The role for fetal Doppler sonography includes de- tecting fetal growth restriction (FGR), serving as a modality for fetal surveillance, predicting adverse neonatal events, and determining the optimal time for delivery. Multiple-gestation pregnancies afford a unique opportunity for fetal Doppler application, as abnormalities in growth and potential disturbances of the fetal circulation are relatively common. Doppler data add a physiologic parameter not previously available to the clinician. By reflecting downstream resistance to flow in the umbilical artery, it serves as an accurate proxy for placental insufficiency [1]. By including the cerebral circulation, inferences may be made as to the redistribution of fetal blood flow un- der conditions of chronic asphyxial stress, while mul- tiple vessel interrogation is useful in studying the ex- tremes of circulatory changes seen in some mono- chorionic twins with twin transfusion syndrome (TTS). In multiple as in singleton pregnancies, appli- cation of fetal Doppler velocimetry permits the assessment of the sequence of fetal cardiovascular adjustment to asphyxial stress in the arterial and venous circulations yielding useful insights into the timing of delivery.
Among the risks for multiple gestations listed in Table 20.1, Doppler velocimetry helps define the sta- tus of the fetus with restricted growth, TTS, and con- genital anomalies. In these instances Doppler infor- mation facilitates the appropriate and selective appli- cation of perinatal resources. For decisions regarding patient management, Doppler data become a part of
the clinical mosaic to be used in tandem with other historical, examination, sonographic, laboratory, and biophysical data.
Twin Prevalence
The prevalence of twin gestation varies from 1 to 5%
depending on the gestational age at assessment, as a significant number of twins suffer intrauterine fetal demise of one of the pair [2]. The overall incidence of spontaneous twin gestations has declined, but re- productive technologies, including ovulation induc- tion and surgical transfer of gametes or ova, have re- sulted in an increasing number of high-order multi- ple gestations [2].
Twin Placentation
Twins are derived from either a single ovum (mono- zygotic) or two ova (dizygotic). Dizygotic twinning is influenced by maternal central gonadotropin levels [3, 4] and varies among ethnic groups. For example, Nigerian women have a high level and frequency of twinning and Japanese women have a low level and frequency. Occurring at a fixed rate of 1 per 250 births, proportionately more complications occur in twin monozygotic pregnancies probably owing to both placental vascular anastomosis and placental asymmetry [5, 6].
Because dizygotic twin pregnancies arise from two entirely separate placental disks, each gestational sac has one amnion, one chorion, and rare vascular anas- tomosis [5]. Diamniotic dichorionic gestations ac- count for about 80% of all twin pregnancies, and their placentas may be fused or separate [7]. This type of placentation also may include monozygotic twins if the zygote divides early after fertilization.
The type of placentation seen in a given monozygotic twin pregnancy depends on when in development splitting occurs [8]. If division of the ovum occurs before the chorion develops in the first 2 or 3 days, a diamniotic dichorionic gestation will result [8]. If the split occurs between 3 and 8 days post-fertilization, a
Doppler Velocimetry and Multiple Gestation
Emanuel P. Gaziano, Ursula F. Harkness
Table 20.1. Major complications: multiple gestation preg- nancy
Preterm labor Fetal malformations
Intrauterine growth restriction Fetal loss (vanishing twin) Twin-transfusion syndrome
Amniotic fluid volume changes: polyhydramnios, oligo- hydramnios
Preeclampsia
Cord prolapse or entanglement
Birth trauma
diamniotic monochorionic gestation will result [8].
Monoamniotic monochorionic pregnancies occur when the division occurs between days 8 and 13 after fertilization [8]. Any pregnancy that splits later than this develops into conjoined twins [8]. The type of
placentation is important since this factor defines the relative risks for vascular anastomosis and the com- plications that result in the greatest fetal morbidity.
Growth restriction may have a different mechanism in fetuses from dizygotic pregnancies than in those from a monozygotic pregnancy [9].
Figure 20.1 shows the relation of amnion to chor- ion and the dividing membrane in diamniotic dichor- ionic (DADC), diamniotic monochorionic (DAMC), and monoamniotic monochorionic (MAMC) placen- tation; the latter is rare, accounting for 1% of all twin pregnancies [7]. The number of amnion/chorion layers present in the dividing membrane is also shown in Fig. 20.1. The ultrasonographic appearance of the thicker diamniotic dichorionic dividing mem- brane is apparent in Fig. 20.2. Monochorionic placen- tation (20% of all twins) is associated with artery-to- artery (AA), artery-to-vein (AV), and vein-to-vein (VV) superficial anastomosis, although deep capillary villous anastomoses are also possible (Fig. 20.3) [5, 7, 10]. All gradations of anastomoses are possible;
hence, the variable clinical presentations and variable Doppler velocimetry findings observed. Most cases of twin transfusion occur with diamniotic monochorio- Fig. 20.1. Type of placentation and relative risks for twin pregnancies. A amnion, C chorion, TTS twin-transfusion syn- drome, FGR fetal growth restriction
Fig. 20.2. Dividing membrane in dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. Note the anterior and posterior placentas and relative thickness of the dividing membrane
May be abnormal in presence
of growth restriction, anomaly,
chromosome abnormality
nic placentation, and perinatal mortality (25%±50%) occurs principally with this type of placentation com- pared with the 10% mortality in the diamniotic di- chorionic group [2, 11].
Figure 20.4 demonstrates a monoamniotic mono- chorionic twin gestation and no dividing membrane.
These fetuses are at risk for cord entanglement and death. Recently, 50% mortality was reported for preg- nancies with monoamniotic monochorionic placenta- tion [12].
Fetal Doppler and Complications of Multiple Gestation
In the United States, the infant mortality rate among multiple births was more than five times higher than among singleton births in both 1989 and 1999 [13]
and the perinatal mortality was similarly increased [14]. Two-thirds of the perinatal losses before 30
weeks occur at gestational ages of 26 weeks or less [15]. Whereas multiple gestations resulted in 3% of live births in 2000, 14% of infant deaths in the same year were multiples [16].
Studies on multiple gestations have focused on using fetal Doppler data in three clinical areas: (a) identification or prediction of growth restriction; (b) the TTS; and (c) prediction of perinatal morbidity and mortality. We address the use of Doppler velo- cimetry for each of these separately.
Growth Restriction and Discordance
Prior to 30 weeks' gestation, the major causes of neo- natal death relate to immaturity while stillbirths due to growth restriction contribute a significant number of perinatal losses after 32 weeks' gestation [15].
Growth restriction occurs in one-fourth of multiple gestations [17]. Representing 1% of pregnancies, twins account for 12% of early neonatal deaths and 17% of all growth-restricted infants [17]. Triplets and other higher-order multiple gestations also lend a dis- proportionate contribution to the number of growth- restricted fetuses.
Evaluation of Fetal Growth
Two methods are used to evaluate fetal growth in multiple pregnancies: (a) growth discordance (differ- ences in fetal weight frequently expressed as a per- cent); and (b) longitudinal assessment of the weight or growth for the individual fetus.
Since the introduction of Babson et al.'s correlation between severe growth discordance and neonatal de- velopmental delay [18], the concept of differences in weight (discordance) has gained popularity. No uni- form cutoff value is reported for growth discordance, although 15% or more birth-weight difference be- tween twins is considered mild discordance, and more than 25% birth-weight difference is classified as Fig. 20.3. Deep arteriove-
nous anastomosis in mono- chorionic diamniotic twin placentation. Twin-to-twin transfer. IUGR intrauterine growth restriction, AGA ap- propriate-for-gestational age
Fig. 20.4. Monochorionic monoamniotic twin placentation
with no dividing membrane. Umbilical cords from the
twins are entangled
severe discordance [19±22]. When the weight differ- ence between twins is >25%, perinatal death rate is increased by a factor of 2.5 and risk of fetal death is increased by a factor of 6.5 [23].
Differences in ultrasound measurement parameters or Doppler indices in twins are commonly reported as the percent difference and are expressed as delta change or intrapair difference. A number of studies [24±35] rely upon the discordance concept and have reported Doppler results accordingly.
The advent of high-resolution real-time ultraso- nography and duplex Doppler systems diminishes the need to view multiple gestations only in terms of dis- cordance because the individual fetus in multiple ges- tations can be independently and accurately assessed.
Expressing either Doppler or estimated fetal weight (EFW) differences between twins is less useful, as neonatal morbidity appears to be best predicted by individual fetal assessment. Using 30% disparity in birth weight, O'Brien et al. [36] were able to deter- mine only one in five growth-restricted twins. Bron- steen and colleagues [37] evaluated 131 consecutive sets of surviving infants and showed that individual evaluation for intrauterine growth was more effective than discordance or other classifications for predict- ing adverse neonatal outcomes. Regarding neonatal morbidity among twins, neither birth-weight discor- dance of >20% or >25% was a factor for predicting adverse events compared with individual birth-weight percentiles of <15th and <10th, respectively. The most clinically relevant outcomes, such as neonatal death, congenital anomalies, small for gestational age (SGA) and periventricular leukomalacia, are defined by a birth-weight difference of 30% [38]. In a study of 192 twin pairs who had ultrasound within 16 days of delivery, intertwin estimated fetal weight discor- dance of 25% or more had a sensitivity of 55%, spec- ificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 82%, and negative predictive value of 91% for predicting actual birth-weight discordance [39]. The antepartum diag- nosis of discordance was correct in 4 of 5 cases; how- ever, discordance may be overdiagnosed in almost 20% of cases and almost half of the significantly dis- cordant twin pairs were missed.
Gaziano et al. [33] focus on the individual fetus and classify the Doppler value, EFW, abdominal cir- cumference, or other measurement parameter for each fetus as a percentile for the gestational age at which it is obtained. Deter et al. [40, 41] recom- mended multiple individual parameter assessment (individualized growth assessment) for the twin fetus suspected of growth restriction. This approach simp- lifies interpretation of clinical data, allowing the fetus to be followed over time and permitting focused sur- veillance.
Doppler Sonographic Prediction of Fetal Growth Restriction
A number of difficulties are inherent in assessing the fetal Doppler results and their relationship to growth restriction. Firstly, the heterogeneous cause of FGR in singletons also apply to multiple gestations and can be broadly categorized as follows: (a) malformations, intrauterine infections, or chromosomal abnormali- ties; (b) maternal vascular and nutritional deficits;
and (c) constitutionally small fetuses. In addition, causes specifically related to twins must be consid- ered, such as twin transfusion, primary uterine or placental pathology, and anomalies due to the twin- ning process. Secondly, although the umbilical ar- teries are relatively accessible compared with the internal fetal vessels, careful establishment of individ- ual fetal circulations by real-time ultrasonography is necessary to prevent sampling the same umbilical circulation twice. This point is particularly impor- tant for suspected TTS, as the smaller ªstuckº twin with oligohydramnios may be relatively difficult to image. Thirdly, studies differ in instrumentation, pulsed-wave vs continuous-wave (CW) technology, and the resistance index selected: systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D); pulsatility index (PI); or resistance index (RI). A variety of end points for Doppler-diagnosed ab- normalities are reported. Outcomes may be reported as birth-weight differences of >20% or >25% and the cut- off for defining growth restriction is reported at var- ious percentile ranges (<10th, <5th, or <2.5th). Final- ly, the latter definitions for FGR, as for singletons, are not always satisfactory, as some constitutionally small twins are normal in all other respects, while some ªnormalº-weight fetuses may be growth restricted.
Pathologic studies suggest an anatomic lesion in some cases of FGR. For example, histologic examina- tion of placentas shows fewer placental tertiary stem villi in twin pregnancies complicated by ªplacental in- sufficiencyº and abnormal S/D ratios than in fetuses with normal S/D ratios [42]. These findings are simi- lar to those observed in some singleton pregnancies with FGR and suggest a placental vascular pathology rather than a uteroplacental one [1, 42]. Furthermore, in twin pregnancies the PO
2levels in the individual fetus appear unaffected among a wide range of um- bilical RI values [43]. Differences in the RIs for twin fetuses were of little value for detecting PO
2differ- ences until the differences in the RI between the fetuses was 76% [43].
Doppler prediction for fetal growth restriction has been evaluated by a number of investigators [24±35].
Table 20.2 summarizes the experience of these inves-
tigators, indicating the method of assessment, out-
come variable measured, and the sensitivity for SGA
prediction.
Pioneering studies reported by Giles et al. [24] and Farmakides et al. [25] were conducted with CW Dop- pler, and the S/D ratio (A/B ratio) differences be- tween twins were correlated with the birth of an SGA infant. Index ratio differences of >0.40 or 1.57 dem- onstrated sensitivities of 73% and 70%, respectively.
In a study of 56 twin pregnancies using real-time and pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasonography, an abnor- mal Doppler result predicted a weight discordance of
>25% with a sensitivity of 82% [26]. Adequate fetal growth was accurately predicted in 44 of 45 normal sets of fetuses and discordant growth in 9 of 11 twin sets. A 50% sensitivity has been demonstrated for un- satisfactory outcomes using abnormal umbilical ar- tery Doppler sonography as an end point. One such adverse outcome was SGA which was found in 9 of 11 fetuses [27]. A 42% positive predictive value for the birth of an SGA infant has been reported when the intrapair difference for the S/D ratio was >0.4 [28].
Some investigators report no difference between ul- trasound-derived EFW and the S/D ratio (intrapair differences of >15%) for predicting the birth of dis- cordant-weight twins (>15% birth weight) [29]. Both
methods showed a sensitivity of 78% for these pa- rameters [29]. Yamada et al. [31] demonstrated a sen- sitivity of 75% for a birth-weight difference of >20%
when the umbilical artery PI difference between twins was >0.5, similar to the 78% sensitivity reported by Kurmanvicius et al. for birth weight discordance [34].
In summary, of the studies reviewed, a disparity was observed for FGR prediction among the investi- gators, and one-third noted sensitivities of <50%.
Ultrasonographic Biometry and Fetal Doppler Studies
Ultrasonographically detected differences in discor- dant growth pairs can be seen as early as 23±24 weeks, with the smaller twin exhibiting a slow rate of growth between 33 and 37 weeks (Fig. 20.5) [44]. In pathologic twins, differences can be suggested as early as the beginning of the second trimester.
Ultrasound measurements, such as the biparietal diameter (BPD), are insensitive predictors of neonatal growth discordance [23]. In twin gestations the BPD is determined in only 79% of all fetuses, whereas Table 20.2. Fetal growth restriction prediction using umbilical artery in twin-gestation pregnancies. CW continuous-wave Doppler, S/D systolic/diastolic ratio, SGA small-for-gestational age, GA gestational age, PI pulsatility index, EFW estimated fetal weight, RI resistance index, US ultrasonography
Reference No. of twin
pregnancies Method of assessment Outcome variable Sensitivity (%) [24] 76 CW; S/D ratio differences of 1.57
or >75th percentile difference Birth of SGA infant 70 [25] 43 CW; S/D ratio differences between
twins of >0.4 Birth of SGA infant 73
[26] 56 Duplex pulsed Doppler;
abnormal Doppler value for GA Weight discordance >25% 82
[27] 30 Duplex pulsed Doppler;
percent difference PI umbilical artery Unfavorable outcome
(9 of 11 were SGA) 50
[28] 69 CW after real-time US;
S/D difference >0.4 Birth of SGA infant 42
a[29] 58 Real-time US followed by CW;
delta S/D or EFW >15% Birth-weight discordance
>15% 78
[30] 89 CW after real-time US Birth of SGA infant
(25th percentile) 29
[31] 31 Duplex pulsed Doppler PI
difference >0.5 Birth-weight difference
>20% 75
[32] 37 Duplex pulsed Doppler;
abnormal Doppler value for GA Birth of SGA infant
(<10th percentile) 58
[33] 94 Duplex pulsed Doppler;
abnormal S/D >95th percentile for GA Birth of SGA infant
(<10th percentile) 44
[34] 32 Delta RI Birth-weight discordance 78
[35] 40 Pulsed Doppler/mechanical sector
scanner; PI difference >0.2 Birth of SGA infant 42
a