ANSI / FM Approvals 2510 flood abatement equipment test standard Frédéric Kravetz

Testo completo

(1)E3S Web of Conferences 7, 13005 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0713005. ANSI / FM Approvals 2510 flood abatement equipment test standard Frédéric Kravetz 1. 1,a. FM Approvals France, 8 cours du Triangle 92937 La Défense Cedex, France. Abstract. Natural hazards, including flooding, continue to be the leading cause of commercial and industrial property damage worldwide. Until recently, there has been a limited amount of readily available guidance on choosing flood abatement protection. FM Approvals, a divi

(2)

(3) working together with the Association of State Floodplain Managers and the US Army Corps of Engineers have developed a National Flood Barrier Test Program after recognizing the urgent demand for reliable flood abatement products to mitigate potential losses. This lead to the ANSI/ FM2510 flood abatement equipment standard.. 1. Flood risk and facts Flooding is one of the most complex property risks facing property owners and insurers alike. Ongoing analysis by the FM Approvals parent company, FM Global, shows that a property located within a published flood zone is five to seven times more likely to suffer a flood loss than to suffer an equivalent loss due to fire or explosion. In addition, the average flood loss is about 1.5 times as great as the average fire loss. As England emerges from one of its wettest winter on record, a study published in the journal Nature Climate Change predicts that average annual flood damage losses

(4) n by 2050, compared !

(5)

(6) """ "# [1]. In 2011, Bangkok flooding reportedly "

(7) damages [2], more than 14000 companies [3] have been touched. The supply chain upstream companies have had an international repercussion because of all electronic components manufacturing used for automotive and hard disk drives. This latter shortage lasted more than one year to be compensated. FM Global studies show that flooding costs companies an $

(8) losses annually worldwide%making it the most costly natural hazard globally. For facilities in the planning stages, the simple solution to flood risk is to locate the facility outside of the high-and moderate-hazard flood zone and levee/floodwall failure inundation areas, and design the site to ensure all stormwater drainage systems are adequate. In some cases, a Corresponding author: frederic.kravetz@fmapprovals.com. flood risk can be reduced by using fill to elevate the building site above the 500-year flood level. However, approximately one in 10 industrial facilities is located within a flood zone. Facilities at risk for flooding must prepare well in advance in order to keep water out of critical buildings and limit resulting damages.. 2. Proactive flood protection is the right choice for flood-prone properties

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13) .

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

(27)

(28)

(29)

(30)

(31)

(32) ! x x x.

(33)

(34)

(35)

(36)

(37)

(38) "

(39)

(40)

(41) "

(42)

(43)

(44)

(45) .

(46)

(47)

(48)

(49)

(50)

(51)

(52) "

(53)

(54)

(55) #$%& $

(56)

(57) '

(58) $ (

(59) $

(60) ) *+,* $

(61) & &

(62) &&-./&

(63) &

(64) &&&

(65) & -01&

(66) &

(67) &

(68) &2&. © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)..

(69) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 13005 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0713005. <

(70)

(71) "

(72)

(73)

(74) 3

(75)

(76)

(77)

(78) 7 >

(79)

(80)

(81) ! . x :

(82)

(83)

(84)

(85) >

(86)

(87)

(88) x

(89) > B

(90) x >

(91)

(92)

(93) x

(94) >

(95)

(96) x 4

(97)

(98)

(99)

(100)

(101)

(102) .

(103)

(104)

(105)

(106)

(107)

(108)

(109)

(110) .

(111) . 4.1 Perimeter barriers. :

(112)

(113)

(114)

(115)

(116)

(117)

(118)

(119) 5 7

(120)

(121)

(122)

(123)

(124) C 5

(125)

(126)

(127) C

(128) C C

(129)

(130)

(131) 8 7 ,9 . 7

(132)

(133)

(134)

(135) 5

(136)

(137) , . 3. FM Approved flood protection

(138)

(139)

(140)

(141)

(142)

(143)

(144) 3

(145) 4 the SMARTeST project (Smart Resilient Technologies, Systems and Tools) ' () Research Program, was conceived in order to address many of the issues of integration of flood resilience technology into the overall approach to flood risk management * y referencing the FM Approvals standard 2510, highlighting its value for assessing flood mitigation products.

(146) . 5

(147)

(148) .

(149)

(150) 3

(151)

(152) ( 6

(153) 7

(154)

(155) 6 84)7 4

(156) )

(157)

(158) 7

(159)

(160) 9

(161)

(162) &

(163)

(164) & : & ;

(165) 2& <=& &

(166) &

(167)

(168)

(169)

(170) 3

(171)

(172) 4

(173)

(174)

(175)

(176)

(177)

(178) 3

(179)

(180)

(181)

(182)

(183)

(184)

(185)

(186) <

(187)

(188) 3

(189)

(190) .

(191)

(192)

(193)

(194) > 5

(195) . 4. The ANSI/FM2510 standard $

(196) ($<?*@,+

(197)

(198)

(199)

(200)

(201)

(202)

(203)

(204)

(205)

(206) . 7

(207)

(208) A

(209) "

(210) ! x )

(211)

(212) x : x 6 x

(213) . * "

(214) !

(215) "

(216)

(217)

(218)

(219) "

(220) . : 5. <

(221)

(222) &

(223) &

(224) & & & 2& & <=& & &

(225)

(226)

(227) @ ,+ ,@ *+

(228) *@ D+ . 2.

(229) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 13005 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. : . Perimeter barriers include rapidly deployable walls and inflatable tubes that can withstand riverine flooding.. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0713005.

(230)

(231)

(232)

(233) =&&& &2&&. Performance tests for opening barriers, backwater valves and flood mitigation pumps also include simulated realworld conditions. 4.2 Opening barriers For the opening barriers, after completion of the hydrostatic test the test basin is drained of water, the

(234) +

(235) * subjected to the dynamic impact load test. The test consists of hitting the barrier with a 600 Joule force (Fig 2.). 7

(236) ,@+ E

(237)

(238)

(239) ,*

(240) 7

(241)

(242) . * < 5. )

(243)

(244)

(245)

(246)

(247)

(248)

(249)

(250)

(251)

(252)

(253) . )

(254)

(255) !.

(256) )

(257)

(258) . 3.

(259) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 13005 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0713005. 4.3 Backwater valves. 4.5 Manufacturer responsibilities:. 7

(260)

(261)

(262) <

(263)

(264)

(265)

(266)

(267)

(268) .

(269)

(270) "

(271)

(272) ". $

(273) !. x 7

(274)

(275)

(276)

(277) . x 7

(278) 7 ,+

(279)

(280) 3 !. Nominal Size, Volume of Collected Water, Inches Fl oz (mL) 1.5 5.5 (163) 2 9.5 (281) 3 21.5 (636) 4 38.5 (1139) 6 87.0 (2573) 8 153.0 (4525). 4.4 Flood mitigation pumps. "

(281) " "

(282)

(283)

(284) "

(285)

(286)

(287) 3

(288)

(289) "

(290)

(291) "

(292)

(293) . 7

(294)

(295)

(296)

(297) .

(298)

(299)

(300)

(301) .

(302)

(303) #J

(304) G& <

(305)

(306) G& )

(307) &

(308) &

(309)

(310)

(311) &

(312) %2& & && && &&&

(313) &&

(314) &

(315)

(316) "

(317)

(318)

(319)

(320) 5. 5. Loss prevention and insurance

(321)

(322)

(323) .

(324)

(325)

(326)

(327)

(328)

(329)

(330)

(331)

(332)

(333) <

(334)

(335)

(336)

(337) . 5

(338) 3

(339)

(340)

(341)

(342)

(343)

(344)

(345)

(346) .

(347) 5

(348)

(349)

(350)

(351)

(352)

(353)

(354) 84;:9

(355)

(356)

(357) . 7

(358)

(359) "

(360) 5

(361)

(362)

(363)

(364)

(365)

(366)

(367) . 7

(368)

(369)

(370)

(371)

(372) &&

(373) &#&&

(374)

(375) %2. $

(376)

(377)

(378)

(379)

(380)

(381)

(382)

(383) '

(384)

(385)

(386)

(387)

(388)

(389) ? .

(390)

(391) .

(392)

(393)

(394)

(395)

(396)

(397)

(398)

(399)

(400) . 7 >

(401) 7

(402)

(403)

(404) 5

(405)

(406)

(407)

(408)

(409)

(410)

(411)

(412)

(413) " .

(414)

(415) . $

(416)

(417)

(418) ,++F G&=&

(419) && &

(420) &&&&

(421) . 7

(422)

(423)

(424) 7 =&

(425)

(426) .

(427)

(428)

(429)

(430) 7 3

(431)

(432) "

(433)

(434)

(435)

(436) . )

(437)

(438) . 7

(439)

(440)

(441) DDH 2& <=& DDH

(442)

(443)

(444)

(445)

(446)

(447)

(448) . $

(449) ! I $

(450) )

(451) ?) $ J 8,+++

(452) 9 K K

(453) J L

(454) . 4.

(455) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 13005 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. 6. References ,,@, 6

(456) 5:

(457) 7

(458) ( +*+H* ANSI / FM Approvals Standard 2510 % Approval standard for flood abatement equipment ANSI: American National Standard Institute SMARTest D2.3 Final: July 2013 Flood Resilience Technologies [1] Nature Climate Change 4, 264,268 (2014) http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n4/full/nclim ate2124.html -./ http://www.lloyds.com/~/media/files/news%20and%20in sight/global%20underinsurance%20report/case%20studie s/thailand%20flooding.pdf World Bank estimation, December 13, 2011 http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2011/12/13/w orld-bank-supports-thailands-post-floods-recovery-effort [3] THAILAND: Bangkok Braces for Month of Floods by Marwaan Macan-Markar (bangkok) Tuesday, October 25, 2011 Inter Press Service. 5. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0713005.

(459)