• Non ci sono risultati.

k2_2000Hz 0.5 10⋅ 8 kN ⋅m

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "k2_2000Hz 0.5 10⋅ 8 kN ⋅m"

Copied!
13
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

ORIGIN:= 1

STEADY STATE ANALYSIS OF MDOF SYSTEM WITH PROPORTIONAL DAMPING AND FDL

(performed by: Dott. Ing. Simone Caffè - Date: 15/06/2015)

The following example is facing the Stady State analysis of a MDOF system, in which the masses are concentrated in the nodes 2,3,4 and 5 bonded to each other through links whose stiffnes and viscous linear damping assume different intensity values depending on the frequency. The harmonic forces (applied to nodes 2 and 4) depend also on the frequency according to a magnification law described as follows:

Masses and Mass Matrix definitions:

m2:= 20000kg m3:= 10000kg m4:= 5000kg m5:= 2500kg

Ms m2

0 0 0

0 m3

0 0

0 0 m4

0 0 0 0 m5

1

kg

20000 0 0 0

0 10000

0 0

0 0 5000

0 0 0 0 2500

= :=

Link stiffness and damping and definitions:

Link 1: k1_0Hz 2 10 8 kN

m

:= k1_2000Hz 1 10 8 kN

m :=

Link 2: k2_0Hz 1 10 8 kN

m

:= k2_2000Hz 0.5 10 8 kN

m :=

Link 3: k3_0Hz 4 10 8 kN

m

:= k3_2000Hz 2 10 8 kN

m :=

Link 4: k4_0Hz 0.5 10 8 kN

m

:= k4_2000Hz 0.8 10 8 kN

m :=

(2)

Link 1: c1_0Hz 10000 kN s

m

:= c1_2000Hz 5000 kN s

m :=

Link 2: c2_0Hz 5000 kN s

m

:= c2_2000Hz 1000 kN s

m :=

Link 3: c3_0Hz 100 kN s

m

:= c3_2000Hz 3000 kN s

m :=

Link 4: c4_0Hz 500 kN s

m

:= c4_2000Hz 4000 kN s

m :=

Stiffness functions:

It has been considered, for example, a linear stiffness variation depending on frequency:

fmax:= 2000 Hz

k1 f() k1_2000Hz k1_0Hz

fmax f+ k1_0Hz :=

k2 f() k2_2000Hz k2_0Hz

fmax f+ k2_0Hz :=

k3 f() k3_2000Hz k3_0Hz

fmax f+ k3_0Hz :=

k4 f() k4_2000Hz k4_0Hz

fmax f+ k4_0Hz :=

0 500 1 10× 3 1.5 10× 3 2 10× 3

0 1 10× 11 2 10× 11 3 10× 11 4 10× 11

Frequency dependent stiffness

[Hz]

[kN/m]

k1 f() k2 f() k3 f() k4 f()

f

(3)

Linear Viscous Damping functions:

It has been considered, for example, a linear damping variation depending on frequency:

c1 f() c1_2000Hz c1_0Hz

fmax f+ c1_0Hz :=

c2 f() c2_2000Hz c2_0Hz

fmax f+ c2_0Hz :=

c3 f() c3_2000Hz c3_0Hz

fmax f+ c3_0Hz :=

c4 f() c4_2000Hz c4_0Hz

fmax f+ c4_0Hz :=

0 500 1 10× 3 1.5 10× 3 2 10× 3

0 2 10× 6 4 10× 6 6 10× 6 8 10× 6 1 10× 7

Frequency dependent viscous Damping

[Hz]

[kNs/m]

c1 f() c2 f() c3 f() c4 f()

f

Hysteretic Damping functions:

In order to use correctly the FDL in S AP, it has been necessary to convert the linear viscous damping in hysteretic damping.

ch1 f():= c1 f()2πf ch2 f():= c2 f()2πf ch3 f():= c3 f()2πf ch4 f():= c4 f()2πf

(4)

0 200 400 600 800 1 10× 3 0

1 10× 10 2 10× 10 3 10× 10 4 10× 10 5 10× 10

Frequency dependent hysteretic damping

[Hz]

[kN/m]

ch1 f() ch2 f() ch3 f() ch4 f()

f

Stiffness Matrix and Damping Matrix definitions:

Stiffness and Damping Matricies are depending on frequency:

Ks f()

k1 f() +k2 f()

( )

k2 f()

0 0

k2 f()

k2 f() + k3 f()

( )

k3 f()

0

0 k3 f()

k3 f() + k4 f()

( )

k4 f()

0 0 k4 f()

k4 f()

m

N :=

Cs f()

c1 f() +c2 f()

( )

c2 f()

0 0

c2 f()

c2 f() + c3 f()

( )

c3 f()

0

0 c3 f()

c3 f() + c4 f()

( )

c4 f()

0 0 c4 f()

c4 f()

m N s

:=

Modal - superposition Procedure Employing Modes of the undamped structures:

Λ f( ):= Ms1Ks f() System eigen-values:

λ f( ):= sort eigenvals Λ f( ( ( )))

(5)

The undamped natural frequencies are:

ωn1( )f := λ f( )1

fn1 f() ωn1 f() 2π :=

ωn2( )f := λ f( )2 fn2 f() ωn2 f() 2π :=

ωn3( )f := λ f( )3 fn3 f() ωn3 f() 2π :=

ωn4( )f := λ f( )4 fn4 f() ωn4 f() 2π :=

0 500 1 10× 3 1.5 10× 3 2 10× 3 0

5 10× 3 1 10× 4 1.5 10× 4

Undamped natural circular frequencies

ωn1( )f ωn2( )f ωn3( )f ωn4( )f

f

0 500 1 10× 3 1.5 10× 3 2 10× 3 0

500 1 10× 3 1.5 10× 3 2 10× 3

Undamped natural frequencies

fn1( )f fn2( )f fn3( )f fn4( )f

f

(6)

Dynamic Stiffness Matrix (DIRECT METHOD) :

KDYN f() Ks f() + 1(2πf)Cs f() (2πf)2Ms

:=

Harmonic forces vector:

Consider the case of force exitation with frequency equal to 50 Hz.

F2:= 10000kN F3:= 0kN F4:= 5000kN F5:= 0kN

F0 F2 F3 F4 F5

1

N

10000000 0 5000000

0

= :=

fF:= 50 Hz

Fharmonic f() F0 f fF

2

:=

(7)

Dynamic responses in physical coordinates:

U f( ):= KDYN f()1Fharmonic f()

U2 f():= U f( )1 U3 f():= U f( )2 U4 f():= U f( )3 U5 f():= U f( )4

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 0.015 0.03 0.045 0.06

Joints 2,3,4,5 - Physical Displacements

[Hz]

[m]

U2 f() U3 f() U4 f() U5 f()

f

(8)

Dynamic responses in physical coordinates for 35%F:

X f( ):= KDYN f()1(0.35Fharmonic f())

X2 f():= X f( )1 X3 f():= X f( )2 X4 f():= X f( )3 X5 f():= X f( )4

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

Joint 2 - Physical Displacements

[Hz]

[m] U2 f()

X2 f()

f

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02

Joint 3 - Physical Displacements

[Hz]

[m] U3 f()

X3 f()

f

(9)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 0.01

0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

Joint 4 - Physical Displacements

[Hz]

[m] U4 f()

X4 f()

f

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

Joint 5 - Physical Displacements

[Hz]

[m] U5 f()

X5 f()

f

(10)

SAP 2000 Dynamic responses in physical coordinates:

Harmonic Force = F

Harmonic Force = 35%F

(11)

Dynamic responses in physical coordinates - velocity:

v2 f() := U f( )1 (2πf) v3 f() := U f( )2 (2πf) v4 f() := U f( )3 (2πf) v5 f() := U f( )4 (2πf)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 100 200 300 400

Joints 2,3,4,5 - Velocity

[Hz]

[m]

v2 f() v3 f() v4 f() v5 f()

f

(12)

Dynamic responses in physical coordinates - acceleration:

a2 f() := v2 f()(2πf) a3 f() := v3 f()(2πf) a4 f() := v4 f()(2πf) a5 f() := v5 f()(2πf)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 1000000 2000000 3000000 4000000

Joints 2,3,4,5 - Acceleration

[Hz]

[m]

a2 f() a3 f() a4 f() a5 f()

f

(13)

Displacements Ratio Values:

f:= 1525

U2 f() =0.00585 X2 f() =0.002 ρ2 X2 f()

U2 f() =35% :=

U3 f() =0.01633 X3 f() =0.0057 ρ3 X3 f()

U3 f() =35% :=

U4 f() =0.04057 X4 f() =0.0142 ρ4 X4 f()

U4 f() =35% :=

U5 f() =0.02007 X5 f() =0.007 ρ5 X5 f()

U5 f() =35% :=

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

As for the value of Resistance to Uniaxial Compressive Strenght, the survey refers to the results obtained by the compressive press, being it a direct test; the instrument

The results of the KS test also confirmed that the data distribution between cities were different, with Brisbane, Helsinki, London and Toronto having the most similar shape

In a relatively low wind regime (8 m/s in a height of 400 m) our simplified simulations show that the wave influenced wind increase the fatigue damage compared to a situation with

when temperature is lower than **** some of the RIS/RRA trains are called in operation and correspondingly reactor primary pumps **** are shutdown; when temperature is lower

Question: when in a non negative stochastic by columns matrix a pertur- bation of a zero to nonzero makes its powers positive, or equivalently makes 1 dominant with respect all

[r]

[r]

[r]