• Non ci sono risultati.

- Linear and angular momentum in terms of signed area information

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "- Linear and angular momentum in terms of signed area information"

Copied!
17
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Lecture 2

Vortex knots dynamics and momenta of a tangle:

- Localized Induction Approximation (LIA) and Non-Linear Schrödinger (NLS) equation

- Integrable vortex dynamics and LIA hierarchy - Torus knot solutions to LIA

- Linear and angular momentum in terms of signed area information

Selected references

Maggioni, F, Alamri, SZ, Barenghi, CF & Ricca, RL 2010 Velocity, energy and helicity of vortex knots and unknots. Phys Rev E 82, 26309.

Ricca, RL 1993 Torus knots and polynomial invariants for a class of soliton equations. Chaos 3, 83 [Erratum. Chaos 5, 346].

Ricca, RL 2008 Momenta of a vortex tangle by structural complexity

analysis. Physica D 237, 2223.

(2)

Localized induction approximation (LIA) homogeneous

incompressible

inviscid fluid in : in

as

∇ ⋅ u = 0

u = 0 X → ∞ u = u X,t ( )

ω = ∇ × u

R

3

R

3

Space curve , given by: C

t

C

t

: X(s,t) := X

t

(s) ∈ C

ν

s∈ [0,L] → R

3

Intrinsic reference on , given by:

(Frenet frame) C

t

ˆ t := ′ X (s,t) =X

s { ˆ t , ˆ n , ˆ b }

Vortex line on : C

t

ˆ t

n ˆ

b ˆ

C

t

ω = ω

0

ˆ t ω

0

, = constant circulation = constant asymptotic theory: κ

R / a >> 1

X(s,t) = X

t = ′ X × ′′ X = c ˆb = u

LIA

(Da Rios 1906; Hama & Arms 1961 )

(3)

Intrinsic equations under LIA and NonLinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation Intrinsic description: , curvature, torsion;

u = (u

t

,u

n

,u

b

)

under LIA: , , . u

LIA

= cˆ b u

t

= u

n

= 0 u

b

= c

C

t

:= ϕ

t

(C)

c = −(c ˙ τ ) − ′ ′ c τ

τ ˙ = c − c ′ ′ τ

2

c

+ ′ c c

Da Rios 1906 Betchov 1965

NLS eq. via Madelung transform:

c s,t ( ) τ s,t ( )

ψ s,t ( ) = c s,t ( ) e

i 0τ ξ , t

( )

d

s ξ

c

τ

ψ R

2

C

Intrinsic equations by log-derivative:

let and consider

(Hasimoto 1972)

ℜe ℑm

i ψ + ′′ ψ +

12

ψ

2

ψ = 0

NLS eq.:

Da Rios- Betchov eqs .

Θ s,t ( ) =

0s

τ ξ ( ) ,t d ξ ψ = c e

iΘ

(4)

Integrable vortex dynamics and LIA hierarchy Integrable vortex dynamics:

: inhomogeneities

(Lakshmanan & Ganesan 1985) β , δ

: non-linear stretching

(Onuki 1985) γ

: axial flow and vorticity

(Fukumoto & Miyazaki 1991)

u = α + βs ( ) b + γ + δs ( ) t + µ ˆ (

12

c

2

ˆ t + ′ c ˆ n + cτˆ b )

µ

LIA hierarchy:

u ( )

0

= u

LIA

(Langer & Perline 1991)

(Nakayama et al. 1992)

NLSE mKdV sine-G … … Hirota class

… … …

ψ ˙ = P

ψ

( u

n

e

) + Q

ψ

( u

b

e

)

integrable class:

u ( )

j+1

= ˆt × ˆt +c s,t ( ) ( u

b

( )

j

+ τ u

n

( )

j

) ds ˆt =

ν =1j+1

F

ν

u s

ν

( )

0

= R u ( ) ( )

0

(5)

Stationary solutions: Hasimoto soliton

(Hasimoto 1972)

τ = const.

c s ( ) = 2 sech s ( )

(6)

Steady solutions to LIA: torus knots and unknots

T

p, q

p > 1 q > 1

Theorem (Ricca 1993). LIA admits torus knot solutions in closed analytic form, given by: T

p, q

r = r

0

+ ε sin w ( ) ξ α = s

r

0

+ ε

wr

0

cos w ( ) ξ z = t

r

0

+ ε 1− 1 w

2

1/2

cos w ( ) ξ r

2

= F

r

( ) J , , . α = F

α

( ) E z = F

z

( ) Π

. Theorem (Kida 1981). There exists

a class of steady torus knot solutions ( , co-prime integers) to

LIA in terms of incomplete elliptic integrals, given by Look for stationary solutions to LIA in the

shape of torus knots and unknots:

(Da Rios 1933)

(7)

Proof. First let’s write LIA in terms of cartesian coordinates

(x, y, z) and cylindrical polar coordinates (r, α , z) .

From

and x = r cos α , y = r sin α , z , by taking time-derivative, we have

u

LIA

= X(s,t) = ′ X × ′′ X

and by the last equality of , we have

(∗) (∗∗)

(∗)

.

We now take the arc-length derivative of and substitute in the above, to get LIA in cylindrical polar coordinates: (∗∗)

.

(∗∗∗)

(8)

. Small-amplitude perturbations are given by taking

.

By substituting these into and taking first-order terms, we have (∗∗∗)

r = r

0

+ ε sin w ( ) ξ α = s

r

0

+ ε

wr

0

cos w ( ) ξ z = t

r

0

+ ε 1− 1 w

2

1/2

cos w ( ) ξ . By looking for a traveling-wave solution ξ = s– κ t as torus knot, we have

Now let’s consider small-amplitude perturbations. For the vortex ring

we have r = R , and α = s/R , so that previous equations reduce to

(9)

Small-amplitude torus knots and unknots under LIA

torus knots

torus unknots

(10)

Linear stability of LIA torus knots

(Ricca et al 1999)

T

2, 3

w > 1 ( ) T

3, 2

w < 1 ( )

Theorem (Ricca 1995). For any given , is linearly stable

iff . w = q / p

w > 1 T

p, q

(11)

LIA knots and unknots ,

(Maggioni et al. 2010)

T

p,q

U

1,m

U

m,1

(12)

Creation and dynamics of trefoil vortex knot in water

(Klecker & Irvine 2013)

(13)

Linear and angular momentum by signed area information

Let denote the centreline of a vortex filament with ( ). χ ω = ω

0

ˆt ω

0

= cst.

Theorem (Ricca 2008). The components of linear and angular

momentum of a vortex filament of circulation Γ , given respectively by

P = (P

x

, P

y

, P

z

) and M = (M

x

,M

y

,M

z

) , can be expressed in terms of signed areas of the projected graph regions:

.

,

(14)

- the linear momentum is given by

- the angular momentum is given by

Λ = ˆ ν ( χ ) :

3

2

How to compute ?

For individual components, we have

P

x

: Λ

x

A

x

= A ( ) Λ

x

Let denote the vortex axis: ( ) , and ; χ ω = ω

0

ˆt ω

0

= cst.

X = ˆt = dX ds

, since , we have and

Proof.

X ds = dX

and

P

y

: Λ

y

A

y

= A ( ) Λ

y

P

z

: Λ

z

A

z

= A ( ) Λ

z

and and

where denotes the standard graph projected along the x -axis and the signed area of . Similarly for the y - and z -axis and M

x

, M

y

, M

z

.

. P = 1

2 X × ω d

3

X

V ω

( )

= 1 2 Γ

L χ

( ) X × ′ X ds = Γ

A χ

( ) d

2

X

M = 1

3 ∫

V ω

( ) X × X × ( ω ) d

3

X = 1 3 Γ

L χ

( ) X × X × ′ ( X ) ds = 2 3 Γ

A χ

( ) d

2

X

(15)

Computation of signed area of a planar graph

ˆt +1 ρ ˆ

R

χ

To each sub-region of Λ we assign an index that weights the relative contribution from the circulation of neighbouring strands:

R

j

where according to the r.h.

sign convention of the reference .

3

2

where is the standard area of .

The signed area of Λ is thus given by +1

–1

–2 –1

0

(16)

Thus, by the standard definitions of momenta and the observations above we have:

P = 1

2 Γ X × ′ X ds

L χ

( )

= Γ

A( χ )

d

2

X = Γ

M = 1

3 Γ ∫

L χ( )

X × X × ′ ( X ) ds = 2 3 Γ

A( χ )

X × d

2

X = 2 3 Γ

where , and the signed areas of the projected graphs.

Computation of signed area of interacting vortices ( Γ=1 )

Corollary. The components of linear and angular momentum of a

vortex tangle T can be computed in terms of signed areas of the

projected graph regions.

(17)

Head-on collision of vortex rings

a b

(Lim & Nickels 1992)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The parameters ν′ and a′ estimated by ActiveAx orig (top) and ActiveAx amico with two levels of regularization (λ = 0 in the middle andλ = 0.1 at the bottom) on each

I risultati dimostrano che, diminuendo la coppia magnetica e variando la condizione iniziale imposta alle ali del cursore (all’aumentare della distanza, e quindi al diminuire

Nel tentativo di regolamentare questo settore, in parte anche in risposta all’intenzione di una società produttrice di test diretti al consumatore (Pathway

The control regions are chosen to be kinematically close to the corresponding signal region, to minimize the systematic un- certainty associated with extrapolating the background

Although the two variants dis- played very similar structures under conditions that stabilize highly disordered or highly ordered states, differences emerged in the intermediate

Detta assistenza infermieristica, preventiva, curativa, palliativa e riabilitativa, è di natura tecnica, relazionale, educativa. Le loro principali funzioni sono la

Di particolare interesse rispetto alle teorie dell’epoca sono alcune opere di carattere generale, che, accanto ad altre “non strettamente botaniche”, ci riportano indietro