• Non ci sono risultati.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Biological Significance of Hepatic Transdifferentiation in Adenocarcinoma Cells

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Biological Significance of Hepatic Transdifferentiation in Adenocarcinoma Cells"

Copied!
11
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Biological Significance of Hepatic Transdifferentiation in

Adenocarcinoma Cells

Hiroshi Ishikura

1

, Yana Supriatna

1

, Kazuhiro Kojima

1,2

, Shigeyuki Kamata

1,2

, Hiroki Nakaya

3

, and Takashi Kishimoto

1

Clinicopathology of Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma was first described in the stomach as a subtype of alpha- fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric cancers with distinct clinicopathological prop- erties [1,2]. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach is defined as a primary gastric carcinoma with areas of functionally and structurally distinctive foci of hepatocellu- lar differentiation. It usually arises as a circumscribed mass in the antrum to body of the stomach in middle-aged to elderly persons (Fig. 1).

Tumor cells in a certain type of AFP-producing gastric carcinomas were once regarded as poorly differentiated or undifferentiated due to the sheetlike arrangement of tumor cells with abundant, eosinophilic cytoplasm. However, after the recognition of a liverlike trabecular arrangement, as well as production of a set of liver-specific proteins [2,3], the sheetlike proliferation of AFP-producing gastric carcinoma has now come to be regarded as a morphological mimicry of the liver structure (Figs. 2–5).

Most importantly, hepatoid adenocarcinomas exhibit hepatocellular differentiation, usually in association with well-differentiated tubular or papillary adenocarcinoma [2,4]. Adenocarcinoma cells are either of intestinal epithelial type with production of mucin, or of clear cell type with a primitive appearance. Adenocarcinoma cells usually can be found in the mucosal layer of the gastric wall (Fig. 6), which strongly indicates the emergence of hepatoid cells from adenocarcinoma through neometaplasia or transdifferentiation. Rare cases of hepatoid adenocarcinoma, however, have no obvious adenocarcinoma components; in such cases, de novo development has not been excluded. Transition between adenocarcinoma and hepatoid cells is gradual in some cases (Fig. 7) and abrupt in others.

139

1Department of Molecular Pathology,2Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Grad- uate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, Japan

3Department of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan

e-mail: hishik@med.m.chiba-u.ac.jp

(2)

Hepatocellular differentiation in a hepatoid adenocarcinoma includes structural mimicry of liver tissue, for example, trabecular arrangement with sinusoid-like vas- culature and formation of bile (Fig. 8), glycogen, and bile canaliculus-like structures (Fig. 9), and production of liver-specific proteins such as AFP [1,2], albumin [3,5], transferrin [2], PIVKA-II [6], and Hep-par 1 [7,8] antigens. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining-positive hyaline globules are numerous in some cases (Fig. 10). The hepato- cellular phenotype in a hepatoid adenocarcinoma is determined by a collective con- sideration of the afore-mentioned factors; the mere presence or absence of AFP production does not necessarily characterize phenotype. Thus, not all AFP-producing gastric carcinomas are hepatoid adenocarcinoma, whereas there are many hepatoid adenocarcinomas that do not produce AFP (Fig. 11) [4]. The nonhepatoid, AFP- producing tumors include enteroblastic gastric tumors [9], medullar tumors with gastrointestinal tract-specific AFP [10], and yolk sac tumors [11]. The biological behavior of hepatoid adenocarcinomas is definitively worse than that of other types of AFP-producing gastric cancers, both clinically [4] and experimentally [12].

A striking feature exhibited by hepatoid adenocarcinoma is its invasion of vessels, usually extending to veins. This invasion can readily be seen by light microscopy as expanded veins in the gastric wall that are filled with tumor cells (Fig. 12). In addi- tion, intravenously invading tumor cells can even be seen grossly as tumor thrombi from the serosal surface in occasional hepatoid adenocarcinoma cases (Fig. 13). Hepa- toid adenocarcinoma of the stomach, therefore, is characterized by almost inevitable blood-borne metastasis to the liver, which results in an extremely poor prognosis of patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma [4]. In a study with a limited number of cases, hepatoid adenocarcinoma metastasizes to the liver even if its invasion is limited to the submucosal layer of the gastric wall [13,14].

In rare circumstances, tumor thrombi were in direct continuity with those in the portal vein. Considering that morphology of liver metastatic foci also resembles that of hepatocellular carcinoma, the presence of portal vein thrombi that are contiguous to gastric veins causes a diagnostic problem; it is difficult to differentiate between hepatocellular carcinoma metastatic to the stomach and hepatoid adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver [15]. Our previous study revealed that the absence of liver cir- rhosis and the presence of intramucosal adenocarcinoma favor the origin of the stomach, that is, hepatoid adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver [15]. In contrast, hepatocellular carcinoma metastatic to the stomach is characterized by the gross appearance of a gastric submucosal tumor in association with liver cirrhosis or hep- atitis virus-associated hepatitis. Before the introduction of hepatoid adenocarcinoma, several case studies had concluded the former cases were rare examples of hepato- cellular carcinoma metastatic to the stomach [15].

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma as a Ubiquitously Occurring Carcinoma with Hepatocellular Transdifferentiation

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma was first described in the stomach, followed by reports of it in a variety of other organs, with gastric primaries being most common [16–19].

Extragastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma has been found in the digestive organs, includ-

ing the esophagus [20,21], duodenum [22], large intestine [23], gallbladder [24], and

(3)

pancreas [25]. It has also been found in the lung [26,27]. In addition, the genitouri- nary organs are one of the most common sites of origin; it has been described in the renal pelvis [28], urinary bladder [29], uterus [30–32], fallopian tube [33], and ovary [34–37]. In all these organs except the ovary, hepatoid adenocarcinomas almost always arise from the mucosa. Hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary was classified into the mis- cellaneous tumor category in the WHO classification in 2003, but the proposal that it belongs in the common epithelial category has been made by several investigators [37–39].

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma as a Model for Transdifferentiation in Adenocarcinoma

Phenotypic microheterogeneities are well known in a variety of human and animal tumors. For example, the occurrence of argentaffin/argyrophil cells in otherwise common-type gastric adenocarcinoma cells has been shown [40]. This finding may be due to maturation or transdifferentiation of adenocarcinoma cells with a ques- tionable clinicopathological impact; the occurrence has not clearly been related to an altered prognosis. In contrast, the emergence of transdifferentiated oat cell-type neu- roendocrine tumor cells in gastric adenocarcinoma may profoundly alter the clinico- pathology [41]. Similarly, the emergence of transdifferentiated hepatocellular tumor tissues in gastric adenocarcinoma has a great impact on the biology of gastric adenocarcinoma through frequent blood-borne metastases to the liver [2,4]. This biological modification seen in hepatocellular transdifferentiation in hepatoid ade- nocarcinoma warrants intensive study of its genesis and regulation.

Several cell lines of AFP-producing gastric cancers have been cultured [42–44].

These lines provide an opportunity to study phenotypic regulation of gastric carci- noma at the molecular level. Currently, some of them have been shown to represent hepatocellular transdifferentiation based on the production of a set of liver-specific proteins (Supriatna et al. 2005, manuscript in preparation).

Liver-Enriched Nuclear Factors, Hepatogenesis, and Hepatic Transdifferentiation in Carcinoma Cells

We showed that FU97 cells, an AFP-producing gastric adenocarcinoma cell line, pro- duced a set of liver-specific proteins (Supriatna et al. 2005, manuscript in prepara- tion). In addition, transcriptional factors positively regulate transcription of the AFP gene in FU97 cells, which is indicated by the fact that FU97 cells expressed the herpes simplex tymidine kinase (HSVtk) gene through the function of the AFP promoter/enhancer sequence [45]. It is probable that other genes for liver-specific proteins may also be expressed by a mechanism identical or similar to it.

Cooperative expressions of multiple master transcriptional factors have been

shown in multiple organogenesis sites such as the lung [46]. In hepatogenesis, several

important transcriptional factors, collectively called liver-enriched nuclear factors,

exert their role on structural and functional development of the liver [47,48]. Based

on the fact that transdifferentiation of adenocarcinoma toward the hepatocellular

(4)

phenotype might be homologous to liver bud emergence in the primitive digestive tract at the duodenum, some of the liver-enriched nuclear factors might well be involved in the genesis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma, as suggested by the HSVtk autocidal experiment [45].

Our previous data indicated that HNF-4a mRNA is expressed in the gastric hepa- toid adenocarcinoma tissues [3]. However, gastric adenocarcinoma tissues without distinctive hepatocellular transdifferentiation also expressed similar amounts of HNF-4a mRNA, indicating that this liver-enriched nuclear factor may not be the sole factor responsible for hepatic transdifferentiation in gastric carcinomas [3]. With regard to the lung, upregulation of HNF-4a mRNA was specifically seen in hepatoid adenocarcinoma but not in the normal lung and conventional lung carcinoma tissues.

Furthermore, HNF-4a was specifically stained in the nuclei in the transdifferentiated but not in the conventional areas of the hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung, indicating an organ-specific role of liver-enriched nuclear factors in the genesis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma (Kishimito et al. 2005, manuscript in preparation).

Hepatic transdifferentiation has been shown in neoplastic and nonneoplastic rodent pancreas cells [49]. In rodent models, regenerated pancreas contained liver cells [50,51]. A recent experiment demonstrated a C/EBP-b-rendered transdifferenti- ation of rat pancreatic carcinoma cells into tumor cells with a hepatocellular pheno- type [52]. This observation exemplifies that a single, or a few, master transcriptional protein(s) indeed have the potential to transdifferentiate tumor cells into another phe- notype, in this case, into a hepatocellular phenotype. The transcriptional regulatory region of the mdr-1/p-glycoprotein gene contains a C/EBP-b site [53]. This finding adds to the possible importance of liver-enriched nuclear factors in the treatment of transdifferentiated tumor cells.

Conclusions

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma is an extrahepatic carcinoma with functionally and struc- turally distinctive foci of hepatocellular differentiation. The usual presence of adeno- carcinoma indicates the emergence of hepatocellular transdifferentiation from adenocarcinoma cells. Hepatoid adenocarcinoma most commonly occurs in the stomach, but other gastrointestinal and genitourinary organs are also common sites of origin. Master transcriptional regulators, particularly liver-enriched nuclear factors, might be involved in the transdifferentiation process, as well as in the biology of hepatoid adenocarcinoma tissues.

References

1. Ishikura H, Fukasawa Y, Ogasawara K, et al (1985) An AFP-producing gastric carcinoma with features of hepatic differentiation. A case report. Cancer (Phila) 56:840–848

2. Ishikura H, Kirimoto K, Shamoto M, et al (1986) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach:

an analysis of seven cases. Cancer (Phila) 58:119–126

3. Yano T, Kishimoto T, Tomaru U, et al (2003) Further evidence of hepatic transdifferentia- tion in hepatoid adenocarcinomas of the stomach: quantitative analysis of mRNA for albumin and hepatocyte nuclear factor-4a. Pathology 35:75–78

(5)

4. Nagai E, Ueyama T, Yao T, et al (1993) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach. A clinico- pathologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Cancer (Phila) 72:1827–1835

5. Foschini MP, Baccarini P, Dal Monte PR, et al (1998) Albumin gene expression in adeno- carcinomas with hepatoid differentiation. Virchows Arch 433:537–541

6. Kudo M, Takamine Y, Nakamura K, et al (1992) Des-g-carboxy prothrombin (PIVKA-II) anda-fetoprotein-producing IIc-type early gastric cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 87:1859–

1862

7. Maitra A, Murakata LA, Albores-Saavedra J (2001) Immunoreactivity for hepatocyte paraf- fin 1 antibody in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Pathol 115:689–694

8. Villari D, Caruso R, Grosso M, et al (2002) Hep Par 1 in gastric and bowel carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study. Pathology 34:423–426

9. Matsunou H, Konishi F, Jalal REA, et al (1994) Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carci- noma with enteroblastic differentiation. Cancer (Phila) 73:534–540

10. Ooi A, Nakanishi I, Sakamoto N, et al (1990) Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-producing gastric car- cinoma: is it hepatoid differentiation? Cancer (Phila) 65:1741–1747

11. Motoyama T, Aizawa K, Watanabe H, et al (1993)a-Fetoprotein producing gastric carcino- mas: a comparative study of three different subtypes. Acta Pathol Jpn 43:654–661 12. Aizawa K, Motoyama T, Suzuki T, et al (1994) Different characteristics of hepatoid and non-

hepatoid a-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinomas: an experimental study using xenografted tumors. Int J Cancer 58:430–435

13. Aoyagi K, Koufuji K, Yano S, et al (2003) Alpha-fetoprotein-producing early gastric cancer:

report of two cases. Kurume Med J 50:63–66

14. Tsurumachi T, Yamamoto H, Watanabe K, et al (1997) Resection of liver metastasis from alpha-fetoprotein-producing early gastric cancer: report of a case. Surg Today 27:563–566 15. Ishikura H, Kishimoto T, Andachi H, et al (1997) Gastrointestinal hepatoid adenocarcinoma:

venous permeation and mimicry of hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of four cases.

Histopathology (Oxf) 31:47–54

16. Kang GH, Kim YI (1998)a-Fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma presenting focal hepa- toid differentiation in metastatic lymph nodes. Virchows Arch 432:85–87

17. Ihling C, Shaefer HE, Baumgartner U, et al (1995) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach:

a case report. Gen Diagn Pathol 141:61–65

18. Roberts CC, Colby TV, Batts KP (1997) Carcinoma of the stomach with hepatocyte differ- entiation (hepatoid adenocarcinoma). Mayo Clin Proc 72:1154–1160

19. Morinaga S, Takahashi Y (1996) Primary hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoid adenocar- cinoma of the stomach with liver metastasis: an unusual association. Jpn J Clin Oncol 26:258–263

20. Motoyama T, Higuchi M, Taguchi J (1995) Combined choriocarcinoma, hepatoid adenocar- cinoma, small cell carcinoma and tubular adenocarcinoma in the oesophagus. Virchows Arch 427:451–454

21. Tanigawa H, Kida Y, Kuwao S, et al (2002) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus associated with achalasia: first case report. Pathol Int 52:141–146

22. Gardiner GW, Lajoie G, Keith R (1992) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the papilla of Vater.

Histopathology (Oxf) 20:541–544

23. Hocking GR, Shembrey M, Hay D, et al (1995) Alpha-fetoprotein-producing adenocarcinoma of the sigmoid colon with possible hepatoid differentiation. Pathology 27:277–279 24. Nakashima H, Nagafuchi K, Satoh H, et al (2000) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the gall-

bladder. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7:226–230

25. Yano T, Ishikura H, Wada T, et al (1999) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Histopathology (Oxf) 35:90–92

26. Ishikura H, Kanda M, Ito M, et al (1990) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a distinctive histologi- cal subtype of alpha-fetoprotein-producing lung carcinoma. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 417:73–80

(6)

27. Arnould L, Drouot F, Fargeot P, et al (1997) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung: report of a case of an unusual a-fetoprotein-producing lung tumor. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1113–1118 28. Ishikura H, Ishiguro T, Enatsu C, et al (1991) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis

producing alpha-fetoprotein of hepatic type and bile pigment. Cancer (Phila) 67:3051–3056 29. Sinard J, Macleay L Jr, Melamed J (1994) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma in the urinary bladder.

Unusual localization of a newly recognized tumor type. Cancer (Phila) 73:1919–1925 30. Hoshida Y, Nagakawa T, Mano S, et al (1996) Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium

associated with alpha-fetoprotein production. Int J Gynecol Pathol 15:266–269

31. Takahashi Y, Inoue T (2003) Hepatoid carcinoma of the uterus that collided with carci- nosarcoma. Pathol Int 53:323–326

32. Yoyoda H, Hirai T, Ishii E (2000) Alpha-fetoprotein producing uterine corpus carcinoma:

a hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Pathol Int 50:847–852

33. Aoyama T, Mizuno T, Andoh K, et al (1996)a-Fetoprotein-producing (hepatoid) carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Gynecol Oncol 63:261–266

34. Ishikura H, Scully RE (1987) Hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary. A newly described tumor.

Cancer (Phila) 60:2775–2784

35. Senzaki H, Kiyozuka Y, Mizuoka H, et al (1999) An autopsy case of hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary with PIVKA-II production: immunohistochemical study and literature review.

Pathol Int 49:164–169

36. Badreddine J, Rabouille Y, Heron JF, et al (1993) Ovarian tumor with hepatoid differentia- tion. Discussion and review of the literature. Report of a case. Ann Pathol 13:37–39 37. Scurry JP, Brown RW, Jobling T (1996) Combined ovarian serous papillary and hepatoid car-

cinoma. Gynecol Oncol 63:138–142

38. Matsuta M, Ishikura H, Murakami K, et al (1991) Hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary: a case report. Int J Gynecol Pathol 10:302–310

39. Tochigi N, Kishimoto T, Supriatna Y, et al (2003) Hepatoid carcinoma of the ovary: a report of three cases admixed with a common surface epithelial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol 22:266–271

40. Proks C, Feit V (1982) Gastric carcinoma with argyrophil and argentaffin cells. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 395:201–206

41. Lechago J (1994) Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine cell proliferations. Hum Pathol 25:

1114–1122

42. Nozue M, Nishida M, Todoroki T, et al (1991) Establishment and characterization of a human scirrhous type gastric cancer cell line, GCIY, producing CA19–9 (in Japanese). Hum Cell 4:

71–75

43. Matsuda M, Watanabe A, Sawada H, et al (1999) Establishment of an a-fetoprotein-produc- ing cell line derived from gastric cancer. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 35:555–557

44. Sekiguchi M, Fujii Y, Saito A, et al (1995) Alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric carcinoma:

biological properties of a cultured cell line. J Gastroenterol 30:589–598

45. Nakaya H, Ishizu A, Ikeda H, et al (2003) In vitro model of suicide gene therapy for alpha- fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 23:3795–3800

46. Warburton D, Wuenschell C, Flores-Delgado G, et al (1998) Commitment and differentia- tion of lung cell lineages. Biochem Cell Biol 76:971–995

47. Schrem H, Klempnauer J, Borlak J (2002) Liver-enriched transcription factors in liver func- tion and development. Part I: The hepatocyte nuclear factor network and liver-specific gene expression. Pharmacol Rev 54:129–158

48. Schrem H, Klempnauer J, Borlak J (2004) Liver-enriched transcription factors in liver func- tion and development. Part II: The C/EBPs and D site-binding protein in cell cycle control, carcinogenesis, circadian gene regulation, liver regeneration, apoptosis, and liver-specific gene regulation. Pharmacol Rev 56:291–330

49. Liu Y, Rao MS (2003) Transdifferentiation: fact or artifact. J Cell Biochem 88:29–40 50. Scarpelli DG, Rao MS (1981) Differentiation of regenerating pancreatic cells into hepato-

cyte-like cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:2577–2581

(7)

51. Rao MS, Subbarao V, Scarpelli DG (1988) Development of hepatocytes in the pancreas of hamsters treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Toxicol Environ Health 25:

201–205

52. Shen CN, Horb ME, Slack JM, et al (2003) Transdifferentiation of pancreas to liver. Mech Dev 120:107–116

53. Combates NJ, Rzepka RW, Chen YN, et al (1994) NF-IL6, a member of the C/EBP family of transcription factors, binds and trans-activates the human MDR1 gene. J Biol Chem 269:

29715–29719

Fig. 1. Hepatoid adenocarci- noma of the stomach. A 5¥ 8 cm, circumscribed mass with ulcera- tion is seen in the body of the stomach in a 76-year-old man.

Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was 7600 ng/ml

Fig. 2. Sheetlike proliferation of polygonal carcinoma cells with abundant, eosinophilic cyto- plasm in a hepatoid adenocarci- noma. This pattern was once regarded as “patternless,”

resulting in the designation of this area as poorly differentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma.

Thin networks of microvessels give an appearance of vague thick trabeculae

Color Plates

(8)

Fig. 3. Sheetlike proliferation of polygonal carcinoma cells with abundant, eosinophilic cyto- plasm in a hepatoid adenocarci- noma. Anastomosing networks of capillaries are dilated in several areas, giving the appear- ance of a distinct middle trabec- ular pattern

Fig. 4. Sheetlike proliferation of polygonal carcinoma cells with abundant, eosinophilic cyto- plasm in a hepatoid adenocar- cinoma. Capillary networks are incomplete. Middle-to-thin trabeculae are conspicuous

Fig. 5. Cords and sheets of hyperchromatic carcinoma cells in a hepatoid adenocarcinoma.

Glandlike spaces are filled with mucin. Cytoplasm of these tumor cells is abundant and eosinophilic, giving the appear- ance of hepatoid cells

(9)

Fig. 7. Close apposition of adenocarcinoma (right) and hepatoid cells (left). There is a transition between these areas at the middle upper portion of the figure

Fig. 8. Production of bile pigment in a hepatoid adenocar- cinoma. Only a limited number of cases show bile production, but this finding demonstrates a clear-cut hepatocellular differentiation

Fig. 6. Adenocarcinoma seen in the mucosal layer of a hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

Note the transition of tall, columnar, mucin-producing adenocarcinoma cells to hepa- toid cells with large eosinophilic cytoplasm

(10)

Fig. 9. Canalicular structures in a hepatoid adenocarcinoma. These structures are intermingled in the hepatoid portion, and positive for polyclonal anticarcinoembryonic antigen antibodies.

Given that these antibodies cross-react with biliary glycoprotein, the morphological finding in combination with this immunohistochemical finding suggests a development of bile canaliculi in hepatoid adenocarcinoma cells, even in the absence of visible bile pigment

Fig. 10. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive hyaline globules in a hepatoid adenocarcinoma

Fig. 11. Hepatoid adenocarci- noma with no obvious AFP pro- duction. There was no elevation in the patient’s serum AFP level.

Immunostaining for AFP was negative. Vascular permeation was extensive, and multiple liver metastases were seen.

The histopathological pattern indicated a hepatoid adenocarcinoma

(11)

Fig. 12. Extensive vascular involvement seen in the primary gastric wall in a hepatoid adeno- carcinoma

Fig. 13a,b. Gross appearance of hepatoid adenocarcinoma with wormlike tumor thrombi within veins in the gastric serosa. a A mucosal view of the primary gastric hepatoid adenocarci- noma. b A serosal view. Adipose tissues surrounding the veins were removed. Note the expanded, wormlike veins radiating from the primary site a

b

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Sono i due nuovi coinquilini della vecchia casa di Thomas e Emma, che sentono “the piano playing / Just as a ghost might play”, infatti, il poeta

We will relate the transmission matrix introduced earlier for conductance and shot noise to a new concept: the Green’s function of the system.. The Green’s functions represent the

amount of bacteria in riPiri that was isolated directly from barley roots, and the steady decrease during axenic subculture suggest that a plant host promotes the propagation of

This association is often attributed to the presence of antioxidants such as ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and polyphenols. The substances that hinder the presence of free radicals are

endobacteria partial 16S rRNA gene sequences retrieved from AM spores 21. within the

The semifielel pIane wit.h kernel GF(2) de- rivcs t.he DempwoIff pIane of order 16 which admit.s SL(2, 4) as a collineation gronp.. Furt.hermore, t.he kernel of the Demp\Volff pIane

It is submitted that the probable intention of the drafters of the Restatement (Second) was to achieve a balance (in section 187 (2) (a)) between the older reasonable

(Previously undetected errors may need to be corrected, or it might be necessary to write a new but similar program, but those are different matters.) An automobile is a piece