basedonourdata,westillrecommendECDasaviable alter-nativetoSPintermsofsuccessfuloutcomefortumoursunder 3cm.Ithasconfirmedthepreliminaryresultsreportedinour previousstudyandthoseinarecentbibliography.23,24
Unfortunately,thereareonlyfewprospectivestudieson procedure-specificincidencesofcomplicationsafterbenign parotid surgery. Predictive factors for postoperative facial dysfunction remain controversial. Ruohoalho has recently published an interesting prospective study about the com-plication rates and assessed risk factors of postoperative transientfacialpalsy.Heshowedthatageandalongoperation increasetherisk.25
Nevertheless,weaimtokeepourmindsopentoall pos-sibleinnovationsthatwillallowanynewsurgicalapproach,
notonlytoimprove effectiveness, butalso toincreasethe optionsforaminimally-invasiveapproach.
Ethicsstatement/confirmationofpatients’permission
Thisstudywasapprovedasan“exemptstudy”bythe Institu-tionalReviewBoardattheUniversityFedericoIIofNaples. Patients’permissionwasnotnecessary.
Conflictofinterest
Wehavenoconflictsofinterest.
References
1.KadletzL,GraslS,GraslMC,etal.Extracapsulardissectionversus superficialparotidectomyinbenignparotidglandtumors:theVienna MedicalSchoolexperience.HeadNeck2017;39:356–60.
2.GuerraG,TestaD,MontagnaniS,etal.Surgicalmanagementof pleomor-phicadenomaofparotidglandinelderlypatients:roleofmorphological features.IntJSurg2014;2(Suppl.2):S12–6.
3.DonovanDT,ConleyJJ.Capsularsignificanceinparotidtumorsurgery: realityandmythsoflaterallobectomy.Laryngoscope1984;94:324–9. 4.Guntinas-LichiusO,KickC,KlussmannJP,etal.Pleomorphicadenoma
of the parotid gland: a 13-year experience of consequent manage-ment by lateral or total parotidectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
2004;261:143–6.
5.KochM,ZenkJ,IroH.Long-termresultsofmorbidityafterparotidgland surgeryinbenigndisease.Laryngoscope2010;120:724–30.
6.HouseJW,BrackmannDE.Facialnervegradingsystem.Otolaryngol HeadNeckSurg1985;93:146–7.
7.QuerM,VanderPoortenV,TakesRP,etal.Surgicaloptionsinbenign parotidtumors:aproposalforclassification.EurArchOtorhinolaryngol
2017;274:3825–36.
8.KlintworthN,ZenkJ,KochM,etal.Postoperativecomplicationsafter extracapsulardissectionofbenignparotidlesionswithparticular refer-encetofacialnervefunction.Laryngoscope2010;120:484–90. 9.Dell’AversanaOrabonaG,SalzanoG,PetrocelliM,etal.Reconstructive
techniquesoftheparotidregion.JCraniofacSurg2014;25:998–1002. 10.Zbären P, Stauffer E. Pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland:
histopathologicanalysisofthecapsularcharacteristicsof218tumors.
HeadNeck2007;29:751–2.
11.CarlsonER,McCoyJM.Marginsforbenignsalivaryglandneoplasms oftheheadandneck.OralMaxillofacSurgClinNorthAm2017;29: 325–40.
12.LaccourreyeH, Laccourreye O,Cauchois R, et al.Total conserva-tive parotidectomyfor primarybenignpleomorphic adenoma ofthe parotidgland:a25-yearexperiencewith229patients.Laryngoscope
1994;104:1487–94.
13.ForestaE,TorroniA,DiNardoF,etal.Pleomorphicadenomaandbenign parotidtumors:extracapsulardissectionvssuperficialparotidectomy— reviewofliteratureandmeta-analysis.OralSurgOralMedOralPathol OralRadiol2014;117:663–76.
14.DalleraP,MarchettiC.Campobassia:localcapsulardissectionofparotid pleomorphicadenomas.IntJOralMaxillofacSurg1993;22:154–7. 15.McGurkM,RenehanA,GleaveEN,etal.Clinicalsignificanceofthe
tumourcapsuleinthetreatmentofparotidpleomorphicadenomas.BrJ Surg1996;83:1747–9.
16.Mantsopoulos K, Koch M, Klintworth N, et al. Evolution and changingtrendsinsurgeryforbenignparotidtumors.Laryngoscope
2015;125:122–7.
17.Albergotti WG, Nguyen SA, Zenk J, et al. Extracapsular dis-section for benign parotid tumors: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope
2012;122:1954–60.
18.ZhangSS,MaDQ,GuoCB,etal.Conservationofsalivarysecretion andfacialnervefunctioninpartialsuperficialparotidectomy.IntJOral MaxillofacSurg2013;42:868–73.
19.ShehataEA.Extra-capsulardissectionforbenignparotidtumours.IntJ OralMaxillofacSurg2010;39:140–4.
20.PateyDH,ThackrayAC.Thetreatmentofparotidtumoursinthelight ofapathologicalstudyofparotidectomymaterial.BrJSurg1958;45: 477–87.
21.Dell’AversanaOrabonaG,RomanoA,BonavolontàP, etal.Tumor modelforsurgicalsimulationtoassessaminimallyinvasiveendoscopic approachformidcheekmassremoval.SurgOncol2017;26:286–9. 22.ChenWL, FanS.ZhangDM Endoscopically assistedextracapsular
dissectionofpleomorphicadenomaoftheparotidglandthrougha postau-ricularsulcusapproachinyoungpatients.BrJOralMaxillofacSurg
2017;55:400–3.
23.Dell’AversanaOrabonaG,BonavolontàP,IaconettaG,etal.Surgical managementofbenigntumorsoftheparotidgland:extracapsular dissec-tionversussuperficialparotidectomyourexperiencein232cases.JOral MaxillofacSurg2013;71:410–3.
24.ErenSB,DoganR,OzturanO,etal.Howdeleteriousisfacialnerve dissectionforthefacialnerveinparotidsurgery:anelectrophysiological evaluation.JCraniofacSurg2017;28:56–60.
25.RuohoalhoJ,MäkitieAA,AroK,etal.Complicationsaftersurgeryfor benignparotidglandneoplasms:aprospectivecohortstudy.HeadNeck